Abstract
Hydrological model accuracy is often constrained by limited in-situ data. This study develops a coupled framework integrating machine-learning-based remote sensing retrievals with the Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) to improve reservoir water quality simulations. Landsat imagery (2013–2023) and multiple algorithms (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, etc.) were used to derive spatiotemporal distributions of total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), which were incorporated as dynamic boundary conditions in EFDC. The coupled model reduced simulation errors by 0.13–5.28% and increased mean R² from 0.70 to 0.81. Compared with standalone EFDC, retrieval-based estimates showed lower mean relative errors for TN (20.61%), TP (28.95%), and Chl-a (26.08%). Seasonal analysis revealed Chl-a peaks in June (14.6 µg/L) and TN/TP accumulation in summer. Scenario simulations indicated that external load reduction (5–30%) effectively decreased TN and TP but had limited influence on Chl-a due to threshold effects. The optimal integrated strategy (30% external load reduction + 1.0% outflow reduction, scenario f-1) achieved concurrent reductions of 27.4% (TN), 23.7% (TP), and 13.2% (Chl-a), averaging 21.4% across all indicators. Critically, scenario analysis revealed that reducing external inflow loads alone produced limited suppression of algal biomass due to threshold effects and internal nutrient buffering, whereas combined reductions in inflow loading and moderate adjustments to hydrodynamic outflow regulation were necessary to achieve meaningful Chl-a control. These findings demonstrate that alterations to both nutrient inflow and reservoir hydrodynamics are essential levers for eutrophication management, with implications for operational decision-making in data-scarce reservoir systems worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Identifying environmental impacts on planktonic algal proliferation and associated risks: a five-year observation study in Danjiangkou Reservoir, China
Seasonal variations in water quality and hydrological dynamics in a tropical reservoir driven by rainfall, runoff, and anthropogenic activities
Comprehensive monitoring of the spatiotemporal variation of water quality and its associated human health risks in Luvuvhu river catchment, Vhembe biosphere reserve, South Africa
Data availability
The data generated from the study will be provided by the corresponding author upon request.
References
Ho, J. C., Michalak, A. M. & Pahlevan, N. Widespread global increase in intense lake phytoplankton blooms since the 1980s. Nature 574, 667–670 (2019).
Grill, G. et al. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature 569, 215–221 (2019).
Chen, Y. et al. Monthly monitoring of inundated areas and water storage dynamics in China’s large reservoirs using multisource remote sensing. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2023WR036450 (2024).
Keller, A. A., Garner, K., Rao, N., Knipping, E. & Thomas, J. Hydrological models for climate-based assessments at the watershed scale: A critical review of existing hydrologic and water quality models. Sci. Total Environ. 867, 161209 (2023).
Liang, S., Jia, H., Xu, C., Xu, T. & Melching, C. A Bayesian approach for evaluation of the effect of water quality model parameter uncertainty on TMDLs: A case study of Miyun Reservoir. Sci. Total Environ. 560–561, 44–54 (2016).
Quijano, J. C., Zhu, Z., Morales, V., Landry, B. J. & Garcia, M. H. Three-dimensional model to capture the fate and transport of combined sewer overflow discharges: A case study in the Chicago Area Waterway System. Sci. Total Environ. 576, 362–373 (2017).
Jiang, L. et al. Parameter uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of water quality model in Lake Taihu, China. Ecol. Model. 375, 1–12 (2018).
Noa-Yarasca, E., Babbar-Sebens, M. & Jordan, C. E. Machine learning models for prediction of shade-affected stream temperatures. J. Hydrol. Eng. 30, 04024058 (2025).
Zhang, C. & Fu, T. Recalibration of a three-dimensional water quality model with a newly developed autocalibration toolkit (EFDC-ACT v1.0.0): How much improvement will be achieved with a wider hydrological variability? Geosci. Model. Dev. 16, 4315–4329 (2023).
Wu, G. & Xu, Z. Prediction of algal blooming using EFDC model: Case study in the Daoxiang Lake. Ecol. Model. 222, 1245–1252 (2011).
Chen, J. et al. Remote Sensing Big Data for Water Environment Monitoring: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Earths Future. 10, e2021EF002289 (2022).
