Abstract
Climate impact assessments on crop productivity typically rely on globally constant temperature optima, overlooking physiological acclimation across spatial temperature gradients. This limits predictive accuracy under progressive climate warming. Here, we present 0.05-degree resolution global maps of temperature optima for rice (mean ± spatial Standard Deviation: 28.63 ± 2.65 °C), soybean (27.34 ± 2.34 °C), maize (26.12 ± 3.46 °C), and wheat (24.73 ± 3.41 °C), derived from satellite-based proxies of gross primary productivity and validated against eddy covariance flux observations. Our analysis reveals pervasive spatial heterogeneity in temperature optima within species, peaking in subtropical regions. This thermal acclimation is shaped by local temperature, water availability, and solar radiation, highlighting a phenotypic plasticity in crop thermal responses. As warming accelerates, growing-season days exceeding local temperature optima are increasing, contracting the thermal safe space, particularly in tropical and subtropical zones. This poses significant risks to maize and rice productivity. Integrating spatially explicit temperature optima into climate impact models improves global crop productivity projections by approximately 16 ± 2%, and by up to 22 ± 4% for temperate crops. These findings underscore the necessity of incorporating spatially explicit thermal responses into Earth system models to refine agricultural projections and inform targeted adaptation strategies.
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions, which helped improve the manuscript. We are also grateful to all handling editors. We acknowledge the producers of the publicly available datasets used in this study. This work benefited from the Interdisciplinary Intelligence Super Computer Center of Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai for providing computational resources.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2025YFF0812104), International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 177GJHZ2022052MI), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42301187), and the project “Climate Change and Systemic Risk Governance”, selected as an endorsed initiative of the UNESCO International Decade of Sciences for Sustainable Development (2024–2033, IDSSD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Peer Review file (download PDF )
Reporting Summary (download PDF )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Zhang, Z., Wu, X. et al. Spatially explicit temperature optima improve climate impact assessment of global crop productivity.
Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-74564-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-74564-1
Source: Ecology - nature.com
