in

Deep-sea gas hydrate mounds and chemosynthetic fauna discovered at 3640 m on the Molloy Ridge, Greenland Sea


Abstract

Methane seepage at the seafloor can form gas hydrate and sustain chemosynthetic communities of deep-sea animals. Most known hydrate seeps occur shallower than 2000 m on continental slopes, whereas hydrothermal vents are found at greater depths along active spreading centres. Here we report the discovery of hydrate mounds with cold-seep fauna at 3640 m deep on the Molloy Ridge. The mounds display seafloor morphologies resulting from progressive stages of hydrate dissociation. Gas bubbles from the mounds rise to within 300 m of the ocean surface, and isotopic analysis shows the hydrates contain thermogenic gas. Crude oil sampled from the hydrate deposits indicates a young Miocene source rock formed in a fresh-brackish water paleo-environment. The hydrate mounds are inhabited by taxa including siboglinid and maldanid tubeworms, skeneid and rissoid snails, and melitid amphipods. Family-level composition of the fauna is similar to that of Arctic hydrothermal vents at similar depths, including the Jøtul vent field on the Knipovich Ridge, and less similar to nearby methane seeps at shallower depths. The overlap between seep and vent fauna in the Arctic has implications for understanding ecological connectivity across deep-sea habitats and assessing their vulnerability to future impacts from seafloor resource extraction in the region.

Similar content being viewed by others

Long-distance migration and venting of methane from the base of the hydrate stability zone

Negligible atmospheric release of methane from decomposing hydrates in mid-latitude oceans

Discovery of the first hydrothermal field along the 500-km-long Knipovich Ridge offshore Svalbard (the Jøtul field)

Data availability

All the data generated and or analysed in the study are included in the main text and in the Supplementary Information file. The species identified at the Freya gas hydrate mounds, the ROV frame showing the Freya gas hydrate mounds and the gas hydrate sampling on which the biological and geochemical analyses for this paper, the n-Alkanes chromatograms of the oil from Freya gas hydrate mounds, the source rock proxies, the oil maturity proxies, all-pairwise faunal similarity matrix (Sørensen Index values) for high-Arctic (>72 °N) cold seeps and hydrothermal vents, calculated from family presence/absence data using faunal records from this study and published literature (see Supplementary Data 1 for data sources), and the Fledermaus plot showing where the flares originate on the topography as processed with Qimera and acoustic backscatter processed with FMMidwater using the shipboard MBES at the Freya gas hydrate mounds are provided in the Supplementary Information. A video showing methane bubbles in this study is provided as Supplementary Movie 1.

References

  1. Bohrmann, G. & Torres, M. E. Marine gas hydrates. in Encyclopedia of Marine Geosciences (eds Harff, J. et al.) 1–7 (Springer Netherlands, 2013).

  2. Dillon, W. P. Gas hydrate in the ocean environment. in Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd edn (ed. Meyers, R. A.) 473–486 (Academic Press, 2002).

  3. Suess, E. Marine cold seeps and their manifestations: geological control, biogeochemical criteria and environmental conditions. Int. J. Earth Sci. 103, 1889–1916 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Milkov, A. V. Global estimates of hydrate-bound gas in marine sediments: How much is really out there? Earth Sci. Rev. 66, 183–197 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schoell, M. Multiple origins of methane in the Earth. Chem. Geol. 71, 1–10 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boetius, A. & Wenzhöfer, F. Seafloor oxygen consumption fuelled by methane from cold seeps. Nat. Geosci. 6, 725–734 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levin, L. A. Ecology of cold seep sediments: interactions of fauna with flow, chemistry and microbes. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 43, 11–56 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Åström, E. K., Sen, A., Carroll, M. L. & Carroll, J. Cold seeps in a warming Arctic: insights for benthic ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 244 (2020).

