in

The ecological and developmental foundations of brood parasitism in a catfish


Abstract

Interspecific brood parasitism has evolved repeatedly from parental care. However, many non-avian brood-parasitic lineages have ancestors lacking parental care, leaving the foundations of brood parasitism in these lineages enigmatic. We examine ecological, reproductive, and developmental data from the Lake Tanganyika radiation of Synodontis catfishes, where one species, the cuckoo catfish, exhibits brood parasitism of mouthbrooding cichlid fishes. Our comparative analyses, coupled with experimental parasitism, suggest that a combination of ancestral traits (large eggs and rapid embryo development) enabled the origin of brood parasitism. Evolutionary innovations then presumably enhanced the success of brood parasitism after it emerged. Novel traits comprise frequent production of small clutches to effectively utilize host availability, the evolution of egg mimicry to facilitate host egg adoption, and modifications to development to enhance the performance of catfish embryos in the host’s buccal cavity. Interestingly, despite the distinct ecological and life history contexts of the origin of catfish brood parasitism, its evolutionary and developmental outcomes align with those of canonical avian brood parasites. This suggests that general patterns are repeated in the evolution of brood parasitism, despite disparate starting conditions.

Similar content being viewed by others

Individual experience as a key to success for the cuckoo catfish brood parasitism

Repeated evolution of cooperative breeding and life history traits in Lake Tanganyika cichlids

Social deprivation in maternal mouthbrooders Tropheus sp. “Caramba” (Teleostei: Cichlidae) decreases the success rate of reproduction and survival rate of fish fry

Data availability

All trophic, reproductive, ontogenetic and experimental data generated in this study have been deposited in the Figshare database [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28646141] and are freely available. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Raw ddRADseq reads have been deposited in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) (BioProject: PRJNA1132910) under accession numbers SAMN42360897–SAMN42360967. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The scripts to replicate all analyses reported in this study are available from Figshare [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28646141].

References

  1. Davies, N. Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats (AC Black, 2010).

  2. Feeney, W. E. et al. Brood parasitism and the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Science 342, 1506–1508 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feeney, W. E., Welbergen, J. A. & Langmore, N. E. Advances in the study of coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 227–246 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kilner, R. M. & Langmore, N. E. Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biol. Rev. 86, 836–852 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Medina, I. & Langmore, N. E. The evolution of acceptance and tolerance in hosts of avian brood parasites. Evolution of defences in hosts. Biol. Rev. 91, 569–577 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thorogood, R., Spottiswoode, C. N., Portugal, S. J. & Gloag, R. The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: a call for integration. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180190 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lyon, B. E. & Eadie, J. McA. Conspecific brood parasitism in birds: a life-story perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 343–363 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spottiswoode, C. N., Kilner, R. M. & Davies, N. B. Brood parasitism. In The Evolution of Parental Care 226–356. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).

  9. Sless, T. J. L., Danforth, B. N. & Searle, J. B. Evolutionary origins and patterns of diversification in animal brood parasitism. Am. Nat. 202, 107–121 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Skelton, P. Freshwater Fishes of Southern Africa (Struik Nature, 2024).

  11. Sato, T. A brood parasitic catfish of mouthbrooding cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika. Nature 323, 58–59 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ronco, F. et al. Drivers and dynamics of a massive adaptive radiation in cichlid fishes. Nature 589, 76–81 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blažek, R. et al. Success of cuckoo catfish brood parasitism reflects coevolutionary history and individual experience of their cichlid hosts. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4380 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wisenden, B. D. Alloparental care in fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 9, 45–70 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reichard, M. Cuckoo catfish. Curr. Biol. 29, R722–R723 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmermann, H., Blažek, R., Polačik, M. & Reichard, M. Individual experience as a key to success for the cuckoo catfish brood parasitism. Nat. Commun. 13, 1723 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen, M. S., Hawkins, M. B., Stock, D. W. & Cruz, A. Early life-history features associated with brood parasitism in the cuckoo catfish, Synodontis multipunctatus (Siluriformes: Mochokidae). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180205 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmerman, H., Tolman, D. & Reichard, M. Low incidence of cannibalism among brood parasitic cuckoo catfish embryos. Behav. Ecol. 34, 521–527 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mouginot, P., Galipaud, M. & Reichard, M. The evolution of brood parasitism from host egg predation. Behav. Ecol. 35, arae043 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Day, J. J. & Wilkinson, M. On the origin of the Synodontis catfish species flock from Lake Tanganyika. Biol. Lett. 2, 548–552 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Koblmüller, S., Egger, B., Sturmbauer, C. & Sefc, K. M. Rapid radiation, ancient incomplete lineage sorting and ancient hybridization in the endemic Lake Tanganyika cichlid tribe Tropheini. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 55, 318–334 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Englmaier, G. K. et al. Revised taxonomy of Synodontis catfishes (Siluriformes: Mochokidae) from the Lake Tanganyika basin reveals lower species diversity than expected. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 202, zlae130 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wright, J. J. & Page, L. M. Taxonomic revision of Lake Tanganyikan Synodontis (Siluriformes: Mochokidae). Bull. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. 46, 57 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peart, C. R., Bills, R., Newton, J., Near, T. J. & Day, J. J. Do sympatric catfish radiations in Lake Tanganyika show eco-morphological diversification? Evol. J. Linn. Soc. 3, kzae015 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schluter, D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).

