in

The effects of plastic pollution on biodiversity


Abstract

As plastic is increasingly found in natural environments, concern has grown about its biological effects beyond individual-level impacts, particularly on species health, food-web dynamics and ecosystem functioning. In this Review, we summarize current evidence on plastic exposure pathways, organismal responses and potential effects at higher levels of biological organization. Impacts on individual organisms can be acute or chronic, and include physiological stress, disrupted locomotion, feeding and reproduction, internal injury, and death. Sublethal effects might not be immediately detectable but can have profound implications for individual fitness. Although macroplastics can cause mortality, their role in population declines remains largely uncertain, and demonstrated impacts beyond the individual level are rare. Clear evidence of population-level harm from microplastics to wild organisms is lacking. Nevertheless, emerging research demonstrates a growing likelihood of broader effects, particularly for species with high plastic-encounter rates. Connecting environmental exposure to individual-level fitness and population-level consequences is a critical frontier. Future research must prioritize long-term monitoring, demographic modelling and high-throughput methods to accurately quantify risks to biodiversity. Effective solutions must be context-specific, span local to global scales, account for interactions with other stressors and integrate plastic pollution mitigation policies with broader conservation strategies to safeguard biodiversity in the Anthropocene.

Key points

  • Thousands of species have been found to interact with plastic debris, largely via ingestion or entanglement.

  • Research has historically focused on marine systems, although studies in freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems have expanded rapidly over the past decade.

  • Most documented impacts occur at the individual level, and relatively little research has explicitly tested for effects at population, community or ecosystem levels.

  • For macroplastics, emerging evidence indicates potential effects on populations and ecosystems in highly exposed or vulnerable contexts, whereas comparable evidence for microplastics in wild populations remains lacking.

  • Preventing biodiversity effects will require coordinated actions across local, regional and global scales that reduce plastic exposure while accounting for interactions with other environmental stressors.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The interactions of plastic with biodiversity.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Geographic coverage of entanglement and ingestion research.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Intervention effectiveness and spatiotemporal scales.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Scientific knowledge of plastic pollution effects across levels of biological organization.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Field evidence for microplastic interactions in marine benthic invertebrates

Environmental impacts of biodegradable microplastics

Microplastic burden in marine benthic invertebrates depends on species traits and feeding ecology within biogeographical provinces

