in

A wave glider for passive acoustic monitoring of cetaceans and anthropogenic sources in the central Mediterranean Sea


Abstract

Passive acoustic monitoring has become a widely used method to study cetaceans, especially for populations facing escalating threats from noisy human activities, including shipping traffic, fishing industry and marine constructions. Here, we conducted a study using an autonomous surface vehicle to explore the distribution and acoustic behavior of cetaceans and to characterize anthropogenic sound sources in the central Mediterranean Sea. A wave glider equipped with a single-towed acoustic recorder was deployed from 13th September 2022 to 3rd March 2023. The recording yielded 19,115 files of 460s each (approximately 2 TB), a third of which was kept for a preliminary analysis based on spectrogram visualization and audio listening. The results showed that nearly half of the dataset contained delphinid signals (Delphinidae), followed by sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) and fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus), with notable hotspots in the southern Tyrrhenian and the Ionian Sea. Moreover, the almost continuous detection of anthropogenic sources highlighted the widespread acoustic impact of human activities in the area. These findings demonstrate the value of passive acoustics in the use of autonomous vehicles as a versatile tool for large-scale and long-term monitoring, offering a promising approach to support conservation efforts for vulnerable species while advancing strategies to mitigate human impacts on marine ecosystems.

Data availability

Acoustic data is available on request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Erbe, C., McCauley, R. & Gavrilov, A. Characterizing marine soundscapes. In The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II (eds Popper, A. N. & Hawkins, A.) 265–271. Springer, New York (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richardson, W. J., Greene, C. R., Jr, Malme, C. I. & Thomson, D. H. Marine Mammals and Noise (Academic, Cambridge, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roussel, E. Disturbance to Mediterranean cetaceans caused by noise. In Cetaceans of the Mediterranean and Black Seas: State of knowledge and conservation strategies (ed. Notarbartolo di Sciara, G.). Report to the ACCOBAMS Secretariat, Monaco, Section 13, 18 (2002).

  4. Dotinga, H. M. & Elferink, A. G. O. Acoustic pollution in the oceans: The search for legal standards. Ocean. Dev. Int. Law. 31, 151–182 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nowacek, D. P., Thorne, L. H., Johnston, D. W. & Tyack, P. L. Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise. Mammal Rev. 37, 81–115 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mellinger, D., Stafford, K., Moore, S., Dziak, R. & Matsumoto, H. An overview of fixed passive acoustic observation methods for cetaceans. Oceanography 20, 36–45 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caruso, F. et al. Monitoring of a nearshore small Dolphin species using passive acoustic platforms and supervised machine learning techniques. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 267 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howe, B. M. et al. Observing the oceans acoustically. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 426 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Mauro, L. S., Diego-Tortosa, D., Sciacca, V., Riccobene, G. & Viola, S. Acoustic tracking of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the central Mediterranean Sea using the NEMO-OνDE Deep-Sea observatory. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 13 (4), 682 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sousa-lima, R. S., Norris, T. F., Oswald, J. N. & Fernandes, D. P. A review and inventory of fixed autonomous recorders for passive acoustic monitoring of marine mammals. Aquat. Mamm. 39, 23–53 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Verfuss, U. K. et al. A review of unmanned vehicles for the detection and monitoring of marine fauna. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 140, 17–29 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klinck, H. et al. Mobile autonomous platforms for passive-acoustic monitoring of high-frequency cetaceans. In World Robotic Sailing Championship and International Robotic Sailing Conference, 29–37 (2015).

  13. Hildebrand, J. A. et al. The past, present and future of underwater passive acoustic monitoring. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 155 (3 Suppl.), A96 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cauchy, P. et al. Gliders for passive acoustic monitoring of the oceanic environment. Front. Remote Sens. 4, 1106533 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Caruso, F. et al. Large-scale monitoring of Indo-Pacific finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides) using multiple static acoustic sensors. Front. Remote Sens. 3, 987105 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carvalho, J., Chérubin, L. M. & O’Corry-Crowe, G. Autonomous wave gliders as a tool to characterize delphinid habitats along the Florida Atlantic Coast. PeerJ 13, e19204 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Premus, V. E. et al. A wave glider-based, towed hydrophone array system for autonomous, real-time, passive acoustic marine mammal monitoring. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 152, 1814–1828 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tyack, P. L. & Clark, C. W. Communication and acoustic behavior of dolphins and whales.In Hearing by Whales and Dolphins (eds Au, W. W. L., Fay, R. R. & Popper, A. N.). Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 12, 156–224. Springer, New York (2000).

