Search

Menu
Search
in Ecology

River interlinking and biodiversity risks in Indian freshwater ecosystems

129 Views


Abstract

India’s National River Linking Project (NRLP) is a large-scale inter-basin water transfer scheme designed to address water scarcity and excesses by connecting surplus basins to deficit ones across the country. However, such large-scale hydrological alterations pose serious ecological risks. This study examines the potential role of river interlinking on the distribution and dynamics of freshwater invasive alien species and their interactions with native biodiversity across Indian river basins. We modelled the distribution of 15 naturalised freshwater IAS using species distribution models based on bioclimatic variables. These maps were then overlaid with basin-level freshwater biodiversity and threatened-species data, as well as the proposed river-linking network. The results reveal strong positive correlations between IAS richness and overall as well as threatened freshwater biodiversity, with biodiversity hotspots such as the Krishna, Godavari, Mahanadi, Brahmaputra, and the Western Ghats basins being most at risk. The proposed interlinking routes are expected to act as ecological corridors, enabling biotic exchange among previously isolated basins. Such increased connectivity could accelerate biological invasions, disrupt migratory routes, alter hydrological regimes, and undermine ecosystem resilience. The findings emphasise the urgent need to incorporate invasion ecology and biodiversity safeguards into NRLP plans to prevent irreversible ecological damage.

Similar content being viewed by others

Freshwater fish diversity in the western Amazon basin shaped by Andean uplift since the Late Cretaceous

Article
Open access
19 October 2023

Hydropower impacts on riverine biodiversity

Article

14 October 2024

Meta-analysis-derived estimates of stressor–response associations for riverine organism groups

Article
Open access
11 November 2025

Data availability

The data used in the analysis were downloaded from GBIF, iNaturalist and the India Biodiversity Portal.

References

  1. Fu, H. et al. A meta-analysis of environmental responses to freshwater ecosystem restoration in China (1987–2018).. Environ. Pollut. 316, 120589 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sayer, C. A. et al. One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction. Nature 638, 138–145 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tockner, K. (ed.) Handbook of water resources management: Discourses, concepts and examples (Springer International Publishing, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60147-8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballut-Dajud, G. A. et al. Factors affecting wetland loss: A review. Land 11, 434 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lynch, A. J. et al. People need freshwater biodiversity. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water. 10(3), e1633 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Guzman, I. et al. Water diversion and pollution interactively shape freshwater food webs through bottom-up mechanisms. Glob. Chang. Biol. 28, 859–876 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, J., Huang, J., Prell, C. & Bryan, B. A. Changes in supply and demand mediate the effects of land-use change on freshwater ecosystem services flows.. Sci. Total Environ. 763, 143012 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. UNEP. Progress on Water-Related Ecosystems: Mid-Term Status of SDG Indicator 6.6.1 and Acceleration Needs, with a Special Focus on Biodiversity. (2024).

  9. Waine, A., Robertson, P. & Pattison, Z. Integrated management of the raw water transfer invasion pathway.. Manag. Biol. Invasions. 16, 227–246 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallardo, B. & Aldridge, D. C. Inter-basin water transfers and the expansion of aquatic invasive species.. Water Res. 143, 282–291 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dudgeon, D. et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.. Biol. Rev. 81, 163–182 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ricciardi, A. & Macisaac, H. J. Impacts of Biological Invasions on Freshwater Ecosystems. 212–220 (2011).

  13. Leuven, R. S. E. W. et al. The river Rhine: A global highway for dispersal of aquatic invasive species.. Biol. Invasions. 11, 1989 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strecker, A. L. & Brittain, J. T. Increased habitat connectivity homogenizes freshwater communities: Historical and landscape perspectives.. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1343–1352 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Amarasinghe, U. A., Shah, T. & Malik, R. P. S. Strategic analyses of the national river linking project (NRLP) of India, series 1: India’s water future: Scenarios and issues. Int. Water Manag. Inst. https://doi.org/10.5337/2011.002 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joshi, N. M. National river linking project of India. Hydro Nepal J. Water Energy Environ. 12, 13–19 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shah, T. & Amarasinghe, U. A. River linking project: A solution or problem to India’s water woes? In Water Resources Management in India. 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25184-4_7 (2016)

  18. Tyagi, P. & Gupta, K. A. Water scenario and the river linking proposal: An impact analysis. In Land Use and Environmental Resources. 11. (Astral International Publishing, New Delhi; Associated Publishing Co., New Delhi, 2016).

