in

Remote sensing delivers tropical forest resilience monitoring for the Global Biodiversity Framework


Abstract

Tropical forests sustain a disproportionate share of global biodiversity and of nature’s contributions to people, yet they are increasingly destabilized by interacting pressures from climate change, land-use change and intensifying disturbance regimes. Understanding and monitoring forest resilience — the capacity to resist, absorb, recover from and adapt to disturbance — requires scalable approaches that integrate biodiversity, ecosystem structure and function across space and time. In this Review, we discuss how the essential biodiversity variables (EBV) framework, enabled by satellite remote sensing, has improved understanding of forest resilience under global environmental change. Remotely sensed EBV proxies derived from multispectral, thermal, hyperspectral, radar, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and solar-induced fluorescence observations capture multiple facets of biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics. However, scale dependence, observational biases and the limited capacity of current EBVs to resolve fine-grained biological and mechanistic processes underpinning resilience (particularly species turnover and functional reassembly) are critical limitations. Emerging opportunities, including data fusion, next-generation satellite missions and integration with in situ observations, will advance the operationalization of EBV-based resilience monitoring, particularly in the context of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Conceptual framework for linking vegetation remote sensing to tropical forest resilience and the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Fig. 2: Biodiversity facets tracked by remote sensing as predictors of tropical forest resilience.
Fig. 3: Sensor limitations and advances for tropical forest EBV monitoring.
Fig. 4: Comparison of above-ground biomass density estimates across tropical forests.

Similar content being viewed by others

Disentangling linkages between satellite-derived indicators of forest structure and productivity for ecosystem monitoring

Integrating remote sensing with ecology and evolution to advance biodiversity conservation

Building the backbone for Europe’s biodiversity monitoring

References

  1. Wright, S. J. The future of tropical forests. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1195, 1–27 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gatti, R. C. et al. The number of tree species on Earth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115329119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855–1259855 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guz, J. & Kulakowski, D. Forests in the Anthropocene. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 111, 869–879 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Randhir, T. O. & Erol, A. Emerging threats to forests: resilience and strategies at system scale. Am. J. Plant Sci. 04, 739–748 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsch, C. A. et al. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6668–6672 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  9. Colwell, R. K., Brehm, G., Cardelús, C. L., Gilman, A. C. & Longino, J. T. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322, 258–261 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silva, C. V. J. et al. Drought-induced Amazonian wildfires instigate a decadal-scale disruption of forest carbon dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20180043 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berenguer, E. et al. Tracking the impacts of El Niño drought and fire in human-modified Amazonian forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2019377118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  14. What are EBVs? GEO BON https://geobon.org/ebvs/what-are-ebvs/ (2026).

