Harder, L. D. & Barclay, R. M. R. The functional significance of poricidal anthers and buzz pollination: Controlled pollen removal from. Dodecatheon. Funct. Ecol. 8, 509–517 (1994).
Hargreaves, A. L., Harder, L. D. & Johnson, S. D. Consumptive emasculation: The ecological and evolutionary consequences of pollen theft. Biol. Rev. 84, 259–276 (2009).
Burger, H., Ayasse, M., Dötterl, S., Kreissl, S. & Galizia, C. G. Perception of floral volatiles involved in host-plant finding behaviour: Comparison of a bee specialist and generalist. J. Comp. Physiol. A 199, 751–761 (2013).
Dobson, H. E. M. Role of flower and pollen aromas in host-plant recognition by solitary bees. Oecologia 72, 618–623 (1987).
Cane, J. H. & Sipes, S. D. Characterizing floral specialization by bees: Analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty. in Plant-Pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization 99:122 (University of Chicago Press, 2006).
Parker, A. J., Williams, N. M. & Thomson, J. D. Specialist pollinators deplete pollen in the spring ephemeral wildflower Claytonia virginica. Ecol. Evol. 6, 5169–5177 (2016).
Westerkamp, C. Keel blossoms: Bee flowers with adaptations against bees. Flora 192, 125–132 (1997).
Westerkamp, C. & Claßen-Bockhoff, R. Bilabiate flowers: The ultimate response to bees? Ann. Bot. -London 100, 361–374 (2007).
Buchmann, S. L. Buzz pollination in angiosperms. in Handbook of experimental pollination biology (eds Jones, C. E. & Little, R. J.) 73–113 (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1983).
Arnold, S. E. J., Idrovo, M. E. P., Arias, L. J. L., Belmain, S. R. & Stevenson, P. C. Herbivore defence compounds occur in pollen and reduce bumblebee colony fitness. J. Chem. Ecol. 40, 878–881 (2014).
Detzel, A. & Wink, M. Attraction, deterrence or intoxication of bees (Apis mellifera) by plant allelochemicals. Chemoecology 4, 8–18 (1993).
Sedivy, C., Piskorski, R., Müller, A. & Dorn, S. Too low to kill: Concentration of the secondary metabolite ranunculin in buttercup pollen does not affect bee larval survival. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 996–1002 (2012).
Wang, X.-Y., Tang, J., Wu, T., Wu, D. & Huang, S.-Q. Bumblebee Rejection of Toxic Pollen Facilitates Pollen Transfer. Curr. Biol. 29, 1401–1406.e4 (2019).
Lunau, K., Piorek, V., Krohn, O. & Pacini, E. Just spines — Mechanical defense of malvaceous pollen against collection by corbiculate bees. Apidologie 46, 144–149 (2015).
Konzmann, S., Koethe, S. & Lunau, K. Pollen grain morphology is not exclusively responsible for pollen collectability in bumble bees. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–8 (2019).
Roulston, T. H. & Buchmann, S. L. A phylogenetic reconsideration of the pollen starch–pollination correlation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2, 627–643 (2000).
Roulston, T. H. & Cane, J. H. Pollen nutritional content and digestibility for animals. Plant Syst. Evol. 222, 187–209 (2000).
Roulston, T. H., Cane, J. H. & Buchmann, S. L. What governs protein content of pollen: Pollinator preferences, pollen-pistil interactions, or phylogeny? Ecol. Monogr. 70, 617–643 (2000).
Treanore, E. D., Vaudo, A. D., Grozinger, C. M. & Fleischer, S. J. Examining the nutritional value and effects of different floral resources in pumpkin agroecosystems on Bombus impatiens worker physiology. Apidologie, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-019-00668-x (2019).
Vaudo, A. D. et al. Bumble bees regulate their intake of essential protein and lipid pollen macronutrients. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 3962–3970 (2016).
Harder, L. D. & Thomson, J. D. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. Am. Nat. 133, 323–344 (1989).
Janz, N. & Nylin, S. The oscillation hypothesis of host-plant range and speciation. In Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects 203–215 (University of California Press, 2008).
Müller, A. & Kuhlmann, M. Pollen hosts of western palaearctic bees of the genus Colletes (Hymenoptera: Colletidae): The Asteraceae paradox. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 95, 719–733 (2008).
Sedivy, C., Praz, C. J., Müller, A., Widmer, A. & Dorn, S. Patterns of host-plant choice in bees of the genus Chelostoma: The constraint hypothesis of host-range evolution in bees. Evolution 62, 2487–2507 (2008).
Sipes, S. D. & Tepedino, V. J. Pollen-host specificity and evolutionary patterns of host switching in a clade of specialist bees (Apoidea: Diadasia). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86, 487–505 (2005).
Archer, C. R., Pirk, C. W. W., Wright, G. A. & Nicolson, S. W. Nutrition affects survival in African honeybees exposed to interacting stressors. Funct. Ecol. 28, 913–923 (2014).
