in

Ten key insights and gaps to inform drought risk research, policy and practice


Abstract

Droughts are deeply intertwined with socio-economic and ecological systems across temporal and spatial scales. They are getting more severe and frequent under climate change and human pressures, affecting livelihoods, socio-economic sectors and the environment. Addressing these multifaceted impacts of droughts now and in the future will require actionable insights and a comprehensive research agenda. In this Perspective we draw on the interdisciplinary expertise of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences Working Group on ‘Drought in the Anthropocene’ and participants of the Drought Resilience +10 conference, a follow-up to the first High-Level Meeting on National Drought Policy in 2013. We synthesize ten key insights from drought research that have emerged in the past decade and highlight their relevance for policy and practice. Furthermore, we identify ten critical research gaps that must be addressed over the coming decade to further guide drought governance, strengthen drought resilience and effectively combat the water crisis.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Drought science to inform policy and practice.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Overview of gaps and their links to the three pillars of integrated drought management.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Network dynamics reveal drought synchronization hubs in the Po River Basin

Emerging hotspots of agricultural drought under climate change

Physical mechanisms of meteorological drought development, intensification and termination: an Australian review

Data availability

The raw data for the online survey are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Stewart‑Koster, B. et al. Living within the safe and just Earth system boundaries for blue water. Nat. Sustain. 7, 53–63 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission Joint Research Centre & United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification World Drought Atlas (eds Toreti, A et al.) (Publications Office of the European Union, 2024); https://doi.org/10.2760/3842670

  3. Thomas, R. et al. Economics of Drought: Investing in Nature‑Based Solutions for Drought Resilience—Proaction Pays (UNCCD/Economics of Land Degradation (ELD) Initiative/United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), 2024).

  4. Stefanski, R. et al. Drought resilience demands urgent global actions and cooperation. Nat. Water. 3, 127–130 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Drought Management Policy Guidelines: A Template for Action (WMO & Global Water Partnership, 2014).

  6. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction GAR Special Report on Drought 2021 (United Nations, 2021).

  7. Drought Resilience +10 Conference: Conclusions and Recommendations (IDMP, 2024); https://www.droughtmanagement.info/portal/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Conclusions-and-Recommendations-1.pdf

  8. Hagenlocher, M. et al. Tackling growing drought risks: the need for a systemic perspective. Earth Future 11, e2023EF003857 (2023).

  9. Van Loon, A. F. et al. Drought as a continuum—memory effects in interlinked hydrological, ecological, and social systems. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 3173–3205 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blauhut, V. The triple complexity of drought risk analysis and its visualisation via mapping: a review across scales and sectors. Earth Sci. Rev. 210, 103345 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hagenlocher, M. et al. Drought vulnerability and risk assessments: state of the art, persistent gaps, and research agenda. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 083002 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biella, R. et al. Thinking systemically about climate services: using archetypes to reveal maladaptation. Clim. Serv. 34, 100490 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  13. AghaKouchak, A. et al. Anthropogenic drought: definition, challenges, and opportunities. Rev. Geophys. 59, e2019RG000683 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Loon, A. F. et al. Drought in the Anthropocene. Nat. Geosci. 9, 89–91 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spinoni, J. et al. Global exposure of population and land‑use to meteorological droughts under different warming levels and SSPs: a CORDEX‑based study. Int. J. Climatol. 41, 6825–6853 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  16. Azadi, H. et al. Agricultural land conversion: reviewing drought impacts and coping strategies. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 31, 184–195 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  17. Di Baldassarre, G. et al. Water shortages worsened by reservoir effects. Nat. Sustain. 1, 617–622 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  18. Konar, M. et al. Expanding the scope and foundation of sociohydrology as the science of coupled human–water systems. Water Resour. Res. 55, 874–887 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cook, B. I. et al. Twenty‑first century drought projections in the CMIP6 forcing scenarios. Earth Future 8, e2019EF001461 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  20. Satoh, Y. et al. The timing of unprecedented hydrological drought under climate change. Nat. Commun. 13, 3287 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zampieri, M. et al. On the stationarity of the global spatial dependency of heat risk on drought. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL111117 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  22. Avanzi, F. et al. Winter snow deficit was a harbinger of summer 2022 socio‑hydrologic drought in the Po Basin, Italy. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 64 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van Tiel, M., Van Loon, A. F., Seibert, J. & Stahl, K. Hydrological response to warm and dry weather: do glaciers compensate? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25, 3245–3265 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  24. Staal, A. et al. Feedback between drought and deforestation in the Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044024 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walker, D. et al. Flash drought typologies and societal impacts: a worldwide review. Weather Clim. Soc. 16, 3–28 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan, X. et al. A global transition to flash droughts under climate change. Science 380, 187–191 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, L. et al. Global increase in the occurrence and impact of multiyear droughts. Science 387, 278–284 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barendrecht, M. H. et al. Exploring drought‑to‑flood interactions and dynamics: a global case review. WIREs Water 11, e1726 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  29. Livneh, B. & Badger, A. M. Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 452–455 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  30. Graham, D. J., Bierkens, M. F. P. & van Vliet, M. T. H. Impacts of droughts and heatwaves on river water quality worldwide. J. Hydrol. 629, 130590 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mosley, L. M. Drought impacts on the water quality of freshwater systems: review and integration. Earth‑Sci. Rev. 140, 203–214 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  32. van Vliet, M. T. H. et al. Global river water quality under climate change and hydroclimatic extremes. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 687–702 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  33. van Vliet, M. T. H. Complex interplay of water quality and water use affects water scarcity under droughts and heatwaves. Nat. Water 1, 902–904 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fabian, P. S., Hyun‑Han, K., Vithanage, M. & Lee, J. Modeling, challenges, and strategies for understanding impacts of climate extremes on water quality in Asia: a review. Environ. Res. 225, 115617 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters EM‑DAT: The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database (Catholic University of Leuven, 2023).