  19. Sayigh, L. S. Cetacean acoustic communication. In Biocommunication of Animals (ed Witzany, G.) Springer, Dordrecht (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmer, W. Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Cetaceans (Springer, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, P. J., Johnson, M. P. & Tyack, P. L. Sperm Whale behaviour indicates the use of echolocation click buzzes ‘creaks’ in prey capture. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 271, 2239–2247 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klinck, H. et al. Seasonal presence of cetaceans and ambient noise levels in Polar waters of the North Atlantic. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, EL176–EL181 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bittencourt, L. et al. Mapping cetacean sounds using a passive acoustic monitoring system towed by an autonomous wave glider in the Southwestern Atlantic ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part I. 142, 58–68 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Poupard, M., Ferrari, M., Best, P. & Glotin, H. Passive acoustic monitoring of sperm whales and anthropogenic noise using stereophonic recordings in the Mediterranean Sea, North West Pelagos sanctuary. Sci. Rep. 12, 2007 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weilgart, L. S. The impacts of anthropogenic ocean noise on cetaceans and implications for management. Can. J. Zool. 85, 1091–1116 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, C. et al. Acoustic masking in marine ecosystems: Intuitions, analysis, and implication. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395, 201–222 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and the Security of the Citizen. Mapping of Potential Risk of Ship Strike with Fin Whales in the Western Mediterranean Sea (Publications Office, 2013).