  15. Skidmore, A. K. et al. Environmental science: agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space. Nature 523, 403–405 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Skidmore, A. K. et al. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 896–906 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fassnacht, F. E., White, J. C., Wulder, M. A. & Næsset, E. Remote sensing in forestry: current challenges, considerations and directions. For. Int. J. For. Res. 97, 11–37 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cleemput, E. V. et al. Scaling-up ecological understanding with remote sensing and causal inference. Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 122–135 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chambers, J. Q. et al. Regional ecosystem structure and function: ecological insights from remote sensing of tropical forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 414–423 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sader, S., Stone, T. & Joyce, A. Remote sensing of tropical forests — an overview of research and applications using non-photographic sensors. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 56, 1343–1351 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Duncanson, L. et al. Aboveground biomass density models for NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 270, 112845 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dubayah, R. et al. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Sci. Remote Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wulder, M. A. et al. Fifty years of Landsat science and impacts. Remote Sens. Environ. 280, 113195 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pettorelli, N. et al. Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 2, 122–131 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen, T. H., Jones, S., Soto-Berelov, M., Haywood, A. & Hislop, S. Landsat time-series for estimating forest aboveground biomass and its dynamics across space and time: a review. Remote Sens. 12, 98 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  26. Komatsu, K. et al. Quantifying carbon stock and tree community composition in tropical forests through combining satellite and UAV analyses. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34938-9 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Functional susceptibility of tropical forests to climate change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 878–889 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yano, S. et al. Effects of logging on landscape-level tree diversity across an elevational gradient in Bornean tropical forests. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 29, e01739 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Takeshige, R. et al. Influences of fern and vine coverage on the above-ground biomass recovery in a Bornean logged-over degraded secondary forest. J. For. Res. 28, 260–270 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jetz, W. et al. Essential biodiversity variables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 539–551 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, R. & Gamon, J. A. Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111218 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  32. Féret, J.-B. & Asner, G. P. Mapping tropical forest canopy diversity using high-fidelity imaging spectroscopy. Ecol. Appl. 24, 1289–1296 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gastauer, M. et al. Spectral diversity allows remote detection of the rehabilitation status in an Amazonian iron mining complex. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 106, 102653 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kishore, B. S. P. C., Kumar, A., Saikia, P. & Khan, M. L. Alpha and beta diversity mapping in Indian tropical deciduous forests using high-fidelity imaging spectroscopy. Adv. Space Res. 73, 1413–1426 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Banerjee, S., Sarker, S. K. & Pijanowski, B. Remotely sensed mapping of plant diversity in Earth’s largest mangrove forests: developing a spectral diversity metric with DESIS hyperspectral data and the ‘spectral species’ concept. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc. Environ. 39, 101676 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rocchini, D. et al. The spectral species concept in living color. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 127, e2022JG007026 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  37. Laliberté, E. et al. Seeing the forest and the trees: a workflow for automatic acquisition of ultra-high resolution drone photos of tropical forest canopies to support botanical and ecological studies. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.02.673753 (2026).

  38. Ball, J. G. C. et al. Towards comprehensive individual tree species mapping in diverse tropical forests by harnessing temporal and spectral dimensions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.24.600405 (2025).

  39. Carvalho, R. L. et al. Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research. Curr. Biol. 33, 3495–3504 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  40. Asner, G. P. & Martin, R. E. Airborne spectranomics: mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests. Front. Ecol. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1890/070152 (2009).

  41. Almeida, D. R. A. de et al. Monitoring restored tropical forest diversity and structure through UAV-borne hyperspectral and lidar fusion. Remote Sens. Environ. 264, 112582 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  42. Asner, G. P. & Martin, R. E. Spectranomics: emerging science and conservation opportunities at the interface of biodiversity and remote sensing. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 8, 212–219 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Guo, Y. et al. Plant species richness prediction from DESIS hyperspectral data: a comparison study on feature extraction procedures and regression models. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 196, 120–133 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rocchini, D. et al. From local spectral species to global spectral communities: a benchmark for ecosystem diversity estimate by remote sensing. Ecol. Inform. 61, 101195 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lutz, J. A. et al. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 849–864 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  46. Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882–892 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  47. Díaz, S. et al. Functional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability. Ecol. Evol. 3, 2958–2975 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wright, S. J. et al. Functional traits and the growth–mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology 91, 3664–3674 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rüger, N. et al. Demographic trade-offs predict tropical forest dynamics. Science 368, 165–168 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  50. Eisenhauer, N., Hines, J., Maestre, F. T. & Rillig, M. C. Reconsidering functional redundancy in biodiversity research. npj Biodivers. 2, 9 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Long-term droughts may drive drier tropical forests towards increased functional, taxonomic and phylogenetic homogeneity. Nat. Commun. 11, 3346 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K. & Mirotchnick, N. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1079–1087 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  53. Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Pantropical modelling of canopy functional traits using Sentinel-2 remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ. 252, 112122 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  54. Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Tropical forests in the Americas are changing too slowly to track climate change. Science 387, eadl5414 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  55. Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Canopy functional trait variation across Earth’s tropical forests. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08663-2 (2025).

