Siitonen, J. Biodiversity in dead wood (Stokland, J. N., Siitonen, J. & Jonsson, B. G. ed.) 380-393 (New York, 2012).
Laaksonen, M., Peuhu, E., Várkonyi, G. & Siitonen, J. Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure on saproxylic species dwelling in boreal spruce-swamp forests. Oikos. 117, 1098–1110 (2008).
Jonsson, B. G., Siitonen, J. & Stokland, J. N. Biodiversity in dead wood (Stokland, J. N., Siitonen, J. & Jonsson, B. G. ed.) 402-411 (New York, 2012).
Williams, D. T., Straw, N., Fielding, N., Jukes, M. & Price, J. The influence of forest management systems on the abundance and diversity of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in commercial plantations of Sitka spruce. Forest Ecol. Manag. 398, 196–207 (2017).
Moretti, M. et al. Fire-induced taxonomic and functional changes in saproxylic beetle communities in fire sensitive regions. Ecography 33, 760–771 (2010).
Gibb, H., Johansson, T., Stenbacka, F. & Hjältén, J. Functional Roles Affect Diversity-Succession Relationships for Boreal Beetles. PloS ONE 8, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072764 (2013).
Gossner, M. M. et al. Current ‘near-to-nature’ forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests. Conserv. Biol. 27, 605–614 (2013).
Müller, J., Jarzabek-Müller, A., Bussler, H. & Gossner, M. M. Hollow beech trees identified as keystone structures for saproxylic beetles by analyses of functional and phylogenetic diversity. Anim. Conserv. 17, 154–162 (2013).
Thorn, S. et al. New Insights into the Consequences of Post-Windthrow Salvage Logging Revealed by Functional Structure of Saproxylic Beetles Assemblages. PloS ONE 9(7), e101757 (2014).
Janssen, P., Fuhr, M., Cateau, E., Nusillard, B. & Bouget, C. Forest continuity acts congruently with stand maturity in structuring the functional composition of saproxylic beetles. Biol. Conserv. 205, 1–10 (2017).
Speight, M. C. D. Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation. (Strasbourg, 1989).
Sánchez-Galván, I. R., Marcos-García, M. A., Galante, E., Azeria, E. T. & Micó, E. Unraveling Saproxylic Insect Interactions in Tree Hollows from Iberian Mediterranean Forest. Environ. Entomol 47, 300–308 (2018).
Quinto, J., Marcos-García, M. A., Brustel, H., Galante, E. & Micó, E. Effectiveness of three sampling methods to survey saproxylic beetle assemblages in Mediterranean Woodland. J. Insect Conserv. 17, 765–776 (2013).
Redolfi De Zan, L., Bellotti, F., D’Amato, D. & Carpaneto, G. M. Saproxylic beetles in three relict beech forests of central Italy: Analysis of environmental parameters and implications for forest management. Forest Ecol. Manag. 328, 229–244 (2014).
Stroud, J. T. et al. Is a community still a community? Reviewing definitions of key terms in community ecology. Ecol. Evol 5(21), 4757–4765 (2015).
Ranius, T. & Jansson, N. A comparison of three methods to survey saproxylic beetles in hollow oaks. Biodivers. Conserv 11(10), 1759–1771 (2002).
Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Skarpaas, O. & Ødegaard, F. Hollow oaks and beetle conservation: the significance of the surroundings. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 837–852 (2010).
García-López, A., Galante, E. & Micó, E. Saproxylic Beetle Assemblage Selection as Determining Factor of Species Distributional Patterns: Implications for Conservation. J. Insect Sci. 16(1), 45, https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iew030 (2016).
Gouix, N. & Brustel, H. Emergence trap, a new method to survey Limoniscus violaceus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) from hollow trees. Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 421–436 (2012).
Micó, E. Saproxylic Insects. Diversity, ecology and conservation (Ulyshen, M. D. ed.) 693-728 (Switzerland, 2018).
Cocciufa, C. et al. Survey of saproxylic beetle assemblages at different forest plots in central Italy. B. Insectol 67, 295–306 (2014).
McGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 178–185 (2006).
Menezes, S., Baird, D. J. & Soares, A. M. V. M. Beyond taxonomy: a review of macroinvertebrate trait-based community descriptors as tools for freshwater biomonitoring. J. Appl. Ecol 47, 711–719 (2010).
Barton, P. S., Gibb, H., Manning, A. D., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Cunningham, S. A. Morphological traits as predictors of diet and microhabitat use in a diverse beetle assemblage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc 102, 301–310 (2011).
Lavorel, S. et al. A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services. J. Veg. Sci. 24, 942–948 (2013).
Lopez, B. et al. A new framework for inferring community assembly processes using phylogenetic information, relevant traits and environmental gradients. One Ecosystem 1, e9501 (2016).
Fountain-Jones, N. M. et al. Moving beyond the guild concept: developing a practical functional trait framework for terrestrial beetles. Ecol. Entomol. 40, 1–13 (2015).
Moretti, M., de Bello, F., Roberts, S. P. M. & Potts, S. G. Taxonomical vs. Functional responses of bee communities to fire in two contrasting climatic regions. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 98–108 (2009).
