in

The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production


Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparisons of simulated GPP by Lai et al.4 with GPP observations at eddy covariance sites and satellite-based GPP simulations in the tropical regions.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Disentangling the impacts of PAR and VPD on LRU and evaluating the performance of the LRU simulation algorithm by Lai et al.4.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Data availability

The resulting dataset of our analysis presented in this paper are available at Zenodo16 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18396814). The CLM5 simulation output by Lai et al.4 is available online (https://doi.org/10.7298/mxg9-7176). The flux data are available from the FLUXNET2015 dataset (https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet2015-dataset/) and the LBA dataset (https://daac.ornl.gov/LBA/guides/CD32_Fluxes_Brazil.html). The data of PAR, VPD and LRU of carbonyl in Hyytiälä, Finland is sourced from Zenodo17 (https://zenodo.org/records/1211481#.XB4Lb9IzbIU).

References

  1. Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jung, M. et al. Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the fluxcom approach. Biogeosciences 17, 1343–1365 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, X. & Xiao, J. Mapping photosynthesis solely from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: a global, fine-resolution dataset of gross primary production derived from OCO-2. Remote Sens. 11, 2563 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lai, J. et al. Terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from plant carbonyl sulfide uptake. Nature 634, 855–861 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2470–2475 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whelan, M. E. et al. Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences 15, 3625–3657 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, W., Berry, J. A., Yakir, D. & Seibt, U. Leaf relative uptake of carbonyl sulfide to CO2 seen through the lens of stomatal conductance–photosynthesis coupling. N. Phytol. 235, 1729–1742 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lai, J. et al. Reply to: The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10561-0 (2026).

  9. Maseyk, K. et al. Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the southern great plains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9064–9069 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stimler, K., Berry, J. A. & Yakir, D. Effects of carbonyl sulfide and carbonic anhydrase on stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 158, 524–530 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tian, J. et al. A leaf age-dependent light use efficiency model for remote sensing the gross primary productivity seasonality over pantropical evergreen broadleaved forests. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17454 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, Y. et al. Improved estimate of global gross primary production for reproducing its long-term variation, 1982–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2725–2746 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, J. et al. Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in amazon evergreen forests. Science 351, 972–976 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, X. et al. Novel representation of leaf phenology improves simulation of amazonian evergreen forest photosynthesis in a land surface model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12, e2018MS001565 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, X. et al. Vapor pressure deficit and sunlight explain seasonality of leaf phenology and photosynthesis across amazonian evergreen broadleaved forest. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2018MS001565 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tian, J. et al. Data to support ‘The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18396814 (2026).

  17. Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Dataset for ‘Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1211481 (2018).

  18. Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 5, 180214 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42401426) and the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong (2024B1212070012). J.W. was supported by HKU Science Faculty RAE Improvement Fund and the Innovation and Technology Fund (funding support to State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.Y. and X.C. designed the manuscript. J.T. and X.H. conducted the analyses and wrote the manuscript. All of the authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Xiuzhi Chen or Wenping Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Figs. 1–7, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tian, J., Huang, X., Chen, H. et al. The size of tropical vegetation gross primary production.
Nature 654, E1–E4 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10562-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10562-z


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Dietary perspectives on social asymmetry in a full Iron Age community of northern Italy: stable isotope evidence from the Patavine CUS-Piovego necropolis

Species-specific assessment of climate change vulnerability in Himalayan Pikas and identification of at-risk elevational and latitudinal zones