Eckhardt, M., Haider, M., Dorn, S. & Müller, A. Pollen mixing in pollen generalist solitary bees: a possible strategy to complement or mitigate unfavourable pollen properties? J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 588–597 (2014).
Praz, C. J., Müller, A. & Dorn, S. Specialized bees fail to develop on non-host pollen: do plants chemically protect their pollen? Ecology 89, 795–804 (2008).
Sedivy, C., Müller, A. & Dorn, S. Closely related pollen generalist bees differ in their ability to develop on the same pollen diet: Evidence for physiological adaptations to digest pollen. Funct. Ecol. 25, 718–725 (2011).
Vaudo, A. D., Patch, H. M., Mortensen, D. A., Tooker, J. F. & Grozinger, C. M. Macronutrient ratios in pollen shape bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) foraging strategies and floral preferences. PNAS 113, E4035–E4042 (2016).
Haider, M., Dorn, S. & Müller, A. Better safe than sorry? A Fabaceae species exhibits unfavourable pollen properties for developing bee larvae despite its hidden anthers. Arthropod-Plant Inte. 8, 221–231 (2014).
Kevan, P. G. & Ebert, T. Can almond nector & pollen poison honey bees? Am. Bee J. (2005).
London-Shafir, I., Shafir, S. & Eisikowitch, D. Amygdalin in almond nectar and pollen – Facts and possible roles. Plant Syst. Evol. 238, 87–95 (2003).
Adler, L. S. The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91, 409–420 (2000).
Adler, L. S. & Irwin, R. E. Ecological Costs and Benefits of Defenses in Nectar. Ecology 86, 2968–2978 (2005).
Irwin, R. E., Adler, L. S. & Brody, A. K. The Dual Role of Floral Traits: Pollinator Attraction and Plant Defense. Ecology 85, 1503–1511 (2004).
Artz, D. R. & Nault, B. A. Performance of Apis mellifera, Bombus impatiens, and Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as pollinators of pumpkin. J. Econ. Entomol. 104, 1153–1161 (2011).
Hurd, P. D., Linsley, E. G. & Whitaker, T. W. Squash and gourd bees (Peponapis, Xenoglossa) and the origin of the cultivated Cucurbita. Evolution 25, 218–234 (1971).
Julier, H. E. & Roulston, T. H. Wild Bee Abundance and Pollination Service in Cultivated Pumpkins: Farm Management, Nesting Behavior and Landscape Effects. Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 563–573 (2009).
Kevan, P. G., Mohr, N. A., Offer, M. D. & Kemp, J. R. The squash and gourd bee, Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera). P. Entomol. Soc. Ont. 119, 9–15 (1989).
Petersen, J. D., Reiners, S. & Nault, B. A. Pollination services provided by bees in pumpkin fields supplemented with either Apis mellifera or Bombus impatiens or not supplemented. PLoS ONE 8, e69819 (2013).
Lundgren, J. G. Pollen nutrition and defense. in Relationships of Natural Enemies and Non-Prey Foods vol. 7, 127–139 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009).
Edens-Meier, R., Joseph, M., Arduser, M., Westhus, E. & Bernhardt, P. The pollination biology of an annual endemic herb, Physaria filiformis (Brassicaceae), in the Missouri Ozarks following controlled burns. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 138, 287–297 (2011).
Russo, L. & Danforth, B. Pollen preferences among the bee species visiting apple (Malus pumila) in New York. Apidologie 48, 806–820 (2017).
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met. 57, 289–300 (1995).
Genissel, A., Aupinel, P., Bressac, C., Tasei, J.-N. & Chevrier, C. Influence of pollen origin on performance of Bombus terrestris micro-colonies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104, 329–336 (2002).
Tasei, J.-N. & Aupinel, P. Nutritive value of 15 single pollens and pollen mixes tested on larvae produced by bumblebee workers (Bombus terrestris, Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie 39, 397–409 (2008).
Petersen, J. D. & Nault, B. A. Landscape diversity moderates the effects of bee visitation frequency to flowers on crop production. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1347–1356 (2014).
Ruedenauer, F. A., Wöhrle, C., Spaethe, J. & Leonhardt, S. D. Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) differentiate between different pollen types? PLoS ONE 13, e0205821 (2018).
Freeland, W. J. & Janzen, D. H. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: The role of plant secondary compounds. Am. Nat. 108, 269–289 (1974).
Hägele, B. F. & Rowell-Rahier, M. Dietary mixing in three generalist herbivores: Nutrient complementation or toxin dilution? Oecologia 119, 521–533 (1999).
Singer, M. S., Bernays, E. A. & Carrière, Y. The interplay between nutrient balancing and toxin dilution in foraging by a generalist insect herbivore. Anim. Behav. 64, 629–643 (2002).
Bernays, E. A., Bright, K. L., Gonzalez, N. & Angel, J. Dietary mixing in a generalist herbivore: Tests of two hypotheses. Ecology 75, 1997–2006 (1994).
Pennings, S. C., Nadeau, M. T. & Paul, V. J. Selectivity and growth of the generalist herbivore Dolabella auricularia feeding upon complementary resources. Ecology 74, 879–890 (1993).