  9. Vogt, P. et al. Haakon Mosby mud volcano provides unusual example of venting. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 78, 549–557 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Panieri, G. et al. An integrated view of the methane system in the pockmarks at Vestnesa Ridge, 79°N. Mar. Geol. 390, 282–300 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Panieri, G. et al. CAGE-22-2 Scientific Cruise Report. AKMA 2/Ocean Senses, in CAGE-22-2 Scientific Cruise Report. AKMA 2/Ocean Senses. UiT & #8211; The Arctic University of Norway (2022).

  12. Argentino, C., Borrelli, C., Akinselure, A., Correa-Diaz, M. & Panieri, G. Biogeochemical investigations of methane seepage at the ultraslow-spreading Arctic mid-ocean ridge: Svyatogor ridge, Fram Strait. Mar. Pet. Geol. 162, 106761 (2024).

  13. Eilertsen, M. H. et al. Faunal communities of Arctic deep-water methane seeps are specialised with links to hydrothermal vents. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr. Research. Pap. 225, 104594 (2025).

  14. Serov, P. et al. Widespread natural methane and oil leakage from sub-marine Arctic reservoirs. Nat. Commun. 14, 1782 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Panieri, G. et al. The discovery of Boreal mud volcano: a natural sanctuary for threatened Arctic species. Nat. Commun. 16, 504 (2025).

  16. Argentino, C. et al. A constellation of mud volcanoes originated from a buried Arctic mega-slide, Southwestern Barents Sea. Sci. Rep. 15, 15161 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Åström, E. K. L. et al. Methane cold seeps as biological oases in the high-Arctic deep sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, S209–S231 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schander, C. et al. The fauna of hydrothermal vents on the Mohn Ridge (North Atlantic). Mar. Biol. Res. 6, 155–171 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stensland, A. et al. 3He along the ultraslow spreading AMOR in the Norwegian-Greenland Seas. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 147, 1–11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bohrmann, G. et al. Discovery of the first hydrothermal field along the 500-km-long Knipovich Ridge offshore Svalbard (the Jøtul field). Sci. Rep. 14, 10168 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pedersen, R. B. et al. Discovery of a black smoker vent field and vent fauna at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Nat. Commun. 1, 126 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ramirez-Llodra, E. et al. Hot vents beneath an icy ocean: The Aurora Vent Field, Gakkel Ridge, Revealed. Oceanography 36, 6–17 (2022).

  23. Eilertsen, M. H. et al. Diversity, habitat endemicity and trophic ecology of the fauna of Loki’s Castle vent field on the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Sci. Rep. 14, 103 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, C. et al. Integrative taxonomy of a new cocculinid limpet dominating the Aurora Vent Field in the central Arctic Ocean. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 220885 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tunnicliffe, V., Juniper, S. K. & Sibuet, M. Reducing environments of the deep-sea floor. Ecosystems of the Deep Oceans 28, 81–110 (2003).

  26. Van Dover, C. L. et al. Evolution and Biogeography of Deep-Sea Vent and Seep Invertebrates. Science 295, 1253–1257 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Watanabe, H. et al. Japan: vents and seeps in close proximity. in The Vent and Seep Biota: Aspects from Microbes to Ecosystems (ed. Kiel, S.) 379–401 (Springer Netherlands, 2010).

  28. Portail, M. et al. Comparative study of vent and seep macrofaunal communities in the Guaymas Basin. Biogeosciences 12, 5455–5479 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Talwani, M. & Eldholm, O. Evolution of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. GSA Bull. 88, 969–999 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dumais, M.-A. et al. New interpretation of the spreading evolution of the Knipovich Ridge derived from aeromagnetic data. Geophys. J. Int. 224, 1422–1428 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Engen, Ø, Faleide, J. I. & Dyreng, T. K. Opening of the Fram Strait gateway: a review of plate tectonic constraints. Tectonophysics 450, 51–69 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chand, S., Knies, J., Geissler, W. H., Plaza-Faverola, A. & Thorsnes, T. Acoustic evidence of hydrocarbon release associated with the Spitsbergen Transform Fault, north of the Molloy Ridge, Fram Strait. Front. Earth Sci. 12, 1347252 (2024).

