in

Plastic mulch productivity-sustainability tradeoffs and pathways toward an eco-friendly framework: insights from a global meta-analysis


Abstract

Meeting global food demands by 2050 requires a 45–60% increase in agricultural production. Plasticulture has emerged as a pivotal yet controversial solution. Here we perform a meta-analysis synthesizing the findings of global studies and reveal that plastic mulch enhances crop yields by 28.7% and water use efficiency by 48.9% under diversified systems. In China (2015–2024), plasticulture contributed an additional 189 million tons (Mt) of staple food, conserved 33.5 million hectares of arable land, and reduced emissions by 438 Mt CO₂-equivalent. However, persistent plastic residues degrade soils, and nanoplastics infiltrate food chains, posing ecological and health risks. Despite global negotiations (2024–2025), a binding UN treaty on plastic pollution remains stalled due to disparities among players. To reconcile productivity with sustainability, we propose six evidence-based priorities: (1) scaling integrated eco-farming systems with AI-driven precise application of soil mulches; (2) accelerating material innovation, focusing on biodegradable films and organic-based alternatives; (3) deploying blockchain-enabled circular economies for plastic waste; (4) improving reuse and recycling infrastructure; (5) implementing localized incentive mechanisms to support plastic-free farming; and (6) integrating plastic management into UN carbon trading frameworks. These strategies can pivot plasticulture toward a climate-resilient, ecologically sustainable model—balancing food security with environmental stewardship in an era of climate uncertainty.

Similar content being viewed by others

Plasticulture detection at the country scale by combining multispectral and SAR satellite data

Advancing sustainable agriculture: a novel multi-layer film approach to plastic mulching

Plastics matter in the food system

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study, including source data for the display items, have been deposited in the Fishare repository [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6025748]65. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

No new code was generated in the analysis.

References

  1. Coutu, S., Becker-Reshef, I., Whitcraft, A. K. & Justice, C. Food security: underpin with public and private data sharing. Nature 578, 515–516 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karakoc, D. B. & Konar, M. Trade-offs between resilience, sustainability and cost in the US agri-food transportation infrastructure. Nat. Food 6, 401–409 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, H. et al. Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 411–418 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cui, Z. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous. Statistics – Agriculture. China Statistical Yearbook, http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2021/indexeh.htm (2021).

  6. Sun, D. et al. An overview of the use of plastic-film mulching in China to increase crop yield and water-use efficiency. Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 1523–1526 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, Y., Liu, Q., Jia, W., Yan, C. & Wang, J. Agricultural plastic mulching as a source of microplastics in the terrestrial environment. Environ. Pollut. 260, 114096 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lv, W. et al. Microplastic pollution in rice-fish co-culture system: a report of three farmland stations in Shanghai, China. Sci. Total Environ. 652, 1209–1218 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, Y. et al. Microplastics in soils: a review of methods, occurrence, fate, transport, ecological and environmental risks. Sci. Total Environ. 748, 141368 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anonymous. A European strategy for plastics in a circular economy. https://circular-cities-and-regions.ec.europa.eu/support-materials/eu-regulations-legislation/european-strategy-plastics-circular-economy (2018).

  11. FAO. The UN Environment Programme. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, https://www.unep.org/publications-data (FAO, 2025).

  12. McLellan, F. Plastics treaty left in limbo. Lancet 406, 991 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spring, M. et al. Effective progress and implementation of the INC-5 plastics treaty through scientific guidance. Nat. Sustain 8, 728–730 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chai, Q. et al. Water-saving innovations in Chinese agriculture. Adv. Agron. 126, 149–201 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gao, H. et al. Effects of plastic mulching and plastic residue on agricultural production: a meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 651, 484–492 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gu, X. et al. Residual plastic film decreases crop yield and water use efficiency through direct negative effects on soil physicochemical properties and root growth. Sci. Total Environ. 946, 174204 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, M. et al. Combined effects of microplastics and other contaminants on earthworms: a critical review. Appl Soil Ecol. 180, 104626 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, F., Hermansen, C. & Norgaard, T. Effects of microplastics on soil microbial diversity and community structure revealed by meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst. Environ. 390, 109720 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, L. et al. Strategies to improve soil health by optimizing the plant–soil–microbe–anthropogenic activity nexus. Agric Ecosyst. Environ. 359, 108750 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, J. et al. Effect of plastic mulching on soil organic carbon chemical stability: Insights from soil organic carbon chemical fractions and structure. Soil Tillage Res. 256, 106889 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, Z. et al. Degradable film mulching increases soil carbon sequestration in major Chinese dryland agroecosystems. Nat. Com. 16, 5029 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. de Souza Machado, A. A. et al. Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6044–6052 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sheng, D. et al. Plastic pollution in agricultural landscapes: an overlooked threat to pollination, biocontrol and food security. Nat. Com. 15, 8413 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goodman, K. E., Hare, J. T., Khamis, Z. I., Hua, T. & Sang, Q.-X. A. Exposure of human lung cells to polystyrene microplastics significantly retards cell proliferation and triggers morphological changes. Chem. Res Toxicol. 34, 1069–1081 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. González-Acedo, A. et al. Evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies on the potential health repercussions of micro- and nanoplastics. Chemosphere 280, 130826 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rahman, A., Sarkar, A., Yadav, O.P., Achari, G. & Slobodnik, J. Potential human health risks due to environmental exposure to nano-and microplastics and knowledge gaps: a scoping review. Sci. Total Environ. 757, 143872 (2021).