  19. Misra, A. K. et al. Proposed river-linking project of India: A boon or bane to nature. Environ. Geol. 51, 1361–1376 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lakra, W. S., Sarkar, U. K., Dubey, V. K., Sani, R. & Pandey, A. River inter linking in India: Status, issues, prospects and implications on aquatic ecosystems and freshwater fish diversity. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 21, 463–479 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, D. S. The Indian rivers (Springer Singapore, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2984-4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fitzpatrick, B. M., Fordyce, J. A. & Gavrilets, S. Pattern, process and geographic modes of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 2342–2347 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Il, M. et al. Role of paleoclimatic and paleohydrological processes in lineage divergence in freshwater organisms: A snippet from lentic genus Pila. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 181, 107723 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Petsch, D. K. Causes and consequences of biotic homogenization in freshwater ecosystems. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol 101, 113–122 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson, J. A., Kuppusamy, S. & Dhawan, B. Study on Ecology and Migratory Patterns of Golden Mahseer (Tor putitora) in River Ganga Using Radio Telemetry Techniques: Project Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30906.06084. (2021)

  26. Nobinraja, M., Aravind, N. A. & Ravikanth, G. Opening the floodgates for invasion—modelling the distribution dynamics of invasive alien fishes in India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 195, 1411 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chauhan, T., Devanand, A., Roxy, M. K., Ashok, K. & Ghosh, S. River interlinking alters land-atmosphere feedback and changes the Indian summer monsoon. Nat. Commun. 14, 5928 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Higgins, S. A., Overeem, I., Rogers, K. G. & Kalina, E. A. River linking in India: Downstream impacts on water discharge and suspended sediment transport to deltas. Elementa Sci. Anthropocene. 6, 20 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bhaduri, A. & Barbier, E. Linking rivers in the Ganges-Brahmaputra River Basin: Exploring the transboundary effects. In IWMI Conference Proceedings 235176 (International Water Management Institute, 2008). https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.235176.

  30. Thomas, P. A. & Room, P. M. Successful control of the floating weed Salvinia molesta in Papua New Guinea: A useful biological invasion neutralizes a disastrous one. Environ. Conserv. 13, 242–248 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aloo, P., Ojwang, W., Omondi, R., Njiru, J. M. & Oyugi, D. A review of the impacts of invasive aquatic weeds on the bio-diversity of some tropical water bodies with special reference to lake Victoria (Kenya). Biodivers. J. 4, 471–482 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Keller, R. P., Masoodi, A. & Shackleton, R. T. The impact of invasive aquatic plants on ecosystem services and human well-being in Wular Lake, India. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 847–857 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Molur, S., Smith, K. G., Daniel, B. A. & Darwall, W. R. T. The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India. (Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, and Coimbatore, India: Zoo Outreach Organisation, 2011).

  34. Albert, J. S. et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis. Ambio 50, 85–94 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Daniels, J. A., Kerr, J. R. & Kemp, P. S. River infrastructure and the spread of freshwater invasive species: Inferences from an experimentally‐parameterised individual‐based model. J. Appl. Ecol. 60, 999–1009 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meador, M. R. Inter-basin water transfer: Ecological concerns. Fisheries 17, 17–22 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yi, S. & Kondolf, G. M. Environmental planning and the evolution of inter-basin water transfers in the United States. Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1489917 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tickner, D. P., Angold, P. G., Gurnell, A. M. & Mountford, J. O. Riparian plant invasions: Hydrogeomorphological control and ecological impacts. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 25, 22–52 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pettit, R. & Lenhart, S. Optimal control of a PDE model of an invasive species in a river. Mathematics. 7, 975 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Anand, J., Gosain, A. K., Khosa, R. & Srinivasan, R. Regional scale hydrologic modelling for prediction of water balance, analysis of trends in streamflow and variations in streamflow: The case study of the Ganga River Basin. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 16, 32–53 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Singh, A. K. State of aquatic invasive species in tropical India: An overview. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health. Manag. 24, 13–23 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dueñas, M.-A., Hemming, D. J., Roberts, A. & Diaz-Soltero, H. The threat of invasive species to IUCN-listed critically endangered species: A systematic review. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 26, e01476 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Arunkumar, A. A. & Manimekalan, A. Freshwater fish fauna of rivers of the southern Western Ghats. India. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 10, 1735–1752 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Spear, D., Foxcroft, L. C., Bezuidenhout, H. & McGeoch, M. A. Human population density explains alien species richness in protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 159, 137–147 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Panlasigui, S., Davis, A. J. S., Mangiante, M. J. & Darling, J. A. Assessing threats of non-native species to native freshwater biodiversity: Conservation priorities for the United States. Biol. Conserv. 224, 199–208 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kumar Rai, P. & Singh, J. S. Invasive alien plant species: Their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health. Ecol. Indic. 111, 106020 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Falaschi, M., Melotto, A., Manenti, R. & Ficetola, G. F. Invasive species and amphibian conservation. Herpetologica 76, 216 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lagrue, C. Impacts of crustacean invasions on parasite dynamics in aquatic ecosystems: A plea for parasite-focused studies. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 6, 364–374 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar, L., Ruland, F. & Jeschke, J. M. Non-native freshwater fishes in India: Existing evidence and knowledge gaps. NeoBiota 102, 419–440 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yakandawala, D. & Yakandawala, K. Hybridization between native and invasive alien plants: An overlooked threat to the biodiversity of Sri Lanka. Ceylon J. Sci. Biol. Sci. 40, 13–23 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wainright, C. A., Muhlfeld, C. C., Elser, J. J., Bourret, S. L. & Devlin, S. P. Species invasion progressively disrupts the trophic structure of native food webs. PNAS. 118, (2021).