Ellis, E. A. et al. Bridging the divide between inland water quantity and quality with satellite remote sensing: An interdisciplinary review. WIREs Water. 11, e1725 (2024).
Han, Z. et al. Improving reservoir outflow estimation for ungauged basins using satellite observations and a hydrological model. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2020WR027590 (2020).
Yan, K. et al. Deep learning-based automatic extraction of cyanobacterial blooms from sentinel-2 MSI satellite data. Remote Sens. 14, 4763 (2022).
Zhu, M. et al. A review of the application of machine learning in water quality evaluation. Eco-Environ Health. 1, 107–116 (2022).
Pyo, J. et al. Using convolutional neural network for predicting cyanobacteria concentrations in river water. Water Res. 186, 116349 (2020).
Zhan, X. et al. Reconstructing historical forest spatial patterns based on CA-AdaBoost-ANN model in northern Guangzhou, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 242, 104950 (2024).
Xu, J., Liu, Z., Hong, G. & Cao, Y. A new machine-learning-based calibration scheme for MODIS thermal infrared water vapor product using BPNN, GBDT, GRNN, KNN, MLPNN, RF, and XGBoost. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 62, 1–12 (2024).
Alavi, M., Albaji, M., Golabi, M., Ali Naseri, A. & Homayouni, S. Estimation of sugarcane evapotranspiration from remote sensing and limited meteorological variables using machine learning models. J. Hydrol. 629, 130605 (2024).
Dong, N. et al. Toward improved parameterizations of reservoir operation in ungauged basins: A synergistic framework coupling satellite remote sensing, hydrologic modeling, and conceptual operation schemes. Water Resour. Res. 59, e2022WR033026 (2023).
Rafik, A. et al. Groundwater level forecasting in a data-scarce region through remote sensing data downscaling, hydrological modeling, and machine learning: A case study from Morocco. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 50, 101569 (2023).
Lubczynski, M. W., Leblanc, M. & Batelaan, O. Remote sensing and hydrogeophysics give a new impetus to integrated hydrological models: A review. J. Hydrol. 633, 130901 (2024).
Meyer Oliveira, A., Fleischmann, A. S. & Paiva, R. C. D. On the contribution of remote sensing-based calibration to model hydrological and hydraulic processes in tropical regions. J. Hydrol. 597, 126184 (2021).
Jin, L. et al. Coupling the remote sensing data-enhanced SWAT model with the bidirectional long short-term memory model to improve daily streamflow simulations. J. Hydrol. 634, 131117 (2024).
Abd-Elhamid, F. Rainfall forecasting in arid regions in response to climate change using ARIMA and remote sensing. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk. 15, 2347414 (2024).
Saha, A. & Chandra Pal, S. Application of machine learning and emerging remote sensing techniques in hydrology: A state-of-the-art review and current research trends. J. Hydrol. 632, 130907 (2024).
Hong, S. M. et al. Autonomous calibration of EFDC for predicting chlorophyll-a using reinforcement learning and a real-time monitoring system. Environ. Model. Softw. 168, 105805 (2023).
Kim, S. et al. Developing a cloud-based toolbox for sensitivity analysis of a water quality model. Environ. Model. Softw. 141, 105068 (2021).
Gholizadeh, M., Melesse, A. & Reddi, L. A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques. Sensors 16, 1298 (2016).
Carey, C. C., Ibelings, B. W., Hoffmann, E. P., Hamilton, D. P. & Brookes, J. D. Eco-physiological adaptations that favour freshwater cyanobacteria in a changing climate. Water Res. 46, 1394–1407 (2012).
Thornton, K. W., Kimmel, B. L. & Payne, F. E. Reservoir Limnology: Ecological Perspectives (Wiley, 1991).
Deng, C., Zou, J. & Wang, W. Assimilation of remotely sensed evapotranspiration products for streamflow simulation based on the CAMELS data sets. J. Hydrol. 629, 130574 (2024).
Fleming, S. W., Rittger, K., Oaida Taglialatela, C. M. & Graczyk, I. Leveraging next-generation satellite remote sensing‐based snow data to improve seasonal water supply predictions in a practical machine learning‐driven river forecast system. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2023WR035785 (2024).
