Abstract
Coastal agriculture in India, where it serves as an important economic pillar, operates under escalating climate variability, fragmented landholdings, and risks in marketing and socio-economic conditions. Integrated farming systems (IFS) provide a system-based approach for smallholder farmers to improve resource-use efficiency, diversify income streams, and become more resilient to climatic conditions and other forms of risk. This study outlines the current status and determinants of IFS adoption in coastal Odisha using primary data gathered from 208 farm respondents selected through a multi-stage random sampling design across three coastal districts during 2020–2023. Principal Component Analysis included nine socio-economic variables that were used to describe five latent components that explained 86.67% of the cumulative variance. Probit regression analysis (McFadden’s pseudo-R2 = 0.712; 95.95% correctly classified) indicates that access to institutional credit (marginal effect = 0.286), education (0.174), market connectivity (0.213), labour availability, and family type significantly increase the adoption probability (p < 0.05), whereas age and operational landholding exert negative effects. Economic comparison revealed significant differences in gross income among farming systems for marginal farmers (F = 124.63, p < 0.01) and medium farmers (F = 9.89, p < 0.01), and in variable costs for marginal farmers (F = 247.57, p < 0.01) and small farmers (F = 15.56, p < 0.01). Tukey’s post-hoc analysis further confirmed relative economic differentiation among farming system models. The Crop–Livestock–Pisciculture–Resource Generating (vermicompost and FYM)–Mushroom model, integrated for additional income generation and resource recycling, demonstrated the highest economic performance, whereas Crop–Livestock systems were more suitable for smaller holdings. The findings underscore the need for targeted credit mechanisms, specially designed location specific extension services, and promoting region-specific IFS models aligned with agro-ecological conditions and farm-size categories for enhancing livelihood resilience and aligning with broader sustainability targets.
Data availability
The original datasets generated and analysed in the current study are included in the manuscript/Supplementary file; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all who worked for this article. We are also thankful to Vellore Institute of Technology for providing the necessary support and resources during the preparation of this manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Vellore Institute of Technology. Authors declare that the research was not supported by any grants, funding bodies, or other financial resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent to participate and publish
Informed consent was taken from all subjects before enrolling them in the survey. Participants were clearly explained the study purpose, the voluntary nature of their participation, and the confidentiality of their answers. Only individuals who provided verbal and/or written consent were included in the study.
Ethics approval
This research work was developed with collaborative academic insights from domain experts at Vellore Institute of Technology. The research protocol is of socioeconomic study involving human participants (farmers) was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics-cum-Advisory Committee of the College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India (Reference No. 1405/CA., dated 06.04.2021).
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1. (download DOCX )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pattanaik, S., Priyadarshini, A., Sarangi, K.K. et al. Status and key determinants of integrated farming systems in coastal regions of eastern India: a comparative assessment.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49440-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49440-z
Keywords
- Coastal integrated farming systems
- Livelihood diversification
- Sustainability
- Agro-climatic resilience
Source: Ecology - nature.com
