Search

Menu
Search
in Ecology

Quantitative assessment of ecological security and its influencing factors in the Danjiangkou Reservoir based on a health–risk–service framework

23 Views


Abstract

The Danjiangkou Reservoir (DR) serves as the primary water source for the Middle Route of China’s South-to-North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP), and its ecological security (ES) is critical to water supply safety in North China and to broader regional sustainability. However, systematic assessments of ES in the DR region remain limited. In this study, a health–risk–service framework was developed to evaluate the evolution of the ecological security in DR across three benchmark years (2003, 2013, and 2023). Furthermore, the XGBoost–SHAP model was employed to uncover the dominant natural, anthropogenic, and landscape influential factors behind ES variation. The results indicate that: (1) The proposed framework effectively captures the ES status of DR, with a strong correlation between ecological security index (ESI) and remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) (R² > 0.8, P < 0.001); (2) ESI exhibited a fluctuating upward trend over time, with over 95% of the area classified as Medium or above in terms of ecological security. The ESI hotspots were primarily distributed in the northern and southern regions, which are dominated by forest cover, whereas the cold spots were mainly concentrated in the central region, characterized by cropland and built-up land; (3) Results from the XGBoost–SHAP model revealed that ESI is influenced by multiple factors in a nonlinear fashion. NDVI and LPI were the primary positive contributors, whereas HDI and urbanization had negative impacts, with all these relationships exhibiting nonlinear threshold effects. Notably, threshold effects were identified within specific ranges of these variables. This framework provides a practical approach for evaluating ESI in reservoir regions and offers a scientific foundation for ecological protection and source-area ecological security management in cross-basin water diversion projects such as the DR.

Similar content being viewed by others

Integrating ecosystem service trade-offs and bundles for ecological zoning and management optimization: A case study of the Danjiangkou reservoir area, China

Article
Open access
04 December 2025

Dynamic monitoring of ecological security patterns in arid zone oases: a remote sensing-based ecological index evolution analysis

Article
Open access
10 December 2025

Ecological sensitivity assessment and driving force analysis of the Tarim river basin

