in

Long-term effects of nitrogen fertilization on methane emissions in drained tropical peatland


Abstract

Nitrogen (N) fertilization improves crop productivity. However, the long-term effects of N application on methane (CH4) emissions in drained peat soils, particularly under different hydrological conditions, remain poorly understood. Accurate quantification of CH4 emissions from peatlands is essential for assessing carbon losses and formulating effective climate change mitigation strategies. This study was conducted to investigate the impact of N fertilization on CH4 emissions and identify the main factors influencing CH4 emissions from drained tropical peatlands. This study was conducted on an oil palm plantation in Sarawak, Malaysia, a randomized block design included four N fertilizer treatments: Control (0 kg N ha− 1 yr− 1) (T1); low (31.1 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) (T2), moderate (62.2 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) (T3), and high (124.3 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) (T4). Soil CH4 fluxes showed no statistically significant differences between treatments or across years, with emissions ranging from − 163.6 to 320.7 µg C m− 2 hr− 1 at T1, -86.7 to 285.8 µg C m− 2 hr− 1 at T2, -131.6 to 274.1 µg C m− 2 hr− 1 at T3 and − 125.7 to 185.9 µg C m− 2 hr− 1 at T4 (p > 0.05). Although ammonium sulfate fertilization did not significantly alter CH4 emissions, its pronounced acidifying effect on soil pH, particularly at application rates above 62.2 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ along with elevated sulfate (SO42−) inputs and nitrogen pools exceeding the critical threshold (> 400 ppm), likely suppressed methanogenic activity and constrained soil organic matter decomposition. Water-filled pore space (WFPS) influenced CH4 emissions more than groundwater level (GWL), with the low GWL at the site limiting its impact. Increased WFPS (60–80%) reduced nitrate (NO3) through enhanced denitrification, lowering its inhibition on CH4 production and thus increasing emissions. This study highlights the key role of soil moisture and nitrogen cycling in regulating CH4 emissions in peatland.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. IPCC, A. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 1535. (2013).

  2. Wang, Z., Zeng, D. & Patrick, W. H. Methane emissions from natural wetlands. Environ. Monit. Assess. 42, 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394047 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, C., Grayson, R., Holden, J. & Li, P. Erosion in peatlands: recent research progress and future directions. Earth Sci. Rev. 185, 870–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.005 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, J., Morris, P. J., Liu, J. & Holden, J. P. E. A. T. M. A. P. Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. Catena 160, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ribeiro, K. et al. Tropical peatlands and their contribution to the global carbon cycle and climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 27 (3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15408 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra, S. et al. Degradation of Southeast Asian tropical peatlands and integrated strategies for their better management and restoration. J. Applied Ecology. 58 (7), 1370–1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13905 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Omar, M. S. et al. Peatlands in Southeast asia: A comprehensive geological review. Earth Sci. Rev. 104149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104149 (2022).