  53. Nishijima, S., Nishikawa, C. & Miyashita, T. Habitat modification by invasive crayfish can facilitate its growth through enhanced food accessibility. BMC Ecol. 17, 37 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cucherousset, J. & Olden, J. D. Ecological impacts of non-native freshwater fishes. Fisheries 36, 215–230 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Walsh, J. R., Carpenter, S. R. & Vander Zanden, M. J. Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 4081–4085 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Peeler, E. J., Oidtmann, B. C., Midtlyng, P. J., Miossec, L. & Gozlan, R. E. Non-native aquatic animals introductions have driven disease emergence in Europe. Biol. Invasions. 13, 1291–1303 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Borko, Š, Premate, E., Zagmajster, M. & Fišer, C. Determinants of range sizes pinpoint vulnerability of groundwater species to climate change: A case study on subterranean amphipods from the Dinarides. Aquat. Conserv. 33, 629–636 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ward, J. V. & Stanford, J. A. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag. 11, 105–119 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Petts, G. E. & Gurnell, A. M. Hydrogeomorphic effects of reservoirs, dams, and diversions. In Treatise on Geomorphology. 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818234-5.00034-1. (2022).

  60. Fuller, M. R., Doyle, M. W. & Strayer, D. L. Causes and consequences of habitat fragmentation in river networks. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1355, 31–51 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sheer, M. B. & Steel, E. A. Lost Watersheds: Barriers, aquatic habitat connectivity, and salmon persistence in the Willamette and Lower Columbia River Basins. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135, 1654–1669 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Central Water Commission. Central Water Commission. Status of Trace and Toxic Metals in Rivers of India Central Water Commission, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. 8, https://cwc.gov.in/en/status-trace-and-toxic-metals-river-india-8th-edition-2024-1.pdf (2024).

  63. Liermann, C. R., Nilsson, C., Robertson, J. & Ng, R. Y. Implications of dam obstruction for global freshwater fish diversity. Bioscience 62, 539–548 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Linares, M. S., Callisto, M. & Marques, J. C. Thermodynamic based indicators illustrate how a run-of-river impoundment in neotropical savanna attracts invasive species and alters the benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages’ complexity. Ecol. Indic. 88, 181–189 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jansson, R., Nilsson, C., Dynesius, M. & Andersson, E. Effects of river regulation on river-margin vegetation: A comparison of eight boreal rivers. Ecol. Appl. 10, 203–224 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Dukes, J. S. & Mooney, H. A. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 135–139 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sakai, A. K. et al. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 305–332 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Benning, T. L., LaPointe, D., Atkinson, C. T. & Vitousek, P. M. Interactions of climate change with biological invasions and land use in the Hawaiian Islands: Modeling the fate of endemic birds using a geographic information system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 14246–14249 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Patz, J. A. et al. Unhealthy Landscapes: Policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence. Environ. Health Perspect. 112, 1092–1098 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sarma, C. K. & Hazarika, O. B. India-Bangladesh riparian relations. Foreign Affairs J. 16, 260–276 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ranjan, A. Disputed Waters: India, Pakistan and the transboundary rivers. Stud. Indian Polit. 4, 191–205 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Palmer, M. A. et al. Climate change and the world’s river basins: Anticipating management options. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 81–89 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pletterbauer, F., Melcher, A. H., Ferreira, T. & Schmutz, S. Impact of climate change on the structure of fish assemblages in European rivers. Hydrobiologia 744, 235–254 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bellard, C., Jeschke, J. M., Leroy, B. & Mace, G. M. Insights from modeling studies on how climate change affects invasive alien species geography. Ecol. Evol. 8, 5688–5700 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Seebens, H. et al. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 970–982 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mahapatra, B. K. & Mohanty, B. P. Invasive alien fish species in India are threat to the inland aquatic ecosystem. In Advances in Fish Research, Vol. VIII, 1st ed.13, (2023).