Article
Open access
03 October 2025

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Liu, C. L. et al. Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Ecol. Indic. 137, 108734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108734 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peng, C. C., Li, B. & Nan, B. An analysis framework for the ecological security of urban agglomeration: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. J. Clean. Prod. 315, 128111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128111 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, C. X., Wu, X. L. & Wang, L. Analysis on land ecological security change and affect factors using RS and GWR in the Danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Appl. Geogr. 105, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.02.009 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xie, B., Jones, P., Dwivedi, R., Bao, L. & Liang, R. Evaluation, comparison, and unique features of ecological security in Southwest china: A case study of Yunnan Province. Ecol. Indic. 153, 110453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110453 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, X. L. & Zhang, H. D. Evaluation of ecological environmental quality and factor explanatory power analysis in western Chongqing. China Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108311 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, M. M. et al. Construction and optimization strategy of ecological security pattern in a rapidly urbanizing region: A case study in central-south China. Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106030 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh, S., Das Chatterjee, N. & Dinda, S. Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting using integrated DEMATEL-ANP and CA-Markov models: a case study on Kolkata metropolitan Area, India. Sustain. Cities Soc. 68, 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102773 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pan, Z., Gao, G. & Fu, B. Spatiotemporal changes and driving forces of ecosystem vulnerability in the Yangtze river Basin, china: quantification using habitat-structure-function framework. Sci. Total Environ. 835, 155494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155494 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bi, M., Xie, G. & Yao, C. Ecological security assessment based on the renewable ecological footprint in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater Bay Area, China. Ecol. Indicat. 116, 106432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106432 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, W. et al. Spatio-temporal variations of ecosystem services and their drivers in the Pearl river Delta, China. J. Clean. Prod. 337, 130466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130466 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu, Q. & Cai, Y. Integrating ecological risk, ecosystem health, and ecosystem services for assessing regional ecological security and its driving factors: insights from a large river basin in China. Ecol. Indicat. 155, 110954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110954 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, C. et al. Temporal and Spatial variations of ecological security on the Northeastern Tibetan plateau integrating ecosystem health-risk-services framework. Ecol. Indicat. 158, 111365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111365 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng, H. R., Zhu, L. K. & Meng, J. J. Fuzzy evaluation of the ecological security of land resources in mainland China based on the Pressure-State-Response framework. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150053 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, Y. & Cai, Z. X. Ecological security assessment of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration based on an adapted ecological footprint model. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120973 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, M. et al. Comprehensive partitions and different strategies based on ecological security and economic development in Guizhou Province, China. J. Clean. Prod. 274, 122794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122794 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karimian, H., Zou, W., Chen, Y., Xia, J. & Wang, Z. Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factor analysis in Dongjiang river watershed. Chemosphere 307, 135835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135835 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hasan, S. S., Zhen, L., Miah, M. G., Ahamed, T. & Samie, A. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: a review. Environ. Dev. 34, 100527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100527 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lorilla, R. S., Poirazidis, K., Detsis, V., Kalogirou, S. & Chalkias, C. Socio-ecological determinants of multiple ecosystem services on the mediterranean landscapes of the ionian Islands (Greece). Ecol. Model. 422, 108994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108994 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, J., Bai, Y. & Alatalo, J. M. Impacts of rural tourism-driven land use change on ecosystems services provision in Erhai lake basin. China Ecosyst. Serv. 42, 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101081 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, B. F., Zhao, H., Lu, F. & Wang, X. K. Spatial and Temporal patterns of carbon sequestration in the Northeastern forest regions and its impact factors analysis. Acta Geogr. Sin. 38 (14), 4975–4983. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201706201119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, W., Kang, J. & Wang, Y. Spatiotemporal changes and driving forces of ecological security in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, china: quantification using health-services-risk framework. J. Clean. Prod. 389, 136135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136135 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, Z., Liu, S. & Su, Y. Spatiotemporal evolution of habitat quality and its response to landscape patterns in karst mountainous cities: a case study of Guiyang City in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut R. 30, 114391–114405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30420-z (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, Z. et al. Achieving the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services through zoning regulation based on land use thresholds. Land. Use Policy. 139, 107056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107056 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shen, W., Li, Y. & Qin, Y. Research on the influencing factors and multi-scale regulatory pathway of ecosystem health: A case study in the middle reaches of the yellow river. China J. Clean. Prod. 406, 137038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137038 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gorosito, I., Bermúdez, M. & Busch, M. Advantages of combining generalized linear models and occupancy models to find indicators of habitat selection: small mammals in agroecosystems as a case study. Ecol. Indic. 85, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.003 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kun, L., Junsan, Z., Yongping, L. & Yilin, L. Identifying trade-offs and synergies among land use functions using an XGBoost-SHAP model: A case study of Kunming, China. Ecol. Indicat. 172, 113330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113330 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guo, S. et al. Threshold effect of ecosystem services in response to climate change, human activity and landscape pattern in the upper and middle yellow river of China. Ecol. Indic. 136, 108603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108603 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yichao, T. et al. Use of interpretable machine learning for Understanding ecosystem service trade-offs and their driving mechanisms in karst peak-cluster depression basin, China. Ecol. Indic. 166, 112474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112474 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li, K., Zhao, J. & Lin, Y. Debris-flow susceptibility assessment in Dongchuan using stacking ensemble learning including multiple heterogeneous learners with RFE for factor optimization. Nat. Hazard. 118, 2477–2511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06099-3 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ma, M. et al. XGBoost-based method for flash flood risk assessment. J. Hydrol. 598, 126382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126382 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ouyang, N., Rui, X., Zhang, X., Tang, H. & Xie, Y. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem health and its driving factors in the Southwestern karst regions of China. Ecol. Indic. 166, 112530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112530 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Peng, Y. & Unluer, C. Interpretable machine learning-based analysis of hydration and carbonation of carbonated reactive Magnesia cement mixes. J. Clean. Prod. 434, 140054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140054 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tong, Z. et al. Unravel the spatio-temporal patterns and their nonlinear relationship with correlates of dockless shared bikes near metro stations. Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci. 26, 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2022.2137857 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar, S. & Kondaveeti, H. Towards transparency in AI: explainable bird species image classification for ecological research. Ecol. Indic. 169, 112886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112886 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yin, H. et al. Analyzing economy-society-environment sustainability from the perspective of urban Spatial structure: A case study of the Yangtze river delta urban agglomeration. Sustainable Cities Soc. 96, 104691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104691 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, X. J. et al. The new concept of water resources management in china: ensuring water security in changing environment. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 20, 897–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9918-8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, H., Yin, J. & Feng, L. The dynamic changes in the storage of the Danjiangkou reservoir and the influence of the South-North water transfer project. Sci. Rep. 8, 8710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26788-5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ma, Y. J. et al. Water loss by evaporation from china’s South-North water transfer project. Ecol. Eng. 95, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.086 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, L. et al. Land use and ecosystem services evolution in Danjiangkou reservoir Area, china: implications for sustainable management of National projects. Land 12, 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040788 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, J. & Huang, X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3907–3925. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021. (2021).