Steppuhn, A. & Baldwin, I. T. Resistance management in a native plant: nicotine prevents herbivores from compensating for plant protease inhibitors. Ecol. Lett. 10, 499–511 (2007).
Cruz-Rivera, E. & Hay, M. E. Prey nutritional quality interacts with chemical defenses to affect consumer feeding and fitness. Ecol. Monogr. 73, 483–506 (2003).
Gosselin, M. et al. Does Aconitum septentrionale chemically protect floral rewards to the advantage of specialist bumblebees? Impact of toxic rewards on visitors. Ecol. Entomol. 38, 400–407 (2013).
Simpson, S. J. & Raubenheimer, D. The geometric analysis of nutrient-allelochemical interactions: A case study using locusts. Ecology 82, 422–439 (2001).
Wahl, O. & Ulm, K. Influence of pollen feeding and physiological condition on pesticide sensitivity of the honey bee Apis mellifera carnica. Oecologia 59, 106–128 (1983).
Unsicker, S. B., Oswald, A., Köhler, G. & Weisser, W. W. Complementarity effects through dietary mixing enhance the performance of a generalist insect herbivore. Oecologia 156, 313–324 (2008).
Ayasse, M., Marlovits, T., Tengö, J., Taghizadeh, T. & Francke, W. Are there pheromonal dominance signals in the bumblebee Bombus hypnorum L (Hymenoptera, Apidae)? Apidologie 26, 163–180 (1995).
Manson, J. S. & Thomson, J. D. Post-ingestive effects of nectar alkaloids depend on dominance status of bumblebees. Ecol. Entomol. 34, 421–426 (2009).
Ribeiro, M. F. Growth in bumble bee larvae: Relation between development time, mass, and amount of pollen ingested. Can. J. Zool. 72, 1978–1985 (1994).
Sutcliffe, G. H. & Plowright, R. C. The effects of food supply on adult size in the bumble bee Bombus terricola Kirby (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can. Entomol. 120, 1051–1058 (1988).
Cnaani, J., Wong, A. & Thomson, J. D. Effect of group size on ovarian development in bumblebee workers (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus). Entomol. Gen. 305–314, https://doi.org/10.1127/entom.gen/29/2007/305 (2007).
Couvillon, M. J. & Dornhaus, A. Small worker bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) are hardier against starvation than their larger sisters. Insect. Soc. 57, 193–197 (2010).
Couvillon, M. J., Jandt, J. M., Bonds, J., Helm, B. R. & Dornhaus, A. Percent lipid is associated with body size but not task in the bumble bee Bombus impatiens. J. Comp. Physiol. A 197, 1097 (2011).
Larrere, M. & Couillaud, F. Role of juvenile hormone biosynthesis in dominance status and reproduction of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33 (1993).
Richardson, L. L. et al. Secondary metabolites in floral nectar reduce parasite infections in bumblebees. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20142471–20142471 (2015).
Tasei, J.-N. & Aupinel, P. Validation of a method using queenless Bombus terrestris micro-colonies for testing the nutritive value of commercial pollen mixes by comparison with queenright colonies. J. Econ. Entomol. 101, 1737–1742 (2008).
Urbanowicz, C. et al. Low maize pollen collection and low pesticide risk to honey bees in heterogeneous agricultural landscapes. Apidologie, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-019-00655-2 (2019).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676 (2012).
Schindelin, J., Rueden, C. T., Hiner, M. C. & Eliceiri, K. W. The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 82, 518–529 (2015).
Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference (2017).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67 (2015).
Fox, J. et al. car: Companion to applied regression (2017).
Lenth, R., Love, J. & Herve, M. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (2018).
Mazerolle, M. J. AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c) (2017).
Therneau, T. M. coxme: Mixed effects cox models (2015).
Therneau, T. M. & Lumley, T. survival: Survival analysis (2017).
Wickham, H. Reshaping data with the reshape package. J. Stat. Softw. 21 (2007).
Wickham, H. The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 40 (2011).
Wickham, H. & Chang, W. ggplot2: Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. (2016).
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems: Data exploration. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).
Hervé, M. RVAideMemoire: Testing and Plotting Procedures for Biostatistics. R package version 0.9-74. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire (2020).
Kassambara, A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.2.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr (2019).
Nieuwenhuis, R., te Grotenhuis, M. & Pelzer, B. influence.ME: Tools for Detecting Influential Data in Mixed Effects Models. R Journal, 4, 38–47 (2012).
Kassambara, A., Kosinski, M. & Biecek, P. survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survminer (2019).
Mangiafico, S. rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. R package version 2.3.21. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion (2020).
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition. (Springer, New York, 2002).
Rousset, F. & Ferdy J.-B. Testing environmental and genetic effects in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Ecography 37, 781–790 (2014).
Luke, S. G. Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behav. Res. 49, 1494–1502 (2017).
Searle, S. R., Speed, F. M. & Milliken, G. A. Population marginal means in the linear model: An alternative to least squares means. Am. Stat. 34, 216–221 (1980).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
