in

Inland fish and fisheries integral to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

  • 1.

    Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1 (UN, 2015).

  • 2.

    Fader, M., Cranmer, C., Lawford, R. & Engel-Cox, J. Toward an understanding of synergies and trade-offs between water, energy, and food SDG targets. Front. Environ. Sci. 6, 112 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Barbier, E. B. & Burgess, J. C. The Sustainable Development Goals and the systems approach to sustainability. Economics 11, 1–23 (2017).

    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Bhaduri, A. et al. Achieving Sustainable Development Goals from a water perspective. Front. Environ. Sci. 4, 64 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 5.

    Smith, M. S. Change the approach to sustainable development. Nature 483, 375 (2012).

  • 6.

    CWP Handbook of Fishery Statistical Standards. Section G: Fishing Areas – General (FAO, 2014).

  • 7.

    Funge-Smith, S. Review of the State of the World Fishery Resources: Inland Fisheries FIAF / C94 (FAO, 2018).

  • 8.

    Lynch, A. J. et al. The social, economic, and environmental importance of inland fish and fisheries. Environ. Rev. 24, 115–121 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Cooke, S. J. et al. On the sustainability of inland fisheries: finding a future for the forgotten. Ambio 45, 753–764 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture – 2018 (SOFIA) (FAO, 2018).

  • 11.

    Lymer, D., Teillard, F., Opio, C. & Bartley, D. M. in Freshwater, Fish, and the Future: Proceedings of the Global Cross-Sectoral Conference (eds Taylor, W. W. et al.) 169–182 (American Fisheries Society Press, 2016).

  • 12.

    Freshwater, Fish and the Future: Proceedings of the Global Cross-Sectoral Conference (American Fisheries Society, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and Michigan State University, 2016).

  • 13.

    Butchart, S. H. M., Miloslavich, P., Reyers, B. & Subramanian, S. M. in IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds Brondizio, E. S. et al.) Ch. 3 (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), 2019).

  • 14.

    Welcomme, R. L. et al. Inland capture fisheries. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 365, 2881–2896 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 15.

    Youn, S.-J. et al. Inland capture fishery contributions to global food security and threats to their future. Glob. Food Secur. 3, 142–148 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Cooke, S. J., Arlinghaus, R., Johnson, B. M. & Cowx, I. G. in Freshwater Fisheries Ecology (ed. Craig, J. F.) 449–465 (Wiley Blackwell Science Ltd, 2015).

  • 17.

    Noble, M. et al. Culturally significant fisheries: keystones for management of freshwater social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 21, 22 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 18.

    Postel, S. & Carpenter, S. in Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (ed. Daily, G. C.) 195–214 (Island Press, 1997).

  • 19.

    Fluet-Chouinard, E., Funge-Smith, S. & Mcintyre, P. B. Global hidden harvest of freshwater fish revealed by household surveys. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7623–7628 (2018).

  • 20.

    Iovanna, R. & Griffiths, C. Clean water, ecological benefits, and benefits transfer: a work in progress at the U.S. EPA. Ecol. Econ. 60, 473–482 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Brooks, E. G. E., Holland, R. A., Darwall, W. R. T. & Eigenbrod, F. Global evidence of positive impacts of freshwater biodiversity on fishery yields. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 553–562 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Holmlund, C. M. & Hammer, M. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecol. Econ. 29, 253–268 (1999).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 23.

    Béné, C., Macfayden, G. & Allison, E. H. Increasing the Contribution of Small-Scale Fisheries to Poverty Alleviation and Food Security FAO Fisheries Technical Paper (FAO, 2007).

  • 24.

    UNEP Blue Harvest: Inland Fisheries as an Ecosystem Service (WorldFish Center, 2010).

  • 25.

    Orr, S., Pittock, J., Chapagain, A. & Dumaresq, D. Dams on the Mekong River: lost fish protein and the implications for land and water resources. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 925–932 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 26.

    Palmer, T. A., Montagna, P. A., Pollack, J. B., Kalke, R. D. & DeYoe, H. R. The role of freshwater inflow in lagoons, rivers, and bays. Hydrobiologia 667, 49–67 (2011).

  • 27.

    Béné, C. Small-Scale Fisheries: Assessing their Contributions to Rural Livelihoods in Developing Countries FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1008 (FAO, 2006).

  • 28.

    Fiorella, K. J. et al. Transactional fish-for-sex relationships amid declining fish access in Kenya. World Dev. 74, 323–332 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    Voices from African Artisanal Fisheries: Calling for an African Year of Artisanal Fisheries (Sida, SSNC, 2016).