References

  1. Kenyon, K. W. & Kridler, E. Laysan albatrosses swallow indigestible matter. Auk 86, 339–343 (1969).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carpenter, E. J., Anderson, S. J., Harvey, G. R., Miklas, H. P. & Peck, B. B. Polystyrene spherules in coastal waters. Science 178, 749–750 (1972).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Santos, R. G., Machovsky-Capuska, G. E. & Andrades, R. Plastic ingestion as an evolutionary trap: toward a holistic understanding. Science 373, 56–60 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rochman, C. M. et al. Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 38, 703–711 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan, E. M. et al. A global review of marine turtle entanglement in anthropogenic debris: a baseline for further action. Endanger. Species Res. 34, 431–448 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ryan, P. G. Entanglement of birds in plastics and other synthetic materials. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 135, 159–164 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jepsen, E. M. & de Bruyn, P. J. N. Pinniped entanglement in oceanic plastic pollution: a global review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 145, 295–305 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parton, K. J., Galloway, T. S. & Godley, B. J. Global review of shark and ray entanglement in anthropogenic marine debris. Endanger. Species Res. 39, 173–190 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  9. Good, T. P., June, J. A., Etnier, M. A. & Broadhurst, G. Derelict fishing nets in Puget Sound and the Northwest Straits: patterns and threats to marine fauna. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 39–50 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Desforges, J. P. W., Galbraith, M. & Ross, P. S. Ingestion of microplastics by zooplankton in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 69, 320–330 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Botterell, Z. L. R. et al. Microplastic ingestion in zooplankton from the Fram Strait in the Arctic. Sci. Total Environ. 831, 154886 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, W. et al. Microplastics in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) from Antarctic region. Sci. Total Environ. 870, 161880 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Torres, L. G. et al. Zoop to poop: assessment of microparticle loads in gray whale zooplankton prey and fecal matter reveal high daily consumption rates. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1201078 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mancia, A. et al. Adverse effects of plastic ingestion on the mediterranean small-spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula). Mar. Environ. Res. 155, 104876 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  15. D’Souza, J. M., Windsor, F. M., Santillo, D. & Ormerod, S. J. Food web transfer of plastics to an apex riverine predator. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3846–3857 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hermabessiere, L., Thaysen, C., Sherlock, C., Choy, C. A. & Rochman, C. M. Little evidence for bioaccumulation or biomagnification of microplastics in a deep-sea food web. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 724, 17–32 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  17. Covernton, G. A. et al. Large size (>100-μm) microplastics are not biomagnifying in coastal marine food webs of British Columbia, Canada. Ecol. Appl. 32, e2654 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  18. McIlwraith, H. K. et al. Evidence of microplastic translocation in wild-caught fish and implications for microplastic accumulation dynamics in food webs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 12372–12382 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Merrill, G. B., Hermabessiere, L., Rochman, C. M. & Nowacek, D. P. Microplastics in marine mammal blubber, melon & other tissues: evidence of translocation. Environ. Pollut. 335, 122252 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marfella, R. et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. N. Engl. J. Med. 390, 900–910 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harper, P. C. & Fowler, J. A. Plastic pellets in New Zealand storm-killed prions (Pachyptila spp.) 1958-1977. Notornis 34, 65–70 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bucci, K., Tulio, M. & Rochman, C. M. What is known and unknown about the effects of plastic pollution: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ecol. Appl. 30, e02044 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  23. Puskic, P. S., Lavers, J. L. & Bond, A. L. A critical review of harm associated with plastic ingestion on vertebrates. Sci. Total Environ. 743, 140666 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  24. de Jersey, A. M. et al. Seabirds in crisis: plastic ingestion induces proteomic signatures of multiorgan failure and neurodegeneration. Sci. Adv. 11, eads0834 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  25. Santos, R. G. et al. Exploring plastic-induced satiety in foraging green turtles. Environ. Pollut. 265, 114918 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schuyler, Q., Hardesty, B. D., Wilcox, C. & Townsend, K. To eat or not to eat? Debris selectivity by marine turtles. PLoS ONE 7, e40884 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  27. Savoca, M. S., Wohlfeil, M. E., Ebeler, S. E. & Nevitt, G. A. Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600395 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  28. Merrill, G. B. et al. Acoustic signature of plastic marine debris mimics the prey items of deep-diving cetaceans. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 209, 117069 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moon, Y. et al. What type of plastic do sea turtles in Korean waters mainly ingest? Quantity, shape, color, size, polymer composition, and original usage. Environ. Pollut. 298, 118849 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yin, X. et al. Accumulation of microplastics in fish guts and gills from a large natural lake: selective or non-selective? Environ. Pollut. 309, 119785 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  31. Heswall, A.-M. et al. Clear-white plastics are most common in global oceans and seabird stomachs, but local species can ingest specific colours. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 215, 117827 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  32. Botterell, Z. L. R. et al. Bioavailability of microplastics to marine zooplankton: effect of shape and infochemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 12024–12033 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  33. Duncan, E. M. et al. Diet-related selectivity of macroplastic ingestion in green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in the eastern Mediterranean. Sci. Rep. 9, 11581 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  34. Savoca, M. S. The ecology of an olfactory trap. Science 362, 904 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jâms, I. B., Windsor, F. M., Poudevigne-Durance, T., Ormerod, S. J. & Durance, I. Estimating the size distribution of plastics ingested by animals. Nat. Commun. 11, 1594 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  36. Charlton-Howard, H. S., Bond, A. L., Rivers-Auty, J. & Lavers, J. L. ‘Plasticosis’: characterising macro- and microplastic-associated fibrosis in seabird tissues. J. Hazard. Mater. 450, 131090 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, L. et al. Mechanisms of eco-corona effects on micro(nano)plastics in marine medaka: insights into translocation, immunity, and energy metabolism. J. Hazard. Mater. 480, 136236 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  38. Araújo, A. P., da, C., Gomes, A. R. & Malafaia, G. Hepatotoxicity of pristine polyethylene microplastics in neotropical physalaemus cuvieri tadpoles (Fitzinger, 1826). J. Hazard. Mater. 386, 121992 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  39. Belontz, S. L. et al. Combining submicron spectroscopy techniques (AFM-IR and O-PTIR) To detect and quantify microplastics and nanoplastics in snow from a Utah ski resort. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 13362–13373 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  40. Xie, J., Gowen, A., Xu, W. & Xu, J. Analysing micro- and nanoplastics with cutting-edge infrared spectroscopy techniques: a critical review. Anal. Methods 16, 2177–2197 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  41. Duswald, K. et al. Detection of unlabeled polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics in mammalian tissue by optical photothermal infrared spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 97, 16714–16722 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pięta, E. et al. Photothermal infrared imaging of nanoplastics in human cells with nanoscale resolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 59161–59172 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ducoli, S., Kalčíková, G., Velimirovic, M., Depero, L. E. & Federici, S. Production, characterization, and toxicology of environmentally relevant nanoplastics: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 23, 649–675 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chae, Y. & An, Y.-J. Nanoplastic ingestion induces behavioral disorders in terrestrial snails: trophic transfer effects via vascular plants. Environ. Sci. Nano 7, 975–983 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cunningham, B. E., Sharpe, E. E., Brander, S. M., Landis, W. G. & Harper, S. L. Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment. Front. Toxicol. 5, 1154538 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wei, W., Chen, J. & Ni, B.-J. Toxicity of micro/nanoplastics in the environment: roles of plastisphere and eco-corona. Soil Environ. Health 1, 100002 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  47. Casagrande, N., Verones, F., Sobral, P. & Martinho, G. Physical properties of microplastics affecting the aquatic biota: a review. Environ. Adv. 17, 100566 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yuan, Z., Nag, R. & Cummins, E. Ranking of potential hazards from microplastics polymers in the marine environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 429, 128399 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kudzin, M. H., Piwowarska, D., Festinger, N. & Chruściel, J. J. Risks associated with the presence of polyvinyl chloride in the environment and methods for its disposal and utilization. Materials 17, 173 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  50. Suaria, G. et al. Microfibers in oceanic surface waters: a global characterization. Sci. Adv. 6, 1 eaay8493 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brahney, J., Hallerud, M., Heim, E., Hahnenberger, M. & Sukumaran, S. Plastic rain in protected areas of the United States. Science 368, 1257–1260 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  52. Santonicola, S., Volgare, M., Olivieri, F., Cocca, M. & Colavita, G. Natural and regenerated cellulosic microfibers dominate anthropogenic particles ingested by commercial fish species from the Adriatic Sea. Foods 14, 1237 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  53. Santonicola, S. et al. Detection of fibrous microplastics and natural microfibers in fish species (Engraulis encrasicolus, Mullus barbatus and Merluccius merluccius) for human consumption from the Tyrrhenian sea. Chemosphere 363, 142778 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lim, K. P. et al. A meta-analysis of the characterisations of plastic ingested by fish globally. Toxics 10, 186 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schwarzer, M. et al. Shape, size, and polymer dependent effects of microplastics on Daphnia magna. J. Hazard. Mater. 426, 128136 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, C. et al. Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: a global meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 337, 122593 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mészáros, E. et al. Impacts of plastics on plant development: recent advances and future research directions. Plants 12, 3282 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhu, R. et al. A global estimate of multiecosystem photosynthesis losses under microplastic pollution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2423957122 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shi, X. et al. Impact of microplastics on plant physiology: a meta-analysis of dose, particle size, and crop type interactions in agricultural ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 955, 177245 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  60. Huo, Y., Dijkstra, F. A., Possell, M. & Singh, B. Ecotoxicological effects of plastics on plants, soil fauna and microorganisms: a meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 310, 119892 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhao, W. et al. Impacts of plastic pollution on soil–plant properties and greenhouse gas emissions in wetlands: a meta-analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 480, 136167 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  62. Crump, A., Aiken, C., Cunningham, E. M. & Arnott, G. Short-term microplastic exposure impairs cognition in hermit crabs. Animals 13, 1055 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cunningham, E. M. et al. Microplastics do not affect the feeding rates of a marine predator. Sci. Total Environ. 779, 146487 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  64. Langenfeld, D. et al. Microplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations had minimal impacts on pelagic zooplankton communities in a large in-lake mesocosm experiment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 19419–19428 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  65. Covernton, G. A. et al. Increasing microplastic exposure had minimal effects on fatty acid composition in zooplankton and yellow perch in a large, in-lake mesocosm experiment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 81, 1717–1727 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kvale, K., Prowe, A. E. F., Chien, C., Landolfi, A. & Oschlies, A. Zooplankton grazing of microplastic can accelerate global loss of ocean oxygen. Nat. Commun. 12, 2358 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kvale, K. & Oschlies, A. Recovery from microplastic-induced marine deoxygenation may take centuries. Nat. Geosci. 16, 10–12 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  68. Shore, E. A., DeMayo, J. A. & Pespeni, M. H. Microplastics reduce net population growth and fecal pellet sinking rates for the marine copepod, Acartia tonsa. Environ. Pollut. 284, 117379 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  69. Roberts, C. et al. Microplastics may reduce the efficiency of the biological carbon pump by decreasing the settling velocity and carbon content of marine snow. Limnol. Oceanogr. 69, 1918–1928 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kvale, K., Hunt, C., James, A. & Koeve, W. Regionally disparate ecological responses to microplastic slowing of faecal pellets yields coherent carbon cycle response. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1111838 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ritchie, M. W., Provencher, J. F., Allison, J. E., Muzzatti, M. J. & MacMillan, H. A. The digestive system of a cricket pulverizes polyethylene microplastics down to the nanoplastic scale. Environ. Pollut. 343, 123168 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  72. Dawson, A. L. et al. Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill. Nat. Commun. 9, 1001 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pasquini, E. et al. Microplastics reach the brain and interfere with honey bee cognition. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 169362 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  74. Deng, Y. et al. Microplastic polystyrene ingestion promotes the susceptibility of honeybee to viral infection. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 11680–11692 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sheng, D. et al. Plastic pollution in agricultural landscapes: an overlooked threat to pollination, biocontrol and food security. Nat. Commun. 15, 8413 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  76. Brandon, A. M., Garcia, A. M., Khlystov, N. A., Wu, W.-M. & Criddle, C. S. Enhanced bioavailability and microbial biodegradation of polystyrene in an enrichment derived from the gut microbiome of Tenebrio molitor (mealworm larvae). Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 2027–2036 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  77. Meng, K., Lwanga, E. H., van der Zee, M., Munhoz, D. R. & Geissen, V. Fragmentation and depolymerization of microplastics in the earthworm gut: a potential for microplastic bioremediation? J. Hazard. Mater. 447, 130765 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  78. Barboza, L. G. A. et al. in Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 94 (ed. Sheppard, C.) 159–200 (Academic, 2023).

