in

Socioeconomic prospects of a seaweed bioeconomy in Sweden

  • 1.

    Dhargalkar, V. K. & Pereira, N. Seaweed: Promising plant of the millennium. Science and Culture 71, 60–66 (2005).

    • Google Scholar
  • 2.

    Mouritsen, O. G. Those tasty weeds. Journal of Applied Phycology 29, 2159–2164, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0986-1 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Fleurence, J. Seaweed proteins: biochemical, nutritional aspects and potential uses. Trends in Food Science & Technology 10, 25–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00015-1 (1999).

  • 4.

    Maguire, J. SEABIOPLAS Report Summary, http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/189140_en.html (2016).

  • 5.

    Pechsiri, J. S. et al. Energy performance and greenhouse gas emissions of kelp cultivation for biogas and fertilizer recovery in Sweden. Science of The Total Environment 573, 347–355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.220 (2016).

  • 6.

    Pangestuti, R. & Kim, S.-K. In Marine Algae Extracts 319–330 (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2015).

  • 7.

    Hasselström, L., Visch, W., Gröndahl, F., Nylund, G. M. & Pavia, H. The impact of seaweed cultivation on ecosystem services – a case study from the west coast of Sweden. Marine Pollution Bulletin 133, 53–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.005 (2018).

  • 8.

    Xiao, X. et al. Nutrient removal from Chinese coastal waters by large-scale seaweed aquaculture. Scientific Reports 7, 46613, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46613, https://www.nature.com/articles/srep46613#supplementary-information (2017).

  • 9.

    Chung, I. K. et al. Installing kelp forests/seaweed beds for mitigation and adaptation against global warming: Korean Project Overview. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss206 (2013).

  • 10.

    Duarte, C. M., Wu, J., Xiao, X., Bruhn, A. & Krause-Jensen, D. Can Seaweed Farming Play a Role in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation? Frontiers in Marine Science 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00100 (2017).

  • 11.

    Krause-Jensen, D. et al. Macroalgae contribute to nested mosaics of pH variability in a subarctic fjord. Biogeosciences 12, 4895–4911, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4895-2015 (2015).

  • 12.

    FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018. Meeting the sustainable development goals. (Rome, 2018).

  • 13.

    European Commission. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe – Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (Brussels, 13.2.2012, 2012).

  • 14.

    SwAM. God Havsmiljö 2020. Marin strategi för Nordsjön och Östersjön. Del 4: Åtgärdsprogram för havsmiljön. (Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Report 2015, 2015).

  • 15.

    Calahan, D., Osenbaugh, E. & Adey, W. Expanded algal cultivation can reverse key planetary boundary transgressions. Heliyon 4, e00538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00538 (2018).

  • 16.

    van den Burg, S. W. K., van Duijn, A. P., Bartelings, H., van Krimpen, M. M. & Poelman, M. The economic feasibility of seaweed production in the North Sea. Aquaculture Economics & Management 20, 235–252, https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2016.1177859 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 17.

    Watson, L. & Dring, M. Business plan for the establishment of a seaweed hatchery and grow-out farm. Irish Sea Fisheries Board: Dun Laoghaire, Ireland (2011).

  • 18.

    Camus, C., Infante, J. & Buschmann, A. H. Revisiting the economic profitability of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Ochrophyta) cultivation in Chile. Aquaculture 502, 80–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.12.030 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 19.

    Johansson, P.-O. & Kriström, B. Cost-benefit analysis for project appraisal. (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

  • 20.

    Thomas, J.-B. E., Ramos Da Silva, F. & Gröndahl, F. Identifying suitable sites for macroalgae cultivation on the Swedish West Coast. Coastal Management (2019).

  • 21.

    FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2014. Opportunities and challenges. 223 pp. (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome, 2014).

  • 22.

    SwAM. Näringsbelastningen på Östersjön och Västerhavet 2014. Sveriges underlag till Helcoms sjätte Pollution Load Compilation. (Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. Report 2016:12, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2016).

  • 23.

    Hyytiäinen, K. et al. Policy Goals for Improved Water Quality in the Baltic Sea: When do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs? Environmental and Resource Economics 61, 217–241, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9790-z (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 24.

    Czajkowski, M. et al. Valuing the commons: An international study on the recreational benefits of the Baltic Sea. Journal of Environmental Management 156, 209–217 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 25.

    SwAM. Marine tourism and recreation in Sweden. A study for the Economic and Social Analysis of the Initial Assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive., (Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, Gothenburg, 2012).

  • 26.

    Thomas, J.-B. E., Nordström, J., Risén, E., Malmström, M. E. & Gröndahl, F. The perception of aquaculture on the Swedish West Coast. Ambio 47, 398–409, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0945-3 (2018).

  • 27.

    Thomas, J.-B. E. et al. In Insights on the sustainability of a Swedish seaweed industry (ed. J-B.E. Thomas) (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Enviroment; Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering; Division of Water and Environmental Engineering, 2018).

  • 28.

    Ahlroth, S. Valuation of environmental impacts and its use in environmental systems analysis tools, KTH Royal Institute of Technology (2009).

  • 29.

    Kinell, G., Söderqvist, T. & Hasselström, L. Monetära schablonvärden för miljöförändringar (Naturvårdsverket, 2009).

  • 30.

    Noring, M. Valuing ecosystem services – linking ecology and policy, KTH Royal Institute of Technology (2014).

  • 31.

    Ahtiainen, H. et al. Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea–a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 3, 278–305 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Steen, I. Phosphorus availability in the 21st century: management of a non-renewable resource. Phosphorus Potassium 217, 25–31 (1998).

    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Vaccari, D. A. Phosphorus: a looming crisis. Scientific American 300, 54–59 (2009).

  • 34.

    Thomas, J.-B. E. Insights on the sustainability of a Swedish seaweed industry Philosophy Doctorate thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, (2018).

  • 35.

    LNV. Overheidsvisie op de bio-based economy in de energietransitie: de keten sluiten. (Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (LNV), Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2007).

  • 36.

    Scoggan, J., Zhimeng, Z. & Feijiu, W. Culture of kelp (Laminaria japonica) in China. Vol. 89 (Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 1989).

  • 37.

    Schiener, P., Black, K. D., Stanley, M. S. & Green, D. H. The seasonal variation in the chemical composition of the kelp species Laminaria digitata, Laminaria hyperborea, Saccharina latissima and Alaria esculenta. Journal of Applied Phycology 27, 363–373, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0327-1 (2015).

  • 38.

    Le Bras, Q., Lesueur, M., Lucas, S. & GOUIN, S. Etude du marché français des algues alimentaires. Panorama de la distribution. Programme IDEALG Phase 2 – Programme IDEALG Phase 2. Les publications du Pôle halieutique AGROCAMPUS OUEST n°36. 42p (Agrocampus Ouest, 2015).

  • 39.

    Tasende, M. G. & Peteiro, C. Explotación de las macroalgas marinas: Galicia como caso de estudio hacia una gestión sostenible de los recursos. Revista Ambienta n 111, 116–132 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Organic Monitor. The European market for sea vegetables. (2014).

  • 41.

    Evans, D. In Cost–Benefit Analysis and Incentives in Evaluation (ed. Massimo Florio) (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    What is the future of lighting waste?

    MIT helps first-time entrepreneur build food hospitality company