in

Genome-wide genetic diversity yields insights into genomic responses of candidate climate-selected loci in an Andean wetland plant

  • 1.

    IPBES. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Eizaguirre, C. & Baltazar-Soares, M. Evolutionary conservation-evaluating the adaptive potential of species. Evol. Appl. 7, 963–967 (2014).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Razgour, O. et al. Considering adaptive genetic variation in climate change vulnerability assessment reduces species range loss projections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10418–10423 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. & Briscoe, D. A. Introduction to Conservation Genetics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Hoffmann, A. A., Sgro, C. M. & Kristensen, T. N. Revisiting adaptive potential, population size, and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 506–517 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Allendorf, F. W., Luikart, G. H. & Aitken, S. N. Conservation and the Genetics of POPULATIONS (Wiley Blackwell, Malden, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Caballero, A. & Garcia-Dorado, A. Allelic diversity and its implications for the rate of adaptation. Genetics 195, 1373–1384 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Lopez-Cortegano, E. et al. Optimal management of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Front. Genet. 10, 843 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Frankham, R. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126, 131–140 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Mable, B. K. Conservation of adaptive potential and functional diversity: Integrating old and new approaches. Conserv. Genet. 20, 89–100 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Holderegger, R., Kamm, U. & Gugerli, F. Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: Implications for landscape genetics. Landsc. Ecol. 21, 797–807 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Kirk, H. & Freeland, J. R. Applications and implications of neutral versus non-neutral markers in molecular ecology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, 3966–3988 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Yildirim, Y., Tinnert, J. & Forsman, A. Contrasting patterns of neutral and functional genetic diversity in stable and disturbed environments. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12073–12089 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Reed, D. H. & Frankham, R. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55, 1095–1103 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Willi, Y. & Hoffmann, A. A. Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 124–133 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Matuszewski, S., Hermisson, J. & Kopp, M. Catch me if you can: Adaptation from standing genetic variation to a moving phenotypic optimum. Genetics 200, 1255–1272 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. H. Evolution of a species’ range. Am. Nat. 150, 1–23 (1997).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Bridle, J. R., Polechova, J., Kawata, M. & Butlin, R. K. Why is adaptation prevented at ecological margins? New insights from individual-based simulations. Ecol. Lett. 13, 485–494 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Tigano, A. & Friesen, V. L. Genomics of local adaptation with gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 25, 2144–2164 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Jacob, S. et al. Gene flow favours local adaptation under habitat choice in ciliate microcosms. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1407–1410 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Leffler, E. M. et al. Revisiting an old riddle: What determines genetic diversity levels within species?. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001388 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Corbett-Detig, R. B., Hartl, D. L. & Sackton, T. B. Natural selection constrains neutral diversity across a wide range of species. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002112 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Ellegren, H. & Galtier, N. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 422–433 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Zhu, Z. B., Yuan, D. J., Luo, D. H., Lu, X. T. & Huang, S. Enrichment of minor alleles of common SNPs and improved risk prediction for Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 10, e0133421 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Lei, X. Y., Yuan, D. J., Zhu, Z. B. & Huang, S. Collective effects of common SNPs and risk prediction in lung cancer. Heredity 121, 537–547 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Huang, S. New thoughts on an old riddle: What determines genetic diversity within and between species?. Genomics 108, 3–10 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Hoffmann, A. A. & Willi, Y. Detecting genetic responses to environmental change. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 421–432 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Sgro, C. M., Lowe, A. J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol. Appl. 4, 326–337 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Luikart, G., England, P. R., Tallmon, D., Jordan, S. & Taberlet, P. The power and promise of population genomics: From genotyping to genome typing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 981–994 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Pfeiffer, V. W. et al. Partitioning genetic and species diversity refines our understanding of species-genetic diversity relationships. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12351–12364 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Forester, B. R., Lasky, J. R., Wagner, H. H. & Urban, D. L. Comparing methods for detecting multilocus adaptation with multivariate genotype-environment associations. Mol. Ecol. 27, 2215–2233 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Dolédec, S. & Chessel, D. Co-Inertia analysis—An alternative method for studying species environment relationships. Freshw. Biol. 31, 277–294 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Mackintosh, A. et al. The determinants of genetic diversity in butterflies. Nat. Commun. 10, 3466 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Franks, S. J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Genetics of climate change adaptation. Ann. Rev. Genet. 46, 185–208 (2012).

  • 36.

    Scheben, A., Yuan, Y. X. & Edwards, D. Advances in genomics for adapting crops to climate change. Curr. Plant Biol. 6, 2–10 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Manel, S. et al. Genomic resources and their influence on the detection of the signal of positive selection in genome scans. Mol. Ecol. 25, 170–184 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Gomulkiewicz, R. & Houle, D. Demographic and genetic constraints on evolution. Am. Nat. 174, E218–E229 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 37, 433–458 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Lehnert, S. J. et al. Genomic signatures and correlates of widespread population declines in salmon. Nat. Commun. 10, 2996 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Vellend, M. et al. Drawing ecological inferences from coincident patterns of population- and community-level biodiversity. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2890–2901 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Bertin, A. et al. Genetic variation of loci potentially under selection confounds species-genetic diversity correlations in a fragmented habitat. Mol. Ecol. 26, 431–443 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Elshire, R. J. et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6, e19379 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Troncoso, A. J., Bertin, A., Osorio, R., Arancio, G. & Gouin, N. Comparative population genetics of two dominant plant species of high Andean wetlands reveals complex evolutionary histories and conservation perspectives in Chile’s Norte Chico. Conserv. Genet. 18, 1047–1060 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Vigneau, E. & Qannari, E. M. Clustering of variables around latent components. Commun. Stat-Simul. C. 32, 1131–1150 (2003).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Vigneau, E., Chen, M. K. & Qannari, E. M. ClustVarLV: An R package for the clustering of variables around latent variables. R J. 7, 134–148 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Oksanen, J. et al.Vegan: Community Ecology Packagehttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html (2018).

  • 49.

    Dray, S. & Dufour, A. B. The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Softw. 22, 1–20 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Dyer, R. Gstudio: An R Package for the Spatial Analysis of Population Genetic Datahttps://github.com/dyerlab/gstudio/ (2017).

  • 51.

    Lumley, T. & Miller, A. Leaps: Regression Subset Selectionhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/leaps/index.html (2009).

  • 52.

    Mazerolle, M. J. AICcmodavg: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q)AIC(c)https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AICcmodavg/index.html (2020).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Undergraduates ramp up research during pandemic diaspora

    Rational design of a microbial consortium of mucosal sugar utilizers reduces Clostridiodes difficile colonization