in

Mortality of a large wide-ranging mammal largely caused by anthropogenic activities

  • 1.

    Scheiner, S. M. & Willig, M. R. A general theory of ecology. Theoretical Ecology 1, 21–28 (2008).

    • Google Scholar
  • 2.

    Collins, C. & Kays, R. Causes of mortality in North American populations of large and medium‐sized mammals. Animal Conservation 14, 474–483 (2011).

    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Hill, J., DeVault, T. L. & Belant, J. L. Cause–specific mortality of the world’s terrestrial vertebrates. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28, 680–689 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Gibbs, J. P. & Steen, D. A. Trends in sex ratios of turtles in the United States: implications of road mortality. Conservation Biology 19, 552–556 (2005).

    • Google Scholar
  • 5.

    Wright, G. J., Peterson, R. O., Smith, D. W. & Lemke, T. O. Selection of northern Yellowstone elk by gray wolves and hunters. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1070–1078 (2006).

    • Google Scholar
  • 6.

    Kays, R. et al. Does hunting or hiking affect wildlife communities in protected areas? Journal of Applied Ecology 54, 242–252 (2017).

    • ADS
    • Google Scholar
  • 7.

    Leclerc, M., Frank, S. C., Zedrosser, A., Swenson, J. E. & Pelletier, F. Hunting promotes spatial reorganization and sexually selected infanticide. Scientific Reports 7, 1–6 (2017).

    • Google Scholar
  • 8.

    Hill, J., DeVault, T. L. & Belant, J. L. Anthropogenic mammal mortality increases with the human footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 18, 13–18 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Milner, J. M., Nilsen, E. B. & Reassen, H. P. Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conservation Biology 21, 36–47 (2006).

    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Kristensen, T., Means, M., Eggert, L. S., Smith, K. G. & White, D. Demographics of American black bear populations following changes in harvest policy. Ursus 29, 147–162 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 11.

    Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484 (2014).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 12.

    Darimont, C. T., Fox, C. H., Bryan, H. M. & Reimchen, T. E. The unique ecology of human predators. Science 349, 858–860 (2015).

  • 13.

    Krofel, M., Treves, A., Ripple, W. J., Chapron, G. & López-Bao, J. V. Hunted carnivores at outsized risk. Science 350, 518–519 (2015).

  • 14.

    Festa-Bianchet, M. & Mysterud, A. Hunting and evolution: theory, evidence, and unknowns. Journal of Mammalogy 99, 1281–1292 (2018).

    • Google Scholar
  • 15.

    Brown, J. H. & Nicoletto, P. F. Spatial scaling of species composition: body masses of North American land mammals. The American Naturalist 138, 1478–1512 (1991).

    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Mcloughlin, P. D., Ferguson, S. H. & Messier, F. Intraspecific variation in home range overlap with habitat quality: a comparison among brown bear populations. Evolutionary Ecology 14, 39–60 (2000).

    • Google Scholar
  • 17.

    Gantchoff, M., Wang, G., Beyer, D. & Belant, J. L. Scale‐dependent home range optimality for a solitary omnivore. Ecology and Evolution 8, 12271–12282 (2018).

  • 18.

    Schwab, A. C. & Zandbergen, P. A. Vehicle–related mortality and road crossing behavior of the Florida panther. Applied Geography 31, 859–870 (2011).

    • Google Scholar
  • 19.

    Treves, A. & Karanth, K. U. Human‐carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology 17, 1491–1499 (2003).

    • Google Scholar
  • 20.

    Beckmann, J. P. & Berger, J. Rapid ecological and behavioural changes in carnivores: the responses of black bears (Ursus americanus) to altered food. Journal of Zoology 261, 207–212 (2003).

    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Feng, Y. et al. Bear bile: dilemma of traditional medicinal use and animal protection. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5, 2 (2009).

  • 22.

    Albert, D. M., Bowyer, R. T. & Miller, S. D. Effort and success of brown bear hunters in Alaska. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 501–508 (2001).

    • Google Scholar
  • 23.

    Freeman, M. M. & Wenzel, G. W. The nature and significance of polar bear conservation hunting in the Canadian. Arctic. Arctic 59, 21–30 (2006).

    • Google Scholar
  • 24.

    Beston, J. A. Variation in life history and demography of the American black bear. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1588–1596 (2011).

    • Google Scholar
  • 25.

    Freedman, A. H., Portier, K. M. & Sunquist, M. E. Life history analysis for black bears (Ursus americanus) in a changing demographic landscape. Ecological Modelling 167, 47–64 (2003).