  28. Pace, D. S. & Tizzi, R. Cetaceans value and conservation in the Mediterranean Sea. J. Biodivers. Endanger. Species. 1 (S1), S1–004 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laran, S. et al. Seasonal distribution and abundance of cetaceans within French waters. Part I: The north-western Mediterranean, including the Pelagos sanctuary. Deep Sea Res. Part II. 141, 20–30 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hildebrand, J. Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395, 5–20 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van Parijs, S. M. et al. Establishing baselines for predicting change in ambient sound metrics, marine mammal, and vessel occurrence within a U.S. Offshore wind energy area. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 82, 148 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Frouin-Mouy, H. et al. Acoustic and visual cetacean surveys reveal year-round spatial and temporal distributions for multiple species in Northern British Columbia, Canada. Sci. Rep. 12, 19272 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stoppa, E. et al. Cetacean conservation in the Pelagos sanctuary: Status and proposal for its improvement. Diversity 17, 174 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Panigada, S. et al. The ACCOBAMS survey initiative: The first synoptic assessment of cetacean abundance in the Mediterranean Sea through aerial surveys. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1270513 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stephenson, F. et al. Fine-scale Spatial and Temporal distribution patterns of large marine predators in a biodiversity hotspot. Divers. Distrib. 29, 804–820 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Boisseau, O. et al. Encounter rates of cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea and contiguous Atlantic area. J. Mar. Biol. Association United Kingd. 90, 1589–1599 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gannier, A., Drouot, V. & Goold, J. Distribution and relative abundance of sperm whales in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 243, 281–293 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis, T. et al. Abundance estimates for sperm whales in the Mediterranean Sea from acoustic line-transect surveys. J. Cetacean Res. Manag. 18, 103–117 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bingham, B. et al. Passive and active acoustics using an autonomous wave glider. J. Field Robot. 29, 911–923 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lammers, M. O. et al. The occurrence of humpback whales across the Hawaiian Archipelago revealed by fixed and mobile acoustic monitoring. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1083583 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cauchy, P. et al. Sperm Whale presence observed using passive acoustic monitoring from gliders of opportunity. Endanger. Species Res. 42, 133–149 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Küsel, E. T., Munoz, T., Siderius, M., Mellinger, D. K. & Heimlich, S. Marine mammal tracks from two-hydrophone acoustic recordings made with a glider. Ocean. Sci. 13, 273288 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gannier, A. Summer distribution and relative abundance of delphinids in the Mediterranean Sea. Rev. Écol. 60, 223–238 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Azzolin, M. et al. Spatial distribution modelling of striped Dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) at different geographical scales within the EU Adriatic and ionian sea region, central-eastern mediterranean sea. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 30, 1194–1207 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gnone, G. et al. Cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea: Encounter rate, dominant species, and diversity hotspots. Diversity 15, 321 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Azzolin, M., Papale, E., Lammers, M. O., Gannier, A. & Giacoma, C. Geographic variation of whistles of the striped Dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) within the Mediterranean Sea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 694–705 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ali Ahmed, R. et al. Comparative analysis of the whistles of three oceanic dolphins in the Comoros. Mar. Mammal Sci. 42 (1), e70062 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gannier, A., Fuchs, S., Quèbre, P. & Oswald, J. N. Performance of a contour-based classification method for whistles of mediterranean delphinids. Appl. Acoust. 71, 1063–1069 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Caruso, F. et al. Long-term monitoring of Dolphin biosonar activity in deep pelagic waters of the Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Rep. 7, 4321 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Papale, E. et al. Year-round acoustic patterns of dolphins and interaction with anthropogenic activities in the Sicily Strait, central Mediterranean Sea. Ocean. Coastal. Manage. 197, 105320 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wiggins, S. M., Frasier, K. E., Henderson, E. E. & Hildebrand, J. A. Tracking Dolphin whistles using an autonomous acoustic recorder array. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 3813–3818 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lin, T. H., Yu, H. Y., Chen, C. F. & Chou, L. S. Passive acoustic monitoring of the Temporal variability of odontocete tonal sounds from a long-term marine observatory. PLoS ONE. 10 (4), e0123943 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pace, D. S. et al. Habitat suitability modeling in different sperm Whale social groups. J. Wildl. Manage. 82, 1062–1073 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pirotta, E., Matthiopoulos, J., MacKenzie, M., Scott-Hayward, L. & Rendell, L. Modelling sperm Whale habitat preference: A novel approach combining transect and follow data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 436, 257–272 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tepsich, P., Rosso, M., Halpin, P. & Moulins, A. Habitat preferences of two deep-diving cetacean species in the Northern Ligurian sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 508, 247–260 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mussi, B., Miragliuolo, A., Zucchini, A. & Pace, D. S. Occurrence and spatio-temporal distribution of sperm Whale (Physeter macrocephalus) in the submarine Canyon of Cuma (Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Aquat. Conserv. 24, 59–70 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bellomo, S. et al. Photo-identification of Physeter macrocephalus in the Gulf of Taranto (northern ionian Sea, central-eastern Mediterranean Sea). IMEKO TC (2019).

  58. Caruso, F. et al. Size distribution of sperm whales acoustically identified during long-term deep-sea monitoring in the ionian sea. PLoS ONE. 10, e0144503 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Laran, S. and Drouot-Dulau, V. Seasonal variation of striped dolphins, fin- and sperm whales’ abundance in the Ligurian Sea (Mediterranean Sea). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 87, 345-352 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Würtz, M. Mediterranean Pelagic Habitat: Oceanographic and Biological Processes, an Overview (IUCN, 2010).

  61. Castellote, M., Clark, C. W. & Lammers, M. O. Fin Whale (Balaenoptera physalus) population identity in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 28, 325–344 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sciacca, V. et al. Annual acoustic presence of fin Whale (Balaenoptera physalus) offshore Eastern Sicily, central Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE. 10, e0141838 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Putland, R. L., Merchant, N. D., Farcas, A. & Radford, C. A. Vessel noise cuts down communication space for vocalizing fish and marine mammals. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1708–1721 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Forcada, J., Aguilar, A., Hammond, P., Pastor, X. & Aguilar, R. Distribution and abundance of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in the Western Mediterranean Sea during the summer. J. Zool. 238, 23–34 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Canese, S. et al. The first identified winter feeding ground of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in the Mediterranean Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Association United Kingd. 86, 903–907 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Panigada, S. et al. Satellite tagging of mediterranean fin whales: Working towards the identification of critical habitats and the focussing of mitigation measures. Sci. Rep. 7, 3365 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Laran, S. & Gannier, A. Spatial and temporal prediction of fin Whale distribution in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 1260–1269 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  68. ACCOBAMS. Methodological guide: Guidance on underwater noise mitigation measures (Version 3.1). Presented at the Eighth Meeting of the Parties to ACCOBAMS, Malta, 29 November–2 December 2022 (2022).