  41. Xiao, R. et al. Ecosystem health assessment: A comprehensive and detailed analysis of the case study in coastal metropolitan region, Eastern China. Ecol. Ind. 98, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.010 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chen, W., Gu, T. & Zeng, J. Urbanisation and ecosystem health in the middle reaches of the Yangtze river urban agglomerations, china: A U-curve relationship. J. Environ. Manage. 318, 115565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115565 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Qiao, F. W., Bai, Y. P., Xie, L. X., Yang, X. D. & Sun, S. S. Spatio-temporal characteristics of landscape ecological risks in the ecological functional zone of the upper yellow River, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 18, 12943. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412943 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, H. et al. Spatial-temporal pattern analysis of landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use/land cover change in Baishuijiang National nature reserve in Gansu Province, China. Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107454 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mann, D., Anees, M. M., Rankavat, S. & Joshi, P. K. Spatio-temporal variations in landscape ecological risk related to road network in the Central Himalaya. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1710693 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, D. et al. Land use/cover predictions incorporating ecological security for the Yangtze river delta region, China. Ecol. Indicat. 119, 106841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106841 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Li, S. et al. Optimization of landscape pattern in China Luojiang Xiaoxi basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment. Ecol. Ind. 146, 109887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109887 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Xue, C., Zhang, H., Wu, S., Chen, J. & Chen, X. Spatial-temporal evolution of ecosystem services and its potential drivers: A Geospatial perspective from Bairin left banner. China Ecol. Indic. 137, 108760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108760 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xu, H. Q. et al. Prediction of ecological effects of potential population and impervious surface increases using a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI). Ecol. Indic. 93, 730–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.055 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Xu, H. Q., Wang, Y. F., Guan, H. D., Shi, T. T. & Hu, X. S. Detecting ecological changes with a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202345 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, H. et al. Remote sensing-based approach for the assessing of ecological environmental quality variations using Google Earth Engine: A case study in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15040960 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Xu, H. Q. & Deng, W. H. Rationality analysis of MRSEI and its difference with RSEI. Remote Sens. Technol. Application 37, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2022.1.0001 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Getis, A. & Ord, J. K. The analysis of Spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24 (3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hou, M. J. et al. Ecological risk assessment and impact factor analysis of alpine wetland ecosystem based on LUCC and boosted regression tree on the Zoige Plateau, China. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030368 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Samat, A. et al. Meta-XGBoost for hyperspectral image classification using extended MSER-guided morphological profiles. Remote Sens-Basel 12(12), 1973. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12121973 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ho, L. S. & Tran, V. Q. Machine learning approach for predicting and evaluating California bearing ratio of stabilized soil containing industrial waste. J. Clean. Prod. 370, 133587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133587 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jamei, M. et al. Application of an explainable glass-box machine learning approach for prognostic analysis of a biogas-powered small agriculture engine. Energy 288, 129862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129862 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Li, Z., Xia, J., Deng, X. & Yan, H. Multilevel modelling of impacts of human and natural factors on ecosystem services change in an oasis, Northwest China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 169, 105474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105474 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ma, L., Bo, J., Li, X., Fang, F. & Cheng, W. Identifyingkey landscape pattern indices influencing the ecological security of inland river basin: the middle and lower reaches of Shule river basin as an example. Sci. Total Environ. 674, 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.107 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chen, W., Chi, G. & Li, J. The Spatial aspect of ecosystem services balance and its determinants. Land. Use Pol. 90, 104263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104263 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Peng, J., Pan, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, H. & Wang, Y. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Habitat Int. 71, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.010 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Feng, Y. et al. Evaluating land ecological security and examining its relationships with driving factors using GIS and generalized additive model. Sci. Total Environ. 633, 1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133587 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tang, C. C., Wu, X. F., Zheng, Q. Q. & Lyu, N. Ecological security evaluations of the tourism industry in ecological conservation development areas: A case study of beijing’s ECDA. J. Clean. Prod. 197, 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.232 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gao, J., Zuo, L. & Liu, W. Environmental determinants impacting the Spatial heterogeneity of karst ecosystem services in Southwest China. Land. Degrad. Dev. 32 (4), 1718–1731. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3815 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhu, C. et al. Identifying the trade-offs and synergies among land use functions and their influencing factors from a Geospatial perspective: A case study in Hangzhou. China J. Clean. Prod. 314, 128026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128026 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang, W., Chang, W. J., Zhu, Z. C. & Hui, Z. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Chinese coastal cities based on land use change. Appl. Geogr. 117, 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102174 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFF0711601); the Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Geological Survey and Evaluation of Ministry of Education (Grant No. GLAB2022ZR01) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; the Programs national natural science foundation of China (42471475).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Yinghui Chang & Liang Wu

  2. School of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Liang Wu, Zhanlong Chen & Chuncheng Yang

Authors

  1. Yinghui Chang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liang Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhanlong Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chuncheng Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.C. (Yinghui Chang) contributed to the study design and wrote the manuscript; L.W. (Liang Wu) discussed the original idea, revised the manuscript; Z.C. (Zhanlong Chen) and C.Y. (Chuncheng Yang) were involved in drafting and checking of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Liang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, Y., Wu, L., Chen, Z. et al. Quantitative assessment of ecological security and its influencing factors in the Danjiangkou Reservoir based on a health–risk–service framework.
Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34039-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34039-7

Keywords

  • Ecosystem security
  • Assessment system
  • Driving factors
  • XGBoost-SHAP
  • Danjiangkou Reservoir

Source: Ecology - nature.com

The sexual reproductive strategy in clonal Scopolia carniolica is based on obligatory cross-pollination and self-incompatibility

Phage-mediated resistome dynamics in global aquifers

This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.

Back to Top
Close