    • Google Scholar
  • 26.

    Hebblewhite, M., Percy, M. & Serrouya, R. Black bear (Ursus americanus) survival and demography in the Bow Valley of Banff National Park, Alberta. Biological Conservation 112, 415–425 (2003).

    • Google Scholar
  • 27.

    Scheick, B. K. & McCown, W. Geographic distribution of American black bears in North America. Ursus 25, 24–34 (2014).

    • Google Scholar
  • 28.

    Garshelis, D. L., Scheick, B. K., Doan–Crider, D. L., Beecham, J. J. & Obbard, M. E. Ursus americanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016, e.T41687A45034604 (2016).

    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    Bales, S. L., Hellgren, E. C., Leslie, D. M. Jr. & Hemphill, J. Jr. Dynamics of a recolonizing population of black bears in the Ouachita Mountains of Oklahoma. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 1342–1351 (2005).

    • Google Scholar
  • 30.

    Simek, S. L., Belant, J. L., Young, B. W., Shropshire, C. & Leopold, B. D. History and status of the American black bear in Mississippi. Ursus 23, 159–167 (2012).

    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Clark, J. D., Huber, D. & Servheen, C. Bear reintroductions: lessons and challenges. Ursus 13, 335–345 (2002).

    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Larkin, J. L., Cox, J. J., Wichrowski, M. W., Dzialak, M. R. & Maehr, D. S. Influences on release‐site fidelity of translocated elk. Restoration Ecology 12, 97–105 (2004).

    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Fritts, S. H. et al. Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho. Restoration Ecology 5, 7–27 (1997).

    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Belant, J. L., Etter, D. R., Friedrich, P., Williams, B. & Scribner, K. Comparison of techniques for sex determination of American martens. Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 256–260 (2011).

    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Norton, D. C., Belant, J. L., Beyer, D. E. Jr. & Bruggink, J. G. Female American black bears do not alter space use or movements to reduce infanticide risk. Plos One. 13, e0203651 (2018).

  • 36.

    Wilton, C. M. et al. Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance. PLoS One 9, e111257 (2014).

  • 37.

    Duquette, J. F. et al. Black bear (Ursus americanus) functional resource selection relative to intraspecific competition and human risk. Canadian Journal of Zoology 95, 203–212 (2017).

    • Google Scholar
  • 38.

    Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478 (2015).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Naef‐Daenzer, B., Korner‐Nievergelt, F., Fiedler, W. & Grüebler, M. U. Bias in ring‐recovery studies: causes of mortality of little owls Athene noctua and implications for population assessment. Journal of Avian Biology 48, 266–274 (2017).

    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Gantchoff, M., Conlee, L. & Belant, J. L. Conservation implications of sex‐specific landscape suitability for a large generalist carnivore. Diversity and Distributions 25, 1488–1496 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 41.

    Lunn, M. & McNeil, D. Applying Cox regression to competing risks. Biometrics 51, 524–532 (1995).

  • 42.

    Murray, D. L. et al. Death from anthropogenic causes is partially compensatory in recovering wolf populations. Biological Conservation 143, 2514–2524 (2010).

    • Google Scholar
  • 43.

    Grambsch, P. & Therneau, T. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81, 515–26 (1994).

  • 44.

    R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from, https://www.R–project.org/ (2019).

  • 45.

    Therneau, T. M. & Lumley, T. Survival: survival analyses. R package version 2.44–1.1. Available from, https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html (2019).

  • 46.

    Bled, F. & Belant, J. L. demetR: a Bayesian population simulation web–application for harvest management. Ursus 29, 82–92 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 47.

    Hill, J., DeVault, T. L. & Belant, J. L. CauseSpec: A database of global terrestrial vertebrate mortality. Ecology, e02865, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2865 (2019).

  • 48.

    Warton, D. I. & Hui, F. K. The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92, 3–10 (2011).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 49.

    Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretical approach. (Springer, 2002).

  • 50.

    Bischof, R., Fujita, R., Zedrosser, A., Söderberg, A. & Swenson, J. E. Hunting patterns, ban on baiting, and harvest demographics of brown bears in Sweden. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 79–88 (2008).

    • Google Scholar
  • 51.

    Cooley, H. S., Wielgus, R. B., Koehler, G. M., Robinson, H. S. & Maletzke, B. T. Does hunting regulate cougar populations? A test of the compensatory mortality hypothesis. Ecology 90, 2913–2921 (2009).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Keller, B. J. et al. A review of vital rates and cause‐specific mortality of elk Cervus elaphus populations in eastern North America. Mammal Review 45, 146–159 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 53.