  69. Sanguineti, M. et al. An automated passive acoustic monitoring system for real-time sperm Whale (Physeter macrocephalus) threat prevention in the Mediterranean Sea. Appl. Acoust. 172, 107650 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gilles, A. et al. Estimates of Cetacean Abundance in European Atlantic Waters in Summer 2022 from the SCANS-IV Aerial and Ahipboard Surveys. Final Report, 29 64 pp. (2023).

  71. Gannier, A. J., Boyer, G. & Gannier, A. C. Recreational boating as a potential stressor of coastal striped dolphins in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 185, 114222 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Carlucci, R. et al. Anthropogenic noise effects on risso’s Dolphin vocalizations in the Gulf of Taranto (northern ionian Sea, central Mediterranean Sea). Ocean. Coastal. Manage. 254, 107177 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Dominoni, D. M. et al. Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 502–511 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  74. McHugh, M. L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Med. 22, 276–282 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  75. EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium. EMODnet Digital Bathymetry (DTM 2022) (2022).

  76. Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Generalized additive models. Stat. Sci. 1 (3), 297–318 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  77. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2023).

  78. Wood, S. N. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood Estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 73, 3–36 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Širović, A., Hildebrand, J. A. & Wiggins, S. M. Blue and fin Whale call source levels and propagation range in the Southern ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1208–1215 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mehdi, A. et al. Large-scale seasonal distribution of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in the central Mediterranean Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Association United Kingd. 88 (6), 1253–1261. (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research would not have been possible without the work of many colleagues at the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn. In particular, the authors would like to thank Robin Caron, Florence Rappin and Gerardo Sorrentino. During the writing of this manuscript, S.F. was supported by the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn and the University of Turin through a SUSTNET PhD scholarship (n°39-033-31-DOT21BX3F7-8932). The PhD funder had no role in study design, data collection, or data analysis. Part of the work conducted for this study by F.C., S. F. and A. E. was carried out within the framework of the projects PRIN DIVES (CUP: C53D23003430006, Grant Assignment Decree n°1015-07/07/2023) and PRIN PNRR KNOWhale (CUP: C53D23007160001, Grant Assignment Decree n°1370-01/09/2023), funded by the European Union – Next GenerationEU – under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.1, Calls for tender No. 104 and 1409 published on 2022 by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR). This work was also supported by NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.4, Call for tender N. 3138 of 16/12/2021, rectified by Decree n.3175 of18/12/2021 of MUR, funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU (Project code: CN_00000033, Concession Decree No. 1034 of 17/06/2022adopted by the MUR, CUP: C63C22000520001, project National Biodiversity Future Center – NBFC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C, S.F. A.E.; methodology, F.C, S.C., A.P, S.F., A.E.; data analysis, F.C., S.F., A.E.; writing—original draft preparation, S.F., A.E.; writing—review and editing, F.C., L.F; supervision, F.C.; project administration, S.C., A.P., T.R; funding acquisition, T.R, S.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Francesco Caruso.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferri, S., Evrard, A., Canese, S. et al. A wave glider for passive acoustic monitoring of cetaceans and anthropogenic sources in the central Mediterranean Sea.
Sci Rep (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32142-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32142-3

Keywords

  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Mediterranean basin
  • Underwater acoustics
  • Marine mammals
  • Cetaceans’ distribution
  • Marine conservation


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Quality evaluation of Capitatae Fructus from different geographical regions in China

Genome-wide variation reveal that goats were introduced into Asia via multiple migrations

Back to Top