Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B. & Worm, B. How many species are there on earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol. 9, e1001127 (2011).
Google Scholar
Costello, M. J., May, R. M. & Stork, N. E. Can we name earth’s species before they go extinct? Science 339, 413–416 (2013).
Google Scholar
Corlett, R. T. Plant diversity in a changing world: status, trends, and conservation needs. Plant Divers. 38, 10–16 (2016).
Google Scholar
Baldrian, P., Větrovský, T., Lepinay, C. & Kohout, P. High-throughput sequencing view on the magnitude of global fungal diversity. Fungal Divers. 114, 539–547 (2022).
Google Scholar
Taylor, D. L. et al. A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine-scale niche partitioning. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 3–20 (2014).
Google Scholar
Locey, K. J. & Lennon, J. T. Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5970–5975 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schopf, J. W. Disparate rates, differing fates: tempo and mode of evolution changed from the Precambrian to the Phanerozoic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6735–6742 (1994).
Google Scholar
Seager, S., Huang, J., Petkowski, J. J. & Pajusalu, M. Laboratory studies on the viability of life in H2-dominated exoplanet atmospheres. Nat. Astron. 4, 802–806 (2020).
Google Scholar
Halme, P., Holec, J. & Heilmann-Clausen, J. The history and future of fungi as biodiversity surrogates in forests. Fungal Ecol. 27, 193–201 (2017).
Google Scholar
Arnolds, E. Decline of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 35, 209–244 (1991).
Google Scholar
Boddy, L. in The Fungi (eds Watkinson, S. C. et al.) 361–400 (Elsevier, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382034-1.00011-6
Zimmerman, M. The mushroom message. Sun 11A (1992).
Bader, P., Jansson, S. & Jonsson, B. G. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biol. Conserv. 72, 355–362 (1995).
Google Scholar
Weinbauer, M. G. & Rassoulzadegan, F. Extinction of microbes: evidence and potential consequences. Endanger. Species Res. 3, 205–215 (2007).
Google Scholar
Chomicki, G., Kiers, E. T. & Renner, S. S. The evolution of mutualistic dependence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 51, 409–432 (2020).
Google Scholar
Blaser, M. J. The theory of disappearing microbiota and the epidemics of chronic diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 461–463 (2017).
Google Scholar
Carthey, A. J., Blumstein, D. T., Gallagher, R. V., Tetu, S. G. & Gillings, M. R. Conserving the holobiont. Funct. Ecol. 34, 764–776 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schapheer, C., Pellens, R. & Scherson, R. Arthropod-microbiota integration: its importance for ecosystem conservation. Front. Microbiol. 12, 2094 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Wang, C. & Luo, Y. Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nat. Commun. 11, 3072 (2020).
Google Scholar
Anthony, M. A., Stinson, K. A., Moore, J. A. M. & Frey, S. D. Plant invasion impacts on fungal community structure and function depend on soil warming and nitrogen enrichment. Oecologia 194, 659–672 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lilleskov, E., Hobbie, E. A. & Horton, T. Conservation of ectomycorrhizal fungi: exploring the linkages between functional and taxonomic responses to anthropogenic N deposition. Fungal Ecol. 4, 174–183 (2011).
Google Scholar
Gibbons, S. M. et al. Invasive plants rapidly reshape soil properties in a grassland ecosystem. mSystems 2, e00178-16 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rillig, M. C. et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Science 366, 886–890 (2019).
Google Scholar
Certini, G., Moya, D., Lucas-Borja, M. E. & Mastrolonardo, G. The impact of fire on soil-dwelling biota: a review. For. Ecol. Manage. 488, 118989 (2021).
Google Scholar
Caruso, T., Hempel, S., Powell, J. R., Barto, E. K. & Rillig, M. C. Compositional divergence and convergence in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Ecology 93, 1115–1124 (2012).
Google Scholar
Anthony, M., Frey, S. & Stinson, K. Fungal community homogenization, shift in dominant trophic guild, and appearance of novel taxa with biotic invasion. Ecosphere 8, e01951 (2017).
Google Scholar
Guerra, C. A. et al. Global projections of the soil microbiome in the Anthropocene. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 987–999 (2021).
Google Scholar
Enright, D. J., Frangioso, K. M., Isobe, K., Rizzo, D. M. & Glassman, S. I. Mega‐fire in redwood tanoak forest reduces bacterial and fungal richness and selects for pyrophilous taxa that are phylogenetically conserved. Mol. Ecol. 31, 2475–2493 (2022).