    Bischof, R., Swenson, J. E., Yoccoz, N. G., Mysterud, A. & Gimenez, O. The magnitude and selectivity of natural and multiple anthropogenic mortality causes in hunted brown bears. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 656–665 (2009).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 54.

    Obbard, M. E. et al. Big enough for bears? American black bears at heightened risk of mortality during seasonal forays outside Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario. Ursus 28, 182–195 (2017).

    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Pigeon, G., Festa‐Bianchet, M., Coltman, D. W. & Pelletier, F. Intense selective hunting leads to artificial evolution in horn size. Evolutionary Applications 9, 521–530 (2016).

  • 56.

    McLellan, B. N. & Shackleton, D. M. A comparison of grizzly bear harvest data from Montana and southeastern British Columbia. Wildlife Society Bulletin 16, 371–375 (1988).

    • Google Scholar
  • 57.

    Czetwertynski, S. M., Boyce, M. S. & Schmiegelow, F. K. Effects of hunting on demographic parameters of American black bears. Ursus 18, 1–18 (2007).

    • Google Scholar
  • 58.

    Regehr, E. V., Wilson, R. R., Rode, K. D., Runge, M. C. & Stern, H. L. Harvesting wildlife affected by climate change: a modelling and management approach for polar bears. Journal of Applied Ecology 54, 1534–1543 (2017).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 59.

    Rughetti, M. & Festa‐Bianchet, M. Effects of selective harvest of non‐lactating females on chamois population dynamics. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 1075–1084 (2014).

    • Google Scholar
  • 60.

    Krofel, M., Jonozovič, M. & Jerina, K. Demography and mortality patterns of removed brown bears in a heavily exploited population. Ursus 23, 91–103 (2012).

    • Google Scholar
  • 61.

    Van de Walle, J., Pigeon, G., Zedrosser, A., Swenson, J. E. & Pelletier, F. Hunting regulation favors slow life histories in a large carnivore. Nature Communications 9, 1100 (2018).

  • 62.

    Gantchoff, M. G., Beyer, D. & Belant, J. L. Reproductive class influences risk tolerance during denning and spring for American black bears (Ursus americanus). Ecosphere 10, e02705 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 63.

    Coltman, D. W. et al. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426, 655–658 (2003).

  • 64.

    Di Minin, E., Leader-Williams, N. & Bradshaw, C. J. Banning trophy hunting will exacerbate biodiversity loss. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 31, 99–102 (2016).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 65.

    Wanger, T. C., Traill, L. W., Cooney, R., Rhodes, J. R. & Tscharntke, T. Trophy hunting certification. Nature Ecology and Evolution 1, 1791–1793 (2017).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 66.

    Bischof, R. et al. Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 49, 824–832 (2012).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 67.

    Olson, E. R. et al. Pendulum swings in wolf management led to conflict, illegal kills, and a legislated wolf hunt. Conservation Letters 8, 351–360 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 68.

    Mahoney, S. P. Recreational hunting and sustainable wildlife use in North America. In Dickson, B., Hutton, J. & Adams, W.M. (eds.), Recreational hunting, conservation and rural livelihoods: Science and practice. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).

  • 69.

    Jacobson, C. A., Organ, J. F., Decker, D. J., Batcheller, G. R. & Carpenter, L. A conservation institution for the 21st century: Implications for state wildlife agencies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 203–209 (2010).

    • Google Scholar
  • 70.

    IUCN IUCN SSC Guiding principles on trophy hunting as a tool for creating conservation incentives. International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Gland, Switzerland, Ver. 1.0 (2012).

  • 71.

    Carter, N. H. et al. A conceptual framework for understanding non-harvest anthropogenicing of large carnivores. Ambio 46, 251–264 (2017).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 72.

    Miller, S. D. & Tutterrow, V. L. Characteristics of nonsport mortalities to brown and black bears and human injuries from bears in Alaska. Ursus 11, 239–252 (1999).

    • Google Scholar
  • 73.

    Liberg, O. et al. Shoot, shovel and shut up: Cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 270, 91–98 (2012).

    • Google Scholar
  • 74.

    Heurich, M. et al. Illegal hunting as a major driver of the source-sink dynamics of a reintroduced lynx population in Central Europe. Biological Conservation 224, 355–365 (2018).

    • Google Scholar
  • 75.