  27. Bandopadhyay, S., Martin-Closas, L., Pelacho, A.M. & DeBruyn, J.M. Biodegradable plastic mulch films: impacts on soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions. Front. Microbiol. 9, 819 (2018).

  28. Qi, R., Jones, D.L., Li, Z., Liu, Q. & Yan, C. Behavior of microplastics and plastic film residues in the soil environment: a critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 703, 134722 (2020).

  29. Wang, Y. et al. Living plastics from plasticizer-assisted thermal molding of silk protein. Nat. Com. 16, 52 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Campanale, C. et al. A critical review of biodegradable plastic mulch films in agriculture: definitions, scientific background and potential impacts. Trends Anal. Chem. 170, 117391 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, W. et al. Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of and willingness to pay for biodegradable mulch films in China. Sustain Anal. Model 3, 100016 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goldberger, J. R., Jones, R. E., Miles, C. A., Wallace, R. W. & Inglis, D. A. Barriers and bridges to the adoption of biodegradable plastic mulches for US specialty crop production. Renew. Agric Food Syst. 30, 143–153 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dara, M., Dianatpour, M., Azarpira, N. & Omidifar, N. Convergence of CRISPR and artificial intelligence: a paradigm shift in biotechnology. Hum. Gene 41, 201297 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dixit, S., Kumar, A., Srinivasan, K., Vincent, P.M.D.R. & Ramu Krishnan, N. Advancing genome editing with artificial intelligence: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1335301 (2024).

  35. Pazienza, P. & De Lucia, C. For a new plastics economy in agriculture: policy reflections on the EU strategy from a local perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 253, 119844 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. De Lucia, C. & Pazienza, P. Market-based tools for a plastic waste reduction policy in agriculture: a case study in the south of Italy. J. Environ. Manag. 250, 109468 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tumu, K., Vorst, K. & Curtzwiler, G. Global plastic waste recycling and extended producer responsibility laws. J. Environ. Manag. 348, 119242 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao, H. et al. Increased dryland wheat economic returns, and decreased greenhouse gas emissions by year-round straw mulching in dryland areas of China. J. Clean. Prod. 325, 129337 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, L. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal networks—a climate-smart blueprint for agriculture. Plant Commun. 6, e101526 (2025).

  40. Nogueira, G. P. et al. Sustainability synergies and trade-offs considering circularity and land availability for bioplastics production in Brazil. Nat. Com. 15, 8836 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Berger, I. et al. India’s agroecology programme, ‘Zero Budget Natural Farming’, delivers biodiversity and economic benefits without lowering yields. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 2057–2068 (2025).

  42. Liu, C. et al. Root microbiota confers rice resistance to aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acidic soils. Nat. Food 4, 912–924 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Siddique, K. H. M., Li, X. & Gruber, K. Rediscovering Asia’s forgotten crops to fight chronic and hidden hunger. Nat. Plants 7, 116–122 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, L. et al. Enhancing carbon restoration and ecosystem resilience in global drylands via water-to-carbon biotransformation strategies. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, e916 (2025).

  45. Qiu, T. et al. Optimizing cover crop practices as a sustainable solution for global agroecosystem services. Nat. Com. 15, 10617 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vendig, I. et al. Quantifying direct yield benefits of soil carbon increases from cover cropping. Nat. Sustain 6, 1125–1134 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Melara, F. et al. Enhanced efficiency fertilizer: a review on technologies, perspectives, and research strategies. Environ. Dev. Sustain 1, 10668 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Song, Y. et al. Effects of management of plastic and straw mulching management on crop yield and soil salinity in saline-alkaline soils of China: a meta-analysis. Agric. Water Manage 308, 109309 (2025).

