in

Towards a unified understanding of human–nature interactions

  • 1.

    Gaston, K. J. et al. Personalised ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 916–925 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. The ecology of human–nature interactions. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20191882 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Leong, M., Dunn, R. R. & Trautwein, M. D. Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180082 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 94–101 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S. & Frumkin, H. Nature and health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 35, 207–228 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Chippaux, J. P. Incidence and mortality due to snakebite in the Americas. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005662 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Markevych, I. et al. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance. Environ. Res. 158, 301–317 (2017).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Bratman, G. N. et al. Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0903 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Marselle, M. R. et al. Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: a conceptual framework. Environ. Int. 150, 106420 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Hanski, I. et al. Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8334–8339 (2012).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Rook, G. A. Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: an ecosystem service essential to health. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18360–18367 (2013).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Tzoulas, K. et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plann. 81, 167–178 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Balmford, A. et al. A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000144 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M. & Murphy, S. A. The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ. Behav. 41, 715–740 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Chawla, L. Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: a review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People Nat. 2, 619–642 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Shanahan, D. F. et al. Nature-based interventions for improving health and wellbeing: the purpose, the people and the outcomes. Sports 7, 141 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Chapman, B. K. & McPhee, D. Global shark attack hotspots: identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence. Ocean Coast. Manag. 133, 72–84 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Penteriani, V. et al. Human behaviour can trigger large carnivore attacks in developed countries. Sci. Rep. 6, 20552 (2016).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Ives, C. D. et al. Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 13, 1389–1397 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Cox, D. T. C. & Gaston, K. J. Human-nature interactions and the consequences and drivers of provisioning wildlife. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170092 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Michie, S., Van Stralen, M. M. & West, R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 6, 42 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Soga, M., Evans, M. J., Cox, D. T. & Gaston, K. J. Impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on human–nature interactions: pathways, evidence and implications. People Nat. 3, 518–527 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Shaw, L. M., Chamberlain, D. & Evans, M. The house sparrow Passer domesticus in urban areas: reviewing a possible link between post-decline distribution and human socioeconomic status. J. Ornith. 149, 293–299 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Gaston, K. J. & Evans, K. L. Birds and people in Europe. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 1649–1655 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Shifting baseline syndrome: causes, consequences, and implications. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 222–230 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Pauly, D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 430 (1995).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Kellert, S. R. & Wilson, E. O. The Biophilia Hypothesis (Island, 1993).

  • 29.

    Balling, J. D. & Falk, J. H. Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environ. Behav. 14, 5–28 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Ulrich, R. S. in The Biophilia Hypothesis (eds Kelbert, S. R. & Wilson, E. O.) 73–137 (Island, 1993).

  • 31.

    Fukano, Y. & Soga, M. Why do so many modern people hate insects? The urbanization-disgust hypothesis. Sci. Total Environ. 777, 146229 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Pergams, O. R. & Zaradic, P. A. Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. J. Environ. Manag. 80, 387–393 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Kesebir, S. & Kesebir, P. A growing disconnection from nature is evident in cultural products. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 258–269 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Soga, M. et al. How can we mitigate against increasing biophobia among children during the extinction of experience? Biol. Conserv. 242, 108420 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Soga, M., Yamanoi, T., Tsuchiya, K., Koyanagi, T. F. & Kanai, T. What are the drivers of and barriers to children’s direct experiences of nature? Landsc. Urban Plann. 180, 114–120 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Pett, T. J., Shwartz, A., Irvine, K. N., Dallimer, M. & Davies, Z. G. Unpacking the people–biodiversity paradox: a conceptual framework. BioScience 66, 576–583 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Balding, M. & Williams, K. J. Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conserv. Biol. 30, 1192–1199 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Gerl, T., Randler, C. & Neuhaus, B. J. Vertebrate species knowledge: an important skill is threatened by extinction. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 43, 928–948 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Cheng, J. C. H. & Monroe, M. C. Connection to nature: children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environ. Behav. 44, 31–49 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Pyle, R. M. The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland (Houghton Mifflin, 1993).

  • 41.

    Wells, N. M. & Lekies, K. S. Nature and the life course: pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Child. Youth Environ 16, 41663 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Wilson, E. O. in The Biophilia Hypothesis (Island, 1993).

  • 43.

    Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M. & Murphy, S. A. Happiness is in our nature: exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 12, 303–322 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Lin, B. B. et al. How green is your garden? Urban form and socio-demographic factors influence yard vegetation, visitation, and ecosystem service benefits. Landsc. Urban Plann. 157, 239–246 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Uitto, A., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J. & Meisalo, V. Students’ interest in biology and their out-of-school experiences. J. Biol. Educ. 40, 124–129 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Pretty, J. et al. Green exercise in the UK countryside: effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 50, 211–231 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Strachan, D. P. Family size, infection and atopy: the first decade of the ‘hygiene hypothesis’. Thorax 55, S2–S10 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Mills, J. G. et al. Urban habitat restoration provides a human health benefit through microbiome rewilding: the Microbiome Rewilding Hypothesis. Restor. Ecol. 25, 866–872 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Ulrich, R. S. et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 11, 201–230 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989).

  • 51.

    Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3, 390–394 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Kuo, F. E. Nature-deficit disorder: evidence, dosage, and treatment. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events 5, 172–186 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Louv, R. Last Child in the Woods (Algonquin Books, 2005).

  • 54.

    Mygind, L. et al. Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: a systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health Place 58, 102136 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Nyhus, P. J. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 41, 143–171 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    von Döhren, P. & Haase, D. Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol. Indic. 52, 490–497 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Geffroy, B., Samia, D. S., Bessa, E. & Blumstein, D. T. How nature-based tourism might increase prey vulnerability to predators. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 755–765 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Richardson, M. et al. The green care code: how nature connectedness and simple activities help explain pro‐nature conservation behaviours. People Nat. 2, 821–839 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Van der Wal, A. J., Schade, H. M., Krabbendam, L. & Van Vugt, M. Do natural landscapes reduce future discounting in humans? Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20132295 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L. & Capaldi, C. A. Cooperation is in our nature: nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 42, 24–31 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A. & Jadhav, S. The hidden dimensions of human-wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol. Conserv. 157, 309–316 (2013).

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    The polar night shift: seasonal dynamics and drivers of Arctic Ocean microbiomes revealed by autonomous sampling

    Q&A: Can the world change course on climate?