  79. Barboza, L. G. A. et al. Are microplastics a new cardiac threat? A pilot study with wild fish from the North East Atlantic Ocean. Environ. Res. 261, 119694 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  80. Rodriguez-Romeu, O. et al. Sardines in hot water: unravelling plastic fibre ingestion and feeding behaviour effects. Environ. Pollut. 363, 125035 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  81. Vagner, M. et al. Experimental evidence that polystyrene nanoplastics cross the intestinal barrier of European seabass. Environ. Int. 166, 107340 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  82. Menezes, M. et al. Revealing the hidden threats: genotoxic effects of microplastics on freshwater fish. Aquat. Toxicol. 276, 107089 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  83. Bucci, K., Bayoumi, M., Stevack, K., Watson-Leung, T. & Rochman, C. M. Microplastics may induce food dilution and endocrine disrupting effects in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), and decrease offspring quality. Environ. Pollut. 345, 123551 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  84. Huang, J.-N., Wen, B., Wang, Z.-N., Gao, J.-Z. & Chen, Z.-Z. Microplastics change the food utilization of filter-feeding fish via gut microbiota. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c02067 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  85. Cunningham, E. M. & Sigwart, J. D. Environmentally accurate microplastic levels and their absence from exposure studies. Integr. Comp. Biol. 59, 1485–1496 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  86. Provencher, J. F. et al. Proceed with caution: the need to raise the publication bar for microplastics research. Sci. Total Environ. 748, 141426 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  87. Choi, D. Y., Gredzens, C. & Shaver, D. J. Plastic ingestion by green turtles (Chelonia mydas) over 33 years along the coast of Texas, USA. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 173, 113111 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  88. Murphy, E. L. et al. A quantitative risk assessment framework for mortality due to macroplastic ingestion in seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2415492122 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  89. Darmon, G. et al. Drivers of litter ingestion by sea turtles: three decades of empirical data collected in Atlantic Europe and the Mediterranean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 185, 114364 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  90. Duncan, E. M. et al. Marine turtles as bio-indicators of plastic pollution in the eastern Mediterranean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 201, 116141 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  91. Santos, R. G. et al. Bioindicators of plastic pollution: insights into the relationship between environmental plastic abundance and ingestion by green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c01171 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  92. Duncan, E. M. et al. Microplastic ingestion ubiquitous in marine turtles. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 744–752 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  93. Chemello, G. et al. Microplastics evidence in yolk and liver of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta), a pilot study. Environ. Pollut. 337, 122589 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  94. Curl, L. F., Hurst, S. A., Pomory, C. M., Lamont, M. M. & Janosik, A. M. Assessing microplastics contamination in unviable loggerhead sea turtle eggs. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 169434 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  95. Marn, N., Jusup, M., Kooijman, S. A. L. M. & Klanjscek, T. Quantifying impacts of plastic debris on marine wildlife identifies ecological breakpoints. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1479–1487 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  96. Clause, A. G., Celestian, A. J. & Pauly, G. B. Plastic ingestion by freshwater turtles: a review and call to action. Sci. Rep. 11, 5672 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ramon-Gomez, K. et al. Plastic ingestion in giant tortoises: an example of a novel anthropogenic impact for Galapagos wildlife. Environ. Pollut. 340, 122780 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  98. Rahman, M. M., Kim, E.-S. & Sung, H.-C. Microplastics as an emerging threat to amphibians: current status and future perspectives. Heliyon 10, e28220 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  99. Boyero, L. et al. Microplastics impair amphibian survival, body condition and function. Chemosphere 244, 125500 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  100. Baak, J. E. et al. Plastic ingestion by seabirds in the circumpolar arctic: a review. Environ. Rev. 28, 506–516 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  101. Mansfield, I., Reynolds, S. J., Lynch, I., Matthews, T. J. & Sadler, J. P. Birds as bioindicators of plastic pollution in terrestrial and freshwater environments: a 30-year review. Environ. Pollut. 348, 123790 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  102. Roman, L., Bell, E., Wilcox, C., Hardesty, B. D. & Hindell, M. Ecological drivers of marine debris ingestion in procellariiform seabirds. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37324-w (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  103. Roman, L. et al. Plastic ingestion is an underestimated cause of death for Southern Hemisphere albatrosses. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12785 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  104. Rivers-Auty, J., Bond, A. L., Grant, M. L. & Lavers, J. L. The one-two punch of plastic exposure: macro- and micro-plastics induce multi-organ damage in seabirds. J. Hazard. Mater. 442, 130117 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  105. Bourdages, M. P. T., Provencher, J. F., Baak, J. E., Mallory, M. L. & Vermaire, J. C. Breeding seabirds as vectors of microplastics from sea to land: evidence from colonies in arctic Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 764, 142808 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  106. Grant, M. L., Lavers, J. L., Hutton, I. & Bond, A. L. Seabird breeding islands as sinks for marine plastic debris. Environ. Pollut. 276, 116734 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  107. Gamarra-Toledo, V. et al. High incidence of plastic debris in Andean condors from remote areas: evidence for marine-terrestrial trophic transfer. Environ. Pollut. 317, 120742 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  108. Im, J., Joo, S., Lee, Y., Kim, B.-Y. & Kim, T. First record of plastic debris ingestion by a fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) in the sea off East Asia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 159, 111514 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  109. López-Martínez, S. et al. Plastic ingestion by two cetacean groups: Ziphiidae and Delphinidae. Environ. Pollut. 333, 121932 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  110. Philipp, C., Unger, B. & Siebert, U. Occurrence of microplastics in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) from German waters. Animals 12, 551 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  111. Jerbi, H., Pérez, W. & Tellechea, J. Ingestion of floating net debris in sperm whales and larynx strangulation with gillnet parts in bottlenose dolphins on the coast of Tunisia. Aquat. Mamm. 47, 239–244 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  112. Jacobsen, J. K., Massey, L. & Gulland, F. Fatal ingestion of floating net debris by two sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 765–767 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  113. Jardine, A. M. et al. No microplastics detected in the first assessment of Atlantic walrus stomachs from Nunavut, Canada. Arct. Sci. 9, 769–780 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  114. Jardine, A. M. et al. No accumulation of microplastics detected in western Canadian ringed seals (Pusa hispida). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 188, 114692 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  115. Similä, T., Haug, T., Lindblom, L., Lockyer, C. & O’Callaghan, S. A. Stomach contents of three sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) stranded on Andøya, Northern Norway. Aquat. Mamm. 48, 449–455 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  116. Zantis, L. J. et al. Assessing microplastic exposure of large marine filter-feeders. Sci. Total Environ. 818, 151815 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  117. Nelms, S. E., Galloway, T. S., Godley, B. J., Jarvis, D. S. & Lindeque, P. K. Investigating microplastic trophic transfer in marine top predators. Environ. Pollut. 238, 999–1007 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  118. Miller, M. E., Motti, C. A., Hamann, M. & Kroon, F. J. Assessment of microplastic bioconcentration, bioaccumulation and biomagnification in a simple coral reef food web. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159615 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  119. Kahane-Rapport, S. R. et al. Field measurements reveal exposure risk to microplastic ingestion by filter-feeding megafauna. Nat. Commun. 13, 6327 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  120. Nopp-Mayr, U. et al. Microplastic loads in Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) feces—targeting a standardized protocol and first results from an alpine stream, the River Inn. Environ. Monit. Assess. 196, 707 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  121. Schuyler, Q., Roman, L., Lawson, T. J. & Hardesty, B. D. Modelling the relative risk of plastic pollution to wildlife when data are scarce: an applied approach in the Mekong and Ganges river basins. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 074019 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  122. Chen, X. et al. Polystyrene micro- and nanoparticles exposure induced anxiety-like behaviors, gut microbiota dysbiosis and metabolism disorder in adult mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 259, 115000 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  123. Thrift, E., Porter, A., Galloway, T. S., Coomber, F. G. & Mathews, F. Ingestion of plastics by terrestrial small mammals. Sci. Total Environ. 