in

Potassium fertilization enhances both cereal yield and soil organic carbon: a meta-analysis


Abstract

Agricultural ecosystems play a significant role in global food security and climate mitigation through crop production and soil organic carbon sequestration. It is well-established that potassium fertilization enhances crop yield in potassium-deficient regions; however, the factors driving crop yield responses to potassium remain insufficiently characterized at a large scale. Moreover, despite the significant roles of soil organic carbon in soil health and global carbon cycling, the effect of potassium on soil organic carbon in croplands has been less studied. Herein, we collect data from 1185 observations in agricultural ecosystems to conduct a meta-analysis study. We find that potassium fertilization increases cereal yield and soil organic carbon by 19.3% and 4.4%, respectively. Mean annual precipitation and experimental duration are the most important factors affecting potassium effects on cereal yield and soil organic carbon, respectively. Specifically, potassium effects on cereal yield increase with mean annual precipitation, and the potassium-induced increase in soil organic carbon is significant only after long-term (> 20 years) potassium fertilization. Our findings suggest that, in addition to nitrogen and phosphorus, potassium is also crucial for not only cereal yield but also soil carbon sequestration, which should be fully valued in future soil nutrient management, especially in potassium-deficient regions.

Similar content being viewed by others

Global crop production increase by soil organic carbon

Continuous decrease in soil organic matter despite increased plant productivity in an 80-years-old phosphorus-addition experiment

Soil carbon sequestration enhanced by long-term nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization

Data availability

The datasets that support the findings of this study are openly available in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1883901131. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code that supports the findings of this study is available in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1883901131.

References

  1. Liang, G. Nitrogen fertilization mitigates global food insecurity by increasing cereal yield and its stability. Glob. Food Security 34, 100652 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hou, E. et al. Global meta-analysis shows pervasive phosphorus limitation of aboveground plant production in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sardans, J. & Peñuelas, J. Potassium: a neglected nutrient in global change: Potassium stoichiometry and global change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 261–275 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Römheld, V. & Kirkby, E. A. Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and prospects. Plant Soil 335, 155–180 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schlesinger, W. H. Some thoughts on the biogeochemical cycling of potassium in terrestrial ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 154, 427–432 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sardans, J. & Peñuelas, J. Potassium control of plant functions: ecological and agricultural implications. Plants 10, 419 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, M., Zheng, Q., Shen, Q. & Guo, S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. IJMS 14, 7370–7390 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duan, Y. et al. Nitrogen use efficiency in a wheat-corn cropping system from 15 years of manure and fertilizer applications. Field Crops Res. 157, 47–56 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hou, W. et al. Interactive effects of nitrogen and potassium on: Grain yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of rice in low potassium fertility soil in China. Field Crops Res. 236, 14–23 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wood, S., Sebastian, K. & Scherr, S. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Agroecosystems. (2001).

  12. Majumdar, K. et al. Assessing Potassium Mass Balances in Different Countries and Scales. in Improving Potassium Recommendations for Agricultural Crops (eds Murrell, T. S., Mikkelsen, R. L., Sulewski, G., Norton, R. & Thompson, M. L.) 283–340 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).

  13. Srinivasarao, Ch. et al. Soil potassium fertility and management strategies in South Asian agriculture. in Advances in Agronomy vol. 177 51–124 (Elsevier, 2023).

  14. Rizzo, G. et al. Potassium limits productivity in intensive cereal cropping systems in Southeast Asia. Nat. Food 5, 929–938 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, G., Luo, Y., Zhou, Z. & Waring, B. G. Nitrogen effects on plant productivity change at decadal time-scales. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 2488–2499 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bar-Yosef, B. & Ben Asher, J. Simulating the effect of potassium fertilization on carbon sequestration in soil. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 176, 375–386 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Y. et al. Effects of different phosphorus and potassium supply on the root architecture, phosphorus and potassium uptake, and utilization efficiency of hydroponic rice. Sci. Rep. 14, 21178 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sustr, M., Soukup, A. & Tylova, E. Potassium in root growth and development. Plants 8, 435 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, X. et al. Effects of potassium levels on plant growth, accumulation and distribution of carbon, and nitrate metabolism in apple dwarf rootstock seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 904 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sokol, N. W., Kuebbing, S. E., Karlsen-Ayala, E. & Bradford, M. A. Evidence for the primacy of living root inputs, not root or shoot litter, in forming soil organic carbon. N. Phytologist 221, 233–246 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sokol, N. W. & Bradford, M. A. Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input. Nat. Geosci. 12, 46–53 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sokol, N. W., Sanderman, J. & Bradford, M. A. Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: Integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 12–24 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cai, A., Chang, N., Zhang, W. & Liang, G. The spatial patterns of litter turnover time in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 71, 856–867 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y. et al. Does continuous straw returning keep China farmland soil organic carbon continued increase? A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 288, 112391 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brouder, S. M., Volenec, J. J. & Murrell, T. S. The Potassium Cycle and Its Relationship to Recommendation Development. in Improving Potassium Recommendations for Agricultural Crops (eds Murrell, T. S., Mikkelsen, R. L., Sulewski, G., Norton, R. & Thompson, M. L.) 1–46 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).

  26. Tian, D. & Niu, S. A global analysis of soil acidification caused by nitrogen addition. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 024019 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cai, A. et al. Manure acts as a better fertilizer for increasing crop yields than synthetic fertilizer does by improving soil fertility. Soil Tillage Res. 189, 168–175 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liang, G. et al. Correlations among soil biochemical parameters, crop yield, and soil respiration vary with growth stage and soil depth under fertilization. Agron. J. 113, 2450–2462 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Terrer, C., Vicca, S., Hungate, B., Phillips, R. & Prentice, C. Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the fertilization effect. Science 6294, 72–74 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liang, G. & Schlesinger, W. Dataset for a global meta-analysis of potassium fertilization effects on cereal yield and soil organic carbon. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18839011 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the researchers whose data were used in this meta-analysis study. Special thanks are extended to Pengyan Sun, Research Intern in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Yale University, for her diligent efforts in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.L. conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft. W.H.S. was involved in writing and editing subsequent drafts.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Guopeng Liang or William H. Schlesinger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Peer Review file (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, G., Schlesinger, W.H. Potassium fertilization enhances both cereal yield and soil organic carbon: a meta-analysis.
Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71154-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71154-z


Source: Ecology - nature.com

A looming belowground threat: assessment of climate-driven global expansion risk of Meloidogyne spp. in tobacco-growing regions

Varroa mite resistance in a hybrid honey bee (Apis mellifera) population in Southern California

Back to Top