in

Conservation priorities in an endangered estuarine seahorse are informed by demographic history

  • 1.

    Ramos-Onsins, S. E. & Rozas, J. Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 2092–2100 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Wan, Q.-H., Wu, H., Fujihara, T. & Fang, S.-G. Which genetic marker for which conservation genetics issue? Electrophoresis 25, 2165–2176 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Selkoe, K. A. & Toonen, R. J. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol. Lett. 9, 615–629 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Rogers, A. R. & Harpending, H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 552–569 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Nabholz, B., Mauffrey, J.-F., Bazin, E., Galtier, N. & Glemin, S. Determination of mitochondrial genetic diversity in mammals. Genetics 178, 351–361 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Whitfield, A., Mkare, T. K., Teske, P. R., James, N. & Cowley, P. D. Life-histories explain the conservation status of two estuary-associated pipefishes. Biol. Conserv. 212, 256–264 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Leffler, E. M. et al. Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species?. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001388 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49, 725–738 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Romiguier, J. et al. Comparative population genomics in animals uncovers the determinants of genetic diversity. Nature 515, 261–263 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Ellegren, H. & Galtier, N. Determinants of genetic diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 422–433 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Caley, M. J. et al. Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 477–500 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Teske, P. R. et al. Implications of life history for genetic structure and migration rates of southern African coastal invertebrates: planktonic, abbreviated and direct development. Mar. Biol. 152, 697–711 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Mkare, T. K., van Vuuren, B. J. & Teske, P. R. Conservation implications of significant population differentiation in an endangered estuarine seahorse. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 1275–1293 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Vandewoestijne, S., Schtickzelle, N. & Baguette, M. Positive correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a large, well-connected metapopulation. BMC Biol. 6, 46 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Frankham, R. Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 24, 2610–2618 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Nussear, K. E. et al. Translocation as a conservation tool for Agassiz’s desert tortoises: survivorship, reproduction, and movements. J. Wildl. Manag. 76, 1341–1353 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Wright, D. J. et al. The impact of translocations on neutral and functional genetic diversity within and among populations of the Seychelles warbler. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2165–2177 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Whiteley, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Funk, W. C. & Tallmon, D. A. Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 42–49 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Edmands, S. & Timmerman, C. C. Modeling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 17, 883–892 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Tallmon, D. A., Luikart, G. & Waples, R. S. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 489–496 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Frankham, R. et al. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 25, 465–475 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Miller, K. A. et al. Securing the demographic and genetic future of tuatara through assisted colonization. Conserv. Biol. 26, 790–798 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Frankham, R. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126, 131–140 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Peniche, G. et al. Protecting free-living dormice: molecular identification of cestode parasites in captive dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) destined for reintroduction. EcoHealth 14, 106–116 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Pollom, R. Hippocampus capensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: .T10056A54903534. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T10056A54903534.en (2017).

  • 27.

    Bell, E. M., Lockyear, J. F., McPherson, J. M., Marsden, A. D. & Vincent, A. C. J. First field studies of an endangered South African seahorse, Hippocampus capensis. Environ. Biol. Fishes 67, 35–46 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Lockyear, J. F., Hecht, T., Kaiser, H. & Teske, P. R. The distribution and abundance of the endangered Knysna seahorse Hippocampus capensis (Pisces: Syngnathidae) in South African estuaries. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 31, 275–283 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Teske, P. R., Cherry, M. I. & Matthee, C. A. Population genetics of the endangered Knysna seahorse, Hippocampus capensis. Mol. Ecol. 12, 1703–1715 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    López, A., Vera, M., Planas, M. & Bouza, C. Conservation genetics of threatened Hippocampus guttulatus in vulnerable habitats in NW Spain: temporal and spatial stability of wild populations with flexible polygamous mating system in captivity. PLoS ONE 10, e0117538 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Pickrell, J. K. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002967 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Lande, R. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241, 1455–1460 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Wang, J. Estimation of effective population sizes from data on genetic markers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B360, 1395–1409 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G. & Waples, R. S. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 25–33 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Armstrong, D. P. & Seddon, P. J. Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 20–25 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Cerón-Souza, I. et al. Contrasting demographic history and gene flow patterns of two mangrove species on either side of the Central American Isthmus. Ecol. Evol. 5, 3486–3499 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Woodall, L. C., Koldewey, H. J., Boehm, J. T. & Shaw, P. W. Past and present drivers of population structure in a small coastal fish, the European long snouted seahorse Hippocampus guttulatus. Conserv. Genet. 16, 1139–1153 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Teske, P. R. et al. Molecular evidence for long-distance colonization in an Indo-Pacific seahorse lineage. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 286, 249–260 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Heydorn, A. E. F. & Grindley, J. R. Estuaries of the Cape: Part II Synopses of available information on individual systems. Report 30. (Associated Printing and Publishing Co. (Pty) Ltd., 1985).