Google Scholar
Anthony, M. A. et al. Forest tree growth is linked to mycorrhizal fungal composition and function across Europe. ISME J. 16, 1327–1336 (2022).
Google Scholar
Crowther, T. W. et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science 365, eaav0550 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ceballos, G. et al. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253 (2015).
Google Scholar
Novacek, M. J. & Cleland, E. E. The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5466–5470 (2001).
Google Scholar
Guerra, C. A. et al. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. Science 371, 239–241 (2021).
Google Scholar
Guerra, C. A. et al. Blind spots in global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research. Nat. Commun. 11, 3870 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cameron, E. K. et al. Global mismatches in aboveground and belowground biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1187–1192 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tedersoo, L. et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346, 1256688 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233–237 (2018).
Google Scholar
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 359, 320–325 (2018).
Google Scholar
Peixoto, R. S. et al. Harnessing the microbiome to prevent global biodiversity loss. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01173-1 (2022).
Box, G. E. P. & Draper, N. R. Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces (Wiley, 1987).
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G. & Hunter, J. S. Statistics for Experimenters: an Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building (Wiley, 1978).
Kothamasi, D., Spurlock, M. & Kiers, E. T. Agricultural microbial resources: private property or global commons? Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1091–1093 (2011).
Google Scholar
Davison, J. et al. Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism. Science 349, 970–973 (2015).
Google Scholar
van der Linde, S. et al. Environment and host as large-scale controls of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Nature 558, 243–248 (2018).
Google Scholar
Davison, J. et al. Temperature and pH define the realised niche space of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 231, 763–776 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ramirez, K. S. et al. Detecting macroecological patterns in bacterial communities across independent studies of global soils. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 189–196 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wild, S. Quest to map Africa’s soil microbiome begins. Nature 539, 152 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bissett, A. et al. Introducing BASE: the Biomes of Australian Soil Environments soil microbial diversity database. GigaScience 5, 21 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pan, K., Guo, Z. & Liu, J. Building and materializing of China Soil Microbiome Data Platform. Acta Pedol. Sin. 56, 1023–1033 (2019).
Orgiazzi, A., Ballabio, C., Panagos, P., Jones, A. & Fernández‐Ugalde, O. LUCAS Soil, the largest expandable soil dataset for Europe: a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 140–153 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hinckley, E. S. et al. The soil and plant biogeochemistry sampling design for The National Ecological Observatory Network. Ecosphere 7, e01234 (2016).
Google Scholar
Větrovský, T. et al. GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Sci. Data 7, 228 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jackson, F. Sustainable agriculture and a low carbon future: are we missing out on mycelium? Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/feliciajackson/2021/12/02/sustainable-agriculture-and-a-low-carbon-future-are-we-missing-out-on-mycelium/?sh=3dc1a6d076ed (2021).
Gilbert, J. A., Jansson, J. K. & Knight, R. The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations. BMC Biol. 12, 69 (2014).
Google Scholar
Fedrowitz, K. et al. Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta‐analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1669–1679 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., Mitchell, J. & Scow, K. Cover cropping and no-till increase diversity and symbiotroph:saprotroph ratios of soil fungal communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 129, 99–109 (2019).
Google Scholar
Status of the World’s Soil Resources: Main Report (FAO, 2015).
Aronson, J., Goodwin, N., Orlando, L., Eisenberg, C. & Cross, A. T. A world of possibilities: six restoration strategies to support the United Nation’s Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Restor. Ecol. 28, 730–736 (2020).
Google Scholar
Seymour, F. Seeing the forests as well as the (trillion) trees in corporate climate strategies. One Earth 2, 390–393 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dinerstein, E. et al. A global deal for nature: guiding principles, milestones, and targets. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2869 (2019).
Google Scholar
Philipson, C. D. et al. Active restoration accelerates the carbon recovery of human-modified tropical forests. Science 369, 838–841 (2020).
Google Scholar
Coleman, E. A. et al. Limited effects of tree planting on forest canopy cover and rural livelihoods in Northern India. Nat. Sustain. 4, 997–1004 (2021).
Google Scholar
Neuenkamp, L., Prober, S. M., Price, J. N., Zobel, M. & Standish, R. J. Benefits of mycorrhizal inoculation to ecological restoration depend on plant functional type, restoration context and time. Fungal Ecol. 40, 140–149 (2019).
Google Scholar
Koziol, L. et al. Manipulating plant microbiomes in the field: native mycorrhizae advance plant succession and improve native plant restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14036 (2021).