Pavoine, S. & Bonsall, M. B. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 86, 792–812 (2011).
Podgaiski, L. R. et al. Spider trait assembly patterns and resilience under fire-induced vegetation change in South Brazilian grasslands. PLoS ONE 8, e60207 (2013).
Götzenberger, L. et al. Ecological assembly rules in plant communities–approaches, patterns and prospects. Biological Reviews 87, 111–127 (2012).
Winter, S. & Möller, G. C. Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. Forest Ecol. Manag. 255, 1251–1261 (2008).
Mouchet, M. A., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H. & Mouillot, D. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct. Ecol 24, 867–876 (2010).
Hooper, D.U. et al. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Synthesis and Perspectives (Loreau, M., Naeem, S. & Inchausti, P. eds.) 195-208 (Oxford, 2002).
MacArthur, R. H. & Levins, R. Limiting similarity convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Amer. Nat. 101, 377–385 (1967).
Hardin, G. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131(3409), 1292–1297 (1960).
Quinto, J., Micó, E., Galante, E., Martinez-Falcón, A. & Marcos-García, M. A. Influence of tree hollow characteristics on the diversity of saproxylic insect guilds in Iberian Mediterranean woodlands. J. Insect Conserv. 18, 981–992 (2014).
de Bello, F., Carmona, C. P., Lepš, J., Szava-Kovats, R. & Pärtel, M. Functional diversity through the mean trait dissimilarity: resolving shortcomings with existing paradigms and algorithms. Oecologia 180, 933–940 (2016).
Forsythe, T. G. Locomotion in ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae): an interpretation of leg structure in functional terms. J. Zool 200, 493–507 (1983).
Ribera, I., McCracken, D. I., Foster, G. N., Downie, I. S. & Abernethy, V. J. Morphological diversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Scottish agricultural land. J. Zool. 247, 1–18 (1999).
Johansson, L. C. et al. Elytra boost lift, but reduce aerodynamic efficiency in flying beetles. J. R. Soc 9, 2745–2748 (2012).
Ranius, T. Influence of stand size and quality of tree hollows on saproxylic beetles in Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 103, 85–91 (2002).
Jönsson, N., Méndez, M. & Ranius, T. Nutrient richness of wood mould in tree hollows with the Scarabaeid beetle Osmoderma eremita. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 27(2), 79–82 (2004).
Micó, E., García-López, A., Sánchez, A., Juárez, M. & Galante, E. What can physical, biotic and chemical features of a tree hollow tell us about their associated diversity? J. Insect Conserv. 19, 141–153 (2015).
Pilskog, H. E., Birkemoe, T., Framstad, E. & Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. Effect of habitat size, quality, and isolation on functional groups of beetles in hollow oaks. J. Insect Sci. 16(1), 26, https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev145 (2016).
Sebek, P., Altman, J., Platek, M. & Cizek, L. Is active management the key to the conservation of saproxylic biodiversity? Pollarding promotes the formation of tree hollows. PLoS ONE 8, e60456 (2013).
Ramilo, P. et al. Influence of Traditional Management and Environmental Variables on Mediterranean Saproxylic Beetle Assemblages. Environ. Entomol 46(6), 1235–1242 (2017).
Jonsen, I. D. & Fahrig, L. Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure. Landscape Ecol 12, 185–197 (1997).
Downie, I. S. et al. Modelling populations of Erigone atra and E. Dentipalis (Araenae: Linyphiidae) across an agricultura gradient in Scotland. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 80, 15–28 (2000).
Buckley, L. B., Hurlbert, A. H. & Jetz, W. Broad-scale ecological implications of ectothermy and endothermy in changing environments. Global Ecol. Biogeogr 21, 873–885 (2012).
Hjältén, J. et al. Micro and macro-habitat associations in saproxylic beetles: implications for biodiversity management. PLoS ONE 7, e41100 (2012).
Stokland, J. N., Siitonen, J. & Jonsson, B. G. Biodiversity in dead wood. (New York, 2012).
Swenson, N. G. et al. Temporal turnover in the composition of tropical tree communities: functional determinism and phylogenetic stochasticity. Ecology 93, 490–499 (2012).
Schauer, B. et al. Influence of tree hollow characteristics on saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 27(4), 853–869 (2018).
Paillet, Y. et al. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: Meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv. Biol 24(1), 101–112 (2010).
Martello, F. et al. Homogenization and impoverishment of taxonomic and functional diversity of ants in Eucalyptus plantations. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20823-1 (2018).
Quinto, J. et al. Breaking down complex saproxylic communities: understanding sub-networks structure and implications to network robustness. PLoS ONE 7(9), e45062 (2012).
Micó, E., García-López, A., Brustel, H., Padilla, A. & Galante, E. Explaining the saproxylic beetle diversity of a protected Mediterranean area. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 889–904 (2013).
Ramírez-Hernández, A., Micó, E., Marcos-García, M. A., Brustel, H. & Galante, E. The “dehesa”, a key ecosystem in maintaining the diversity of Mediterranean saproxylic insects (Coleoptera and Diptera: Syrphidae). Biodivers. Conserv. 23, 2069–2086 (2014).