842, 156679 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  124. Katlam, G., Prasad, S., Pande, A. & Ramchiary, N. Plastic ingestion in Asian elephants in the forested landscapes of Uttarakhand, India. J. Nat. Conserv. 68, 126196 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  125. Awasthi, B., Lamichhane, B. R. & McConkey, K. R. Plastic ingestion by greater one-horned rhinos in Nepal: an emerging conservation threat. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 46, e02549 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Høiberg, M. A., Woods, J. S. & Verones, F. Global distribution of potential impact hotspots for marine plastic debris entanglement. Ecol. Indic. 135, 108509 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  127. Stelfox, M. et al. Tracing the origin of olive ridley turtles entangled in ghost nets in the Maldives: a phylogeographic assessment of populations at risk. Biol. Conserv. 245, 108499 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  128. Himpson, K., Dixon, S. & Berre, T. L. Evaluation of sea turtle morbidity and mortality within the Indian Ocean from 12 years of data shows high prevalence of ghost net entanglement. PLoS ONE 18, e0289167 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  129. Solomando, A., Pujol, F., Sureda, A. & Pinya, S. Evaluating the presence of marine litter in cetaceans stranded in the Balearic Islands (Western Mediterranean Sea). Biology 11, 1468 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  130. Prampramote, J. et al. Association of ocean macroplastic debris with stranded sea turtles in the central Gulf of Thailand. Endanger. Species Res. 47, 333–343 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  131. Allyn, E. M. & Scordino, J. J. Entanglement rates and haulout abundance trends of Steller (Eumetopias jubatus) and California (Zalophus californianus) sea lions on the north coast of Washington state. PLoS ONE 15, e0237178 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  132. Rodríguez, Y. et al. Litter ingestion and entanglement in green turtles: an analysis of two decades of stranding events in the NE Atlantic. Environ. Pollut. 298, 118796 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  133. Barreiros, J. P. & Raykov, V. S. Lethal lesions and amputation caused by plastic debris and fishing gear on the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758). Three case reports from Terceira Island, Azores (NE Atlantic). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 86, 518–522 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  134. Arthur, C., Friedman, S., Weaver, J., Van Nostrand, D. & Reinhardt, J. Estimating the benefits of derelict crab trap removal in the Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries Coasts 43, 1821–1835 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  135. Blettler, M. C. M. & Mitchell, C. Dangerous traps: macroplastic encounters affecting freshwater and terrestrial wildlife. Sci. Total Environ. 798, 149317 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  136. Shankar, V. S., De, K., Jacob, S. & Satyakeerthy, T. R. Unveiling the risk of marine litter and derelict fishing gear in remote coral reefs of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, North Indian Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 212, 117591 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  137. Pinheiro, H. T. et al. Plastic pollution on the world’s coral reefs. Nature 619, 311–316 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  138. Patterson Edward, J. K. et al. Marine debris — an emerging threat to the reef areas of Gulf of Mannar, India. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 151, 110793 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  139. Lamb, J. et al. Plastic waste associated with disease on coral reefs. Science 359, 26–29 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  140. Angiolillo, M. & Fortibuoni, T. Impacts of marine litter on mediterranean reef systems: from shallow to deep waters. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.581966 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  141. Suka, R., Huntington, B., Morioka, J., O’Brien, K. & Acoba, T. Successful application of a novel technique to quantify negative impacts of derelict fishing nets on Northwestern Hawaiian Island reefs. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 157, 111312 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  142. Halperin, A. A. et al. Coral cover remains suppressed three years after derelict net removal in a remote shallow water coral reef ecosystem. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 188, 114703 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  143. Gilardi, K. V. K. et al. Marine species mortality in derelict fishing nets in Puget Sound, WA and the cost/benefits of derelict net removal. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 376–382 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  144. Arthur, C., Sutton-Grier, A. E., Murphy, P. & Bamford, H. Out of sight but not out of mind: harmful effects of derelict traps in selected U.S. coastal waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 86, 19–28 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  145. Long, W. C., Cummiskey, P. A. & Munk, J. E. Effects of ghost fishing on the population of red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) in Womens Bay, Kodiak Island, Alaska. Fish. Bull. 112, 101–111 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  146. Luna, Á., Rausell-Moreno, A. & Vidal-Cordero, J. M. Plastics and insects: records of ants entangled in synthetic fibres. Ecol. Entomol. 49, 145–148 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  147. Cui, W. et al. Adverse effects of microplastics on earthworms: a critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 850, 158041 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  148. Garello, N. A. et al. Trashy treasures? The increasing terrestrial invertebrate diversity in small-scale dumps. Environ. Pollut. 361, 124818 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  149. Renchen, G. et al. Impact of derelict fish traps in Caribbean waters: an experimental approach. Bull. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2012.1103 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  150. Broadhurst, M. K. & Millar, R. B. Improved size selection and estimated at-vessel mortalities for an Australian whiting (Sillago spp.) boat seine. Fish. Res. 266, 106778 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  151. Nunes, J. A. C. C., Sampaio, C. L. S., Barros, F. & Leduc, A. O. H. C. Plastic debris collars: an underreported stressor in tropical reef fishes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 129, 802–805 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  152. Seitz, J. C. & Poulakis, G. R. Anthropogenic effects on the smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) in the United States. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 52, 1533–1540 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  153. Barreto, R. et al. Macro-debris ingestion and entanglement by blue sharks (Prionace glauca Linnaeus, 1758) in the temperate South Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 145, 214–218 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  154. Colmenero, A. I., Barría, C., Broglio, E. & García-Barcelona, S. Plastic debris straps on threatened blue shark Prionace glauca. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 115, 436–438 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  155. Gündoğdu, S., Yeşilyurt, İN. & Erbaş, C. Potential interaction between plastic litter and green turtle Chelonia mydas during nesting in an extremely polluted beach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 140, 138–145 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  156. Ware, M. & Fuentes, M. M. P. B. Leave no trace ordinances for coastal species management: influences on sea turtle nesting success. Endanger. Species Res. 41, 197–207 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  157. Aguilera, M., Medina-Suárez, M., Pinós, J., Liria-Loza, A. & Benejam, L. Marine debris as a barrier: assessing the impacts on sea turtle hatchlings on their way to the ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 137, 481–487 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  158. Walde, A. D., Harless, M. L., Delaney, D. K. & Pater, L. L. Anthropogenic threat to the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii): litter in the Mojave Desert. West. N. Am. Nat. 67, 147–149 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  159. Stuart, J., Watson, M. L., Brown, T. L. & Eustice, C. Plastic netting: an entanglement hazard to snakes and other wildlife. Herpetol. Rev. 32, 162–164 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  160. Udyawer, V., Read, M. A., Hamann, M., Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Heupel, M. R. First record of sea snake (Hydrophis elegans, Hydrophiinae) entrapped in marine debris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 73, 336–338 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  161. Ortega, J. & Zaidan, F. Observations of flotsam entrapment in the northern diamond-backed watersnake (Nerodia R. rhombifer). Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 4, 270–276 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  162. Ayala, F. et al. From social networks to bird enthusiasts: reporting interactions between plastic waste and birds in Peru. Environ. Conserv. 50, 136–141 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  163. Costa, R. A. et al. Prevalence of entanglements of seabirds in marine debris in the central Portuguese coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 161, 111746 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  164. Moore, E. et al. Entanglements of marine mammals and seabirds in central California and the north-west coast of the United States 2001–2005. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58, 1045–1051 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  165. Votier, S. C., Archibald, K., Morgan, G. & Morgan, L. The use of plastic debris as nesting material by a colonial seabird and associated entanglement mortality. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 168–172 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  166. IJsseldijk, L. L. et al. Pathological findings in stranded harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) with special focus on anthropogenic causes. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.997388 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  167. Salazar-Casals, A. et al. Increased incidence of entanglements and ingested marine debris in Dutch seals from 2010 to 2020. Oceans 3, 389–400 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  168. Raum-Suryan, K. L. & Suryan, R. M. Entanglement of Steller sea lions in marine debris and fishing gear on the central Oregon coast from 2005–2009. Oceans 3, 319–330 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  169. Franco-Trecu, V., Drago, M., Katz, H., Machín, E. & Marín, Y. With the noose around the neck: marine debris entangling otariid species. Environ. Pollut. 220, 985–989 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  170. Allen, R., Jarvis, D., Sayer, S. & Mills, C. Entanglement of grey seals Halichoerus grypus at a haul out site in Cornwall, UK. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 64, 2815–2819 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  171. Avila, I., Ortega, L. & Isaza-Toro, E. Recent accidental entanglements of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Colombian pacific. Aquat. Mamm. 48, 341 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  172. Marks, W. et al. A case study of monofilament line entanglement in a common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): entanglement, disentanglement, and subsequent death. BMC Vet. Res. 16, 223 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  173. Baker, J. D. et al. Four decades of Hawaiian monk seal entanglement data reveal the benefits of plastic debris removal. Science 385, 1491–1495 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  174. Page, B. et al. Entanglement of Australian sea lions and New Zealand fur seals in lost fishing gear and other marine debris before and after government and industry attempts to reduce the problem. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 49, 33–42 (2004).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  175. Perez-Venegas, D. J. et al. Towards understanding the effects of oceanic plastic pollution on population growth for a South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis australis) colony in Chile. Environ. Pollut. 279, 116881 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  176. Waluda, C. M. & Staniland, I. J. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals at Bird Island, South Georgia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 74, 244–252 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  177. Raum-Suryan, K. L., Jemison, L. A. & Pitcher, K. W. Entanglement of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in marine debris: identifying causes and finding solutions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58, 1487–1495 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  178. Thrift, E., Nouvellet, P. & Mathews, F. Plastic entanglement poses a potential hazard to European hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus in Great Britain. Animals 13, 2448 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  179. García-Gómez, J. C., Garrigós, M. & Garrigós, J. Plastic as a vector of dispersion for marine species with invasive potential. A review. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.629756 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  180. Haram, L. E. et al. Emergence of a neopelagic community through the establishment of coastal species on the high seas. Nat. Commun. 12, 6885 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  181. Haram, L. E. et al. Extent and reproduction of coastal species on plastic debris in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 687–697 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  182. Carlton, J. T. et al. Tsunami-driven rafting: transoceanic species dispersal and implications for marine biogeography. Science 357, 1402–1406 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  183. Haney, J. & Rochman, C. M. Plastic pollution has the potential to alter ecological and evolutionary processes in aquatic ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-025-02678-8 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  184. Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J. & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. Life in the “Plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 7137–7146 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  185. Amaral-Zettler, L. A., Zettler, E. R. & Mincer, T. J. Ecology of the plastisphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 139–151 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  186. Ormsby, M. J., Woodford, L. & Quilliam, R. S. Can plastic pollution drive the emergence and dissemination of novel zoonotic diseases? Environ. Res. 246, 118172 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  187. Fackelmann, G. et al. Current levels of microplastic pollution impact wild seabird gut microbiomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 698–706 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  188. Sousa-Guedes, D. et al. Can plastic pollution contaminate loggerhead turtle nests? Evaluation of flame retardants (PBDEs) levels in the sand. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 195, 115550 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  189. Jagiello, Z., Dylewski, Ł., Tobolka, M. & Aguirre, J. I. Life in a polluted world: a global review of anthropogenic materials in bird nests. Environ. Pollut. 251, 717–722 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  190. Townsend, A. K. & Barker, C. M. Plastic and the nest entanglement of urban and agricultural crows. PLoS ONE 9, e88006 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  191. Restani, M. Individual and population effects of entanglement mortality on ospreys from plastic baling twine in nests. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 44, e02496 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  192. Heinze, U. M., Acácio, M., Franco, A. M. A. & Catry, I. A death trap in the nest: anthropogenic nest materials cause high mortality in a terrestrial bird. Ecol. Indic. 178, 113796 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  193. Suárez-Rodríguez, M. & Macías Garcia, C. An experimental demonstration that house finches add cigarette butts in response to ectoparasites. J. Avian Biol. 48, 1316–1321 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  194. Suárez-Rodríguez, M., López-Rull, I. & Macías Garcia, C. Incorporation of cigarette butts into nests reduces nest ectoparasite load in urban birds: new ingredients for an old recipe? Biol. Lett. 9, 20120931 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  195. Baes, L. et al. Postmortem examinations show human activity impacts over half of seabirds beach-cast in Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 973, 179197 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  196. Ryan, P. G. et al. Impacts of plastic ingestion on post-hatchling loggerhead turtles off South Africa. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 107, 155–160 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  197. Grant, M. L., Bond, A. L. & Lavers, J. L. The influence of seabirds on their breeding, roosting and nesting grounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 91, 1266–1289 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  198. Jones, H. P. et al. The circular seabird economy is critical for oceans, islands and people. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 689–702 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  199. Kolenda, K. et al. Bottled & canned – anthropogenic debris as an understudied ecological trap for small animals. Sci. Total Environ. 837, 155616 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  200. Hansen, J., Melchiorsen, J., Ciacotich, N., Gram, L. & Sonnenschein, E. C. Effect of polymer type on the colonization of plastic pellets by marine bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 368, fnab026 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  201. Malla, M. A. et al. The plastisphere ecology: assessing the impact of different pollution sources on microbial community composition, function and assembly in aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 7, 75–83 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  202. Focardi, A. et al. Plastic leachates impair picophytoplankton and dramatically reshape the marine microbiome. Microbiome 10, 179 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  203. Plaza, P. I., Martínez-López, E. & Lambertucci, S. A. The perfect threat: pesticides and vultures. Sci. Total Environ. 687, 1207–1218 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  204. Desforges, J.-P. et al. Predicting global killer whale population collapse from PCB pollution. Science 361, 1373–1376 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  205. Monclús, L. et al. Mapping the chemical complexity of plastics. Nature 643, 349–355 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  206. Zhang, Z. et al. Ecological risk assessment of marine plastic pollution. Nat. Sustain. 8, 1143–1153 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  207. Serra-Gonçalves, C., Lavers, J. L., Tait, H. L., Fischer, A. M. & Bond, A. L. Assessing the effectiveness of MARPOL Annex V at reducing marine debris on Australian beaches. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 191, 114929 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  208. Mantoju, D. Analysis of MARPOL implementation based on port state control statistics. J. Int. Marit. Saf. Environ. Aff. Shipp. 5, 132–145 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  209. Secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions. The Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions. Secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions https://www.brsmeas.org/ (2026).

