
Engel, S., Palmer, C. & Pfaff, A. On the endogeneity of resource comanagement: theory and evidence from Indonesia. Land Econ. 89, 308–329 (2013).
Mansuri, G. & Rao, V. Localizing Developing: Does Participation Work? (World Bank, 2013).
Arnstein, S. R. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 35, 216–224 (1969).
Reed, M. S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2417–2431 (2008).
Coleman, E. A. & Fleischman, F. D. Comparing forest decentralization and local institutional change in Bolivia, Kenya, Mexico, and Uganda. World Dev. 40, 836–849 (2012).
Rustagi, D., Engel, S. & Kosfeld, M. Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330, 961–965 (2010).
Spreitzer, G. M. Individual empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, validation. Acad. Manage. J. 38, 1442–1465 (1995).
Zhang, X. & Bartol, K. M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Manage. J. 53, 108–128 (2010).
Gómez-Baggethun, RodeJ. & Krause, T. Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: a review of the empirical evidence. Ecol. Econ. 117, 270–282 (2015).
Ezzine-de-Blas, CorberaE. & Lepeyre, R. Payments for environmental services and motivational crowding: towards a conceptual framework. Ecol. Econ. 156, 434–443 (2019).
Cárdenas, J. C. Human behaviour and the use of experiments to understand the agricultural, resource, and environmental challenges of the XXI century. Agric. Econ. 47, 61–71 (2016).
Cárdenas, J. C., Stranlund, J. & Willis, C. Local environmental control and institutional crowding-out. World Dev. 28, 1719–1733 (2000).
Vollan, B. Socio-ecological explanations for crowding-out effects from economic field experiments in southern Africa. Ecol. Econ. 67, 560–573 (2008).
Andersson, K. P. et al. Experimental evidence on payments for forest commons conservation. Nat. Sustain. 1, 128–135 (2018).
Kaczan, D. J., Swallow, B. M. & Adamowicz, W. L. Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: Experimental evidence from Tanzania’. Ecol. Econ. 156, 444–453 (2018).
Dedeurwaerdere, T. J. et al. Combining internal and external motivations in multi-actor governance arrangements for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 58, 1–10 (2016).
Fundação Amazonas Sustentável Relatório de Atividades 2018 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sqwdTWI4KXMpLfk36p_ADzC2Hpu1kkOW/view (2018).
Ferraro, P. & Simpson, D. The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Econ. 78, 339–353 (2002).
Groom, B. & Palmer, C. Cost-effective provision of environmental services: the role of relaxing market constraints. Env. Dev. Econ. 15, 219–240 (2010).
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation 38 (ed. Dienstbier, R.) 237–288 (Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1991).
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000).
Bauer, M. et al. Can war foster cooperation? J. Econ. Perspect. 30, 249–274 (2016).
Fabbri, M. How Institutions Shape Preferences: Experimental Evidence from a Large-scale Property Rights Reform Implemented as Randomized Control-trial http://hdl.handle.net/1765/104965 (2017).
Cragg, J. G. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica 39, 829–844 (1971).
Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A. & Baker, R. M. Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 443–450 (1995).
Bouma, J., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T. & Arrazola, S. Understanding conditions for co-management: a framed field experiment amongst the Tsimane, Bolivia. Ecol. Econ. 141, 32–42 (2017).
Bowles, S. & Polania-Reyes, S. Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements? J. Econ. Lit. 50, 368–425 (2012).
Bardhan, P. Decentralization of governance and development. J. Econ. Perspect. 16, 185–205 (2002).
Andersson, K. & Agrawal, A. Inequalities, institutions, and forest commons. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 866–875 (2011).
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).
Baland, J.-M. & Platteau, J.-P. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? (FAO, 1996).
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. & Walker, J. Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources (Univ. of Michigan Press, 1994).
Sally, D. Can I say ‘bobobo’ and mean ‘There’s no such thing as cheap talk’. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 57, 245–266 (2005).
Souza, G. I. People, Parks, and Public Policies in the Twenty-First Century. Human Security and the Political Ecologies of the Brazilian Amazon. Reflections from the Mosaic of Protected Areas of the Lower River Negro, Amazonas (King’s Brazil Institute, 2017).
Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms’. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71, 397–404 (2001).
Keser, C. & van Winden, F. Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scand. J. Econ. 102, 23–39 (2000).
Gupta, S. K. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2, 109–112 (2011).
Battese, G. E. A note on the estimation of Cobb–Douglas production functions when some explanatory variables have zero values. J. Agric. Econ. 48, 250–252 (1997).
QGIS Development Team QGIS Geographic Information System v.2.18 (Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project, 2016); http://qgis.osgeo.org
Source: Ecology - nature.com