  77. Reaser, J. K. et al. The early detection of and rapid response (EDRR) to invasive species: A conceptual framework and federal capacities assessment. Biol. Invasions. 22, 1–19 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Byun, C., Kettenring, K. M., Tarsa, E. E. & de Blois, S. Applying ecological principles to maximize resistance to invasion in restored plant communities. Ecol. Eng. 190, 106926 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tickner, D. et al. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: An emergency recovery plan. Bioscience 70, 330–342 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Miqueleiz, I. et al. Ecoregional distributions of the world’s freshwater vertebrate species. Sci. Data. 12, 1286 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Campos, M., de Andrade, A. F. A. & Kunzmann, B. Modelling of the potential distribution of Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857) on a global scale. Aquat. Invasions. 9, 253–265 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Barbosa, F. G., Schneck, F. & Melo, A. S. Use of ecological niche models to predict the distribution of invasive species: A scientometric analysis. Braz. J. Biol. 72, 821–829 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ashraf, U. et al. Ecological niche model comparison under different climate scenarios: A case study of Olea spp. in Asia. Ecosphere https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1825DigitalObjectIdentifier(DOI) (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Mahapatra, B. B. & Aravind, N. A. Laevicaulis haroldi (Veronicellidae: Gastropoda), a potential future invaderto India. Curr. Sci. 120, 1781–1785 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Phillips, S. J. & Dudík, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31, 161–175 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Elith, J. et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17, 43–57 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Swets, J. A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285–1293 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Zhang, Y., Tang, J., Ren, G., Zhao, K. & Wang, X. Global potential distribution prediction of Xanthium italicum based on Maxent model. Sci. Rep. 11, 16545 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Groff, L. A., Marks, S. B. & Hayes, M. P. Using ecological niche models to direct rare amphibian surveys: A case study using the oregon spotted frog (Rana pretiosa). Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 9, 355 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Sousa-Guedes, D., Arenas-Castro, S. & Sillero, N. Ecological niche models reveal climate change effect on biogeographical regions: The Iberian Peninsula as a case study. Climate 8, 42 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Hammer, Ø., H., D. A. T. & R., P. D. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 4–9 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support received from Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) (CRG/2023/001126) and the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) (BT/PR44932/FCB/125/111/202).

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the support received from Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) (CRG/2023/001126) and the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) (BT/PR44932/FCB/125/111/202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SM Sehgal Foundation Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Jakkur, Bengaluru, 560064, India

    Aravind Neelavar Ananthram, Gokulapriya Raja, M. Nobinraja & G. Ravikanth

  2. Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, 576104, India

    Aravind Neelavar Ananthram & G. Ravikanth

  3. Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Derlakatte, Mangalore, 574119, India

    Aravind Neelavar Ananthram

Authors

  1. Aravind Neelavar Ananthram
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gokulapriya Raja
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Nobinraja
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Ravikanth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NAA conceived the idea, secured funding, and wrote and reviewed the MS. GPriya performed GIS and ENM analyses for non-fish species. NR did ENM for fish, and wrote the first draft of the MS. GR secured funding and reviewed the MS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Aravind Neelavar Ananthram.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ananthram, A.N., Raja, G., Nobinraja, M. et al. River interlinking and biodiversity risks in Indian freshwater ecosystems.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46640-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46640-5

Keywords

  • Inter-basin water transfer
  • Freshwater biodiversity
  • Invasive alien species
  • Species distribution modelling
  • National river linking project
  • Indian rivers

Source: Ecology - nature.com

Biostimulant-based nutrient management for energy-efficient and low-carbon mustard cultivation: a life cycle assessment approach for sustainable development

Extracellular vesicle-mediated metabolic exchange shapes the seasonal assembly of aquatic bacterial communities

This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.

Back to Top
Close