  210. Karasik, R. et al. 20 years of government responses to the global plastic pollution problem. Report 309. Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment & Sustainability https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/publications/20-years-government-responses-global-plastic-pollution-problem (2020).

  211. Allison, A. L., Baird, H. M., Lorencatto, F., Webb, T. L. & Michie, S. Reducing plastic waste: a meta-analysis of influences on behaviour and interventions. J. Clean. Prod. 380, 134860 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  212. Tudor, D. T. & Williams, A. T. The effectiveness of legislative and voluntary strategies to prevent ocean plastic pollution: lessons from the UK and South Pacific. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 172, 112778 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  213. Diana, Z. et al. The evolving global plastics policy landscape: an inventory and effectiveness review. Environ. Sci. Policy 134, 34–45 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  214. Baxter, L., Lucas, Z. & Walker, T. R. Evaluating Canada’s single-use plastic mitigation policies via brand audit and beach cleanup data to reduce plastic pollution. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 176, 113460 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  215. Lau, W. W. Y. et al. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science 369, 1455–1461 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  216. Pottinger, A. S. et al. Pathways to reduce global plastic waste mismanagement and greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Science 386, 1168–1173 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  217. Lebreton, L. & Andrady, A. Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal. Palgrave Commun. 5, 6 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  218. Borrelle, S. B. et al. Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution. Science 369, 1515–1518 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  219. McIntyre, J. K. et al. Treading water: tire wear particle leachate recreates an urban runoff mortality syndrome in coho but not chum salmon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 11767–11774 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  220. Rodgers, T. F. M. et al. Bioretention cells provide a 10-fold reduction in 6PPD-quinone mass loadings to receiving waters: evidence from a field experiment and modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 10, 582–588 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  221. Papp, A. & Oremus, K. L. Plastic bag bans and fees reduce harmful bag litter on shorelines. Science 388, eadp9274 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  222. Savoca, M. S. et al. Monitoring plastic pollution using bioindicators: a global review and recommendations for marine environments. Environ. Sci. Adv. 4, 10–32 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  223. Liu, L. et al. Novel insights into foodborne microplastics-enhanced shoaling behavior in marine Korean rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii): energy deficiency-driven gut-brain axis dysregulation. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c16888 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  224. Olawade, D. B., Ijiwade, J. O., Ige, A. O. & Wada, O. Z. Artificial intelligence for modeling and reducing microplastic in marine environments: a review of current evidence. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 226, 119379 (2026).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  225. Jin, H., Kong, F., Li, X. & Shen, J. Artificial intelligence in microplastic detection and pollution control. Environ. Res. 262, 119812 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  226. Qiu, Y., Mintenig, S., Barchiesi, M. & Koelmans, A. A. Using artificial intelligence tools for data quality evaluation in the context of microplastic human health risk assessments. Environ. Int. 197, 109341 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  227. Stafford, R. & Jones, P. J. S. Viewpoint – Ocean plastic pollution: a convenient but distracting truth? Mar. Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.003 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  228. Lavers, J. L., Bond, A. L. & Rolsky, C. Far from a distraction: plastic pollution and the planetary emergency. Biol. Conserv. 272, 109655 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  229. Uguen, M. et al. The tolerance of a keystone ecosystem engineer to extreme heat stress is hampered by microplastic leachates. Biol. Lett. 20, 20230457 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  230. Sanpradit, P. et al. Combined effects of nanoplastics and elevated temperature in the freshwater water flea Daphnia magna. J. Hazard. Mater. 465, 133325 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  231. United Nations Environment Assembly. 5/14. End plastic pollution: towards an international legally binding instrument: resolution / adopted by the United Nations Environment Assembly. United Nations Digital Library https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3999257?v=pdf (2022).