  26. Stroud, J. T. & Losos, J. B. Ecological opportunity and adaptive radiation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 507–532 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reichard, M. et al. Lack of host specialization despite selective host use in brood parasitic cuckoo catfish. Mol. Ecol. 32, 6070–6082 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Viertler, A., Salzburger, W. & Ronco, F. Comparative scale morphology in the adaptive radiation of cichlid fishes (Perciformes: Cichlidae) from Lake Tanganyika. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 134, 541–556 (2021).

  29. Jawad, L. A. Comparative morphology of scales of four teleost fishes from Sudan and Yemen. J. Nat. Hist. 39, 2643–2660 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Muschick, M., Indermaur, A. & Salzburger, W. Convergent evolution within an adaptive radiation of cichlid fishes. Curr. Biol. 22, 2362–2368 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nair, P., Miller, C. M. & Fuiman, L. A. Tracing exploitation of egg boons: an experimental study using fatty acids and stable isotopes. J. Exp. Biol. 226, jeb246247 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hunter, J. R. & Kimbrell, C. A. Egg cannibalism in the Northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax. Fish. Bull. 78, 811–816 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yongo, E., Iteba, J. & Agember, S. Review of food and feeding habits of some Synodontis fishes in African freshwaters. Oceanogr. Fish. Open Access J. 10, 27–31 (2019).

  34. Konings, A. Tanganyika Cichlids in Their Natural Habitat (Cichlid Press, El Paso, 2015).

  35. Stoddard, M. C. & Hauber, M. E. Colour, vision and coevolution in avian brood parasitism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 372, 20160339 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Santos, M. E. et al. The evolution of cichlid fish egg-spots is linked with a cis-regulatory change. Nat. Commun. 5, 5149 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Atukorala, A. D. S. & Franz-Odendaal, T. A. Spatial and temporal events in tooth development of Astyanax mexicanus. Mech. Dev. 134, 42–54 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Debiais-Thibaud, M. et al. Development of oral and pharyngeal teeth in the medaka (Oryzias latipes): comparison of morphology and expression of eve1 gene. J. Exp. Zoolog. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308B, 693–708 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Koblmüller, S., Sturmbauer, C., Verheyen, E., Meyer, A. & Salzburger, W. Mitochondrial phylogeny and phylogeography of East African squeaker catfishes (Siluriformes: Synodontis). BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 49 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cohen, M. S., Hawkins, M. B., Knox-Hayes, J., Vinton, A. C. & Cruz, A. A laboratory study of host use by the cuckoo catfish Synodontis multipunctatus. Environ. Biol. Fishes 101, 1417–1425 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Title, P. O. et al. The macroevolutionary singularity of snakes. Science 383, 918–923 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Polačik, M., Reichard, M., Smith, C. & Blažek, R. Parasitic cuckoo catfish exploit parental responses to stray offspring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180412 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kattan, G. H. Shiny cowbirds follow the ‘shotgun’ strategy of brood parasitism. Anim. Behav. 53, 647–654 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Payne, R. B. The evolution of clutch size and reproductive rates in parasitic cuckoos. Evolution 28, 169–181 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Langmore, N. E. et al. Coevolution with hosts underpins speciation in brood-parasitic cuckoos. Science 384, 1030–1036 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. McClelland, S. C. et al. Highly virulent avian brood-parasitic species show elevated embryonic metabolic rates at specific incubation stages compared to less virulent and non-parasitic species. Biol. Lett. 20, 20240411 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Spottiswoode, C. N. & Koorevaar, J. A stab in the dark: chick killing by brood parasitic honeyguides. Biol. Lett. 8, 241–244 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Reichard, M. & Zimmermann, H. Dataset and analytical code for ‘The ecological and developmental foundations of brood parasitism in a catfish’. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28646141 (2026).

