in

An evolution towards scientific consensus for a sustainable ocean future

  • IPCC. In IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (IPCC, 2019).

  • IOC-UNESCO. Global Ocean Science Report 2020-Charting Capacity for Ocean Sustainability (UNESCO Publishing, 2020).

  • Sala, E. et al. Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature 592, 397–402 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, D. G., Lotze, H. K., Tittensor, D. P., Carozza, D. A. & Worm, B. Future ocean biomass losses may widen socioeconomic equity gaps. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–11 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Foundation Prince Albert II of Monaco. “Which Knowledge for Which Sustainable Ocean Governance?” in Livre de restitution de la Monaco Ocean Week 2021 (2021).

  • Swilling, M. et al. The Ocean Transition: What to learn from System Transitions (World Resources Institute, 2020).

  • OECD. The Ocean Economy in 2016 (OECD Publishing, 2016).

  • High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy. Transformations for a Sustainable Ocean Economy – a vision for Protection, Production and Prosperity (2020).

  • Landrigan, P. J. et al. Human health and ocean pollution. Ann. Global Health 86, 151 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. Development Co-operation Report 2016: the Sustainable Development Goals as Business Opportunities (OECD Publishing, 2016).

  • OECD. Development Co-operation Report 2020: Learning from Crises, Building Resilience (OECD Publishing, 2020).

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. The Ocean as a Solution to Climate Change: Five Opportunities for Action. (World Resources Institute, 2019).

  • Gattuso, J. P. et al. Ocean solutions to address climate change and its effects on marine ecosystems. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 337 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, C. et al. The quiet crossing of ocean tipping points. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2008478118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • IPBES. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds. Brondizio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S. & Ngo, H. T.) (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  • IPCC. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (IPCC, 2019).

  • Nash, K. L. et al. Planetary boundaries for a blue planet. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1625–1634 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. General Assembly Resolution Declaration of Principles Governing the Seabed and Ocean Floor. A/RES/25/2749. (1970).

  • Brodie Rudolph, T. et al. A transition to sustainable ocean governance. Nat. Commun 11, 1–14 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudet, J., Amon, D. J. & Blasiak, R. Opinion: transformational opportunities for an equitable ocean commons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2117033118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffoley, D. et al. Evolving the narrative for protecting a rapidly changing ocean, post‐ COVID‐19. Aquatic Conserv. 31, 1512–1534 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. et al. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio 50, 834–869 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. J. et al. Towards a sustainable and equitable blue economy. Nat. Sustain. 2, 991–993 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. Oceans and the law of the sea A/RES/72/73 (5 December 2017).

  • De Santo, E. M. et al. Protecting biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction: an earth system governance perspective. Earth Syst. Governance 2, 100029 (2019).

  • Röckmann, C., van Leeuwen, J., Goldsborough, D., Kraan, M. & Piet, G. The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management. Mar. Pol. 52, 155–162 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotzé, L. J. Fragmentation revisited in the context of global environmental law and governance. SALJ 131, 548–582 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudet, J. et al. A roadmap for using the UN decade of ocean science for sustainable development in support of science, policy, and action. One Earth 2, 34–42 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pörtner, H. O. et al. IPBES-IPCC Co-sponsored Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Climate Change (IPBES and IPCC, 2021).

  • Picourt, L. et al. Swimming the Talk: How to Strengthen Collaboration and Synergies between the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions? (Ocean & Climate Platform, 2021).

  • Valdes, L. The UN architecture for ocean science knowledge and governance. Chapter 18. In Handbook on the Economics and Management of Sustainable Oceans (eds. Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, P.A.L.D., Svensson, L. E. & Markandya, A. (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017).

  • Valdés, L. Mees, J. & Enevoldsen, H. International organizations supporting ocean science. In IOC-UNESCO, Global Ocean Science Report—The current status of ocean science around the world (eds. Valdés, L. et al.) 146–169 (UNESCO, 2017).

  • Fawkes, K., Ferse, S., Scheffers, A. & Cummins, V. Learning from experience: what the emerging global marine assessment community can learn from the social processes of other global environmental assessments. Anthropocene Coasts 4, 87–114 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessnow-von Wysocki, I. & Vadrot, A. B. M. The voice of science on marine biodiversity negotiations: a systematic literature review. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 614282 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, K. et al. Marine-related learning networks: shifting the paradigm toward collaborative ocean governance. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1–16 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbara, M. F. Understanding international bricolage. What drives behaviour change towards sustainable land use in the Eastern Amazon? Int. J. Commons 13, 1 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbour, J. & Flachsland, C. 40 years of global environmental assessments: a retrospective analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 77, 193–202 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerli, P. et al. Expansion of sustainability science needed for the SDGs. Nat. Sustain. 2 10, 892–894 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • The Because the Ocean Initiative. Ocean for climate – Ocean-related measures in climate strategies (Nationally determined contributions, national adaptation plans, adaptation communications and national policy frameworks) (2019).

  • Vieross, M. K. et al. Considering indigenous peoples and local communities in the governance of the global ocean commons. Mar. Pol. 119, 104039 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, B. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–7 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Wright, W., & Valdes, J.L. Fragmented Governance of Our One Global Ocean. In The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development – Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Mann Borgese (19182002) 16–22 (Brill, Nijhoff, 2019).

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Chile Madrid Time for Action. FCCC/CO/2019/13.Add.1 Decision 1/CP (2020).