  232. Murphy, E. L., Fredette-Roman, C., Rochman, C. M., Gerber, L. R. & Polidoro, B. A multi-taxonomic, trait-based framework for assessing macroplastic vulnerability. Sci. Total Environ. 892, 164563 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  233. Brandon, A. Plastic pollution in a warming world: a multi-level approach to addressing twin crises. Front. Policy Labs https://doi.org/10.25453/plabs.30731294.v1 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  234. Mehinto, A. C. et al. Risk-based management framework for microplastics in aquatic ecosystems. Microplastics Nanoplastics 2, 17 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  235. Koelmans, A. A. et al. Risk assessment of microplastic particles. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 138–152 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  236. Bucci, K. & Rochman, C. M. Microplastics: a multidimensional contaminant requires a multidimensional framework for assessing risk. Microplastics Nanoplastics 2, 7 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  237. Kidd, K., Rooney, R., Rochman, C. M. & Hataley, E. Final report of the IJC Great Lakes Science Advisory Board work group on microplastics. International Joint Commission Great Lakes Science Advisory Board https://ijc.org/sites/default/files/SAB_MicroplasticsReport_2024.pdf (2024).

  238. Thornton Hampton, L. M. et al. A living tool for the continued exploration of microplastic toxicity. Microplastics Nanoplastics 2, 13 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  239. Hampton, L. M. T. et al. The toxicity of microplastics explorer (ToMEx) 2.0. Microplastics Nanoplastics 5, 38 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  240. Gouin, T., Ellis-Hutchings, R., Pemberton, M. & Wilhelmus, B. Addressing the relevance of polystyrene nano- and microplastic particles used to support exposure, toxicity and risk assessment: implications and recommendations. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 21, 39 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  241. Thornton Hampton, L. M. et al. Characterizing microplastic hazards: which concentration metrics and particle characteristics are most informative for understanding toxicity in aquatic organisms? Microplastics Nanoplastics https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-022-00040-4 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  242. Wilcox, C., Mallos, N. J., Leonard, G. H., Rodriguez, A. & Hardesty, B. D. Using expert elicitation to estimate the impacts of plastic pollution on marine wildlife. Mar. Policy 65, 107–114 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  243. Clark, B. L. et al. Global assessment of marine plastic exposure risk for oceanic birds. Nat. Commun. 14, 3665 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  244. Fossi, M. C. et al. Plastic debris occurrence, convergence areas and fin whales feeding ground in the Mediterranean Marine Protected Area Pelagos Sanctuary: a modeling approach. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 167 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  245. Wilcox, C., Puckridge, M., Schuyler, Q. A., Townsend, K. & Hardesty, B. D. A quantitative analysis linking sea turtle mortality and plastic debris ingestion. Sci. Rep. 8, 12536 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  246. Roman, L., Hardesty, B. D., Hindell, M. A. & Wilcox, C. A quantitative analysis linking seabird mortality and marine debris ingestion. Sci. Rep. 9, 3202 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  247. Brown, A. H. & Niedzwecki, J. M. Assessing the risk of whale entanglement with fishing gear debris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 161, 111720 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  248. Fossi, M. C. et al. Biodiversity at risk in the SPAMI Pelagos Sanctuary: the impact of marine litter on biota. Sci. Total Environ. 964, 178527 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  249. Roman, L., Hardesty, B. D. & Schuyler, Q. A systematic review and risk matrix of plastic litter impacts on aquatic wildlife: a case study of the Mekong and Ganges River basins. Sci. Total Environ. 843, 156858 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  250. Rodríguez, Y. et al. Cory’s shearwater as a key bioindicator for monitoring floating plastics. Environ. Int. 186, 108595 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  251. GESAMP in Guidelines for the Monitoring and Assessment of Plastic Litter in the Ocean (eds Kershaw, P. et al.) 56–67 (GESAMP, 2019).