  56. Schneider, F. D. et al. Towards mapping the diversity of canopy structure from space with GEDI. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 115006 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yachi, S. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  58. Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Souza, F. C. de et al. Evolutionary heritage influences Amazon tree ecology. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20161587 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  60. Souza, F. C. de et al. Evolutionary diversity is associated with wood productivity in Amazonian forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1754–1761 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wiens, J. J. et al. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1310–1324 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ackerly, D. D. & Reich, P. B. Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Am. J. Bot. 86, 1272–1281 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chave, J. et al. Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. Ecol. Appl. 16, 2356–2367 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  64. Swenson, N. G. & Enquist, B. J. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation. Am. J. Bot. 94, 451–459 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vitousek, P. M. Nutrient Cycling and Limitation: Hawai’i as a Model System (Princeton Univ. Press, 2004).

  66. Weedon, J. T. et al. Global meta-analysis of wood decomposition rates: a role for trait variation among tree species? Ecol. Lett. 12, 45–56 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  67. Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. & Oakley, T. H. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17012–17017 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  68. Finke, D. L. & Snyder, W. E. Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science 321, 1488–1490 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cavender-Bares, J. et al. Associations of leaf spectra with genetic and phylogenetic variation in oaks: prospects for remote detection of biodiversity. Remote Sens. 8, 221 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  70. Schweiger, A. K. et al. Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 976–982 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  71. Jucker, T. et al. The global spectrum of tree crown architecture. Nat. Commun. 16, 4876 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  72. Zhao, Y., Zeng, Y., Zhao, D., Wu, B. & Zhao, Q. The optimal leaf biochemical selection for mapping species diversity based on imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens. 8, 216 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  73. Schneider, F. D. et al. Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits. Nat. Commun. 8, 1441 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  74. Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N. & Vellend, M. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11, 609–623 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  75. Perry, A. et al. Resilient forests for the future. Tree Genet. Genomes 20, 17 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  76. Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P. & Pereira, J. S. Understanding plant responses to drought — from genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 30, 239–264 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  77. Booth, R. E. & Grime, J. P. Effects of genetic impoverishment on plant community diversity. J. Ecol. 91, 721–730 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  78. Frieley, J. D., Grime, J. P. & Bilton, M. Genetic identity of interspecific neighbours mediates plant responses to competition and environmental variation in a species-rich grassland. J. Ecol. 95, 908–915 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lankau, R. A. & Strauss, S. Y. Mutual feedbacks maintain both genetic and species diversity in a plant community. Science 317, 1561–1563 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  80. Whitham, T. G. et al. Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology 84, 559–573 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  81. Whitham, T. G. et al. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 510–523 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hughes, A. R. & Stachowicz, J. J. Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8998–9002 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hartl, D. L. & Clark, A. G. Principles of Population Genetics Vol. 116 (Sinauer, 1997).

  84. Jennings, S. B., Brown, N. D., Boshier, D. H., Whitmore, T. C. & Lopes, J. do C. A. Ecology provides a pragmatic solution to the maintenance of genetic diversity in sustainably managed tropical rain forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 154, 1–10 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  85. Vilas, A., Pérez-Figueroa, A., Quesada, H. & Caballero, A. Allelic diversity for neutral markers retains a higher adaptive potential for quantitative traits than expected heterozygosity. Mol. Ecol. 24, 4419–4432 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  86. González, A. V., Gómez-Silva, V., Ramírez, M. J. & Fontúrbel, F. E. Meta-analysis of the differential effects of habitat fragmentation and degradation on plant genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 34, 711–720 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kort, H. D., Mergeay, J., Jacquemyn, H. & Honnay, O. Transatlantic invasion routes and adaptive potential in North American populations of the invasive glossy buckthorn, Frangula alnus. Ann. Bot. 118, 1089–1099 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  88. Jordan, R., Hoffmann, A. A., Dillon, S. K. & Prober, S. M. Evidence of genomic adaptation to climate in Eucalyptus microcarpa: implications for adaptive potential to projected climate change. Mol. Ecol. 26, 6002–6020 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  89. Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D. & Barton, N. H. The effects of genetic and geographic structure on neutral variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 99–125 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  90. Shaw, R. E. et al. Halting genetic diversity loss, from local to international action and policy. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00162-0 (2026).

