in

Optimising load allocation and reduction strategies for sewage treatment plants in urban tropical rivers: Modelling with QUAL2K and GIS


Abstract

The discharge of pollutant loads from sewage treatment plants (STPs) significantly impacts the quality of tropical rivers. The present study evaluates the impact of projected increases in population equivalent (PE) from STPs on the selected water quality parameters (WQP) of the Kuang River basin (KRB) under the influence of climate stress and advanced treatment. Using the QUAL2K model, discharge was simulated, and scenarios were based on population growth rate (PGR) for the next 10 years, with Low (2.1% PGR), Medium (2.2% PGR) and High (2.5% PGR). The findings indicate that elevated PE affects TSS, NH₃-N, and BOD₅ concentrations with a p-value < 0.05 between the seasons. Under high PGR scenarios in the dry season, concentrations for BOD₅ were 7.82 mg/L, 3.02 mg/L for NH₃-N, and 48 mg/L for TSS. This study suggests reducing pollution loads from STPs by 98.88% (35.59 and 7881.5 kg/day) for BOD₅, 99.44% for NH₃-N (7.16 and 1585.27 kg/day), and 83.93% for TSS (35.25 and 1303.08 kg/day) to meet class II. Additionally, the model’s performance was validated with flow calibration results showing R2 = 0.79-0.94 and NSE = 0.80-0.94. Therefore, this study projected the load allocation for WQP for all identified STPs for sustainable KRB management under future urban growth.

Data availability

The data presented in this article will be available on request. Additional other relevant data can be found in the supplementary files accompanying this publication.

References

  1. Das, A. Drinking water resources suitability assessment in Brahmani river Odisha based on pollution index of surface water utilizing advanced water quality methods. Sci. Rep. 15, 34101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19539-w (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdul Zali, M. et al. Tracing sewage contamination based on sterols and stanols markers within the mainland aquatic ecosystem: a case study of Linggi catchment, Malaysia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 20717–20736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11680-5 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haque, A., Holsen, T. M. & Baki, A. B. M. Distribution and risk assessment of microplastic pollution in a rural river system near a wastewater treatment plant, hydro-dam, and river confluence. Sci. Rep. 14, 6006. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56730-x (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thanigaivel, S. et al. Ecological disturbances and abundance of anthropogenic pollutants in the aquatic ecosystem: Critical review of impact assessment on the aquatic animals. Chemosphere 313, 137475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137475 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ishak, K. A. S. S., Panneerselvam, A., Ambikapathy, V., Sathya, R. & Vinothkanna, A. An investigation of sewage water treatment plant and its physico-chemical analysis. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 35, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102061 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kulkarni, B., Wanjule, R. V. & Shinde, H. H. Study on sewage quality from sewage treatment plant at Vashi, Navi Mumbai. Mater. Today Proc. 5, 1859–1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.286 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Adnan MS, Roslen H, Samsuri S. The application of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) approach in water quality assessment for the Batu Pahat River, Presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1022/1/012074 (2022).

  8. Ahmadisharaf, E., Camacho, R. A., Zhang, H. X., Hantush, M. M. & Mohamoud, Y. M. Calibration and validation of watershed models and advances in uncertainty analysis in TMDL studies. J. Hydrol. Eng. 24, 03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001794 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jesiek, J. B., Benham, B. L., Bosch, D. J. & Stephenson, K. Approaches to TMDL planning and implementation and policy tools for implementation to achieve water quality standards. CABI Rev. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20072084 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vondracek, B., Zimmerman, J. K. H. & Westra, J. V. Setting an effective TMDL: Sediment loading and effects of suspended sediment on FISR 1. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 39, 1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb03688.x (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saeidi, P., Mehrdadi, N., Karbassi, A. & Ardestani, M. Integrated river-estuary modeling to assess spawning and habitation area for Caspian WhiteFish in response to upstream pollution sources (Case study: Tajan River Estuary). Int. J. Environ. Res. 16, 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-022-00475-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Y., Yang, H. & Wang, Z. Simulating water quality of Wei River with QUAL2K model, a case study of Hai River Basin in China. MATEC Web Conf. 68, 14005. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166814005 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mathew, M. et al. Anatomy of an urban waterbody: a case study of Boston’s Muddy River. Environ. Pollut. 159, 1996–2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.018 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zurita, A. et al. Modeling biological oxygen demand load capacity in a data-scarce basin with important anthropogenic interventions. Water 13, 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172379 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Current population estimates, Selangor, 2023–2024. Department of Statistics Malaysia, Selangor (2024).

