in

Soil microbial community assembly drives ecosystem multifunctionality under grazing disturbance by regulating diversity and network structure


Abstract

In the context of global climate change, overgrazing has impacted ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF). However, the influence of different characteristics of microbial communities on EMF under grazing pressures remains unclear. In this study, we examined how microbial community diversity, co-occurrence network structure, and assembly processes influence ecosystem function and multifunctionality under three grazing pressures: light grazing, heavy grazing, and grazing exclusion. Our results show that light grazing significantly increased microbial community diversity, richness, network complexity, and stability compared to heavy grazing. Soil bacterial and fungal communities were predominantly shaped by stochastic processes. As grazing pressure increased, the proportion of deterministic processes in both bacterial and fungal communities also grew. Furthermore, light grazing significantly reduced both ecosystem functions and multifunctionality compared to heavy grazing. We observed that microbial community assembly processes under grazing disturbance can directly or indirectly regulate EMF by shaping community diversity and network structure. The relationship with EMF appears to depend more on diversity than on network structure. Moreover, we emphasize that the complexity and stability of community networks are stronger predictors of EMF changes than diversity alone. In conclusion, the protection and careful management of microbial communities are crucial for enhancing ecosystem resilience and supporting sustainable development.

Data availability

All raw sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank Short Read Archive under accession number PRJNA1322087. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Sutter, L. & Albrecht, M. Synergistic interactions of ecosystem services: Florivorous pest control boosts crop yield increase through insect pollination. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20152529 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, J. M., Pei, X. T., Zhu, W. Y. & Jiao, J. Z. Water-related ecosystem services interactions and their natural-human activity drivers: Implications for ecological protection and restoration. J. Environ. Manag. 352, 120101 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manning, P. et al. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 427–436 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dietrich, P. et al. Plant diversity and community age stabilize ecosystem multifunctionality. Glob. Change Biol 30, e17225 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feng, B. et al. Soil physicochemical properties and plant functional traits regulate ecosystem multifunctionality of alpine grassland under different livestock grazing assemblies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 366, 108947 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nizamani, M. M. et al. Microbial biodiversity and plant functional trait interactions in multifunctional ecosystems. Appl. Soil Ecol. 201, 105515 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, F. W. et al. Understanding the drivers of ecosystem multifunctionality in the Mongolian steppe: The role of grazing history and resource input. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 359, 108748 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, X. S. et al. Plant species composition and key-species abundance drive ecosystem multifunctionality. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 2100–2110 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 5266–5270 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, W. G. et al. Aridity-driven shift in biodiversity–soil multifunctionality relationships. Nat. Commun. 12, 5350 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shi, X. Z. et al. Trophic interactions in soil micro-food webs drive ecosystem multifunctionality along tree species richness. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17234 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tariq, A. et al. Impact of aridity rise and arid lands expansion on carbon-storing capacity, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem services. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17292 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Han, S. et al. Soil aggregate size-dependent relationships between microbial functional diversity and multifunctionality. Soil Biol. Biochem. 154, 108143 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Nijs, E. A., Hicks, L. C., Leizeaga, A., Tietema, A. & Rousk, J. Soil microbial moisture dependences and responses to drying–rewetting: The legacy of 18 years drought. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1005–1015 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Renes, S. E., Sjöstedt, J., Fetzer, I. & Langenheder, S. Disturbance history can increase functional stability in the face of both repeated disturbances of the same type and novel disturbances. Sci. Rep. 10, 11333 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiao, S., Yang, Y. F., Xu, Y. Q., Zhang, J. & Lu, Y. H. Balance between community assembly processes mediates species coexistence in agricultural soil microbiomes across eastern China. ISME J 14, 202–216 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wei, Y. X. et al. Structure and assembly mechanism of soil bacterial community under different soil salt intensities in arid and semiarid regions. Ecol. Indic. 158, 111631 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nemergut, D. R. et al. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 342–356 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Romdhane, S. et al. Unraveling negative biotic interactions determining soil microbial community assembly and functioning. ISME J. 16, 296–306 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, W. & Xiao, Y. Microplastics increase soil microbial network complexity and trigger diversity-driven community assembly. Environ. Pollut. 333, 122095 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Teague, R. & Barnes, M. Grazing management that regenerates ecosystem function and grazingland livelihoods. Afr. J. Range For. Sci. 34, 77–86 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yao, Y. et al. Declining tradeoff between resistance and resilience of ecosystems to drought. Earths Future 12, e2024EF004665 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodell, M. & Li, B. L. Changing intensity of hydroclimatic extreme events revealed by GRACE and GRACE–FO. Nat. Water 1, 241–248 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, Z. Z. et al. The hidden risk: Changes in functional potentials of microbial keystone taxa under global climate change jeopardizing soil carbon storage in alpine grasslands. Environ. Int. 185, 108516 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Straffelini, E., Luo, J. & Tarolli, P. Climate change is threatening mountain grasslands and their cultural ecosystem services. CATENA 237, 107802 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Su, Y., Dong, K. H., Wang, C. H. & Liu, X. J. Grazing promoted plant litter decomposition and nutrient release: A meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 337, 108051 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li, S. et al. Effects of grazing on soil respiration in global grassland ecosystems. Soil Till. Res. 238, 106033 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cao, F. F. et al. Effects of grazing on grassland biomass and biodiversity: A global synthesis. Field Crops Res. 306, 109204 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rong, Y. P., Monaco, T. A., Liu, Z. K., Zhao, M. L. & Han, G. D. Soil microbial community structure is unaltered by grazing intensity and plant species richness in a temperate grassland steppe in northern China. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 110, 103404 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ning, D. L. et al. Environmental stress mediates groundwater microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol 9, 490–501 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang, K. W. et al. Effects of grazing on the grassland ecosystem multifunctionality of montane meadow on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 83, 70 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jerrentrup, J. S., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Röver, K. U. & Isselstein, J. Grazing intensity affects insect diversity via sward structure and heterogeneity in a long-term experiment. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 968–977 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vidaller, C., Malik, C. & Dutoit, T. Grazing intensity gradient inherited from traditional herding still explains Mediterranean grassland characteristics despite current land-use changes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 338, 108085 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Knelman, J. E. et al. Bacterial community structure and function change in association with colonizer plants during early primary succession in a glacier forefield. Soil Biol. Biochem. 46, 172–180 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Martín-Devasa, R. et al. A global comparison of stream diatom beta diversity on islands versus continents across scales. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 33, e13916 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jiao, S., Lu, Y. H. & Wei, G. H. Soil multitrophic network complexity enhances the link between biodiversity and multifunctionality in agricultural systems. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 140–153 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li, X. Q. et al. Response of soil microbial communities and microbial interactions to long-term heavy metal contamination. Environ. Pollut. 231, 908–917 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou, H. et al. Network analysis reveals the strengthening of microbial interaction in biological soil crust development in the Mu Us Sandy Land, northwestern China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 144, 107782 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, C. et al. Simplified microbial network reduced microbial structure stability and soil functionality in alpine grassland along a natural aridity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 191, 109366 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Watzinger, A. et al. Correction to: Functional redundant soil fauna and microbial groups and processes were fairly resistant to drought in an agroecosystem. Biol. Fertil. Soils 59, 643 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou, J. Q. et al. Grazing increases the complexity of networks and ecological stochastic processes of mycorrhizal fungi. J. Environ. Manag. 373, 123933 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peco, B., Sánchez, A. M. & Azcárate, F. M. Abandonment in grazing systems: Consequences for vegetation and soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 113, 284–294 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, X. F. et al. Appropriate livestock grazing alleviates the loss of plant diversity and maintains community resistance in alpine meadows. J. Environ. Manag. 351, 119850 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, Y. H. et al. Effects of grazing and climate change on aboveground standing biomass and sheep live weight changes in the desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. Agric. Syst. 217, 103916 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233–237 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. MacArthur, R. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36, 533–536 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  47. May, R. M. Will a large complex system be stable?. Nature 238, 413–414 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chase, J. M. & Myers, J. A. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 2351–2363 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, C. Q. & Kuzyakov, Y. Mechanisms and implications of bacterial–fungal competition for soil resources. ISME J. 18, wrae073 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou, J. Z. & Ning, D. L. Stochastic community assembly: Does it matter in microbial ecology?. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81, e00002-17 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guo, J. J. et al. Soil fungal assemblage complexity is dependent on soil fertility and dominated by deterministic processes. New Phytol. 226, 232–243 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhou, S. Y. D. et al. Distinct patterns of soil bacterial and fungal community assemblages in subtropical forest ecosystems under warming. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1501–1513 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chen, Y. J. et al. Metabolic flexibility allows bacterial habitat generalists to become dominant in a frequently disturbed ecosystem. J. ISME 15, 2986–3004 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Silverstein, M. R., Bhatnagar, J. M. & Segrè, D. Metabolic complexity drives divergence in microbial communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol 8, 1493–1504 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Atkinson, J. et al. Integrating functional traits into trophic rewilding science. J. Ecol. 112, 936–953 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, Q. et al. The multifunctionality of soil aggregates is related to the complexity of aggregate microbial community during afforestation. CATENA 236, 107737 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. de Vries, F. T. & Wallenstein, M. D. Below-ground connections underlying above-ground food production: A framework for optimising ecological connections in the rhizosphere. J. Ecol. 105, 913–920 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ye, Z. C. et al. Diversity and co-occurrence network modularization of bacterial communities determine soil fertility and crop yields in arid fertigation agroecosystems. Biol. Fertil. Soils 57, 809–824 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zhou, S. S. et al. Organic fertilizer compost alters the microbial composition and network structure in strongly acidic soil. Appl. Soil Ecol 195, 105263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Isbell, F. et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Eisenhauer, N., Schulz, W., Scheu, S. & Jousset, A. Niche dimensionality links biodiversity and invasibility of microbial communities. Funct. Ecol. 27, 282–288 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Koerner, S. E. & Collins, S. L. Interactive effects of grazing, drought, and fire on grassland plant communities in North America and South Africa. Ecology 95, 98–109 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. McIntyre, S. & Lavorel, S. Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types. J. Ecol. 89, 209–226 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Pykälä, J. Plant species responses to cattle grazing in mesic semi-natural grassland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 108, 109–117 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Waheed Abdul and Xionghong Liu for their valuable assistance in the grammatical proofreading and data processing.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260311 and 31960338) and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation (2022D01A189).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.W. Jiang, Y.F. Wang, and Q.Q. Zhang conceived the study; K.W. Jiang, C. Lv, and H. Li performed the field experiments; H. Li and K.W. Jiang performed the data analysis. K.W. Jiang, Q.Q. Zhang, R. Tuerxunnayi, and P. J. Yu wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Y.F. Wang, C. Lv, P. J. Yu, and K.W. Jiang edited the manuscript. All authors commented on drafts of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Qingqing Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, K., Lv, C., Wang, Y. et al. Soil microbial community assembly drives ecosystem multifunctionality under grazing disturbance by regulating diversity and network structure.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35462-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35462-0

Keywords

  • Network complexity
  • Stability
  • Community assembly
  • Ecosystem function
  • Grazing


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Obstacle crossing stability research of the swing arm deformable tracked robot in large scale sheep farm and cold climate

The influence of human activities on the microbial community structure and function of a karst cave in southwest China

Back to Top