Wubs, E. R. J., van der Putten, W. H., Bosch, M. & Bezemer, T. M. Soil inoculation steers restoration of terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Plants 2, 16107 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bever, J. & Schultz, P. Prairie mycorrhizal fungi inoculant may increase native plant diversity on restored sites (Illinois). Ecol. Restor. 21, 311–312 (2003).
Vahter, T. et al. Co-introduction of native mycorrhizal fungi and plant seeds accelerates restoration of post-mining landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1741–1751 (2020).
Google Scholar
Egan, C. P. et al. Restoration of the mycobiome of the endangered Hawaiian mint Phyllostegia kaalaensis increases its resistance to a common powdery mildew. Fungal Ecol. 52, 101070 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wubs, E. R. J. et al. Single introductions of soil biota and plants generate long‐term legacies in soil and plant community assembly. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1145–1151 (2019).
Google Scholar
Abrego, N. et al. Reintroduction of threatened fungal species via inoculation. Biol. Conserv. 203, 120–124 (2016).
Google Scholar
Salomon, M. J. et al. Global evaluation of commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants under greenhouse and field conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 169, 104225 (2022).
Google Scholar
Maltz, M. R. & Treseder, K. K. Sources of inocula influence mycorrhizal colonization of plants in restoration projects: a meta-analysis: mycorrhizal inoculation in restoration. Restor. Ecol. 23, 625–634 (2015).
Google Scholar
Busby, P. E., Newcombe, G., Neat, A. S. & Averill, C. Facilitating reforestation through the plant microbiome: perspectives from the phyllosphere. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-021320-010717 (2022).
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M.-A. & Sanders, I. R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future. New Phytol. 205, 1406–1423 (2015).
Google Scholar
Crowther, T. W. et al. Predicting the responsiveness of soil biodiversity to deforestation: a cross-biome study. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2983–2994 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lilleskov, E. A., Kuyper, T. W., Bidartondo, M. I. & Hobbie, E. A. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition impacts on the structure and function of forest mycorrhizal communities: a review. Environ. Pollut. 246, 148–162 (2019).
Google Scholar
Smith, G. R., Steidinger, B. S., Bruns, T. D. & Peay, K. G. Competition–colonization tradeoffs structure fungal diversity. ISME J. 12, 1758–1767 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ceballos, I. et al. The in vitro mass-produced model mycorrhizal fungus, Rhizophagus irregularis, significantly increases yields of the globally important food security crop cassava. PLoS ONE 8, e70633 (2013).
Google Scholar
Buysens, C., César, V., Ferrais, F., de Boulois, H. D. & Declerck, S. Inoculation of Medicago sativa cover crop with Rhizophagus irregularis and Trichoderma harzianum increases the yield of subsequently-grown potato under low nutrient conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 105, 137–143 (2016).
Google Scholar
Antunes, P. M. et al. Influence of commercial inoculation with Glomus intraradices on the structure and functioning of an AM fungal community from an agricultural site. Plant Soil 317, 257–266 (2009).
Google Scholar
Emam, T. Local soil, but not commercial AMF inoculum, increases native and non‐native grass growth at a mine restoration site. Restor. Ecol. 24, 35–44 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. D. et al. A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol. Lett. 13, 394–407 (2010).
Google Scholar
Policelli, N., Horton, T. R., Hudon, A. T., Patterson, T. R. & Bhatnagar, J. M. Back to roots: the role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in boreal and temperate forest restoration. Front. For. Glob. Change 3, 97 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. D. et al. Ectomycorrhizal plant-fungal co-invasions as natural experiments for connecting plant and fungal traits to their ecosystem consequences. Front. Glob. Change 3, 84 (2020).
Google Scholar
Land Use Statistics and Indicators. Global, Regional and Country Trends 1990– 2019 FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No. 28 (FAO, 2021).
Stewart, W. M., Dibb, D. W., Johnston, A. E. & Smyth, T. J. The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron. J. 97, 1–6 (2005).
Google Scholar
Harlander, S. K. The evolution of modern agriculture and its future with biotechnology. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 21, 161S–165S (2002).
Google Scholar
Cooper, J. & Dobson, H. The benefits of pesticides to mankind and the environment. Crop Prot. 26, 1337–1348 (2007).
Google Scholar
Zsögön, A., Peres, L. E. P., Xiao, Y., Yan, J. & Fernie, A. R. Enhancing crop diversity for food security in the face of climate uncertainty. Plant J. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15626 (2021).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
McDonald, B. A. & Stukenbrock, E. H. Rapid emergence of pathogens in agro-ecosystems: global threats to agricultural sustainability and food security. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20160026 (2016).
