Abstract
Conservation planning must allocate limited resources under substantial uncertainty about species interactions. A central dilemma is whether prioritization should be guided by phylogenetic diversity (PD), which preserves long-term evolutionary potential, or functional diversity (FD), which supports current ecosystem functioning. Because PD and FD are often weakly correlated, fixed prioritization schemes can misallocate effort when ecological information is incomplete. We develop a dynamic allocation framework in which the conservation objective is fixed, but the biodiversity proxy guiding decisions adapts to the level of interaction knowledge. When interaction information is limited, PD-based rankings are more robust to uncertainty; as interaction knowledge accumulates, rankings based on FD become increasingly reliable. We evaluate this framework using a 148-year Northeast Atlantic fish stomach time series and simulations on synthetic food webs. Across both empirical and simulated ecosystems, the adaptive strategy consistently produces higher post- disturbance diversity than fixed-weight PD–FD strategies and no-intervention baselines. This indicates that the PD–FD trade-off should be conditioned on the prevailing level of ecological knowledge, rather than fixed ex ante.
Similar content being viewed by others
Global hotspots of traded phylogenetic and functional diversity
Revealing uncertainty in the status of biodiversity change
Individual and population dietary specialization decline in fin whales during a period of ecosystem shift
Funding
This research was funded by the European Union (GA#101059915 – BIOcean5D). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information. (download PDF )
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurchani, M.U., Montoya, J. & Bourgeois-Gironde, S. Treating knowledge as a conservation asset to resolve present–future biodiversity trade-offs.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-59065-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-59065-x
Source: Ecology - nature.com