  • Fawkes, K. & Cummins, V. Beneath the surface of the first world ocean assessment: an investigation into the global process’ support for sustainable development. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 612 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss-Brown, G., Cavaleri Gerhardinger, L. & Starger, C. Networked knowledge to action in support of ocean sustainability. Coast. Manage. 4, 4, 235–237 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardinger, L. C., Holzkämper, E., de Andrade, M. M., Corrêa, M. R. & Turra, A. Envisioning ocean governability transformations through network-based marine spatial planning. Marit. Stud. 21, 1, 131–152 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyborn, C. et al. Imagining transformative biodiversity futures. Nat. Sustain. 3, 670–672 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S. et al. Use your power for good: plural valuation of nature – the Oaxaca statement. Glob. Sustain. 3, e8 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, D. F., Gerhardinger, L. C., Vila-Nova, D. A., de Carvalho, F. G. & Hanazaki, N. Integrated and deliberative multidimensional assessment of a subtropical coastal-marine ecosystem (Babitonga bay, Brazil). Ocean Coast. Manag. 196, 105279 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrory, G., Holmén, J., Schäpke, N. & Holmberg, J. Sustainability-oriented labs in transitions: an empirically grounded typology. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 43, 99–117 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardinger, L. C., Andrade, M. M. de, Corrêa, M. R., & Turra, A. Crafting a sustainability transition experiment for the Brazilian blue economy. Mar. Pol. 120, 104157 (2020).

  • Pereira, L., Sitas, N., Ravera, F., Jimenez-Aceituno, A. & Merrie, A. Building capacities for transformative change towards sustainability: imagaination in Intergovernmental Science-Policy Processes. Elem. Sci.Anth 7, 35 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, W., Toonen, H., Jay, S. & Vince, J. A critical turn in marine spatial planning. Marit. Stud. 1987, 223–228 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. & Flannery, W. The post-political nature of marine spatial planning and modalities for its re-politicisation. J. Envir. Policy Plan. 22 2, 170–183 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schuckmann, K. et al. Copernicus marine service ocean state report 5th issue. J. Oper.Oceanogr. 14, 1–185 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercator International. Digital twin of the ocean. https://www.mercator-ocean.eu/en/digital-twin-ocean/ (2022).

  • Geomar. Digital twin ocean. https://www.geomar.de/en/research/irf/digital-twin-ocean (2022).

  • Creative Commons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ (2022).

  • Orchid. Connecting research and researchers. https://orcid.org/#:~:text=ORCID%20provides%20a%20persistent%20digital,%2C%20peer%20review%2C%20and%20more (2022).

  • Jasanoff, S. Technologies of humility. Nature 450, 33 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pörtner, H.-O. et al. Technical summary. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Pereira, L. M., Hichert, T., Hamann, M., Preiser, R. & Biggs, R. Using futures methods to create transformative spaces: visions of a good anthropocene in Southern Africa. Ecol. Soc. 23, 1, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09907-230119 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • TWI2050 Report. Transformations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Report prepared by World in 2050 Initiative. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). www.twi2050.org (2018).

  • Mitchell, R. B., Clark, W. C., Cash, D. W., & Dickson, N. M. Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence (MIT Press, 2016).

  • Norström, A. V. et al. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat. Sustain. 3, 182–190 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Galland, G., Harrould-Kolieb, E. & Herr, D. The ocean and climate change policy. Clim. Pol. 12, 6, 764–771 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, L. M. et al. Developing multiscale and integrative nature–people scenarios using the nature futures framework. People Nat. 2, 1172–1195 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. et al. Transferring complex scientific knowledge to useable products for society: the role of the global integrated ocean assessment and challenges in the effective delivery of ocean knowledge. Front. Environ. Sci 9, 626532 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Ocean Conference. An international panel for ocean sustainability side event. (2022).

  • Foundation Prince Albert II of Monaco. “Why an IPOS” in Livre de restitution de la Monaco Ocean Week 2022 (2022).

  • Convention on Biodiversity. Open ended working group on the post 2020 global biodiversity framework. 3rd meeting. First Draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework (2021).

  • Sitas, N. et al. Exploring the usefulness of scenario archetypes in science-policy processes: experience across IPBES assessments. Ecol. Soc. 24, 35 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffoley, D. et al. The forgotten ocean: why COP26 must call for vastly greater ambition and urgency to address ocean change. Aquatic Conserv. 32, 1–12 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. A. et al. Ten new insights in climate science 2021: a horizon scan. Glob.Sustain. 4, 1–20 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. Anticipation: what about turning the human and social sciences upside down? Futures 64, 15–18 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review (HM Treasury, 2021).

  • Sumaila, U. R. et al. Financing a sustainable ocean economy. Nat. Commun. 12, 3259 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muiderman, K., Gupta, A., Vervoort, J. & Biermann, F. Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: different conceptions of the future and implications for the present. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e673 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeister, N. Local knowledge, global ambitions: IPBES and the advent of multi-scale models and scenarios. Sustain. Sci. 14, 843–856 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadrot, A., Rankovic, A., Lapeyre, R., Aubert, P. & Laurans, Y. Why are social sciences and humanitites needed in the workds of IPBES? A systematic review of the literature. Innovation 31, S78–S100 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer, O. & Kowarsch, M. Cartography of pathways: a new model for environemntal policy assessments. Enviro.Sci.Policy 51, 56–64 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarsch, M. et al. An road map for global assessments. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 379–382 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Press Release. International Ocean Governance: EU’s Contribution for Setting the Course of a Blue Planet. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_3742 (2022).

  • Seafood Business for Ocean Stewardship (SeaBOS). http://www.seabos.org/ (2022).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Global predictions for the risk of establishment of Pierce’s disease of grapevines

    Seasonal range fidelity of a megaherbivore in response to environmental change