  16. Montana, D., 2020. Qual2K temperature analysis (2020).

  17. Stumbaugh, M. & Hamlet, A. F. Effects of climate change on extreme low-flows in small lowland tributaries in the Skagit River Basin. Northwest Sci. 90, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.3955/046.090.0105 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shahzad, M., Khan, S. & Paul, P. Influence of temperature on the performance of a full-scale activated sludge process operated at varying solids retention times whilst treating municipal sewage. Water 7, 855–867. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7030855 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tabassum, S., Li, Y., Chi, L., Li, C. & Zhang, Z. Efficient nitrification treatment of comprehensive industrial wastewater by using Novel Mass Bio System. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.022 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. National Water Services Commission. Malaysian Sewerage Industry Guidelines – Volume V: Septic Tanks. (2009).

  21. Bandh, S. A. & Mushtaq, B. Water and wastewater treatment technologies. In Wastewater treatment technology 67 (Springer Water. Springer Nature, Switzerland Cham, 2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohan T, R., Chanakya, H. N., Mohan Kumar, M. S. & Rao, L. Achieving biological nutrient removal in an old sewage treatment plant through process modifications – a simulation and experimental study. J. Water Process Eng. 45, 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102461 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shirsat, P. V., Singh, A., Deshmukh, S. P., Starkl, M. & Martin, I. Performance evaluation and optimization of 100 KLD capacity rotating drum biological contactor (RDBC)-based STP for decentralized municipal wastewater treatment. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 10, 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-025-00382-z (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saturday, A., Herrnegger, M., Kangume, S. & Stecher, G. Spatiotemporal variability of surface water quality in tropical agriculture-dominated catchments: Insights from water quality indices. Sci. Rep. 15, 42971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27066-x (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, S., Liao, L., Liu, J. & Wei, X. Sediment mercury and methylmercury dynamics during reservoir operation. Sci. Rep. 15, 18011. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03255-6 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Norouzi, S. et al. Dissolved organic matter quantity and quality response of tropical rainforest headwater rivers to the transition from dry to wet season. Sci. Rep. 14, 3270. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53362-z (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mena-Rivera, L., Salgado-Silva, V., Benavides-Benavides, C., Coto-Campos, J. & Swinscoe, T. Spatial and seasonal surface water quality assessment in a tropical urban catchment: Burío River, Costa Rica. Water 9, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9080558 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eliku, T. & Leta, S. Spatial and seasonal variation in physicochemical parameters and heavy metals in Awash River, Ethiopia. Appl. Water Sci. 8, 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0803-x (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alsulaili, A., Al-Buloushi, B. Y. & Hamoda, M. F. Seasonal variation pattern of physicochemical and microbial parameters in a wastewater treatment plant. Desalin. Water Treat. 208, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.26461 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Makuwa S, Tlou M, Fosso-Kankeu E, Green E. The effects of dry versus wet season on the performance of a wastewater treatment plant in North West Province, South Africa, WSA. https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2022.v48.i1.3897 (2022).

