Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future

Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).

IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer L. A.) (IPCC, 2014).

IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

Tokarska, K. B. & Gillett, N. P. Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 °C global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 296–299 (2018).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Fawcett, A. A. et al. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science 350, 1168–1169 (2015).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Emissions Gap Report 2019 (UNEP, 2019).

Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 2141–2194 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Lawrence, B. M. G. & Schäfer, S. Promises and perils of the Paris Agreement. Science 364, 829–830 (2019).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Anderson, K. & Peters, G. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354, 182–184 (2016).

CAS  Google Scholar 

NRC Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018).

NRC Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration (National Research Council, 2015).

Minx, J. C. et al. Negative emissions—part 1: research landscape and synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063001 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Nemet, G. F. et al. Negative emissions—part 3: innovation and upscaling. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063003 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Roe, S. et al. Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 817–828 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Fuhrman, J., McJeon, H., Doney, S. C., Shobe, W. & Clarens, A. F. From zero to hero?: Why integrated assessment modeling of negative emissions technologies is hard and how we can do better. Front. Clim. 1, 11 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Wise, M. et al. Implications of limiting CO₂ concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324, 1183–1186 (2009).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Calvin, K. et al. Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. Clim. Change 123, 691–704 (2014).

Google Scholar 

Fuss, S. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 850–853 (2014).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO₂ emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Canadell, J. G. & Schulze, E. D. Global potential of biospheric carbon management for climate mitigation. Nat. Commun. 5, 5282 (2014).

Google Scholar 

Keith, D. W., Holmes, G., St. Angelo, D. & Heidel, K. A process for capturing CO₂ from the atmosphere. Joule 2, 1573–1594 (2018).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Realmonte, G. et al. An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat. Commun. 10, 3277 (2019).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Direct Air Capture of CO ₂with Chemicals: a Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs (American Physical Society, 2011).

Carbon engineering’s large-scale direct air capture breakthrough. Carbon Engineering (7 June 2018); https://carbonengineering.com/news-updates/climate-change-breakthrough/

Simon, E. The Swiss company hoping to capture 1% of global CO₂ emissions by 2025. Carbon Brief (22 June 2017); https://www.carbonbrief.org/swiss-company-hoping-capture-1-global-co2-emissions-2025

Peters, A. Can we suck enough CO₂ from the air to save the climate? Global Thermostat (22 December 2017); https://globalthermostat.com/2017/12/global-thermostat-news-fastcompany-com-published-122217/

Chevron, occidental invest in CO₂ removal technology. Reuters (9 January 2019); https://www.reuters.com/article/us-carbonengineering-investment/chevron-occidental-invest-in-co2-removal-technology-idUSKCN1P312R

ExxonMobil and Global Thermostat to advance breakthrough atmospheric carbon capture technology. Business Wire (27 June 2019); https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190627005137/en/ExxonMobil-Global-Thermostat-Advance-Breakthrough-Atmospheric-Carbon

Marcucci, A., Kypreos, S. & Panos, E. The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: energy transition and the role of direct air capture. Climatic Change 144, 181–193 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Strefler, J. et al. Between Scylla and Charybdis: delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044015 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Chen, C. & Tavoni, M. Direct air capture of CO₂ and climate stabilization: a model based assessment. Climatic Change 118, 59–72 (2013).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Holz, C., Siegel, L. S., Johnston, E., Jones, A. P. & Sterman, J. Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5 °C—trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 64028 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Keith, D. W., Ha-Duong, M. & Stolaroff, J. K. Climate strategy with CO₂ capture from the air. Climatic Change 74, 17–45 (2006).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Honegger, M. & Reiner, D. The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design. Clim. Policy 18, 306–321 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Bednar, J., Obersteiner, M. & Wagner, F. On the financial viability of negative emissions. Nat. Commun. 10, 1783 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Haddeland, I. et al. Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3251–3256 (2013).

Google Scholar 

Fricko, O. et al. Energy sector water use implications of a 2 °C climate policy. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 034011 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Calvin, K. et al. GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 677–698 (2019).

CAS  Google Scholar 

BP Statistical Review of World Energy (BP, 2019).

New map of worldwide croplands supports food and water security. Global food security-support analysis data at 30 m. USGS (14 November 2017); https://www.usgs.gov/news/new-map-worldwide-croplands-supports-food-and-water-security

Huppmann, D. et al. IAMC 1.5 °C scenario explorer and data. IIASA https://doi.org/10.22022/SR15/08-2018.15429 (2018)

Hoff, H. et al. Greening the global water system. J. Hydrol. 384, 177–186 (2010).

Google Scholar 

Fajardy, M. & Mac Dowell, N. Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions? Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1389–1426 (2017).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Ng, T. L., Eheart, J. W., Cai, X. & Miguez, F. Modeling miscanthus in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7138–7144 (2010).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Rogelj, J. et al. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573, 357–363 (2019).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Arnell, N. W., Lowe, J. A., Challinor, A. J. & Osborn, T. J. Global and regional impacts of climate change at different levels of global temperature increase. Climatic Change 155, 377–391 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Calvin, K. et al. Global market and economic welfare implications of changes in agricultural yields due to climate change. Clim. Change Econ. 11, 2050005 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Nelson, G. C. et al. Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3274–3279 (2014).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Snyder, A., Calvin, K., Phillips, M. & Ruane, A. A crop yield change emulator for use in GCAM and similar models: Persephone v1.0. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 1319–1350 (2019).

Google Scholar 

McLaren, D. & Markusson, N. The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 392–397 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Alvarez, R. A. et al. Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science 361, 186–188 (2018).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Chu, E., Anguelovski, I. & Carmin, J. A. Inclusive approaches to urban climate adaptation planning and implementation in the Global South. Clim. Policy 16, 372–392 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Füssel, H. M. How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: a comprehensive indicator-based assessment. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 597–611 (2010).

Google Scholar 

Fuhrman, J. Replication Data for “Food Energy Water Tradeoffs of Negative Emissions Technologies in a + 1.5C Future” v1 (University of Virginia Dataverse, 2020); https://doi.org/10.18130/V3/JKJAOG

Peters, G. P. et al. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 3–6 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Mauna Loa CO ₂Annual Mean Data (NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, 2019); https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/

Global Average Near Surface Temperatures Relative to the Pre-Industrial Period (European Environment Agency, 2019; https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/global-average-air-temperature-anomalies-5#tab-dashboard-02

Calvin, K. et al. The SSP4: a world of deepening inequality. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 284–296 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Riahi, K. et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331–345 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Zeman, F. Energy and material balance of CO₂ capture from ambient air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 7558–7563 (2007).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Stolaroff, J. K., Keith, D. W. & Lowry, G. V. Carbon dioxide capture from atmospheric air using sodium hydroxide spray. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 2728–2735 (2008).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Fasihi, M., Efimova, O. & Breyer, C. Techno-economic assessment of CO₂ direct air capture plants. J. Clean. Prod. 224, 957–980 (2019).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Net Zero Technical Report 282, Fig. 10.2 (Committee on Climate Change, 2019).

Mazzotti, M., Baciocchi, R., Desmond, M. J. & Socolow, R. H. Direct air capture of CO₂ with chemicals: optimization of a two-loop hydroxide carbonate system using a countercurrent air–liquid contactor. Climatic Change 118, 119–135 (2013).

CAS  Google Scholar 

GCAM v5.2 Documentation: GCAM Energy System (JGCRI, 2020).

GCAM v5.2 Documentation: Table of Contents (JGCRI, 2019). https://jgcri.github.io/gcam-doc/toc.html