in

Morphometric analysis and weighted sum priority based prioritization of micro-watershed, kiltie watershed, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia


Abstract

Micro-watershed prioritization using morphometric parameter analysis is a systematic approach to identifying and ranking micro-watersheds based on their susceptibility to soil erosion. This helps in implementing effective soil and water conservation measures. Soil erosion is one of the earth’s surface environmental problems. The objectives of this study were to (1) analyze 27 morphometric parameters in kiltie watershed. (2) Prioritize micro watersheds using weighted sum priority techniques. A morphometric analysis of 10 micro-watersheds was conducted, assessing characteristics such as linear, areal, shape, and relief, features to estimate erosion vulnerability. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM) with 30*30 m spatial resolution was used to delineate the micro-watersheds and drainage networks through ArcGIS 10.7.1 software. Micro watersheds were ranked based on their soil erosion susceptibility by using a weighted sum priority (WSP) value derived from various morphometric parameters. The morphometric analysis and erosion evaluation results showed that six micro watersheds (MW1, MW2, MW3, MW4, MW5, and MW8) contributed very high soil erosion in the study area with 78.07% of the total area of the watershed (17.74 km2), three micro watersheds (MW6, MW7, and MW10) contributed high soil erosion with 20.64% of the total area of the watershed(17.74 km2), and one micro watershed (MW9) contributed medium soil erosion with 1.66% of the total area of the watershed (17.74 km2). Therefore, in the study area where soil erosion is significantly very high and we recommend the implementation of effective erosion control techniques that can contribute to long-term soil and water conservation efforts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Application of smart technologies for predicting soil erosion patterns

Impact of soil erosion on agricultural sustainability based on crop water productivity in semi-arid Iran

Assessing soil erosion and farmers’ decision of reducing erosion for sustainable soil and water conservation in Burji woreda, southern Ethiopia

Data availability

The datasets utilized and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Abdeta, G. C., Tesemma, A. B., Tura, A. L. & Atlabachew, G. H. Morphometric analysis for prioritizing sub-watersheds and management planning and practices in Gidabo Basin, Southern rift Valley of Ethiopia. Appl. Water Sci. 10 (7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01239-7 (2020).

  2. Kudnar, N. S. & Rajasekhar, M. A. Study of the morphometric analysis and cycle of erosion in Wainganga Basin, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 6 (1), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00680-1 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asfaw, D. & Neka, M. Factors affecting adoption of soil and water conservation practices: the case of wereillu woreda (District), South Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Int. Soil. Water Conser. Res. 5 (4), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.10.002 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Woldemariam, G. W., Iguala, A. D., Tekalign, S. & Reddy, R. U. Spatial modeling of soil erosion risk and its implication for conservation planning: the case of the Gobele Watershed, East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia. Land 7 (1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7010025 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hossain, A. et al. Agricultural land degradation: processes and problems undermining future food security. Environ. Clim. Plant. Veg. Growth. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3-2 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muralitharan, J., Francis, L. & Zerihun, D. Morphometric analysis and prioritization of Sub-watersheds for soil erosion using geomatics technologies in Megech river Catchment, lake Tana Basin, North Western Ethiopia. E J. S S D 8(1). https://doi.org/10.20372/ejssdastu:v8.i1.2021.225 (2021).

  7. Abera, A. D., Pritam, C. & Rinku, K. Prioritization of soil erosion-prone sub-watersheds using geomorphometric and statistical-based weighted sum priority approach in the middle Omo-Gibe river basin, Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Digit. Earth 17(1).https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2024.2350198(2024).