  • 40.

    Turpie, J. K. & Clark, B. Development of a conservation plan for temperate South African estuaries on the basis of biodiversity importance, ecosystem health and economic costs and benefits. Report by Anchor Environmental Consultants. C.A.P.E. Regional Estuarine Management Programme. 125 (2007).

  • 41.

    Penrith, M. J. & Penrith, M. Redescription of Pandaka silvana (Barnard) (Pisces, Gobiidae). Ann. South Afr. Mus. 60, 105–108 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Branch, G. M. The ecology of Patella linnaeus from the cape Peninsula, South Africa I. Zonation, movements and feeding. Zool. Afr. 6, 1–38 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Largier, J. L., Attwood, C. & Harcourt-Baldwin, J. L. The hydrographic character of the Knysna Estuary. Trans. R. Soc. South Afr. 55, 107–122 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Russell, I. A. Mass mortality of marine and estuarine fish in the Swartvlei and Wilderness lake systems, Southern Cape. South. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 20, 93–96 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Roberts, M. J., van der Lingen, C. D., Whittle, C. & van den Berg, M. Shelf currents, lee-trapped and transient eddies on the inshore boundary of the Agulhas Current, South Africa: their relevance to the KwaZulu-Natal sardine run. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 32, 423–447 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Teske, P. R., Bader, S. & Golla, T. R. Passive dispersal against an ocean current. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 539, 153–163 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Claassens, L. An artificial water body provides habitat for an endangered estuarine seahorse species. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 180, 1–10 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A. & Losos, E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States: Assessing the relative importance of habitat destruction, alien species, pollution, overexploitation, and disease. Bioscience 48, 607–615 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Hey, J. Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 905–920 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Claassens, L., Barnes, R. S. K., Wasserman, J., Lamberth, S. J., Miranda, A. F., van Niekerk, L. & Adams, J. B. Knysna Estuary health: ecological status, threats and options for the future. Afr. J. Aquat. 45 (2020).

  • 51.

    Nielsen, R. & Wakeley, J. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158, 885–896 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Whitfield, A. K. Threatened fishes of the world: Hippocampus capensis Boulenger, 1900 (Syngnathidae). Environ. Biol. Fishes 44, 362–362 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Yue, G. H., David, L. & Orban, L. Mutation rate and pattern of microsatellites in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Genetica 129, 329–331 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Waples, R. S. & Do, C. Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary Ne using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evol. Appl. 3, 244–262 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Do, C. et al. NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 209–214 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Heled, J. & Drummond, A. J. Bayesian inference of population size history from multiple loci. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 289 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969–1973 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537–2539 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Lischer, H. E. L. & Excoffier, L. PGDSpider: an automated data conversion tool for connecting population genetics and genomics programs. Bioinformatics 28, 298–299 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Rambaut, A., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Drummond, A. J. Tracer v1.6. (2014).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Reply to: Concerns about phytoplankton bloom trends in global lakes

    The catalyzing potential of J-WAFS seed grants