  91. Hoban, S. et al. Global commitments to conserving and monitoring genetic diversity are now necessary and feasible. BioScience 71, 964–976 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  92. Corbin, J. P. M. et al. Hyperspectral leaf reflectance detects interactive genetic and environmental effects on tree phenotypes, enabling large-scale monitoring and restoration planning under climate change. Plant Cell Environ. 48, 1842–1857 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  93. Blonder, B. et al. Remote sensing of ploidy level in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). J. Ecol. 108, 175–188 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  94. Blonder, B. et al. Remote sensing of cytotype and its consequences for canopy damage in quaking aspen. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2491–2504 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  95. Czyż, E. A. et al. Intraspecific genetic variation of a Fagus sylvatica population in a temperate forest derived from airborne imaging spectroscopy time series. Ecol. Evol. 10, 7419–7430 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  96. Czyż, E. A. et al. Genetic constraints on temporal variation of airborne reflectance spectra and their uncertainties over a temperate forest. Remote Sens. Environ. 284, 113338 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  97. Chen, Y., Monks, L., Rubio, V. E., Cox, A. J. & Swenson, N. G. Linking leaf hyperspectral reflectance to gene expression. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 694 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  98. Ollinger, S. V. Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. N. Phytol. 189, 375–394 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  99. Aitken, S. N. & Bemmels, J. B. Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees. Evol. Appl. 9, 271–290 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  100. Hernández, M. et al. Population structure and genetic diversity of Magnolia cubensis subsp. acunae (Magnoliaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. Oryx 54, 451–459 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  101. Rocchini, D. et al. Measuring β-diversity by remote sensing: a challenge for biodiversity monitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1787–1798 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  102. Asner, G. P., Martin, R. E., Anderson, C. B. & Knapp, D. E. Quantifying forest canopy traits: imaging spectroscopy versus field survey. Remote Sens. Environ. 158, 15–27 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  103. Chadwick, K. D. & Asner, G. P. Tropical soil nutrient distributions determined by biotic and hillslope processes. Biogeochemistry 127, 273–289 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  104. Singh, A., Serbin, S. P., McNeil, B. E., Kingdon, C. C. & Townsend, P. A. Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. Ecol. Appl. 25, 2180–2197 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  105. Toan, T. L. et al. The BIOMASS mission: mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 2850–2860 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  106. Saatchi, S., Marlier, M., Chazdon, R. L., Clark, D. B. & Russell, A. E. Impact of spatial variability of tropical forest structure on radar estimation of aboveground biomass. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 2836–2849 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  107. Torres, R. et al. GMES Sentinel-1 mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 120, 9–24 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  108. Bussinguer, J. et al. Understanding the spatio-temporal behavior of Sentinel-1 SAR vegetation indices over the Brazilian savanna. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 62, 1–18 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  109. Reiche, J., Hamunyela, E., Verbesselt, J., Hoekman, D. & Herold, M. Improving near-real time deforestation monitoring in tropical dry forests by combining dense Sentinel-1 time series with Landsat and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2. Remote Sens. Environ. 204, 147–161 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  110. Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Parker, G. G. & Harding, D. J. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52, 19–30 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  111. Johnstone, J. F. et al. Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 369–378 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  112. Senf, C. et al. Canopy mortality has doubled in Europe’s temperate forests over the last three decades. Nat. Commun. 9, 4978 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  113. Vierling, K. T., Vierling, L. A., Gould, W. A., Martinuzzi, S. & Clawges, R. M. Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 90–98 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  114. Mitsuhashi, R. et al. in Tropical Peatland Eco-evaluation (eds Osaki, M. et al.) 271–293 (Springer Nature, 2023).