Google Scholar
Avelino, J. et al. The coffee rust crises in Colombia and Central America (2008–2013): impacts, plausible causes and proposed solutions. Food Sec. 7, 303–321 (2015).
Google Scholar
Goss, E. M. et al. The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans originated in central Mexico rather than the Andes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8791–8796 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ploetz, R. C. Panama disease: a classic and destructive disease of banana. Plant Health Prog. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2000-1204-01-HM (2000).
Craven, D. et al. Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity–stability relationship. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1579–1587 (2018).
Google Scholar
Thibaut, L. M. & Connolly, S. R. Understanding diversity–stability relationships: towards a unified model of portfolio effects. Ecol. Lett. 16, 140–150 (2013).
Google Scholar
Isbell, F. et al. Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526, 574–577 (2015).
Google Scholar
Prieto, I. et al. Complementary effects of species and genetic diversity on productivity and stability of sown grasslands. Nat. Plants 1, 15033 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liang, J. et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354, aaf8957 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cornell, C. et al. Do bioinoculants affect resident microbial communities? A meta-analysis. Front. Agron. 3, 753474 (2021).
Google Scholar
Manning, L. Groundwork BioAg raises $11m to expand mycorrhizal inputs business. AgFunder Network https://agfundernews.com/groundwork-bioag-raises-11m-to-expand-mycorrhizal-inputs-business (2021).
Egidi, E. et al. A few Ascomycota taxa dominate soil fungal communities worldwide. Nat. Commun. 10, 2369 (2019).
Google Scholar
Olle, M. & Williams, I. H. Effective microorganisms and their influence on vegetable production—a review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 88, 380–386 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mayer, J., Scheid, S., Widmer, F., Fließbach, A. & Oberholzer, H.-R. How effective are ‘Effective microorganisms® (EM)’? Results from a field study in temperate climate. Appl. Soil Ecol. 46, 230–239 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kodippili, K. P. A. N. & Nimalan, J. Effect of homemade effective microorganisms on the growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annuum) MI-2. AGRIEAST J. Agric. Sci. https://doi.org/10.4038/agrieast.v12i2.57 (2018).
de Araujo Avila, G. M., Gabardo, G., Clock, D. C. & de Lima Junior, O. S. Use of efficient microorganisms in agriculture. Res. Soc. Dev. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17515 (2021).
Saleem, M., Hu, J. & Jousset, A. More than the sum of its parts: microbiome biodiversity as a driver of plant growth and soil health. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 50, 145–168 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bradford, M. A. et al. Thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration to elevated temperature. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1316–1327 (2008).
Google Scholar
Romero-Olivares, A. L., Allison, S. D. & Treseder, K. K. Soil microbes and their response to experimental warming over time: a meta-analysis of field studies. Soil Biol. Biochem. 107, 32–40 (2017).
Google Scholar
Klironomos, J. N. Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84, 2292–2301 (2003).
Google Scholar
Veen, C. G. F., Snoek, B. L., Bakx-Schotman, T., Wardle, D. A. & van der Putten, W. H. Relationships between fungal community composition in decomposing leaf litter and home-field advantage effects. Funct. Ecol. 33, 1524–1535 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Zhong, M. & He, T. Home-field advantage of litter decomposition and nitrogen release in forest ecosystems. Biol. Fertil. Soils 49, 427–434 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. V., Waring, B. G., Rocca, J. D. & Kivlin, S. N. Historical climate controls soil respiration responses to current soil moisture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6322–6327 (2017).
Google Scholar
Morriën, E. et al. Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses. Nat. Commun. 8, 14349 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wittebolle, L. et al. Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress. Nature 458, 623–626 (2009).
Google Scholar
de Graaff, M.-A., Adkins, J., Kardol, P. & Throop, H. A meta-analysis of soil biodiversity impacts on the carbon cycle. Soil 1, 257–271 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gao, J. et al. Assessing the effect of leaf litter diversity on the decomposition and associated diversity of fungal assemblages. Forests 6, 2371–2386 (2015).
Google Scholar
Selosse, M.-A., Bouchard, D., Martin, F. & Tacon, F. L. Effect of Laccaria bicolor strains inoculated on Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) several years after nursery inoculation. Can. J. Res. 30, 360–371 (2000).
Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. et al. Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots. ISME J. 13, 1722–1736 (2019).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
