in

Responses of South Caspian coastal foraminifera to warming: spatial patterns and assemblage shifts


Abstract

This study investigated the spatial distribution of coastal foraminifera at four stations, identifying seven distinct species representing five genera and three families, with Ammonia beccarii caspica as the dominant species. The Bandar Gaz station exhibited the highest density, species richness, evenness, and Shannon diversity. Consequently, Bandar Gaz was selected for a controlled microcosm experiment examining benthic foraminiferal community responses to increased water temperature (24 °C, 27 °C, and 30 °C) over 60 days. While the highest total density and evenness were observed at 30 °C, the total number of species and Margalef and Shannon indices did not significantly differ among treatments. Temperature changes significantly altered community structure through shifts in species dominance. Ammonia species displayed resilience and increased dominance with higher temperatures, replacing other species. Elphidium advenum density decreased significantly at 30 °C, while Ammonia beccarri and Ammonia tepida increased in dominance with rising temperatures. These findings highlight temperature-driven alterations in foraminiferal assemblages, with implications for coastal ecosystem monitoring in the context of climate change.

Data availability

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Maslin, M. Global Warming: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2008).

  2. Venegas, R. M., Acevedo, J. & Treml, E. A. Three decades of ocean warming impacts on marine ecosystems: a review and perspective. Deep Sea Res. Part II. 212, 105318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2023.105318 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagheri, H., Mahmudy Gharaei, M., Mousavi Harami, R. & Khanebad, M. Reconstruction of Caspian sea level changes using magnetic susceptibility during the last millennium. Iran. J. Mar. Sci. 48, 1452–1459 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arpe, K., Molavi-Arabshahi, M. & Leroy, S. A. G. Wind variability over the Caspian Sea, its impact on Caspian seawater level and link with ENSO. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 6039–6054. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6564 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lahijani, H. et al. Behravesh M. A note on the silent decline of the Caspian environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 205, 116551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116551 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roshan, G., Moghbel, M. & Grab, S. Modeling Caspian sea water level oscillations under different scenarios of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 9, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-9-24 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Azizpour, J. & Ghaffari, P. Low-frequency sea level changes in the Caspian sea: long-term and seasonal trends. Clim. Dyn. 61, 2753–2763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06715-9 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taheri, M., Yazdani Foshtami, M., Manbohi, A. & Mira, M. Spatial distribution and effects of temperature rise on coastal free-living nematode community in the South Caspian sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 214, 117806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117806 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Danovaro, R., Gambi, C. & Della Croce, N. Meiofauna response to organic matter enrichment in a mediterranean coastal lagoon. Hydrobiologia 445, 131–139 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Danovaro, R. et al. Deep-sea biodiversity in the mediterranean sea: which is the role of food availability? Deep sea research part I. Oceanogr. Res. Papers. 51, 1529–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.07.015 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mojtahid, M., Nercessian, A., Debenay, J. P. & Buoncristiani, J. F. Modern benthic foraminifera distribution in the Arcachon Lagoon, French Atlantic coast: environmental significance. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 81, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.10.001 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bouchet, V. M. P., Koho, K. A., McCarthy, F. M. G., Martin, R. A. & Martin, J. B. Benthic foraminiferal distribution in Bonne Bay, newfoundland: assessing environmental gradients and proxy potential. Mar. Micropaleontol. 96, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2012.08.001 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dolven, J. K., McCarthy, F. M. G., Collins, E. S., Chmura, G. L. & Patterson, R. T. Salt-marsh foraminifera as proxies for relative sea-level change: statistical (transfer function) vs. indicator zone approaches. J. Quat. Sci. 28, 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2624 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polovodova Asteman, I. & Nordberg, K. The influence of different ecological factors on benthic foraminiferal distribution in the Himmerfjärden Estuary, Northern Baltic sea. J. Micropalaeontol. 32, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1144/jmpaleo2012-015 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duffield, A., Patterson, R. T., Reinhardt, E. G., McKillop, I. K. & Roe, H. M. Distribution of intertidal foraminifera in the Pachena river salt marsh, British Columbia, canada: assessing their utility as sea-level indicators. Mar. Micropaleontol. 119, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2015.06.001 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nordberg, K., Eichler, P. P. B., Volkov, I. A. & Asteman, I. P. Modern benthic foraminifera in the sea of azov: distribution in relation to salinity, organic matter, and pollution. J. Foraminifer. Res. 47, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.47.2.167 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Altenbach, A. V. Short term processes influencing the vertical distribution of foraminifera in a Sublittoral habitat. Mar. Micropaleontol. 20, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8398(92)90024-9 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alve, E. & Bernhard, J. M. Vertical migratory response of benthic foraminifera to controlled oxygen perturbations in an experimental marine ecosystem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 116, 137–151 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Havach, S., Frontalini, F. & Coccioni, R. Benthic foraminifera as indicators of heavy-metal pollution in the lagoon of Venice, Italy. J. Foraminifer. Res. 31, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.2113/0310194 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Le Cadre, V. & Debenay, J. P. Morphological abnormalities in foraminifera: one tool for pollution assessment? Mar. Micropaleontol. 61, 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2006.08.003 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elderfield, H., Vautravers, M. & Cooper, M. The relationship between benthic foraminiferal magnesium and seawater temperature. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 250, 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.07.034 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wit, J. C., Filipsson, H. L. & Platzman, D. J. Interactive effects of hypoxia and pH on the benthic foraminifera Ammonia tepida: growth rate, survival, and shell characteristics. Biogeosciences 10, 7479–7496. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7479-2013 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schönfeld, J. Living Foraminifera in Shelf Seas (Cambridge University Press, 2018).