  • 30.

    Ziv, G., Baran, E., Nam, S., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. & Levin, S. A. Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5609–5614 (2012).

  • 31.

    Liermann, C. R., Nilsson, C., Robertson, J. & Ng, R. Implications of dam obstruction for global freshwater fish diversity. BioScience 62, 539–548 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Winemiller, K. O. et al. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science 351, 128–129 (2016).

  • 33.

    Floyd, M. F., Nicholas, L., Lee, I., Lee, J.-H. & Scott, D. Social stratification in recreational fishing participation: research and policy implications. Leis. Sci. 28, 351–368 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Hunt, W. & McManus, A. Recreational fishing supports health and wellbeing in Western Australia. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 40, 292 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Knopf, R. C. in Behavior and the Natural Environment. Human Behavior and Environment (Advances in Theory and Research) (eds Altman, I. & Wohlwill, J. F.) 205–240 (Springer, 1983).

  • 36.

    Elmqvist, T. et al. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 488–494 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 37.

    Martin, T. G. & Watson, J. E. Intact ecosystems provide the best defense against climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 122–124 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 38.

    Lynch, A. J. et al. Inland fisheries – Invisible but integral to the UN Sustainable Development Agenda for ending poverty by 2030. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 167–173 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Report of the Consultation on Integrating Small-Scale Fisheries in Poverty Reduction Planning in West Africa GCP/INT/735/UK (FAO/DFID, 2003).

  • 40.

    Lynch, A. J. et al. in Freshwater, Fish and the Future: Proceedings of the Global Cross-Sectoral Conference (eds Taylor, W. W. et al.) 183–200 (American Fisheries Society Press, 2016).

  • 41.

    Olver, C. H., Shuter, B. J. & Minns, C. K. Toward a definition of conservation principles for fisheries management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52, 1584–1594 (1995).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 42.

    Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Ecosystem-based water security and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 18, 317–333 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 43.

    Townsend, C. R. Invasion biology and ecological impacts of brown trout Salmo trutta in New Zealand. Biol. Conserv. 78, 13–22 (1996).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 44.

    Penczak, T. Impact of introduced brown trout on native fish communities in the Pilica River catchment (Poland). Environ. Biol. Fishes 54, 237–252 (1999).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 45.

    McHugh, P. & Budy, P. Experimental effects of nonnative brown trout on the individual- and population-level performance of native Bonneville Cutthroat Trout. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135, 1441–1455 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 46.

    Winfield, I. J. Two hearts are better than one: encouraging collaboration between freshwater fish conservation and freshwater fisheries management. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 26, 1007–1012 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 47.

    Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S. & De Poorter, M. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database (ISSG, 2000).

  • 48.

    Granek, E. F. et al. Engaging recreational fishers in management and conservation: global case studies. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1125–1134 (2008).

  • 49.

    Schlaepfer, M. A., Sax, D. F. & Olden, J. D. The potential conservation value of non‐native species. Conserv. Biol. 25, 428–437 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 50.

    Reid, A. J. et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 94, 849–873 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 51.

    Perdikaris, C., Gouva, E. & Paschos, I. Alien fish and crayfish species in Hellenic freshwaters and aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2, 111–120 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Valenti, W. C., Kimpara, J. M., Preto, B., de, L. & Moraes-Valenti, P. Indicators of sustainability to assess aquaculture systems. Ecol. Indic. 88, 402–413 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 53.

    Costa-Pierce, B. A. Sustainable ecological aquaculture systems: the need for a new social contract for aquaculture development. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 44, 88–112 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 54.

    Belton, B., Little, D. & Grady, K. Is responsible aquaculture sustainable aquaculture? WWF and the eco-certification of tilapia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 22, 840–855 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Béné, C. et al. Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security and poverty reduction: assessing the current evidence. World Dev. 79, 177–196 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 56.

    Nilsson, M., Griggs, D. & Visback, M. Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 534, 320–322 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 57.

    Rome Declaration on Responsible Inland Fisheries: 5735E/1/06.16 (FAO & MSU, 2016).

  • 58.

    Beard, T. D. et al. Ecosystem approach to inland fisheries: research needs and implementation strategies. Biol. Lett. 7, 481–483 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 59.

    66/288. The Future We Want. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012. 66th session (UN, 2012).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Abundant nitrite-oxidizing metalloenzymes in the mesopelagic zone of the tropical Pacific Ocean

    Female-biased gene flow between two species of Darwin’s finches