  252. Curzer, H. J., Perry, G., Wallace, M. C. & Perry, D. The three Rs of animal research: what they mean for the institutional animal care and use committee and why. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22, 549–565 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  253. OSPAR. Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP): guidelines for monitoring and assessment of plastic particles in stomachs of fulmars in the North Sea area. Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment Working Group https://old.pame.is/index.php/document-library/desktop-study-on-marine-litter-library/additional-documents/desktop-study-list-of-references/596-ospar-commissio-2015-cemp-guidelines-for-monit/file?it=document-library/desktop-study-on-marine-litter-library/additional-documents/desktop-study-list-of-references/596-ospar-commissio-2015-cemp-guidelines-for-monit/file (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude for the support provided by their respective institutions. M.S.S. thanks R. Anderson for editorial assistance. This work was supported by The Global Plastic Ingestion Bioindicators (GPIB) project. GPIB is an Ocean Decade-sponsored project under the SMARTNET Program. GPIB aims to advance plastic pollution research beyond baseline assessments by evaluating trends, risks and effects on species and ecosystems.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.S.S. led the writing of the first draft with contributions from all authors. E.L.M., C.D. and R.G.S. compiled the data used to create Figs. 2 and 3. M.S.S., E.L.M., A.M.B. and L.M.T.H. conceived and drafted the figures. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Matthew S. Savoca.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Biodiversity thanks Tamara Galloway and Víctor Martín-Vélez for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Barcelona Convention: https://www.unep.org/unepmap/who-we-are/barcelona-convention-and-protocols

Basel Convention: https://www.basel.int/

G20 Action Plan on Marine Litter: https://resolutions.unep.org/resolutions/uploads/g20_mpl_1st_followup_report191029.pdf

International legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution: https://www.unep.org/inc-plastic-pollution

London Convention: https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/london-convention-protocol.aspx

MARPOL Annex V: https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/garbage-default.aspx

OSPAR Convention: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/marine-litter/regional-action-plan

Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/40/oj/eng

The EU Single-Use Plastics Directive: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/plastics/single-use-plastics_en

The Global Commitment: https://www.unep.org/new-plastics-economy-global-commitment

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/marine-environment/implementation-marine-strategy-framework-directive_en

The Ocean Plastics Charter: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-reducing-waste/international-commitments/ocean-plastics-charter.html

Toxicity of Microplastics Explorer: https://sccwrp.shinyapps.io/aq_mp_tox_shiny/

UN Regional Sea Conventions: https://www.unep.org/topics/ocean-seas-and-coasts/regional-seas-programme

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savoca, M.S., Murphy, E.L., Brandon, A.M. et al. The effects of plastic pollution on biodiversity.
Nat. Rev. Biodivers. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00170-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-026-00170-0


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis of a fractional-order Filippov prey-predator model with prey refuge and fear effects

Climate-modulated upwelling drives phytoplankton variability and biomass connectivity in the Humboldt Archipelago coastal system