  33. Thorsnes, T. et al. Gas seeps in Norwegian waters—distribution and mechanisms. Nor. J. Geol. 103, 1–32 (2023).

  34. Tunnicliffe, V. & Cordes, E. E. The tubeworm forests of hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. in Perspectives on the Marine Animal Forests of the World (eds Rossi, S. & Bramanti, L.) 147–192 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).

  35. Knies, J. & Mann, U. Depositional environment and source rock potential of Miocene strata from the central Fram Strait: introduction of a new computing tool for simulating organic facies variations. Mar. Pet. Geol. 19, 811–828 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, J. et al. Evolutionary history of the Arctic flora. Nat. Commun. 14, 4021 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Panieri, G. et al. An Arctic natural oil seep investigated from space to the seafloor. Sci. Total Environ. 907, 167788 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lein, A. et al. Chemical and isotopic evidence for the nature of the fluid in CH4-containing sediments of the Håkon Mosby Mud Volcano. Geo-Mar. Lett. 19, 76–83 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kennicutt, M. C. Oil and gas seeps in the Gulf of Mexico. in Habitats and Biota of the Gulf of Mexico: Before the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Volume 1: Water Quality, Sediments, Sediment Contaminants, Oil and Gas Seeps, Coastal Habitats, Offshore Plankton and Benthos, and Shellfish (ed. Ward, C. H.) 275–358 (Springer New York, 2017).

  40. Geissler, W. H. et al. Arctic megaslide at presumed rest. Sci. Rep. 6, 38529 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lee, M. et al. Method of estimating the amount of in situ gas hydrates in deep marine sediments. Mar. Pet. Geol. 10, 493–506 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Majumdar, U. & Cook, A. E. The volume of gas hydrate-bound gas in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 4313–4328 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Karam, S. et al. Continued warming of deep waters in the Fram Strait. Ocean Sci. 20, 917–930 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rehder, G. et al. Controls on methane bubble dissolution inside and outside the hydrate stability field from open ocean field experiments and numerical modeling. Mar. Chem. 114, 19–30 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Römer, M. et al. Amount and fate of gas and oil discharged at 3400 m water depth from a natural seep site in the Southern Gulf of Mexico. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 700 (2019).

  46. Fu, X., Waite, W. F. & Ruppel, C. D. Hydrate formation on marine seep bubbles and the implications for water column methane dissolution. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 126, e2021JC017363 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. James, R. H. et al. Effects of climate change on methane emissions from seafloor sediments in the Arctic Ocean: a review. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, S283–S299 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. You, K. et al. Mechanisms of methane hydrate formation in geological systems. Rev. Geophys. 57, 1146–1196 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Georgieva, M. N. et al. A chemosynthetic weed: the tubeworm Sclerolinum contortum is a bipolar, cosmopolitan species. BMC Evolut. Biol. 15, 280 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cordes, E. E. et al. Influence of foundation species, depth, and location on diversity and community composition at Gulf of Mexico lower-slope cold seeps. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 57, 1870–1881 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sen, A. et al. Geophysical and geochemical controls on the megafaunal community of a high Arctic cold seep. Biogeosciences 15, 4533–4559 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hughes, T., Denton, G. H. & Grosswald, M. G. Was there a late-Würm Arctic Ice Sheet? Nature 266, 596–602 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jakobsson, M. et al. Arctic Ocean glacial history. Quat. Sci. Rev. 92, 40–67 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Baker, E. T. & German, C. R. On the global distribution of hydrothermal vent fields. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 148, 245–266 (2004)

  55. Mileikovsky, S. A. Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: a re-evaluation. Mar. Biol. 10, 193–213 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rogers, A. D. et al. The discovery of new deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities in the southern ocean and implications for biogeography. PLOS Biol. 10, e1001234 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mammone, M. et al. Brooding strategy of the Arctic cold seep polychaete Oligobrachia haakonmosbiensis. Mar. Biol. 167, 42 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Menon Economics. Brukerundersøkelse Sokkeldirektoratet. Menon-publikasjon nr.5/2024 (2024).