  36. Stanke, C. et al. Health effects of drought: a systematic review of the evidence. PLoS Curr. 5, 5 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cooper, M. W. et al. Mapping the effects of drought on child stunting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17219–17224 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  38. Salvador, C. et al. Public health implications of drought in a climate change context. Annu. Rev. Public Health 44, 213–232 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  39. Harnley, G. E., Kelman, I. & Murray, K. A. Drought‑related cholera outbreaks in Africa and the implications for climate change: a narrative review. Pathog. Glob. Health 116, 3–12 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, K. H. et al. Using climate to explain and predict West Nile Virus risk in Nebraska. GeoHealth 4, e2020GH000244 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  41. Orievulu, K. S. et al. Exploring linkages between drought and HIV treatment adherence in Africa: a systematic review. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e359–e370 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gwon, Y. et al. The effect of heterogeneous severe drought on all‑cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Northern Rockies and Plains of the United States. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 169033 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  43. Berman, J. D. et al. The association between drought conditions and increased occupational psychosocial stress among US farmers: an occupational cohort study. Sci. Total Environ. 78, 149245 (2021).

  44. Vins, H., Bell, J. E., Saha, S. & Hess, J. J. The mental health outcomes of drought: a systematic review and causal process diagram. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 13251–13275 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sena, A., Ebi, K., Freitas, C., Corvalán, C. & Barcellos, C. Indicators to measure risk of disaster associated with drought: implications for the health sector. PLoS ONE 12, e0181394 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nóbrega, R. L. B. et al. Co‑developing pathways to protect nature, land, territory and well‑being in Amazonia. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 364 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  47. Crausbay, S. D. et al. Defining ecological drought for the twenty‑first century. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 2543–2550 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Crausbay, S. et al. Unfamiliar territory: emerging themes for ecological drought research and management. One Earth 3, 337–353 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bogan, M. T., Boersma, K. S. & Lytle, D. A. Resistance and resilience of invertebrate communities to seasonal and supraseasonal drought in arid‑land headwater streams. Freshwat. Biol. 60, 2547–2558 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  50. Müller, L. M. & Bahn, M. Drought legacies and ecosystem responses to subsequent drought. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 5086–5103 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lake, P. S. Drought and Aquatic Ecosystems: Effects and Responses (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).