  24. Dong, B., Kong, L., Guo, W., Zhan, B. & Li, X. Benthic foraminiferal response to environmental changes in the Pearl river Estuary, China. J. Mar. Syst. 195, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.03.001 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldstein, S. T. & Alve, E. Effect of increased bottom-water temperature on foraminiferal assemblages in a Norwegian Fjord. J. Foraminifer. Res. 41, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.41.1.99 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Samant, R. & Prange, M. Climate-driven 21st century Caspian sea level decline estimated from CMIP6 projections. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01017-8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Taheri, M., Darvish Bastami, K. & Yazdani Foshtomi, M. Meiofauna-sediment relationships in shallow water of the south Caspian Sea. In: INOC-International Congress “Estuaries & Coastal Protected Areas” ECPA 2014, 04–06 November 2014, Izmir–Turkey (2014).

  28. Darvish Bastami, K. et al. Molamohyeddin N. Nematode community structure in relation to metals in the Southern of Caspian sea. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 36, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-1114-z (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taheri, M., Darvish Bastami, K. & Yazdani Foshtomi, M. October. The role of the sediment conditions in shaping meiofauna spatial distribution in the shallow water of the south Caspian Sea. In First International Conference on Oceanography for West Asia, 30–31 (2017).

  30. Bernhard, J. M. Distinguishing live from dead foraminifera: methods review and proper applications. Micropaleontology 46, 38–46 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Heiri, O., Lotter, A. F. & Lemcke, G. Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results. J. Paleolimnol. 25, 101–110 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Folk, R. L. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks (Hemphill Publishing Company, 1980).

  33. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (American Public Health Association, 2005).

  34. Taheri, M., Braeckman, U., Vincx, M. & Vanaverbeke, J. Effect of short-term hypoxia on marine nematode community structure and vertical distribution pattern in three different sediment types of the North sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 99, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.04.008 (2014b).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Taheri, M., Yazdani Foshtomi, M., Hamzeh, M. A., Manbohi, A. & Rahnama Haratbar, R. Effects of discarded garbage bags on intertidal free living nematode community. Aquat. Ecol. 58, 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-024-10110-9 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gingold, R., Moens, T. & Rocha-Olivares, A. Assessing the response of nematode communities to climate change-driven warming: A microcosm experiment. PLoS ONE 8, e66653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066653 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lei, Y., Li, T., Jian, Z. & Nigam, R. Taxonomy and distribution of benthic foraminifera in an intertidal zone of the yellow Sea, PR china: correlations with sediment temperature and salinity. Mar. Micropaleontol. 133, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.04.005 (2017a).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lei, Y. L., Stumm, K., Wickham, S. A. & Berninger, U. G. Distributions and biomass of benthic ciliates, foraminifera and amoeboid protists in marine, brackish, and freshwater sediments. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 61, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12129 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Anderson, M. J., Gorley, R. N. & Clarke, K. R. Guide to Software and Statistical Methods (PRIMER-E Ltd., 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gooday, A. J. Benthic foraminifera (Protista) as tools in deep-water palaeoceanography: environmental influences on faunal characteristics. Adv. Mar. Biol. 46, 1–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(03)46002-1 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Murray, J. W. Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera (Cambridge University Press, 2006).

  42. Dubey, R., Saraswat, R. & Nigam, R. Mudbank off Alleppey, India: a Bane for foraminifera but not so for carbon burial. Sci. Total Environ. 634, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.369 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lei, Y., Stumm, K., Wickham, S. A. & Berninger, U. G. Distributions and biomass of benthic ciliates, foraminifera and amoeboid protists in marine, brackish, and freshwater sediments. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 61, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12129 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hale, R., Calosi, P., McNeill, L., Mieszkowska, N. & Widdicombe, S. Predicted levels of future ocean acidification and temperature rise could alter community structure and biodiversity in marine benthic communities. Oikos 120, 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.19469.x (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Meadows, A. S., Ingels, J., Widdicombe, S., Hale, R. & Rundle, S. D. Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on an intertidal meiobenthic community. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 469, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.04.001 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ingels, J. et al. Short-term CO2 exposure and temperature rise effects on metazoan meiofauna and free-living nematodes in sandy and muddy sediments: results from a flume experiment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 502, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2018.03.009 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vafeiadou, A. M. et al. Temperature-driven dynamics: unraveling the impact of climate change on cryptic species interactions within the Litoditis marina complex. PeerJ 12, e17324. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17324 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Moens, T. & Vincx, M. Temperature, salinity and food thresholds in two brackish-water bacterivorous nematode species: assessing niches from food absorption and respiration experiments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 243, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00114-8 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that improved the quality of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is based upon research founded by Iranian National Science Foundation (INSF) under project NO. 40266240.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hossein Bagheri: writing—original draft preparation, methodology, writing-review and editing. Mehrshad Taheri: methodology, software, writing-review and editing, visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Hossein Bagheri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagheri, H., Taheri, M. Responses of South Caspian coastal foraminifera to warming: spatial patterns and assemblage shifts.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38207-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38207-1

Keywords

  • Caspian sea
  • Temperature
  • Foraminifera
  • Sediments


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Rhizosphere microbial functions drive ecological stoichiometry in soils across an elevational gradient of a temperate mountain ecosystem

Avian neighbours: density patterns of synanthropic birds along a rural–urban landscape gradient in Northern India

Back to Top