  59. Ramirez-Llodra, E. et al. Benthic communities on the Mohn’s Treasure Mound: implications for management of seabed mining in the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 490 (2020).

  60. Dover, C. et al. Scientific rationale and international obligations for protection of active hydrothermal vent ecosystems from deep-sea mining. Mar. Policy 90, 20–28 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Åström, E. K. L. et al. Arctic cold seeps in marine methane hydrate environments: impacts on shelf macrobenthic community structure offshore Svalbard. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 552, 1–18 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Åström, E. K. L. et al. Chemosynthesis influences food web and community structure in high-Arctic benthos. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 629, 19–42 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gebruk, A. V. et al. Methane seep community of the Håkon Mosby mud volcano (the Norwegian Sea): composition and trophic aspects. Sarsia 88, 394–403 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sørensen, T. J. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Kongelige Danske videnskabernes selskab; bd. 5, nr. 4. København: I kommission hos E. Munksgaard (1948).

  65. CLARKE, K. R. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rodrigues, L. F. et al. Molecular and isotopic composition of hydrate-bound, dissolved and free gases in the Amazon Deep-Sea Fan and Slope Sediments, Brazil. Geosciences 9, 73 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Geissler, W. H. et al. Indications for the occurrence of gas hydrates in the fram strait from heat flow and multichannel seismic reflection data. J. Geol. Res. 2014, 582424 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vadakkepuliyambatta, S. A graphical user interface for estimating the gas hydrate stability in marine sediments. T.T.A.U.o.N. Ui, Editor, DataverseNO. (2019).

  69. Sloan, E. D. Jr. & Koh, C. A. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases (CRC Press, 2007).

  70. Ryan, W. B. F. et al. Global multi-resolution topography synthesis. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 10, Q03014 (2009).

  71. Authority, T. N. M. Bathymetric data and terrain models of the seabed. (2022).

  72. Argentino, C. et al. Dynamic and history of methane seepage in the SW Barents Sea: new insights from Leirdjupet Fault Complex. Sci. Rep. 11, 4373 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Milkov, A. V. & Etiope, G. Revised genetic diagrams for natural gases based on a global dataset of >20,000 samples. Org. Geochem. 125, 109–120 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Ocean Census, and REV Ocean supported our research and the Deep Arctic – EXTREME24 expedition. Ocean Census acknowledges the funding of The Nippon Foundation, which supported this expedition. K.L. is part of the British Antarctic Survey Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme and funded by the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council. The RV Kronprins Haakon officers and crew, the ROV Aurora team, and Steve Killops are deeply acknowledged.

Funding

Open access funding provided by UiT The Arctic University of Norway (incl University Hospital of North Norway).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

G.P.: conceptualisation, methodology, writing, original draft preparation, funding acquisition. J.T.C.: conceptualisation, methodology, writing. K.L.: methodology, writing. V.N.: methodology, writing. E.R.-L.: methodology, writing. C.A.: data visualisation, methodology. B.F.: data visualisation, writing. A.D.R.: conceptualisation, methodology, writing, funding acquisition. AD-E24 team: methodology.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Giuliana Panieri or Jonathan T. Copley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Warren Wood, William Ussler and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Movie 1

Reporting Summary

Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panieri, G., Copley, J.T., Linse, K. et al. Deep-sea gas hydrate mounds and chemosynthetic fauna discovered at 3640 m on the Molloy Ridge, Greenland Sea.
Nat Commun (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67165-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67165-x


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Integrated assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in extensive livestock farming systems

Carbon dynamics of a controlled peatland rewetting experiment in the Norwegian boreal zone

Back to Top