in

Research on spatiotemporal risk assessment model of bird strike at airports and precise prevention and control strategies


Abstract

To improve the spatiotemporal accuracy and targeted prevention of airport bird strike risk assessment, based on avian biological characteristics, activity patterns, and aircraft operational characteristics, the bird strike probability is refined into temporal probability and spatial probability. Combined with the severity index, a spatiotemporal risk assessment model for airport bird strikes is constructed. Application results at Yan’an Nanniwan Airport indicate that the spatiotemporal assessment model’s risk assessment outcomes across different sections align more closely with actual bird strike occurrences, outperforming the traditional four-factor assessment method. The model effectively reveals bird strike risk characteristics across different sections, seasons, and time periods, and identifies key bird species and key prevention areas. Based on the research, precise prevention and control strategies differentiated by time periods and regions are proposed, which can provide a theoretical basis and practical reference for airport to develop scientific prevention plans and reduce bird strike risk.

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessing the spatial risk of wild birds in avian influenza transmission using global risk score

A bird target detection model designed for substation scenarios

Ecology and environment predict spatially stratified risk of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b in wild birds across Europe

Data availability

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author Jingwen Jia on reasonable request via e-mail: [[email protected]].

References

  1. Metz, I. C. et al. The bird strike challenge. Aerospace 7, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7030026 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Civil Aviation Administration of China. Report on the situation analysis of bird strike prevention in national transportation aviation in 2024. (2025).

  3. Chen, W. et al. Review on wide area bird monitoring and early warning technology. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2025.0427 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhan, J., Zhang, J., Gao, Y. & Wan, X. Spatial and temporal distributional characteristics of bird diversity and bird-strike prevention tactics at Wuhan Tianhe International Airport. Chin. J. Ecol. 43, 3142–3151. https://doi.org/10.13292/j.1000-4890.202410.020 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soldatini, C. et al. Wildlife strike risk assessment in several Italian airports: Lessons from BRI and a new methodology implementation. PLoS ONE 6, e28920 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luan, X., Hu, Z. & Xu, H. Features of avian community and their relationships with habitats in Shanghai agricultural area. Zool. Res. 01, 20–26 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L. et al. Avian diversity and bird strike risks on Luogang Airport. Chin. J. Wildl. 31, 127–130 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, W. et al. Birdstrike risk assessment and birdstrike avoidance of Bayannaoer Civil Airport. J. Inn. Mong.Ia Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 46, 292–300 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tan, S. et al. Spatiotemporal variation and control of hazardous birds at Yibin Wuliangye Airport. Sichuan J. Zool. 42, 471–480 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shi, Y. et al. Analysis of bird diversity survey and bird strike risk at Xinjiang Shache Yarkan Airport. J. Civ. Aviat. Flight Univ. China 35, 36–40+55 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, Y. et al. A birdstrike risk assessment model and its application at Ordos Airport, China. Sci. Rep. 10, 19627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76275-z (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pfeiffer, M. B., Kougher, J. D. & Devault, T. L. Civil airports from a landscape perspective: A multi-scale approach with implications for reducing bird strike. Landsc. Urban Plan. 179, 38 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shi, Z., Zhou, Y. & Shao, Q. Risk assessment of bird strike based on airport environment and flight procedures. Bull. Sci. Technol. 37, 120–125 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Soldatini, C., Georgalas, V., Torricelli, P. & Albores-Barajas, Y. V. An ecological approach to birdstrike risk analysis. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0359-z (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, L. et al. Bird diversity and bird strike risk at Hefei Xinqiao International Airport. Sichuan J. Zool. 32, 619–626 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liang, H., Liu, W. & Xu, H. Bird diversity and bird strike risk assessment at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport. J. Civ. Aviat. 8, 119–123 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, Q. Bird community structure and diversity of airport in eastern Hebei. (Hebei University, 2021).