Kim, J., Seo, D., Jang, M. & Kim, J. Augmentation of limited input data using an artificial neural network method to improve the accuracy of water quality modeling in a large lake. J. Hydrol. 602, 126817 (2021).
Pahlevan, N. et al. ACIX-Aqua: A global assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 over lakes, rivers, and coastal waters. Remote Sens. Environ. 258, 112366 (2021).
Bennett, M. G. et al. Response of chlorophyll a to total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations in lotic ecosystems: A systematic review. Environ. Evid. 10, 23 (2021).
Gorelick, N. et al. Google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).
Shabani, A. et al. A coupled hydrodynamic (HEC-RAS 2D) and water quality model (WASP) for simulating flood-induced soil, sediment, and contaminant transport. J. Flood Risk Manag. 14, e12747 (2021).
Liu, Y. et al. Understanding thermal stratification and circulation dynamics in Fuxian Lake: Insights from EFDC simulation study. Ecol. Indic. 165, 112202 (2024).
Wang, J., Chu, A., Dai, Z. & Nienhuis, J. Delft3D model-based estuarine suspended sediment budget with morphodynamic changes of the channel-shoal complex in a mega fluvial-tidal delta. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 18, 2300763 (2024).
Hamrick, J. M. User’s manual for the environmental fluid dynamics computer code. (1996).
Park, J., Khanal, S., Zhao, K. & Byun, K. Remote sensing of chlorophyll-a and water quality over inland lakes: How to alleviate geo-location error and temporal discrepancy in model training. Remote Sens. 16, 2761 (2024).
Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., Seto, K. C., Lenney, M. P. & Macomber, S. A. Classification and change detection using landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sens. Environ. 75, 230–244 (2001).
Jia, H., Xu, T., Liang, S., Zhao, P. & Xu, C. Bayesian framework of parameter sensitivity, uncertainty, and identifiability analysis in complex water quality models. Environ. Model. Softw. 104, 13–26 (2018).
Li, Y., Gong & Craig, P. Ran Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Surface Water Environment – EFDC Modeling Techniques and Case Studies. (Science Press, 2019).
Moriasi, D. N. et al. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE. 50, 885–900 (2007).
Wool, T. A., Ambrose, R. B., Martin, J. L., Comer, E. A. & Tech, T. Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP). User’s Man. Version 6, (2006).
Vapnik, V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer science & business media, 2013).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Cover, T. & Hart, P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 13, 21–27 (1967).
Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55, 119–139 (1997).
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 1189–1232 (2001).
Bailey, S. W. & Werdell, P. J. A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products. Remote Sens. Environ. 102, 12–23 (2006).
Krause, P., Boyle, D. P. & Bäse, F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci. 5, 89–97 (2005).
Funding
This research was joint supported by the “Tianchi Plan” Innovation Leading Talents Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No. 2024TCLJ01), the Xinjiang Institute of Technology High-Level Talent Research Initiation Fund (Grant No. XJLG2024G003), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41271004). We gratefully acknowledge this support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, H.M. and J.Z.; methodology, H.M. and Y.C.; software, H.M., X.M. and B.L.; validation, J.Z. and X.M.; formal analysis, H.M. and Y.C.; investigation, H.M and Z.Z.; resources, J.Z. and X.M.; data curation, H.M., Y.C. and Z.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.; writing—review and editing, H.M., J.Z. and X.M.; visualization, H.M., J.Z. and B.L.; supervision, J.Z., Z.Z. and B.L.; project administration, J.Z.; funding acquisition, J.Z., and X.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Comparison of coupled model simulations and measured values of WT.
Comparison of coupled model simulations and measured values of DO.
Comparison of coupled model simulations and measured values of Chl-a.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meng, H., Zhang, J., Meng, X. et al. Enhancing reservoir water quality simulation through machine learning-driven remote sensing integration with EFDC: a coupled framework for eutrophication management in data-scarce regions.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46641-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46641-4
Keywords
- EFDC modeling
- Machine learning
- Remote sensing
- Reservoir eutrophication
- Coupled modeling
- Shanzai reservoir
Source: Resources - nature.com
