in

Sonophore enables autonomous observation of micronekton communities in the ocean twilight zone


Abstract

The future productivity of pelagic ecosystems and fisheries globally remains uncertain due to a lack of data on mid-trophic mesopelagic micronekton communities. Here, we demonstrate that integrating readily available autonomous profiling floats with autonomous echosounders enables vertically resolved abundance estimates of mesopelagic micronekton communities, a platform we are naming the “Sonophore”. This successful demonstration is a first step towards addressing critical data gaps identified by fisheries management, earth system and ecosystem modelling communities. With planned engineering enhancements, this platform offers a scalable solution for rapid, cost-effective, year-round monitoring of the planet’s largest vertebrate (but deeply uncertain) biomass. The platform is specifically designed for long-term monitoring of remote and spatially extensive oceanic habitats of the global ocean, without the need for large, expensive research vessels.

Similar content being viewed by others

Global decline of pelagic fauna in a warmer ocean

Atmospheric–ocean coupling drives prevailing and synchronic dispersal patterns of marine species with long pelagic durations

Prioritisation of ocean biodiversity data collection to deliver a sustainable ocean

Data availability

The dataset generated during the current study are available in the CSIRO Data Access Portal, https://doi.org/10.25919/1gkd-6r28.

References

  1. Boyd, P. W., Claustre, H., Levy, M., Siegel, D. A. & Weber, T. Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean. Nature 568, 327–335 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davison, P. C., Koslow, J. A. & Kloser, R. J. Acoustic biomass estimation of mesopelagic fish: Backscattering from individuals, populations, and communities. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72, (2015).

  3. Bianchi, D. & Mislan, K. A. S. Global patterns of diel vertical migration times and velocities from acoustic data. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, (2016).

  4. Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R. & Milo, R. The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, (2018).

  5. Giering, S. L. C. et al. Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean’s twilight zone. Nature. 507, (2014).

  6. Olson, R. J. et al. Decadal diet shift in yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares suggests broad-scale food web changes in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 497, (2014).

  7. Sutton, T. T. et al. A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone. Deep-Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr. Res. Papers. 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.05.006 (2017).

  8. John, M. A. S. et al. A dark hole in our understanding of marine ecosystems and their services: Perspectives from the mesopelagic community. Front. Mar. Sci 3, (2016).

  9. Levin, L. A. et al. Global observing needs in the deep ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00241 (2019).

  10. Proud, R. et al. From siphonophores to deep scattering layers: Uncertainty ranges for the estimation of global mesopelagic fish biomass. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76, (2019).

  11. Albernhe, S. et al. Global characterization of modelled micronekton in biophysically defined provinces. Progr. Oceanogr. 229, (2024).

  12. Henson, S. A. et al. Uncertain response of ocean biological carbon export in a changing world. Nat. Geosci. 15, (2022).

  13. Capotondi, A. et al. Observational needs supporting marine ecosystems modeling and forecasting: From the global ocean to regional and coastal systems. Front. Mar. Sci.. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00623 (2019).

  14. Woodstock, M. S., Sutton, T. T. & Zhang, Y. A trait-based carbon export model for mesopelagic fishes in the Gulf of Mexico with consideration of asynchronous vertical migration, flux boundaries, and feeding guilds. Limnol. Oceanogr. 67, (2022).

  15. Olivar, M. P. et al. Mesopelagic fishes across the tropical and equatorial Atlantic: Biogeographical and vertical patterns. Prog. Oceanogr. 151, (2017).

  16. Annasawmy, P. et al. Micronekton distributions and assemblages at two shallow seamounts of the south-western Indian Ocean: Insights from acoustics and mesopelagic trawl data. Prog. Oceanogr. 178, (2019).

  17. Riquelme-Bugueño, R. et al. Diel vertical migration into anoxic and high-pCO2 waters: acoustic and net-based krill observations in the Humboldt Current. Sci. Rep. 10, (2020).

  18. Lehodey, P., Murtugudde, R. & Senina, I. Bridging the gap from ocean models to population dynamics of large marine predators: A model of mid-trophic functional groups. Prog. Oceanogr. 84, (2010).