  31. Kan, C. et al. Wastewater treatment plant effluents increase the global warming potential in a subtropical urbanized river. Water Res. 266, 122349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122349 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suchowska-Kisielewicz, M. & Nowogoński, I. Influence of storms on the emission of pollutants from sewage into waters. Sci. Rep. 11, 18788. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97536-5 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wen, Y., Schoups, G. & Van De Giesen, N. Organic pollution of rivers: Combined threats of urbanization, livestock farming and global climate change. Sci. Rep. 7, 43289. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43289 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Loi, J. X. et al. Water quality assessment and pollution threat to safe water supply for three river basins in Malaysia. Sci. Total Environ. 832, 155067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155067 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Harada, H. & Karn, S. K. Surface water pollution in three urban territories of Nepal, India, and Bangladesh. Environ. Manage. 28, 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010238 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  36. De Oliveira, D. B. C., De Holanda, M. A. C. R. & De Albuquerque Soares, W. Differences between sewage effluent parameters for dry and rainy periods in tropical climate area. Desalin. Water Treat. 225, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2021.27222 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Han, X. et al. Spatial and seasonal variations of organic corrosion inhibitors in the Pearl River, South China: Contributions of sewage discharge and urban rainfall runoff. Environ. Pollut. 262, 114321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114321 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ben-David, E. A. et al. Microplastic distributions in a domestic wastewater treatment plant: Removal efficiency, seasonal variation and influence of sampling technique. Sci. Total Environ. 752, 141880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141880 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Salim Dantas, M., Rodrigues Barroso, G. & Corrêa Oliveira, S. Performance of sewage treatment plants and impact of effluent discharge on receiving water quality within an urbanized area. Environ. Monit. Assess. 193, 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09075-1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yates, C. A., Johnes, P. J. & Spencer, R. G. M. Characterisation of treated effluent from four commonly employed wastewater treatment facilities: A UK case study. J. Environ. Manage. 232, 919–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.006 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Azuma, T. et al. Detection of pharmaceuticals and phytochemicals together with their metabolites in hospital effluents in Japan, and their contribution to sewage treatment plant influents. Sci. Total Environ. 548–549, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.157 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mutiyar, P. K. & Mittal, A. K. Occurrences and fate of selected human antibiotics in influents and effluents of sewage treatment plant and effluent-receiving River Yamuna in Delhi (India). Environ. Monit. Assess. 186, 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3398-6 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Teklehaimanot, G. Z., Coetzee, M. A. A. & Momba, M. N. B. Faecal pollution loads in the wastewater effluents and receiving water bodies: A potential threat to the health of Sedibeng and Soshanguve communities, South Africa. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 9589–9603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2980-y (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Anjali, G. & Sabumon, P. C. Revolutionizing wastewater treatment: cutting-edge technologies for biological nutrient removal. In Biological and hybrid wastewater treatment technology, Earth and environmental sciences library (eds Ghangrekar, M. M. et al.) 125–158 (Springer Nature, Switzerland, Cham, 2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Choi, Y. I. et al. A study on microorganism dominant species in bench-scale shipboard STP using combined SBR and MBR process. JKSET 19, 550–555. https://doi.org/10.26511/JKSET.19.6.7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Arun, S. et al. Antibiotics in sewage treatment plants, receiving water bodies and groundwater of Chennai city and the suburb, South India: Occurrence, removal efficiencies, and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 851, 158195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158195 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Qin, T., Hong, X., Chen, R., Zha, J. & Shen, J. Evaluating environmental impact of STP effluents on receiving water in Beijing by the joint use of chemical analysis and biomonitoring. Sci. Total Environ. 752, 141942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141942 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ariffin, M. & Sulaiman, S. N. M. Regulating sewage pollution of Malaysian rivers and its challenges. Procedia Environ. Sci. 30, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.030 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dalu, T., Banda, T., Mutshekwa, T., Munyai, L. F. & Cuthbert, R. N. Effects of urbanisation and a wastewater treatment plant on microplastic densities along a subtropical river system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 36102–36111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13185-1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sinharoy, S. S., Pittluck, R. & Clasen, T. Review of drivers and barriers of water and sanitation policies for urban informal settlements in low-income and middle-income countries. Util. Policy. 60, 100957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.100957 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2022/WAB02/UPM/02/1), the Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD) and Universiti Putra Malaysia for sponsoring this research. Additionally, we extend our thanks to Indah Water Konsortium and the PLAN Selangor authority for providing essential data for this study. .

Funding

This article was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2022/WAB02/UPM/02/1), the Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD), and Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Julieth Joseph Balilemwa: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Software, Visualisation, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. Nor Rohaizah Jamil: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Noorain Mohd Isa: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Data curation. Zaki Zainudin: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Methodology, Data curation, Software. Syahida Sapia’e: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Nor Rohaizah Jamil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Participants consent

All authors have read and contributed to this manuscript and agreed to the submission.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and contributed to this manuscript and agreed to the publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balilemwa, J.J., Jamil, N.R., Isa, N.M. et al. Optimising load allocation and reduction strategies for sewage treatment plants in urban tropical rivers: Modelling with QUAL2K and GIS.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46763-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46763-9

Keywords

  • TMDL
  • Point source
  • Urban growth
  • Climate change
  • Seasonal
  • Spatial analysis


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Deciphering the Hidden Ecology and Connectivity of Vibrio in the Oceans

A chelicera-bearing arthropod reveals the Cambrian origin of chelicerates

Back to Top