  52. Yin, X. et al. Exacerbated drought accelerates catastrophic transitions of groundwater‑dependent ecosystems in arid endorheic basins. J. Hydrol. 613, 128337 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  53. Xu, C. et al. Increasing impacts of extreme droughts on vegetation productivity under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 948–953 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schumacher, D. L., Keune, J., Dirmeyer, P. & Miralles, D. G. Drought self‑propagation in drylands due to land–atmosphere feedbacks. Nat. Geosci. 15, 262–268 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dakos, V. et al. Ecosystem tipping points in an evolving world. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 355–362 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mahecha, M. D. et al. Biodiversity and climate extremes: known interactions and research gaps. Earth Future 12, e2023EF003963 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  57. West, H., Quinn, N. & Horswell, M. Remote sensing for drought monitoring & impact assessment: progress, past challenges and future opportunities. Remote Sens. Environ. 232, 111291 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  58. White, C. J. et al. Advances in the application and utility of subseasonal‑to‑seasonal predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 103, E1448–E1472 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Funk, C. et al. Recognizing the Famine Early Warning Systems Network: over 30 years of drought early warning science advances and partnerships promoting global food security. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 1011–1027 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  60. Norman, S. P., Koch, F. H. & Hargrove, W. W. Review of broad-scale drought monitoring of forests: toward an integrated data mining approach. For. Ecol. Manage. 380, 346–358 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  61. Vincent, K., Archer, E., Henriksson, R., Pardoe, J. & Mittal, N. Reflections on a key component of co‑producing climate services: defining climate metrics from user needs. Clim. Serv. 20, 100204 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  62. Savelli, E. et al. Urban water crises driven by elites’ unsustainable consumption. Nat. Sustain. 6, 929–940 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wens, M. L. K., van Loon, A. F., Veldkamp, T. I. E. & Aerts, J. C. J. H. Education, financial aid, and awareness can reduce smallholder farmers’ vulnerability to drought under climate change. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 1201–1232 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  64. Savelli, E., Rusca, M., Cloke, H. & Di Baldassarre, G. Drought and society: scientific progress, blind spots, and future prospects. WIREs Clim. Change 13, e761 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pischke, F. & Stefanski, R. Drought management policies—from global collaboration to national action. Water Policy 18, 228–244 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  66. Penning, E., Peñailillo Burgos, R., Mens, M., Dahm, R. & de Bruijn, K. Nature‑based solutions for floods and droughts and biodiversity: do we have sufficient proof of their functioning? Camb. Prisms Water https://doi.org/10.1017/wat.2023.12 (2023).

  67. Cassin, J. & Ochoa‑Tocachi, B. F. Learning from indigenous and local knowledge: The deep history of nature-based solutions. In Nature‑Based Solutions and Water Security (eds Cassin, J. et al.) 283–335 (Elsevier, 2021).

  68. Blauhut, V. et al. Lessons from the 2018–2019 European droughts: a collective need for unifying drought risk management. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 2201–2217 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  69. Schrieks, T., Botzen, W. J. W., Wens, M., Haer, T. & Aerts, J. C. J. H. Integrating behavioral theories in agent‑based models for agricultural drought risk assessments. Front. Water 3, 686329 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pant, L. P., Adhikari, B. & Bhattarai, K. K. Adaptive transition for transformations to sustainability in developing countries. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 206–212 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  71. Browder, G. et al. An EPIC Response: Innovative Governance for Flood and Drought Risk Management (World Bank, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1596/35754

  72. Ward, P. J. et al. The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies. Water Secur. 11, 100070 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ostrom, E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 641–672 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  74. Verbist, K., Amani, A., Mishra, A. & Cisneros, B. J. Strengthening DRM and policy: UNESCO International Hydrological Programme case studies from Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Water Policy 18, 245–261 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  75. Susskind, L. & Kim, A. Building local capacity to adapt to climate change. Clim. Policy 22, 593–606 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  76. Van Loon, A. F. et al. Drought in a human-modified world: reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 3631–3650 (2016). 2016.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  77. Cash, D. W. et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8086–8091 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  78. Essen, T. D., Ban, N. C., Claxton, N. X. & Darimont, C. T. Contributions of Indigenous knowledge to ecological and evolutionary understanding. Front. Ecol. Environ. 22, 93–101 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Paparrizos, S., Vignola, R. & Sutanto, S. J. Integrating user‑ and data‑driven weather forecasts to develop legitimate, credible and salient information services for smallholders in the Global South. Sci. Rep. 14, 22841 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  80. Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S. & Anchukaitis, K. J. Climate change and drought: from past to future. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 4, 164–179 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  81. Mukherjee, S., Mishra, A. & Trenberth, K. E. Climate change and drought: a perspective on drought indices. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 4, 145–163 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  82. Peterson, T. J. et al. Watersheds may not recover from drought. Science 372, 745–749 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  83. Freire‑González, J., Decker, C. & Hall, J. W. The economic impacts of droughts: a framework for analysis. Ecol. Econ. 132, 196–204 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  84. Smith, K. H., Knutson, C. & Svoboda, M. The Cascading and Compounding Impacts of Drought (UNCCD, COP28, 2023).

  85. Venton, P. et al. Framework for the Assessment of Benefits of Action/Cost of Inaction (BACI) for Drought Preparedness (World Bank, 2019).

