Coetzee, B. W. T., Gaston, K. J. & Chown, S. L. Local scale comparisons of biodiversity as a test for global protected area ecological performance: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e105824 (2014).
Gray, C. L. et al. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat. Commun. 7, 12306 (2016).
Geldmann, J. et al. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol. Conserv. 161, 230–238 (2013).
Jones, K. R. et al. One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 360, 788–791 (2018).
Jones, T., Hawes, J. E., Norton, G. W. & Hawkins, D. M. Effect of protection status on mammal richness and abundance in Afromontane forests of the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. Biol. Conserv. 229, 78–84 (2019).
Cheng, B. S., Altieri, A. H., Torchin, M. E. & Ruiz, G. M. Can marine reserves restore lost ecosystem functioning? A global synthesis. Ecology 100, e02617 (2019).
Terraube, J., Fernández‐Llamazares., Á. & Cabeza, M. The role of protected areas in supporting human health: a call to broaden the assessment of conservation outcomes. Curr. Opin. Env. Sust. 25, 50–58 (2017).
Naidoo, R. et al. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well‐being across the developing world. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3006 (2019).
Rodrigues, A. S. L. et al. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428, 640–643 (2004).
Eklund, J. & Cabeza, M. Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: crucial concepts for conservation planning. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1399, 27–41 (2017).
Leverington, F., Costa, K. L., Pavese, H., Lisle, A. & Hockings, M. A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environ. Manag. 46, 685–698 (2010).
Coad, L. et al. Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the global database of protected area management effectiveness. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 370, 2014–2081 (2015).
Watson, J. et al. Bolder science needed now for protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 30, 243–248 (2016).
Barnes, M. D., Glew, L., Wyborn, C. & Craigie, I. D. Prevent perverse outcomes from global protected area policy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 759–762 (2018).
Andam, K., Ferraro, P. J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A. & Robalino, J. A. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16089–16094 (2008).
Nolte, C., Agrawal, A., Silvius, K. M. & Soares-Filho, B. S. Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4956–4961 (2013).
Carranza, T., Balmford, A., Kapos, V. & Manica, A. Protected area effectiveness in reducing conversion in a rapidly vanishing ecosystem: the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv. Lett. 7, 216–223 (2014).
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Herrera, D. & Sandoval, C. Protected areas’ impacts on Brazilian Amazon deforestation: examining conservation‐development interactions to Inform planning. PLoS ONE 10, 1–17 (2015).
Barnes, M. D. et al. Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio‐economic metrics and body size. Nat. Commun. 7, 12747 (2016).
Beaudrot, L. et al. Standardized assessment of biodiversity trends in tropical forest protected areas: the end is not in sight. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002357 (2016).
Lindsey, P. A. et al. Relative efforts of countries to conserve world’s megafauna. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 243–252 (2017).
Bauer, H. et al. Lion (Panthera leo) populations are declining rapidly across Africa, except in intensively managed areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14894–14899 (2015).
Durant, S. M. et al. The global decline of cheetah Acinonyx jubatus and what it means for conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 528–533 (2017).
Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484 (2014).
Chapron, G. et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346, 1517–1519 (2014).
Liberg, O. et al. Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B. 279, 910–915 (2012).
Chapron, G. & Treves, A. Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B. 283, 20162577 (2016).
Rauset, G. R. et al. National parks in northern Sweden as refuges for illegal killing of large carnivores. Conserv. Lett. 9, 334–341 (2016).
Transparency International (TI). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018. Accessed 15 Nov 2019 (2018).
Pohja-Mykrä, M. & Kurki, S. Strong community support for illegal killing challenges wolf management. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 60, 759–770 (2014).
Suutarinen, J. & Kojola, I. Poaching regulates the legally hunted wolf population in Finland. Biol. Conserv. 215, 11–18 (2017).
Inman, R. M., Nagoin, A. J., Persson, J. & Mattisson, J. The wolverine’s niche: linking reproductive chronology, caching, competition and climate. J. Mammal. 93, 634–644 (2012).
Heim, N., Fisher, J. T., Clevenger, A., Paczkowski, J. & Volpe, J. Cumulative effects of climate and landscape change drive spatial distribution of Rocky Mountain wolverine (Gulo gulo L.). Ecol. Evol. 7, 8903–8914 (2017).
Ruusila, V. & Kojola. I. Ungulates and their management in Finland. In: European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. (eds Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. & Putman, R.) 86–102 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
Stenset, N. E. et al. Seasonal and annual variation in the diet of brown bears Ursus arctos in the boreal forest of southcentral Sweden. Wildl. Biol. 22, 107–116 (2016).