  8. Page, S. et al. Anthropogenic impacts on lowland tropical peatland biogeochemistry. Nat. Reviews Earth Environ. 3 (7), 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00289-6 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hooijer, A. et al. Current and future CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences 7 (5), 1505–1514. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1505-2010 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oktarita, S., Hergoualc’h, K., Anwar, S. & Verchot, L. V. Substantial N2O emissions from peat decomposition and N fertilization in an oil palm plantation exacerbated by hotspots. Environ. Res. Lett. 12 (10), 104007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa80f1 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hergoualc’h, K. A. & Verchot, L. V. Changes in soil CH4 fluxes from the conversion of tropical peat swamp forests: a meta-analysis. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 9 (2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2012.747252 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirano, T., Jauhiainen, J., Inoue, T. & Takahashi, H. Controls on the carbon balance of tropical peatlands. Ecosystems 12, 873–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9209-1 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deshmukh, C. S. et al. Impact of forest plantation on methane emissions from tropical peatland. Glob. Change Biol. 26 (4), 2477–2495. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15019 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Le Mer, J. & Roger, P. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37 (1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01067-6 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Lent, J., Hergoualc’h, K., Verchot, L., Oenema, O. & van Groenigen, J. W. Greenhouse gas emissions along a peat swamp forest degradation gradient in the Peruvian amazon: soil moisture and palm roots effects. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change. 24, 625–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9796-x (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe, A. et al. CO2 fluxes from an Indonesian peatland used for Sago palm (Metroxylon Sagu Rottb.) cultivation: effects of fertilizer and groundwater level management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 134 (1–2), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.06.015 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swails, E., Hergoualc’h, K., Verchot, L., Novita, N. & Lawrence, D. Spatio-temporal variability of peat CH4 and N2O fluxes and their contribution to peat GHG budgets in Indonesian forests and oil palm plantations. Front. Environ. Sci. 9, 617828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.617828 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luta, W. et al. Water table fluctuation and methane emission in pineapples (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) cultivated on a tropical peatland. Agronomy 11 (8), 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081448 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Couwenberg, J., Dommain, R. & Joosten, H. Greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical peatlands in south-east Asia. Glob. Change Biol. 16 (6), 1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02016.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hatano, R. Impact of land use change on greenhouse gases emissions in peatland: a review. Int. Agrophys. 33 (2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.31545/intagr/109238 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chaddy, A. et al. Effects of long-term nitrogen fertilization and ground water level changes on soil CO2 fluxes from oil palm plantation on tropical peatland. Atmosphere 12 (10), 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101340 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hadi, A. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical peatlands of Kalimantan, Indonesia. Nutr. Cycl. Agrosyst. 71, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-004-0380-2 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, Q., Peng, C., Zhang, J., Li, Y. & Song, X. Nitrogen addition decreases methane uptake caused by methanotroph and methanogen imbalances in a Moso bamboo forest. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84422-3 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Banger, K., Tian, H. & Lu, C. Do nitrogen fertilizers stimulate or inhibit methane emissions from rice fields? Glob. Change Biol. 18 (10), 3259–3267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02762.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, B., Zhao, H., Lu, F. & Wang, X. The effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on methane and nitrous oxide emission/uptake in Chinese croplands. J. Integr. Agric. 15 (2), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61063-2 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Conrad, R. Microbial ecology of methanogens and methanotrophs. Adv. Agron. 96, 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(07)96005-8 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laanbroek, H. J. Methane emission from natural wetlands: interplay between emergent macrophytes and soil microbial processes. Mini-Review Annals Bot. 105 (1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp201 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bodelier, P. L. E. & Laanbroek, H. J. Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 47 (3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00304-0 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kambara, H. et al. Environmental factors affecting the community of methane-oxidizing bacteria. Microbes Environ. 37 (1), ME21074. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME21074 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aulakh, M. S., Wassmann, R. & Rennenberg, H. Methane emissions from rice fields—quantification, mechanisms, role of management, and mitigation options. Adv. Agron. 70, 193–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)70006-5 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Steudler, P. A., Bowden, R. D., Melillo, J. M. & Aber, J. D. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on methane uptake in temperate forest soils. Nature 341 (6240), 314–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/341314a0 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mosier, A. R. & Delgado, J. A. Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes in grasslands in Western Puerto Rico. Chemosphere 35 (9), 2059–2082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00231-2 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, J. et al. Nitrate addition inhibited methanogenesis in paddy soils under long-term managements. Plant. Soil. Environ. 64 (8), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.17221/231/2018-PSE (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Basiron, Y. Palm oil production through sustainable plantations. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 109 (4), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600223 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chaddy, A., Melling, L., Ishikura, K. & Hatano, R. Soil N2O emissions under different N rates in an oil palm plantation on tropical peatland. Agriculture 9 (10), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9100213 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hasnol, O., Farawahida, M. D., Mohd, H. & Samsudin A Re-evaluation of nutrients requirements for oil palm planting on peat soil. Planter 90 (1056), 161–177 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Keeney, D. R. & Nelson, D. W. Nitrogen in organic forms. In (eds Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. & Keeney, D. R.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomy No. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 643–698. (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Salehi, M. H., Beni, O. H., Harchegani, H. B., Borujeni, I. E. & Motaghian, H. R. Refining soil organic matter determination by loss-on-ignition. Pedosphere 21 (4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60149-5 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Melling, L., Goh, K. J. & Hatano, R. Short-term effect of Urea on CH4 flux under the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) on tropical peatland in Sarawak, Malaysia. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 52 (6), 788–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00092.x (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fageria, N. K., Dos Santos, A. B. & Moraes, M. F. Influence of Urea and ammonium sulfate on soil acidity indices in lowland rice production. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 41 (13), 1565–1575. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2010.485237 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, Z. P., Delaune, R. D., Patrick, W. H. Jr & Masscheleyn, P. H. Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57 (2), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020016x (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cai, Z. et al. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilizers and water management. Plant. Soil. 196, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004263405020 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Minamikawa, K., Sakai, N. & Yagi, K. Methane emission from paddy fields and its mitigation options on a field scale. Microbes Environ. 21 (3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.21.135 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ro, S., Seanjan, P., Tulaphitak, T. & Inubushi, K. Sulfate content influencing methane production and emission from incubated soil and rice-planted soil in Northeast Thailand. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 57 (6), 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2011.637302 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kim, S. Y., Veraart, A. J., Meima-Franke, M. & Bodelier, P. L. Combined effects of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus on CH4 production and denitrification in wetland sediments. Geoderma 259, 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.015 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cai, Z., Shan, Y. & Xu, H. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on CH4 emissions from rice fields. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 53 (4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00153.x (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Girkin, N. T., Turner, B. L., Ostle, N., Craigon, J. & Sjögersten, S. Root exudate analogues accelerate CO2 and CH4 production in tropical peat. Soil Biol. Biochem. 117, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.008 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ishikura, K. et al. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from peat soil in an undrained tropical peat swamp forest. Ecosystems 22, 1852–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00376-8 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Azizan, S. N. F. et al. Comparing GHG emissions from drained oil palm and recovering tropical peatland forests in Malaysia. Water 13, 3372. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233372 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Busman, N. A. et al. Soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes from different forest types in tropical peat swamp forest. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159973 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Melling, L. & Hatano, R. Goh. K.J. Methane fluxes from three ecosystems in tropical peatland of Sarawak, Malaysia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37 (8), 1445–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.001 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jovani-Sancho, A. J. et al. CH4 and N2O emissions from smallholder agricultural systems on tropical peatlands in Southeast Asia. Glob. Change Biol. 29 (15), 4279–4297. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16747 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Murdiyarso, D., Hergoualc’h, K. & Verchot, L. V. Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tropical peatlands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (46), 19655–19660. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911966107 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sjögersten, S. et al. Temperature response of ex-situ greenhouse gas emissions from tropical peatlands: interactions between forest type and peat moisture conditions. Geoderma 324, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.029 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the generous support from the Sarawak State Government and the Federal Government of Malaysia for making this research possible. We would also like to express our sincere appreciation to the dedicated staff of the Sarawak Tropical Peat Research Institute (TROPI) for their invaluable technical assistance and unwavering support throughout every phase of this study, including the challenging fieldwork. Their expertise and dedication contributed greatly to the successful completion of this study.

Funding

This research was funded by the Federal Government of Malaysia and the Sarawak State Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Literature collection, data collection and analysis were performed by Auldry Chaddy, Faustina Elfrida Sangok, and Sharon Yu Ling Lau. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Auldry Chaddy. Faustina Elfrida Sangok, Sharon Lau Yu Ling and Lulie Melling revised the draft. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Auldry Chaddy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaddy, A., Sangok, F.E., Lau, S.Y.L. et al. Long-term effects of nitrogen fertilization on methane emissions in drained tropical peatland.
Sci Rep (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32378-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32378-z


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Post-COP30, more aggressive policies needed to cap global warming at 1.5 C

Bridging agriculture, health and industry through plant molecular farming in the bioeconomic era

Back to Top