  86. Logar, I. & van den Bergh, J. C. Methods to assess costs of drought damages and policies for drought mitigation and adaptation: review and recommendations. Water Resour. Manage. 27, 1707–1720 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  87. Oakes, R. et al. A future agenda for research on climate change and human mobility. Int. Migr. 61, 116–125 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  88. Berman, J. D., Abadi, A. M. & Bell, J. E. Existing challenges and opportunities for advancing drought and health research. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 11, 1–11 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Haubrock, P. J. et al. A holistic catchment‑scale framework to guide flood and drought mitigation towards improved biodiversity conservation and human wellbeing. WIREs Water 12, e70001 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  90. Raheem, N. et al. Planning for ecological drought: Integrating ecosystem services and vulnerability assessment. WIREs Water 6, e1352 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  91. Toreti, A. et al. Narrowing uncertainties in the effects of elevated CO2 on crops. Nat. Food 1, 775–782 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  92. Van Passel, J. et al. Critical slowing down of the Amazon forest after increased drought occurrence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2316924121 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  93. Brunner, M. I., Götte, J., Schlemper, C. & Van Loon, A. F. Hydrological drought generation processes and severity are changing in the Alps. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL101776 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  94. Huning, L. S. & AghaKouchak, A. Global snow drought hot spots and characteristics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19753–19759 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  95. Pritchard, H. D. Asia’s shrinking glaciers protect large populations from drought stress. Nature 569, 649–654 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  96. van Tiel, M. et al. Cryosphere–groundwater connectivity is a missing link in the mountain water cycle. Nat. Water 2, 624–637 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  97. Fletcher, T. D. et al. Concepts and evolution of urban hydrology. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 789–801 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  98. Stolte, T. et al. Global drought risk in cities: present and future urban hotspots. Environ. Res. Commun. 5, 115008 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  99. Acosta Navarro, J. C. & Toreti, A. Exploiting the signal‑to‑noise ratio in multi‑system predictions of boreal summer precipitation and temperature. Weather Clim. Dynam. 4, 823–831 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  100. Brajard, J., Counillon, F., Wang, Y. & Kimmritz, M. Enhancing seasonal forecast skills by optimally weighting the ensemble from fresh data. Weather Forecast. 38, 1241–1252 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  101. Meehl, G. A. et al. Initialized Earth system prediction from subseasonal to decadal timescales. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 340–357 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  102. Madruga de Brito, M., Kuhlicke, C. & Marx, A. Near‑real‑time drought impact assessment: a text mining approach on the 2018/19 drought in Germany. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 1040a9 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  103. Shyrokaya, A. et al. Advances and gaps in the science and practice of impact‑based forecasting of droughts. WIREs Water 11, e1698 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  104. Carroll, S. R. et al. Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR principles for Indigenous data futures. Sci. Data 8, 108 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  105. Odongo, R. A. et al. From indices to impacts using environmental and socio‑economic clustering in Kenya. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 58, 102269 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  106. AghaKouchak, A. et al. Status and prospects for drought forecasting: opportunities in artificial intelligence and hybrid physical–statistical forecasting. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 380, 20210288 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  107. Dramsch, J. S. et al. Explainability can foster trust in artificial intelligence in geoscience. Nat. Geosci. 18, 112–114 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  108. Yimer, E. A. et al. The underexposed nature‑based solutions: a critical state‑of‑art review on drought mitigation. J. Environ. Manage. 352, 119903 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  109. Ceglar, A., Zampieri, M., Toreti, A. & Dentener, F. Observed northward migration of agro‑climate zones in Europe will further accelerate under climate change. Earth Future 7, 1088–1101 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  110. Enenkel, M., Engle, N. L. & Svoboda, M. A major blind spot in drought risk financing: water services in low‑income countries. Front. Clim. 6, 1297002 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  111. Pek, E., Salman, M. Enabling Pathways for Drought Finance in Agriculture (FAO, 2023).