Bouget, C., Brustel, H., Brin, A. & Noblecourt, T. Sampling saproxylic beetles with window flight traps: methodological insights. Rev. Écol. (Terre Vie) 63, 13–24 (2008a).
Bouchard, P. et al. Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta). ZooKeys 88, 1–972 (2011).
Löbl, I. & Smetana, A. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Volume 2. Hydrophiloidea-Histeroidea -Staphylinoidea. (Stenstrup, 2004).
Löbl, I. & Smetana, A. Catalogue of palaearctic coleoptera. Volume 3. Scarabaeoidea-Scirtoidea-Dascilloidea-Buprestoidea-Byrrhoidea. (Stenstrup, 2006).
Löbl, I. & Smetana, A. Catalogue of palaearctic coleoptera. Volume 4. Elateroidea Derodontoidea-Bostrichoidea-Lymexyloidea-Cleroidea-Cucujoidea. (Stenstrup, 2007).
Löbl, I. & Smetana, A. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Volume 5. Tenebrionoidea. (Stenstrup, 2008).
Löbl, I. & Smetana, A. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Volume 6. Chrysomeloidea. (Stenstrup, 2010).
Chao, A. & Jost, L. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93, 2533–2547 (2012).
Chao, A. & Shen, T. J. Program SPADE (Species Prediction and Diversity Estimation), http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw (2010).
Fountain‐Jones, N. M. et al. Trophic position determines functional and phylogenetic recovery after disturbance within a community. Funct Ecol. 31, 1441–1451, 10.1111/1365-2435.12845 (2017).
Pavoine, S., Marcon, E. & Ricotta, C. ‘Equivalent numbers’ for species, phylogenetic or functional diversity in a nested hierarchy ofmultiple scales. Methods Ecol. Evol 7, 1152–1163 (2016).
Díaz, S. et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. PNAS 104, 20684–20689 (2007).
Carmona, C. P., de Bello, F., Mason, N. W. H. & Leps, J. Traits Without Borders: Integrating Functional Diversity Across Scales. Trends Ecol. Evol 31, 382–394 (2016a).
Carmona, C. P., de Bello, F., Mason, N. W. H. & Leps, J. The Density Awakens: A Reply to Blonder. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 667–669 (2016b).
Carmona, C.P., de Bello, F., Mason, N.W. & Lepš, J. Trait Probability Density (TPD): measuring functional diversity across scales based on trait probability density with R. Ecology, in press. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2876 (2019).
Carmona, C. P. TPD: Methods for Measuring Functional Diversity Based on Trait Probability Density. R package version 0.1.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TPD (2017).
Mason, N. W. H., Mouillot, D., Lee, W. G. & Wilson, J. B. Functional richness, functional and functional evenness divergence: the primary of functional components diversity. Oikos 111, 112–118 (2005).
Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H. & Mouillot, D. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89, 2290–22301 (2008).
Manly, B. F. J. A note on the analysis of species co-occurrences. Ecology 76, 1109–1115 (1995).
Carmona, C. P., Mason, N. W. H., Azcárate, F. M. & Peco, B. Inter-annual fluctuations in rainfall shift the functional structure of Mediterranean grasslands across gradients of productivity and disturbance. J. Veg. Sci. 26(3), 538–551 (2015).
Ricotta, C. et al. Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: a quantitative guide (P Peres-Neto, Ed.). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1386-1395 (2016).
Benjamin, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57, 289–300 (1995).
Traba, J., Morales, M. B., Carmona, C. P. & Delgado, M. P. Resource partitioning and niche segregation in a steppe bird assemblage. Commun. Ecol 16, 178–188 (2015).
Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2017).
Carmona, C. P. et al. Taxonomical and functional diversity turnover in Mediterranean grasslands: interactions between grazing, habitat type and rainfall (M Cadotte, Ed.). J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1084-1093 (2012).
Magura, T., Tóthmérész, B. & Lövei, G. L. Body size inequality of carabids along an urbanisation gradient. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7, 472–482 (2006).
Slade, E. M., Mann, D. J., Villanueva, J. F. & Lewis, O. T. Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 1094–1104 (2007).
Bauer, T. Prey capture and structure of the visual space of an insect that hunts by sight on the litter layer (Notiophilus biguttatus, Carabidae, Coleoptera). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8, 91–97 (1981).
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Impact of habitat type and landscape structure on biomass, species richness and functional diversity of ground beetles. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 139, 181–186 (2010).
Bouget, C., Brustel, H. & Zagatti, P. The French Information System on Saproxylic BEetle Ecology (FRISBEE): an ecological and taxonomical database to help with the assessment of forest conservation status. Rev. Écol. (Terre Vie) 10, 33–36 (2008).
Audisio, P. et al. Lista Rossa IUCN dei Coleotteri saproxilici Italiani. (Roma, 2014).
Didham, R. K., Ghazoul, J., Stork, N. E. & Davis, A. J. Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 255–260 (1996).
Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R. & Lawrence, J. F. Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81, 1450–1461 (2000).
Pearson, R. G. et al. Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change. 4, 217–221 (2014).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
