Rockström, J. et al. A safe operation space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).
Google Scholar
Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Zucman, G. World Inequality Report 2022 (Belknap Press, 2022).
Ivanova, D. et al. Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. J. Ind. Ecol. 20, 526–536 (2016).
Google Scholar
Steen-Olsen, K., Weinzettel, J., Cranston, G., Ercin, A. E. & Hertwich, E. G. Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 10883–10891 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tukker, A. et al. Environmental and resource footprints in a global context: Europe’s structural deficit in resource endowments. Glob. Environ. Change 40, 171–181 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bruckner, B., Hubacek, K., Shan, Y., Zhong, H. & Feng, K. Impacts of poverty alleviation on national and global carbon emissions. Nat. Sustain. 5, 311–320 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hubacek, K. et al. Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecol. Environ. 2, 361–369 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yu, Y., Feng, K. & Hubacek, K. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1178–1186 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wilting, H. C., Schipper, A. M., Bakkenes, M., Meijer, J. R. & Huijbregts, M. A. J. Quantifying biodiversity losses due to human consumption: a global-scale footprint analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 3298–3306 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lucas, P. L., Wilting, H. C., Hof, A. F. & Van Vuuren, D. P. Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness. Glob. Environ. Change 60, 102017 (2020).
Google Scholar
Beylot, A. et al. Assessing the environmental impacts of EU consumption at macro-scale. J. Clean. Prod. 216, 382–393 (2019).
Google Scholar
Koslowski, M., Moran, D. D., Tisserant, A., Verones, F. & Wood, R. Quantifying Europe’s biodiversity footprints and the role of urbanization and income. Glob. Sustain. 3, e1 (2020).
Lutter, S., Pfister, S., Giljum, S., Wieland, H. & Mutel, C. Spatially explicit assessment of water embodied in European trade: a product-level multi-regional input-output analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 38, 171–182 (2016).
Google Scholar
Stadler, K. et al. EXIOBASE 3 (3.8.1) [Data set]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4588235 (2021).
Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (European Commission, 2011).
Steinmann, Z. J. N. et al. Headline environmental indicators revisited with the global multi-regional input–output database EXIOBASE. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 565–573 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ivanova, D. et al. Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 054013 (2017).
Wiedmann, T. O. et al. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6271–6276 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lenzen, M. et al. Implementing the material footprint to measure progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 12. Nat. Sustain. 5, 157–166 (2022).
Dorninger, C. et al. The effect of industrialization and globalization on domestic land-use: a global resource footprint perspective. Glob. Environ. Change 69, 102311 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mekonnen, M. M. & Gerbens-Leenes, W. The water footprint of food. Water 12, 12 (2020).
Google Scholar
Prell, C. & Feng, K. Unequal carbon exchanges: the environmental and economic impacts of iconic U.S. consumption items. J. Ind. Ecol. 20, 537–546 (2016).
Google Scholar
Prell, C., Feng, K., Sun, L., Geores, M. & Hubacek, K. The economic gains and environmental losses of US consumption: a world-systems and input-output approach. Soc. Forces 93, 405–428 (2014).
Google Scholar
Prell, C. Wealth and pollution inequalities of global trade: a network and input-output approach. Soc. Sci. J. 53, 111–121 (2016).
Google Scholar
World Economic Outlook (October 2022) (International Monetary Fund, 2022); https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/datasets/WEO
Wilting, H. C., Schipper, A. M., Ivanova, O., Ivanova, D. & Huijbregts, M. A. J. Subnational greenhouse gas and land-based biodiversity footprints in the European Union. J. Ind. Ecol. 25, 79–94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13042
Cabernard, L. & Pfister, S. A highly resolved MRIO database for analyzing environmental footprints and Green Economy Progress. Sci. Total Environ. 755, 142587 (2021).
Jakob, M., Ward, H. & Steckel, J. C. Sharing responsibility for trade-related emissions based on economic benefits. Glob. Environ. Chang. 66, 102207 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wood, R. et al. The structure, drivers and policy implications of the European carbon footprint. Clim. Policy 20, S39–S57 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wood, R. et al. Growth in environmental footprints and environmental impacts embodied in trade: resource efficiency indicators from EXIOBASE3. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 553–564 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hubacek, K., Chen, X., Feng, K., Wiedmann, T. & Shan, Y. Evidence of decoupling consumption-based CO2 emissions from economic growth. Adv. Appl. Energy 4, 100074 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T. & Lenzen, M. Environmental and social footprints of international trade. Nat. Geosci. 11, 314–321 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dorninger, C. et al. Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecol. Econ. 179, 106824 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hickel, J., Dorninger, C., Wieland, H. & Suwandi, I. Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015. Glob. Environ. Change 73, 102467 (2022).