  19. Gjøsaeter, J. & Kawaguchi, K. A review of the world resources of mesopelagic fish. FAO Fish. Tech. Paper 193, (1980).

  20. Irigoien, X. et al. Large mesopelagic fishes biomass and trophic efficiency in the open ocean. Nat. Commun. 5, (2014).

  21. Godø, O. R. et al. Mesoscale eddies are oases for higher trophic marine life. PLoS One 7, (2012).

  22. Proud, R., Cox, M. J. & Brierley, A. S. Biogeography of the Global Ocean’s Mesopelagic Zone. Curr. Biol. 27, (2017).

  23. Netburn, A. N. & Anthony Koslow, J. Dissolved oxygen as a constraint on daytime deep scattering layer depth in the southern California current ecosystem. Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 104, (2015).

  24. Annasawmy, P., Chandelier, G. & Le Mézo, T. Unraveling major questions in micronekton ecology and their role in the biological carbon pump through integrative approaches and autonomous monitoring. Oceanography 38, 76–81 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bianchi, D., Stock, C., Galbraith, E. D. & Sarmiento, J. L. Diel vertical migration: Ecological controls and impacts on the biological pump in a one-dimensional ocean model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, (2013).

  26. Aksnes, D. L. et al. Effects of migrating mesopelagic fishes on the biological carbon pump. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 717, (2023).

  27. Handegard, N. O. et al. Towards an acoustic-based coupled observation and modelling system for monitoring and predicting ecosystem dynamics of the open ocean. Fish Fish. 14, (2013).

  28. Satterthwaite, E. V. et al. Establishing the Foundation for the Global Observing System for Marine Life. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, (2021).

  29. Johnson, G. C. & Fassbender, A. J. After two decades, Argo at PMEL, looks to the future. Oceanography. 36, (2023).

  30. Roemmich, D. et al. On the future of Argo: A global, full-depth, multi-disciplinary array. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00439 (2019).

  31. Johnson, G. C. et al. Argo-two decades: Global oceanography, revolutionized. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-022521-102008 (2022).

  32. Lavery, A. C. et al. Determining dominant scatterers of sound in mixed zooplankton populations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, (2007).

  33. Haris, K. et al. Sounding out life in the deep using acoustic data from ships of opportunity. Sci. Data 8, (2021).

  34. Demer, D. A. et al. Calibration of acoustic instruments. ICES CRR (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported under the collaboration agreement between the Pacific Community and CSIRO to implement the Climate Science for Ensuring Pacific Tuna Access grant (ACT-0103048) provided to the Pacific Community by the New Zealand Ministry for Foreign Affairs and Trade under the New Zealand Aid Programme.

Funding

Open access funding provided by CSIRO Library Services. Authors from The Pacific Community, CSIRO and Aqualyd were funded through the Climate Science for Ensuring Pacific Tuna Access grant (ACT-0103048) provided to the Pacific Community by the New Zealand Ministry for Foreign Affairs and Trade under the New Zealand Aid Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.D., P.J. and G.M. designed and built the Sonophore and executed the field surveys. G.M., P.J. and R.D. analysed the data and prepared Figs. 1 and 2. R.D., H.P., G.M., C.D. and S.N. wrote the main manuscript text. All authors contributed intellectually and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Ryan A. Downie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Downie, R.A., Jansen, P., Macaulay, G.J. et al. Sonophore enables autonomous observation of micronekton communities in the ocean twilight zone.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41581-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41581-5

Keywords

  • Twilight zone
  • Micronekton
  • Biogeochemical cycles
  • Pelagic ecosystem
  • Climate change
  • Marine acoustics
  • Environmental monitoring


Source: Ecology - nature.com

First molecular confirmations of Anopheles dirus and Anopheles scanloni in Indonesia, with DNA of zoonotic, enzootic and human malarias detected in An. dirus

Demographic, behavioral, and ecological data from a long-term field study of wild baboons in Amboseli, Kenya

Back to Top