  112. Simpson, N. P. et al. Adaptation to compound climate risks: a systematic global stocktake. iScience 26, 105926 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  113. Nevermann, H. et al. Struggling over water, losing it through evaporation: the case of Afghanistan and Iran. J. Environ. Manage. 375, 124319 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  114. Arango‑Quiroga, J., Kinol, A. & Kuhl, L. Examining knowledge and epistemic justice in the design of nature‑based solutions for water management. PLoS Clim. 2, e0000194 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  115. McEwen, L. et al. Building local capacity for managing environmental risk: a transferable framework for participatory, place‑based, narrative‑science knowledge exchange. Sustain. Sci. 17, 2489–2511 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  116. Goodwin, D. et al. What is the evidence linking financial assistance for drought‑affected agriculture and resilience in tropical Asia? A systematic review. Reg. Environ. Change 22, 1–13 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kreibich, H. et al. The challenge of unprecedented floods and droughts in risk management. Nature 608, 80–86 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  118. Estrela, T. & Sancho, T. A. Drought management policies in Spain and the European Union: from traditional emergency actions to drought management plans. Water Policy 18, 153–176 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the Drought Resilience +10 conference, and the IAHS Drought in the Anthropocene research network, for helping identify the insights and gaps described in this Perspective. Specifically, we thank the following participants for assisting us in the conceptualization (CO), data collection (C), gap/insight definition (D), elaboration of missing gap/insight (E) and feedback on the lists and text (F): A.M.S. Alqahtani (C), A. W. Worqlul (C), A. A. C. Attiogbe (C), A. S. Khudier Abas (C), A. Soloviev (C), A. P. DA Cunha (C), A. Van Loon (CO, C, F), A. Akpan (C), A. Cancelliere (C), B. Moccia (E, F), B. Höllermann (F), C. King (F), C. Wilfrid (C), C. T. Canedo Rosso (C, D, F); D. Bagale (C, F), D. Tsegai (C, D, F), D. W. Walker (F), D. Cotti (C), D. Kabakana (C), D. Tetzlaff (F), D. Wendt (C), E. Cremonese (C, D, F), E. M. Mendiondo (F), E. Ridolfi (E, F), E. Stenfors (C, E, F), E. Paton (C, D, F), F. Russo (F), F. K. Donkor (C), F. Avanzi (C, E, F), F. Napolitano (F), F. Ludwig (D, E), G. Koren (C, F), G. Bruno (F), G. Castelli (C, F), H. Aksoy (C, F), I. Hoteit (C), I. Streefkerk (C), J. Montero Tejeda (C), J.-E. Buchter (C, D), J. C. Fernandez (F), J.-P. Vidal (F), K. Rasouli (C, F), K. K. Aristide (C), K. O. iMotsumi (C), L. S. Hunning (F), L. Rossi (C, D, F), L. M. Tallaksen (F), L. Villani (C, E, F), L. Piemontese (C), M. Jampani (C), M. Brunner (C, F), M. Cataldi (C), M. M. Ciprian (C, D, F), M. Kireeva (C, D, E, F), M. Madruga de Brito (C, F), M. Lam (C,D), M. Pasqui (C, D, E, F), M. Cypriani (C), M. Ionita-Scholtz (F), M. Hlavsova (D, F), M. H. Siddiqui (C, F), M. T. Bhatti (C, F), N. Nakashona (C, F), O. Prat (C, D, F), P. Wagner (F), P. van Oel (C, D, F), R. Vignola (C, E, F), S. Vazifehkhah (C, D, F), S. Sutanto (C, D, E, F), S. Shukla (D, E, F), S. Maskey (F), S. Moulds (D, E, F), T. F. Kofitio (C), T. Roy (C, F), T. Gleeson (C, F), V. B. Portal Chagas (C, F), Y. Markonis, Y. Bamutaze (C, F), Y. Cavus (C, F) and Z. Alhajji (C). M.L.K.W. received funding from the Dutch ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap under the Sectorplan Bètawetenschappen education and research programme. M.H. has received financial support through the EW4IGAD III project funded by the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (grant agreement UNDRR/GR/2024/045) and through the GreenAdapt2Extremes project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant agreement 02WWA1706) and the European Union’s Horizon Europe Programme under the 2022 Joint Transnational Call of the European Partnership Water4All (grant agreement number 101060874). A.S. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 956396 (EDIPI project). M.W. has received financial support through the I-CISK project funded under the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement number 101037293).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.L.K.W. and M.H. Methodology; data curation; investigation and formal analysis; writing–draft completion; review and editing: M.L.K.W., M.H., A.S., M.W. and A.T. Writing original draft of individual sections: M.L.K.W., M.H., A.S., M.W., A.T., P.H.L.A., A.C.A., J.E.B., W.-H.N., S.R., J.R., C.R.S., M.Z., A.-S.S.-S., K.S., F.T., P.T., M.T.H.v.V., M.v.T., B. Bonaccorso, R.B., B. Biess, A.N.S. and I.M. Visualization: M.H., S.R. Coordination/supervision; data collection/curation: M.L.K.W.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Michael Hagenlocher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Water thanks Marcos Benso and Jullian Sone for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wens, M.L.K., Hagenlocher, M., Shyrokaya, A. et al. Ten key insights and gaps to inform drought risk research, policy and practice.
Nat Water (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00651-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-026-00651-8


Source: Resources - nature.com

Acidophilic fungi as possible candidates for living forms in the Venus clouds

A nationwide wastewater monitoring pilot to identify legal and illegal substances and enable future substance use research