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ivanova, D. et al. Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 093001 (2020).
Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ivanova, D. & Wood, R. The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability. Glob. Sustain. 3, e18 (2020).
Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L. & Zoomkawala, H. National responsibility for ecological breakdown: a fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970–2017. Lancet Planet. Heal. 6, e342–e349 (2022).
Google Scholar
Otto, I. M., Kim, K. M., Dubrovsky, N. & Lucht, W. Shift the focus from the super-poor to the super-rich. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 82–84 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T. & Steinberger, J. K. Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nat. Commun. 11, 3107 (2020).
Nielsen, K. S., Nicholas, K. A., Creutzig, F., Dietz, T. & Stern, P. C. The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Energy 6, 1011–1016 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jakob, M. Why carbon leakage matters and what can be done against it. One Earth 4, 609–614 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lave, L. B. Using input–output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 420A–426A (1995).
Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T. A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol. Econ. 69, 211–222 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ewing, B. R. et al. Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework. Ecol. Indic. 23, 1–8 (2012).
Google Scholar
Brizga, J., Feng, K. & Hubacek, K. Household carbon footprints in the Baltic States: a global multi-regional input–output analysis from 1995 to 2011. Appl. Energy 189, 780–788 (2017).
Hertwich, E. G. & Peters, G. P. Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6414–6420 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zhong, H., Feng, K., Sun, L., Cheng, L. & Hubacek, K. Household carbon and energy inequality in Latin American and Caribbean countries. J. Environ. Manag. 273, 110979 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stadler, K. et al. EXIOBASE 3: developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi-regional input–output tables. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 502–515 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hardadi, G., Buchholz, A. & Pauliuk, S. Implications of the distribution of German household environmental footprints across income groups for integrating environmental and social policy design. J. Ind. Ecol. 25, 95–113 (2021).
Zhang, Q. et al. Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade. Nature 543, 705–709 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hoekstra, A. Y., Mekonnen, M. M., Chapagain, A. K., Mathews, R. E. & Richter, B. D. Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS ONE 7, e32688 (2012).
Google Scholar
IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Schmidt, S. et al. Understanding GHG emissions from Swedish consumption—current challenges in reaching the generational goal. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 428–437 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huijbregts, M. A. J. Priority Assessment of Toxic Substances in the Frame of LCA. Development and Application of the Multi-Media Fate, Exposure and Effect Model USES-LCA (Interfaculty Department of Envrionmental Science, 1999).
Huijbregts, M. A. J. Priority Assessment of Toxic Substances in the Frame of LCA. Time Horizon Dependency in Toxicity Potentials Calculated with the Multi-Media Fate, Exposure and Effects Model USES-LCA (Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, 2000).
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook (Publications Office EU, 2011).
Verones, F., Moran, D., Stadler, K., Kanemoto, K. & Wood, R. Resource footprints an d their ecosystem consequences. Sci. Rep. 7, 40743 (2017).
Chaudhary, A., Pfister, S. & Hellweg, S. Spatially explicit analysis of biodiversity loss due to global agriculture, pasture and forest land use from a producer and consumer perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3928–3936 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chaudhary, A., Verones, F., De Baan, L. & Hellweg, S. Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species-area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9987–9995 (2015).
Google Scholar
Marquardt, S. G. et al. Consumption-based biodiversity footprints—do different indicators yield different results? Ecol. Indic. 103, 461–470 (2019).
Google Scholar
World Development Indicators DataBank (World Bank, 2022); https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
World Population Prospects 2022 (United Nations, 2022); https://population.un.org/wpp/
Natural Earth Vector (Natural Earth, 2022); https://www.naturalearthdata.com/
Lahti, L., Huovari, J., Kainu, M. & Biecek, P. Retrieval and analysis of eurostat open data with the Eurostat package. R J. 9, 385–392 (2017).
Castellani, V., Beylot, A. & Sala, S. Environmental impacts of household consumption in Europe: comparing process-based LCA and environmentally extended input-output analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 240, 117966 (2019).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