  115. Sakae, T., Sakaizawa, D., Imai, T. & Sumita, T. Development status of MOLI project. In Proc. SPIE Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIX, 136670P (SPIE, 2025).

  116. Dubayah, R., Armston, J. D. & Blair, J. B. Advancing ecosystem structure observation: insights from GEDI and the path to EDGE. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AGUFMGC13W..01D (2024).

  117. Fricker, H. A. & Armston, J. D. Advances in tracking global change: insights from NASA’s satellite laser altimetry missions (ICESat, ICESat-2, and GEDI) and the path to EDGE I. AGU2024 https://agu.confex.com/agu/agu24/meetingapp.cgi/Session/229145 (2024).

  118. Quegan, S. et al. The European Space Agency BIOMASS mission: measuring forest above-ground biomass from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 227, 44–60 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  119. Rosen, P. et al. The NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) mission dual-band radar instrument preliminary design. In 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2017.8127836 (IEEE, 2017).

  120. Asner, G. P. et al. Spectroscopy of canopy chemicals in humid tropical forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 3587–3598 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  121. Jetz, W. et al. Monitoring plant functional diversity from space. Nat. Plants 2, 16024 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  122. Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  123. Malhi, Y. et al. New perspectives on the ecology of tree structure and tree communities through terrestrial laser scanning. Interface Focus 8, 20170052 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  124. Nunes, M. H. et al. Edge effects on tree architecture exacerbate biomass loss of fragmented Amazonian forests. Nat. Commun. 14, 8129 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  125. Nunes, M. H. et al. Forest fragmentation impacts the seasonality of Amazonian evergreen canopies. Nat. Commun. 13, 917 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  126. Martínez-García, E. et al. Drought response of the boreal forest carbon sink is driven by understorey–tree composition. Nat. Geosci. 17, 197–204 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  127. Pinagé, E. R. et al. Forest structure and solar-induced fluorescence across intact and degraded forests in the Amazon. Remote Sens. Environ. 274, 112998 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  128. Wigneron, J.-P. et al. Tropical forests did not recover from the strong 2015–2016 El Niño event. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay4603 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  129. Hernández-Blanco, M. et al. Ecosystem health, ecosystem services, and the well-being of humans and the rest of nature. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 5027–5040 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  130. Kamoske, A. G. et al. Towards mapping biodiversity from above: can fusing lidar and hyperspectral remote sensing predict taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic tree diversity in temperate forests? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 1440–1460 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  131. Manfreda, S. et al. On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring. Remote Sens. 10, 641 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  132. Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought. Nature 561, 538–541 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  133. Langan, L., Scheiter, S., Hickler, T. & Higgins, S. I. Amazon forest resistance to drought is increased by diversity in hydraulic traits. Nat. Commun. 16, 8246 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  134. Griffith, D. M. et al. Capturing patterns of evolutionary relatedness with reflectance spectra to model and monitor biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2215533120 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  135. Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  136. Diniz, C. G. et al. DETER-B: the new amazon near real-time deforestation detection system. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 8, 3619–3628 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  137. Zeng, Y. et al. Structural complexity biases vegetation greenness measures. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1790–1798 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  138. Asner, G. P. et al. A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping. Oecologia 168, 1147–1160 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  139. Doughty, C. E. et al. Satellite derived trait data slightly improves tropical forest biomass, NPP and GPP estimates. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 129, e2024JG008108 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  140. Conto, T., de, Armston, J. & Dubayah, R. Characterizing the structural complexity of the Earth’s forests with spaceborne lidar. Nat. Commun. 15, 8116 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  141. Satapathy, T. & Dutta, D. Characterizing the vertical variability of canopy structure from space: implications for biodiversity, productivity, and ecosystem functioning. Agric. For. Meteorol. 372, 110710 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  142. Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Yun, T. & Li, M. Estimation of subtropical forest aboveground biomass using active and passive sentinel data with canopy height. Remote Sens. 17, 2509 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  143. Bourgoin, C. et al. Human degradation of tropical moist forests is greater than previously estimated. Nature 631, 570–576 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  144. Holcomb, A., Burns, P., Keshav, S. & Coomes, D. A. Repeat GEDI footprints measure the effects of tropical forest disturbances. Remote Sens. Environ. 