Pulliainen, E., Lindgren, E. & Tunkkari, P. S. Influence of food availability and reproductive status on the diet and body condition of the European lynx in Finland. Acta Theriol. 40, 181–196 (1995).
Ministry of the Agriculture and Forestry. Management plan for the lynx population in Finland. Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy (2007).
Persson, J., Ericsson, G. & Segerström, P. Human caused mortality in the endangered Scandinavian wolverine population. Biol. Conserv. 142, 325–331 (2009).
Metsähallitus. Principles of Protected Area Management in Finland. (Natural Heritage Services, 2016).
Mattisson, J. et al. Predation or scavenging? Prey body condition influences decision-making in a facultative predator, the wolverine. Ecosphere 7, e01407 (2016).
Hobbs, N. T., Andrén, H., Persson, J., Aronsson, M. & Chapron, G. Native predators reduce harvest of reindeer by Sami pastoralists. Ecol. Appl. 22, 1640–1654 (2012).
Colpaert, A. & Kumpula, J. Detecting changes in the state of reindeer pastures in northernmost Finland, 1995–2005. Polar Rec. 48, 74–82 (2012).
Heikkinen, H. I., Moilanen, O., Nuttall, M. & Sarkki, S. Managing predators, managing reindeer: contested conceptions of predator policies in Finland’s southeast reindeer herding area. Polar Rec. 47, 218–230 (2011).
Pape, R. & Löffler, J. Climate change, land use conflicts, predation and ecological degradation as challenges for reindeer husbandry in northern Europe: What do we really know after half a century of research? Ambio 41, 421–434 (2012).
De Pourcq, K. et al. Conflict in protected areas: who says co-management does not work? PLoS ONE 10, e0144943 (2015).
Eklund, J., Coad, L., Geldmann, J. & Cabeza, M. What constitutes a useful measure of protected area effectiveness? A case study of management inputs and protected area impacts in Madagascar. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 1, e107 (2019).
Uboni, A., Smith, D. W., Mao, J. S., Stahler, D. R. & Vucetich, J. A. Long‐ and short‐term temporal variability in habitat selection of a top‐predator. Ecosphere 6, 51 (2015).
Filla, M. et al. Habitat selection by Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) is primarily driven by avoidance of human activity during day and prey availability during night. Ecol. Evol. 7, 6367–6381 (2017).
Sazatornil, V. et al. The role of human‐related risk in breeding site selection by wolves. Biol. Conserv. 201, 103–110 (2016).
Metz, M. C., Smith, D. W., Vucetich, J. A., Stahler, D. R. & Peterson, R. O. Seasonal patterns of predation for gray wolves in the multi-prey system of Yellowstone National Park. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 553–563 (2012).
Golden, H. N. et al. Estimating wolverine Gulo gulo population size using quadrat sampling of tracks in snow. Wildl. Biol. 13, 52–61 (2007).
Kojola, I. et al. (2014). Tracks in snow and population size estimation: the wolf Canis lupus in Finland. Wildl. Biol. 20, 279–284 (2014).
Wikenros, C. et al. Fear or food–abundance of red fox in relation to occurrence of lynx and wolf. Sci. Rep. 7, 9059 (2017).
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).
Schleicher, J., Peres, C. A. & Leader‐Williams, N. Conservation performance of tropical protected areas: How important is management? Conserv. Lett. 12, e12650 (2019).
Pringle, R. M. Upgrading protected areas to conserve wild biodiversity. Nature 546, 91–99 (2017).
Visconti, P. et al. Protected area targets post‐2020. Science 364, 239–241 (2019).
Lindén, H. et al. Wildlife triangle scheme in Finland: methods and aims for monitoring wildlife populations. Finn. Game Res. 49, 4–11 (1996).
Milanesi, P., Breiner, F. T., Puopolo, F. & Holderegger, R. European human-dominated landscapes provide ample space for the recolonization of large carnivore populations under future land change scenarios. Ecography 40, 1359–1368 (2017).
R. Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2018).
IUCN and UNEP-WCMC.The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). (UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 2017). www.protectedplanet.net Accessed 3 May 2018.
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G. & Stuart, E. A. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Anal. 15, 199–236 (2007).
Imbens, G. W. & Wooldridge, J. M. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 5–86 (2009).
Rizopoulos, D. GLMMadaptive: Generalized Linear Mixed Models using Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature. https://drizopoulos.github.io/GLMMadaptive/, https://github.com/drizopoulos/GLMMadaptive. (2019).
Hedeker, D., du Toit, S. H., Demirtas, H. & Gibbons, R. D. A note on marginalization of regression parameters from mixed models of binary outcomes. Biometrics 74, 354–361 (2018).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
