in

Rats show direct reciprocity when interacting with multiple partners

  • 1.

    Lehmann, L. & Keller, L. The evolution of cooperation and altruism—a general framework and a classification of models. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1365–1376 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Taborsky, M., Frommen, J. G. & Riehl, C. Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150084 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Trivers, R. L. The evolution of altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. D. The evolution of cooperation. Science (80-. ) 211, 1390–1396 (1981).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M. & Bonhoeffer, S. Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 1115–1120 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Rankin, D. J. & Taborsky, M. Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution (N. Y). 63, 1913–1922 (2009).

  • 7.

    Alexander, R. D. The Biology of Moral Systems (Aldine Gruyter, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393, 573 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Winkler, I., Jonas, K. & Rudolph, U. On the usefulness of memory skills in social interactions: Modifying the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. J. Conflict Resolut. 52, 375–384 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Stevens, J. R., Volstorf, J., Schooler, L. J. & Rieskamp, J. Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies. Front. Psychol. 1, 1–12 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Milinski, M. & Wedekind, C. Working memory constrains human cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 13755–13758 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Volstorf, J., Rieskamp, J. & Stevens, J. R. The good, the bad, and the rare: Memory for partners in social interactions. PLoS One 6, e18945 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Barta, Z. et al. Optimal moult strategies in migratory birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 211–229 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Tinbergen, N. The Study of Instinct (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    McNamara, J. M. & Houston, A. I. Integrating function and mechanism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 670–675 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & ABC Research Group. Simple heuristics that make us smart. (Oxford University Press, 1999).

  • 18.

    Hurley, S. Social heuristics that make us smarter. Philos. Psychol. 18, 585–612 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Isen, A. M. Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 20, 203–253 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Bartlett, M. Y. & DeSteno, D. Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychol. Sci. 17, 319–325 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Stanca, L. Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch? J. Econ. Psychol. 30, 190–202 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Leimgruber, K. L. et al. Give what you get: Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and 4-year-old children pay forward positive and negative outcomes to conspecifics. PLoS One 9, e87035 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Claidière, N. et al. Selective and contagious prosocial resource donation in capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and humans. Sci. Rep. 5, 7631 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Gfrerer, N. & Taborsky, M. Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity. Sci. Rep. 7, 43867 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biol. 5, e196 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. The influence of social experience on cooperative behaviour of rats (Rattus norvegicus): Direct vs generalised reciprocity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 499–505 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Schneeberger, K., Dietz, M. & Taborsky, M. Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 41 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Schweinfurth, M. K., Aeschbacher, J., Santi, M. & Taborsky, M. Male Norway rats cooperate according to direct but not generalized reciprocity rules. Anim. Behav. 152, 93–101 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Dolivo, V. & Taborsky, M. Cooperation among Norway rats: The importance of visual cues for reciprocal cooperation, and the role of coercion. Ethology 121, 1071–1080 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Dolivo, V. & Taborsky, M. Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140959 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Wood, R. I., Kim, J. Y. & Li, G. R. Cooperation in rats playing the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Anim. Behav. 114, 27–35 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. The transfer of alternative tasks in reciprocal cooperation. Anim. Behav. 131, 35–41 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. Reciprocal trading of different commodities in Norway rats. Curr. Biol. 28, 594–599 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Stieger, B., Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. Reciprocal allogrooming among unrelated Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) is affected by previously received cooperative, affiliative and aggressive behaviours. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 182 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Delmas, G. E., Lew, S. E. & Zanutto, S. B. High mutual cooperation rates in rats learning reciprocal altruism: The role of payoff matrix. PLoS ONE 14, 1–14 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Barnett, S. A. & Spencer, M. M. Feeding social behaviour and interspecific competition in wild rats. Behaviour 3, 229–242 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Norton, S., Culver, B. & Mullenix, P. Development of nocturnal behavior in albino rats. Behav. Biol. 15, 317–331 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M. Rats play tit-for-tat instead of integrating cooperative experiences over multiple interactions. Proc. R. Soc. 287, 20192423 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Engqvist, L. The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim. Behav. 70, 967–971 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M. & Altman, D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: The arrive guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 8, 6–10 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Schweinfurth, M. K. et al. Do female Norway rats form social bonds? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 98 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Davis, D. E. The characteristics of rat populations. Q. Rev. Biol. 28, 373–401 (1953).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    McGuire, B., Pizzuto, T., Bemis, W. E. & Getz, L. L. General ecology of a rural population of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) based on intensive live trapping. Am. Midl. Nat. 155, 221–236 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Dunbar, R. I. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 22, 469–493 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Panoz-Brown, D. et al. Replay of episodic memories in the rat. Curr. Biol. 28, 1628–1634 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Crystal, J. D. Prospective memory. Curr. Biol. 23, 750–751 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Telle, H. Beitrag zur Erkenntnis der Verhaltensweise von Ratten, vergleichend dargestellt bei Rattus norvegicus und Rattus rattus. Zeitschrift für Angew. Zool. 53, 129–196 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Calhoun, J. B. The ecology and sociobiology of the Norway rat. (U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, 1979).

  • 49.

    Mogil, J. S. Mice are people too: Increasing evidence for cognitive, emotional and social capabilities in laboratory rodents. Can. Psychol. 60, 14–20 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Dolivo, V., Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. Ultimate and proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism in rats. Learn. Behav. 44, 223–226 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Müller, J. J. A., Massen, J. J. M., Bugnyar, T. & Osvath, M. Ravens remember the nature of a single reciprocal interaction sequence over 2 days and even after a month. Anim. Behav. 128, 69–78 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Stevens, J. R. & Hauser, M. D. Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 60–65 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    New fiber optic temperature sensing approach to keep fusion power plants running

    Honey bee hives decrease wild bee abundance, species richness, and fruit count on farms regardless of wildflower strips