  18. Andrews, R. et al. Three novel bird strike likelihood modelling techniques: The case of Brisbane Airport, Australia. PLoS ONE 17, e0277794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277794 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shi, Y. et al. An integrated birdstrike risk assessment method for airports incorporating flight procedures. Sichuan J. Zool. 44, 272–282 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coccon, F. et al. A land-use perspective for birdstrike risk assessment: The attraction risk index. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128363 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shao, Q., Zhou, Y. & Zhu, P. Key factors assessment on bird strike density distribution in airport habitats: Spatial heterogeneity and geographically weighted regression model. Sustainability 12, 7235 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. John, M. & Phillipps, K. A field guide to the birds of China (Hunan Education Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yanping, W. et al. A dataset on the life-history and ecological traits of Chinese birds. Biodivers. Sci. 29, 1149–1153 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yan’an Airport Flight Procedure Design Document. (Western Airport Group, 2023).

  25. Li, D. & Zhu, W. Taxonomic diversity of fish species in the Daiquyang Waters. J. Zhejiang Ocean. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 36, 289–294 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Civil Aviation Administration of China. Event Example: AC-396-08R3. (Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2023).

  27. Shi, W. Research on airport bird strike prevention method considering the regularity of aircraft flight activities. (Civil Aviation University of China, 2022).

  28. Li, M., Mou, Q. & Ma, Z. Planing and design of airports (China Civil Aviation Press, 2015).

  29. Meng, L. Study on the airport bird strike risk associated flight procedure. (Civil Aviation University of China, 2017).

  30. Zhu, D. & He, G. Visual and instrument flight procedure design (Southwest Jiaotong University Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ning, H. & Chen, W. Bird strike risk evaluation at airports. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 86, 129–137 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guan, K. et al. Constructing an index system of humanistic care capability of hospital pharmacists based upon Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process. Chin. J. Hosp. Pharm. 44, 1801–1805 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wu, S., Deng, J., Yu, W., Liu, C. & Song, Y. Construction of an evaluation system for the rationality of perioperative anticoagulant use in hand and foot surgery based on the Delphi method and research on its clinical application. Chin. J. Hosp. Pharm. 119, 1–10 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gao, Y., Zheng, J. & Cui, Z. Study on calculating model of probability for civil aviation route bird strike based on fuzzy mathematics. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 10, 155–160 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, Y. et al. Avian community structure and bird strike prevention at Changzhou Benniu Airport. Chin. J. Wildl. 41, 616–625 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, H. Design and implementation of bird sentiment collection and bird strike risk assessment system in Civil Aviation Airport. (Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2022).

  37. He, J., Li, W., Zhang, D. & Gao, R. Analysis of correlation between grounding resistance and soil volumetric water content based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. J. Mt. Meteorol. 48, 86–90 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by: 1. Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Smart Operation and Maintenance of Civil Aviation Airports and Airport Department of the Civil Aviation Administration of China: Research on Key Theories and Technologies for Distributed Intelligent Bird Strike Prevention Aimed at Small and Medium-Sized Airports (JCZX2023ZZ06). 2. The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (25CAFUC05005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y. S., J. J. and R. L. initiated the study and designed the overall research framework. R. L. provided the design ideas for Fig. 9 to 14. X. F., Y. S., Y. S., J. C., and J. J. jointly conducted the airport bird activity surveys. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Jingwen Jia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, Y., Jia, J., Lin, R. et al. Research on spatiotemporal risk assessment model of bird strike at airports and precise prevention and control strategies.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36814-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36814-6

Keywords

  • Bird strike risk
  • Spatiotemporal assessment
  • Precise prevention and control
  • The number of aircraft taking off and landing
  • Risk matrix method


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Multistage treatment of industrial ethylene glycol (EG) effluent: integrating chemical extraction, coagulation/precipitation, and decolouration for enhanced wastewater remediation

Pesticide residues alter taxonomic and functional biodiversity in soils

Back to Top