  49. Huang, T. et al. Effects of plastic film mulching on yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency of different crops in China: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 312, 109407 (2024).

  50. Zhang, D., Mak-Mensah, E., Zhou, X., Wang, Q. & Obour, P. B. Impact of plastic film with wheat straw mulching on maize water use efficiency, evapotranspiration, and grain yield in Northern China: a meta-analysis. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 867–880 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu, Z., Li, Y., Xu, G. & Yu, Y. Effects of microplastics on black soil health: a global meta-analysis. J. Hazard Mater. 490, 137850 (2025).

  52. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C. & Schmid, R. F. What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Rev. Educ. Res. 81, 4–28 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ascenzi, I., Hilbers, J.P., van Katwijk, M.M., Huijbregts, M.A.J. & Hanssen, S.V. Increased but not pristine soil organic carbon stocks in restored ecosystems. Nat. Com. 16, 637 (2025).

  54. Xu, S. et al. Positive soil priming effects are the rule at a global scale. Glob. Chang. Biol. 30, e17502 (2024).

  55. Simonsmeier, B. A., Flaig, M., Simacek, T. & Schneider, M. What sixty years of research says about the effectiveness of patient education on health: a second order meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Rev. 16, 450–474 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Anani & Sarab, M. R. Amini Farsani M. Second-order synthesis of meta-analytic studies in applied linguistics (1998–2021). Qual. Quant. 58, 1517–1543 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Beillouin, D. et al. A global meta-analysis of soil organic carbon in the Anthropocene. Nat. Com. 14, 3700 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wang, J. et al. Biochar induced trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services and crop productivity. J. Integr. Agric 23, 3882–3895 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  59. He, X. et al. Agricultural diversification promotes sustainable and resilient global rice production. Nat. Food 4, 788–796 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. van Grinsven, H. J. M. et al. Establishing long-term nitrogen response of global cereals to assess sustainable fertilizer rates. Nat. Food 3, 122–132 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, L. et al. Integrated strategies for enhancing agrifood productivity, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and improving soil health. The Innov. 6, e101006 (2025).

  62. Borenstein, M. C. M. A. S. Comprehensive meta-analysis software. Syst. Rev. Health Res. 3, 535–548 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sanchez-Meca, J. & Marín-Martínez, F. Weighting by inverse variance or by sample size in meta-analysis: a simulation study. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 58, 211–220 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Feeley, T. H. Assessing study quality in meta-analysis. Hum. Comm. Res 46, 334–342 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wang, L. et al. Plastic mulch productivity-sustainability tradeoffs and pathways toward an eco-friendly framework. Figshare Dataset (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32472826), Leading Project of the “Three Agri-Priorities with Nine Directions” Science and Technology Collaboration Plans in Zhejiang Province of China (No. 2025SNJF016), Central Government Funds for Guiding Local Scientific and Technological Development (2025ZY01039), Wenzhou University Research Start-up Fund of China (No. QD2024084), Wenzhou City Talent Introduction Fund of China (R20241101), Key Research and Development Program of Gansu Province (24YFNJ003), Gansu Leading Talent Program, and Central Government Guiding Fund for Local Science and Technology Development Project (24ZYQA036).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.W.1 and G.Y.G. conceptualized the work, analyzed data and wrote original draft; S.G., Y.Z.9, X.Z., P.L., and W.Y. contributed experimental materials; T.G., K.M.M., M.H., Y.I., J.Z., Y.Z.15, D.D., Y.Y., S.K., C.H., and M.Z. brought out the critical issues relative to the subject, reviewed the draft and revisions, provided novel ideas to improve the work; S-J.L., S.F., L.W.1,3, and J.H. contributed subsection materials to the paper; L.W.1, G.Y.G., D.S., and Z.W. collected data, performed statistics, and constructed graphics; K.H.M.S. reviewed and revised revisions; All authors contributed to the manuscript, agreed on the contents and authorships, and approved the final version. G.Y.G. and L.W.1 finalized the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Gary Y. Gan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests as defined by Nature Portfolio or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Caterina De Lucia and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review file

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, L., Guo, S., Ge, T. et al. Plastic mulch productivity-sustainability tradeoffs and pathways toward an eco-friendly framework: insights from a global meta-analysis.
Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68798-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68798-2


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Biomechanical limits of hopping in the hindlimbs of giant extinct kangaroos

Nighttime warming enhances photosynthetic activity and induces changes in chloroplast membrane structure and antioxidant profile in Platycerium ferns

Back to Top