    Červený, J., Krojerová-Prokešová, J., Kušta, T. & Koubek, P. The change in the attitudes of Czech hunters towards Eurasian lynx: Is poaching restricting lynx population growth? Journal for Nature Conservation 47, 28–37 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 76.

    Kaczensky, P. et al. Non-harvest anthropogenicings may hamper brown bear recovery in the Eastern Alps. Ursus 22, 37–46 (2011).

    • Google Scholar
  • 77.

    McCarthy, T. M. & Seavoy, R. J. Reducing nonsport losses attributable to food conditioning: human and bear behavior modification in an urban environment. Bears: Their Biology and Management 9, 75–84 (1994).

    • Google Scholar
  • 78.

    Siemer, W. F., Hart, P. S., Decker, D. J. & Shanahan, J. E. Factors that influence concern about human–black bear interactions in residential settings. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14, 185–197 (2009).

    • Google Scholar
  • 79.

    Creel, S. & Rotella, J. J. Meta–analysis of relationships between human offtake, total mortality and population dynamics of gray wolves (Canis lupus). PLoS ONE 5, 1–7 (2010).

    • Google Scholar
  • 80.

    Wolfe, M. L. et al. Is anthropogenic cougar mortality compensated by changes in natural mortality in Utah? Insight from long–term studies. Biological Conservation 182, 187–196 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 81.

    Rice, M. B., Ballard, W. B., Fish, E. B., McIntyre, N. E. & Holdermann, D. Habitat–distribution modeling of a recolonizing black bear, Ursus americanus, population in the Trans–Pecos region of Texas. The Canadian Field–Naturalist 123, 246–254 (2009).

    • Google Scholar
  • 82.

    Smith, J. A., Duane, T. P. & Wilmers, C. C. Moving through the matrix: Promoting permeability for large carnivores in a human–dominated landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 183, 50–58 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 83.

    Woodroffe, R. & Redpath, S. M. When the hunter becomes the hunted. Science 348, 1312–1314 (2015).

  • 84.

    Mitchell, B. R., Jaeger, M. M. & Barrett, R. H. Coyote depredation management: current methods and research needs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 1209–1218 (2004).

    • Google Scholar
  • 85.

    Hody, J. W. & Kays, R. Mapping the expansion of coyotes (Canis latrans) across North and Central America. ZooKeys 759, 81–97 (2018).

    • Google Scholar
  • 86.

    Stillfried, M., Belant, J. L., Svoboda, N. J., Beyer, D. E. & Kramer-Schadt, S. When top predators become prey: black bears alter movement behaviour in response to hunting pressure. Behavioural Processes 120, 30–39 (2015).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 87.

    Ditmer, M. A., Noyce, K. V., Fieberg, J. R. & Garshelis, D. L. Delineating the ecological and geographic edge of an opportunist: The American black bear exploiting an agricultural landscape. Ecological Modelling 387, 205–219 (2018).

    • Google Scholar
  • 88.

    Baruch-Mordo, S. et al. Stochasticity in natural forage production affects use of urban areas by black bears: implications to management of human-bear conflicts. PloS ONE 9, e85122 (2014).

  • 89.

    Treves, A., Artelle, K. A., Darimont, C. T. & Parsons, D. R. Mismeasured mortality: correcting estimates of wolf poaching in the United States. Journal of Mammalogy 98, 1256–1264 (2017).

  • 90.

    Koons, D. N. et al. Methods for studying cause‐specific senescence in the wild. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5, 924–933 (2014).

    • Google Scholar
  • 91.

    Bischof, R. et al. Regulated hunting re-shapes the life history of brown bears. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2, 116–123 (2018).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
  • 92.

    Hill, J., DeVault, T. L. & Belant, J. L. Protected areas reduce poaching but not overall anthropogenic mortality of North American mammals. Global Ecology and Conservation 21, e00810 (2019).

    • Google Scholar
  • 93.

    Baeza, A. & Estades, C. F. Effect of the landscape context on the density and persistence of a predator population in a protected area subject to environmental variability. Biological Conservation 143, 94–101 (2010).

    • Google Scholar
  • 94.

    Johnson, A., Vongkhamheng, C., Hedemark, M. & Saithongdam, T. Effects of human–carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Animal Conservation 9, 421–430 (2006).

    • Google Scholar
  • 95.

    Carter, N. H. & Linnell, J. D. Co–adaptation is key to coexisting with large carnivores. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 31, 575–578 (2016).

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Transportation policymaking in Chinese cities

    Solar energy farms could offer second life for electric vehicle batteries