  49. Oksanen, J. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2, 5–6 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, Y., Naumann, U., Wright, S. T. & Warton, D. I. mvabund– an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 471–474 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hogsden, K. L. & McHugh, P. A. Preservatives and sample preparation in stable isotope analysis of New Zealand freshwater invertebrates. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 51, 455–464 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kiljunen, M. et al. A revised model for lipid-normalizing δ13 C values from aquatic organisms, with implications for isotope mixing models. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1213–1222 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  53. McCutchan, J. H. Jr, Lewis, W. M. Jr, Kendall, C. & McGrath, C. C. Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. Oikos 102, 378–390 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Post, D. M. Using Stable Isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83, 703–718 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Martinez Arabizu, P. pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise Multilevel Comparison using Adonis (R package version 0.4, 1, 2020).

  56. Dyková, I. et al. Oogenesis, spermatogenesis and spermiation structures in Lake Tanganyika Synodontis species (Mochokidae, Telostei: Siluriformes). J. Vertebr. Biol. 73, 24023 (2024).

  57. Brown-Peterson, N. J., Wyanski, D. M., Saborido-Rey, F., Macewicz, B. J. & Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K. A standardized terminology for describing reproductive development in fishes. Mar. Coast. Fish. 3, 52–70 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sipos, M. J. et al. Evaluation of cGnRH IIa for induction spawning of two ornamental Synodontis species. Aquaculture 511, 734226 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Troscianko, J. & Stevens, M. Image calibration and analysis toolbox – a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, colour and pattern. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1320–1331 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Brooks, M. E. glmmTMB} Balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9, 378–400 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models (R Package Version 0.4. 4, 2021).

  62. Lenth R. V., Piaskowski J. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-squares Means (R package version 2.0.1, 2025).

  63. Revell, L. Phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things). PeerJ 12, e16505 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Harmon, L. J., Weir, J. T., Brock, C. D., Glor, R. E. & Challenger, W. GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24, 129–131 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Walker, M. & Kimmel, C. A two-color acid-free cartilage and bone stain for zebrafish larvae. Biotech. Histochem. 82, 23–28 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Fisheries in Mpulungu, especially Lwabanya Mabo, for facilitating research in Zambia, and Tanzanian Fisheries Research Institute in Kigoma, especially Deogratias P. Mulokozi, for facilitating research in Tanzania. The manuscript benefited from comments from Carl Smith, Lukáš Kratochvíl, Miranda Sherlock and four anonymous referees. This research was funded by the Czech Science Foundation (21-00788X to M.R.) and, in part, by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (doi.org/10.55776/J4584 to H.Z). For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.R., S.K., H.Z. Methodology: M.R., H.Z., R.B., K.P., J.Ž., R.C. Investigation: M.R., H.Z., R.B., T.S., M.P., G.E., V.B., K.P., J.Ž., L.K., I.D., S.K. Visualization: M.R., H.Z., T.S., G.E. Funding acquisition: M.R., H.Z. Project administration: M.R. Supervision: M.R. Writing – original draft: M.R., H.Z. Writing – review and editing: M.R, H.Z., R.B., T.S., M.P., G.E., V.B., K.P., J.Ž., L.K., I.D., R.C., S.K.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Martin Reichard or Holger Zimmermann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Meghan Chenoweth and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Source data

Source data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reichard, M., Blažek, R., Polačik, M. et al. The ecological and developmental foundations of brood parasitism in a catfish.
Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71179-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71179-4


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Continental United States direct Atlantic tropical cyclone fatalities: 1963–2024

Interspecies interactions drive bacterial proteome reorganization and emergent metabolism

Back to Top