308, 114174 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  145. Forkel, M. et al. Burning of woody debris dominates fire emissions in the Amazon and Cerrado. Nat. Geosci. 18, 140–147 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  146. Lima, R. B. de et al. Mapping the density of giant trees in the Amazon. N. Phytol. 249, 152–168 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  147. Lei, Y. et al. Quantification of selective logging in tropical forest with spaceborne SAR interferometry. Remote Sens. Environ. 211, 167–183 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  148. Qi, W. et al. Mapping large-scale pantropical forest canopy height by integrating GEDI lidar and TanDEM-X InSAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 318, 114534 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  149. Potapov, P. et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  150. Guan, K. et al. Photosynthetic seasonality of global tropical forests constrained by hydroclimate. Nat. Geosci. 8, 284–289 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  151. Giardina, F. et al. Tall Amazonian forests are less sensitive to precipitation variability. Nat. Geosci. 11, 405–409 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  152. Koren, G. et al. Widespread reduction in sun-induced fluorescence from the Amazon during the 2015/2016 El Niño. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170408 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  153. Moura, Y. M. de et al. Seasonality and drought effects of Amazonian forests observed from multi-angle satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 171, 278–290 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  154. Moura, Y. M. de et al. Spectral analysis of amazon canopy phenology during the dry season using a tower hyperspectral camera and MODIS observations. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 131, 52–64 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  155. Zhou, L. et al. Widespread decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade. Nature 509, 86–90 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  156. Liu, L. et al. The novel microwave temperature vegetation drought index (MTVDI) captures canopy seasonality across Amazonian tropical evergreen forests. Remote Sens. 13, 339 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  157. Tao, S. et al. Increasing and widespread vulnerability of intact tropical rainforests to repeated droughts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116626119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  158. Bernardino, P. N. et al. Estimating vegetation water content from Sentinel-1 C-band SAR data over savanna and grassland ecosystems. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 034019 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  159. Pinagé, E. R. et al. Surface energy dynamics and canopy structural properties in intact and disturbed forests in the southern Amazon. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 128, e2023JG007465 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  160. Sumoinen, L., Ruokolainen, K., Pitkänen, T. & Tuomisto, H. Similar understorey structure in spite of edaphic and floristic dissimilarity in Amazonian forests. Acta Amaz. 45, 393–404 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  161. Medeiros, E. S. e S., Machado, C. C. C., Galvíncio, J. D., Moura, M. S. B. de & Araujo, H. F. P. de Predicting plant species richness with satellite images in the largest dry forest nucleus in South America. J. Arid Environ. 166, 43–50 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  162. Fagua, J. C. et al. Mapping tree diversity in the tropical forest region of Chocó-Colombia. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 054024 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  163. Marselis, S. M. et al. Evaluating the potential of full-waveform lidar for mapping pan-tropical tree species richness. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1799–1816 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  164. Marselis, S. M., Keil, P., Chase, J. M. & Dubayah, R. The use of GEDI canopy structure for explaining variation in tree species richness in natural forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 045003 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  165. Cao, R. et al. Global evidence for a positive relationship between tree species richness and ecosystem photosynthesis. Nat. Plants 11, 1429–1440 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  166. Asner, G. P. et al. Landscape biogeochemistry reflected in shifting distributions of chemical traits in the Amazon forest canopy. Nat. Geosci. 8, 567–573 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  167. Chadwick, D. K. & Asner, G. P. Organismic-scale remote sensing of canopy foliar traits in lowland tropical forests. Remote Sens. 8, 87 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  168. Swinfield, T. et al. Imaging spectroscopy reveals the effects of topography and logging on the leaf chemistry of tropical forest canopy trees. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 989–1002 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  169. Liu, S. et al. Mapping foliar photosynthetic capacity in sub-tropical and tropical forests with UAS-based imaging spectroscopy: scaling from leaf to canopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 293, 113612 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  170. Schimel, D. et al. Pan-tropical plant functional trait variation from space. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.19199 (2025).

  171. Gauci, V. et al. Global atmospheric methane uptake by upland tree woody surfaces. Nature 631, 796–800 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  172. Burt, A. et al. New insights into large tropical tree mass and structure from direct harvest and terrestrial lidar. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 201458 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  173. Han, T. et al. Taller trees experienced less crown damage during a severe hurricane in a tropical forest. Glob. Change Biol. 32, e70709 (2026).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  174. Huechacona-Ruiz, A. H. et al. Mapping tree species deciduousness of tropical dry forests combining reflectance, spectral unmixing, and texture data from high-resolution imagery. Forests 11, 1234 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  175. Laurin, G. V. et al. Discrimination of tropical forest types, dominant species, and mapping of functional guilds by hyperspectral and simulated multispectral Sentinel-2 data. Remote Sens. Environ. 176, 163–176 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  176. Cross, M. D., Scambos, T., Pacifici, F. & Marshall, W. E. Determining effective meter-scale image data and spectral vegetation indices for tropical forest tree species differentiation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 12, 2934–2943 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  177. Wagner, F. H. The flowering of Atlantic Forest Pleroma trees. Sci. Rep. 11, 20437 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  178. Miura, T. et al. Utility of commercial high-resolution satellite imagery for monitoring general flowering in Sarawak, Borneo. Ecol. Res. 38, 386–402 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  179. Ferreira, M. P., Wagner, F. H., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Shimabukuro, Y. E. & Filho, C. R. de S. Tree species classification in tropical forests using visible to shortwave infrared WorldView-3 images and texture analysis. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 149, 119–131 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  180. Cho, M. A., Malahlela, O. & Ramoelo, A. Assessing the utility WorldView-2 imagery for tree species mapping in South African subtropical humid forest and the conservation implications: Dukuduku forest patch as case study. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 38, 349–357 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  181. Ferreira, M. P. et al. Accurate mapping of Brazil nut trees (Bertholletia excelsa) in Amazonian forests using WorldView-3 satellite images and convolutional neural networks. Ecol. Inform. 63, 101302 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  182. Chaves, P. P., Ruokolainen, K. & Tuomisto, H. Using remote sensing to model tree species distribution in Peruvian lowland Amazonia. Biotropica 50, 758–767 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  183. José-Silva, L. et al. Improving the validation of ecological niche models with remote sensing analysis. Ecol. Model. 380, 22–30 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  184. Deblauwe, V. et al. Remotely sensed temperature and precipitation data improve species distribution modelling in the tropics. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 443–454 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  185. Thomas, R. Q., Kellner, J. R., Clark, D. B. & Peart, D. R. Low mortality in tall tropical trees. Ecology 94, 920–929 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  186. Barber, C. et al. Species-level tree crown maps improve predictions of tree recruit abundance in a tropical landscape. Ecol. Appl. 32, e2585 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  187. Khan, G. et al. Weak population structure and no genetic erosion in Pilosocereus aureispinus: a microendemic and threatened cactus species from eastern Brazil. PLoS ONE 13, e0195475 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are supported by the European Union (ERC, ADAPTA, 101231095), the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC; NE/T011084/1 and NE/Z504191/1), the Royal Society (RGR1251370), the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2024-342), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA; contract NNL 15AA03C).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Biodiversity thanks Haidi Abdullah and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J., Cortes, I., Nunes, M.H. et al. Remote sensing delivers tropical forest resilience monitoring for the Global Biodiversity Framework.
Nat. Rev. Biodivers. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00178-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00178-6


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Hydrogen: clean fuel of the future — if we can find a cheap and clean way to ship it

Urban water affordability crisis exacerbated by climate change