  8. Okoli, J. et al. LIDAR-Derived DEM for landslide susceptibility assessment using AHP and fuzzy logic in Serdang, Malaysia. Geoscience 13 (2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020034 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Valkanou, K. et al. Assessment of neotectonic landscape deformation in evia Island, Greece, using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf. 10 (3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10030118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meshram, S. G. et al. Assessing erosion prone areas in a watershed using interval rough-analytical hierarchy process(IR-AHP) and fuzzy logic (FL). Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 36 (2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02134-6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Altaf, S., Meraj, G. & Romshoo, S. A. Morphometry and land cover based multi-criteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the Western Himalayan watershed. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186 (12), 8391–8412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4012-2 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haokip, P., Khan, M. A., Choudhari, P., Kulimushi, L. C. & Qaraev, I. Identification of erosion-prone areas using morphometric parameters, land use land cover and multi-criteria decision-making method: geo-informatics approach. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 24 (1), 527–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01452-7 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kushwaha, N. L. & Yousuf, A. Soil erosion risk mapping of watersheds using RUSLE, remote sensing and GIS: a review. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 8 (2), 269–277 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duressa, A. A. et al. Identification of soil erosion prone areas for effective mitigation measures using combined approach of morphometric analysis and geographical information system. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101712 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, J. & Johnson, A. A novel approach for prioritizing erosion-prone areas using land cover analysis. Environ. Manag. 45 (3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-024-01134-y (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohamed, E. Watershed delineation and morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS mapping techniques in Qena-Safaga-Bir Queh, central Eastern desert. Int. J. Water Res. Environ. Eng. 12 (2), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJWREE2019.0896 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tamir, A., Aramde, F. & Million, G. Morphometric analysis: sub-watershed prioritization in the Temcha watershed, upper blue nile Basin, Ethiopia. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-024-01134-y (2024). 10,155.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Negash, D. A., Moisa, M. B., Merga, B. B., Sedeta, F. & Gemeda, D. O. Soil erosion risk assessment for prioritization of sub watershed: the case of Chogo watershed, Horo Guduru Wollega Ethiopia. Environ. Earth Sci. 80:589.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09901-2(2021).

  19. Gutema, D., Kassa, T. & Sifan, A. K. Morphometric analysis to identify erosion prone areas on the upper blue nile using GIS (case study of Didessa and Jema sub-basin, Ethiopia). Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 4(8). (2017).

  20. Aher, P. D., Adinarayana, J. & Gorantiwar, S. D. Quantifcation of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of india: a remote sensing and GIS approach. J. Hydrol. 511, 850–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.028 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. & Mahon, T. A. Updated world map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 4, 439–473. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. NMSA (National metrological Service Agency) National metrological service agency at Dangila metrological station, Ethiopia annual report (2023).

  23. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). World Reference Base for Soil resources, 2006: a Framework for International classification, correlation, and Communication (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2006).

  24. Working Group, W. R. B. & IUSS World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps (World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, 2015).

  25. Benzougagh, B. et al. Identification of critical watershed at risk of soil erosion using morphometric and geographic information system analysis. Appl. Water Sci. 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01532-z (2022).

  26. Kulimushi, L. C., Bashagaluke, J. B., Choudhari, P., Masroor, M. & Sajjad, H. Novel combination of analytical hierarchy process and weighted sum analysis for watersheds prioritization. A study of ulindi catchment, congo river basin. Geocarto Int. 37 (25), 8456–8494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2002426 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kadam, A. K., Jaweed, T. H., Kale, S. S., Umrikar, B. N. & Sankhua, R. N. Identification of erosion-prone areas using modified morphometric prioritization method and sediment production rate: a remote sensing and GIS approach. Geomat Nat. Hazards Risk 10(1), 986–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1555189 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nookaratnam, K., Srivastava, Y. K., Rao, V. V., Amminedu, E. & Murthy, K. S. Check dam positioning by prioritization micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and GIS perspective. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 33, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989988 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Das, D. Identification of erosion prone areas by morphometric analysis using GIS. J. Inst. Eng. (India). 95 (1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-014-0069-8 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malik, A., Kumar, A. & Kandpal, H. Morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds in a hilly watershed using weighted sum approach. Arab. J. Geosci. 12(4), 118 .https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4310-7(2019).

  31. Shekar, P. R. et al. Prioritizing sub-watersheds for soil erosion using Geospatial techniques based on morphometric and hypsometric analysis: a case study of the Indian Wyra river basin. Appl. Water Sci. 13 (7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01963-w (2023).

  32. Strahler, A. N. Quantitative Geomorphology of Drainage Basins and Channel Networks, In: Chow, V., Ed., Handbook of Applied Hydrology 439–476 (McGraw Hill, New York, 1964).

  33. Horton, R. E. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydropysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 56(2), 75–370 (1945). (Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 19(4), 533–554). https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339501900406

  34. Strahler, A. N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, eco transects. AGU Union. 38 (6), 913–920. https://doi.org/TR0381006P00913 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schumm, S. A. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy New Jersey. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 67, 597–646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Faniran A. The index of drainage intensity provisional new drainage factor. Aust. J. Sci. 31, 328–330 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Suresh, M., Sudhakar, S., Tiwari, K. N. & Chowdary, V. M. Prioritization of watersheds using morphometric parameters and assessment of surface water potential using remote sensing. J. Ind. Soc. Remote Sens. 32, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030885 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miller, V. C. A Quantitative Geomorphic Study of Drainage Basin Characteristics in the Clinch Mountain Area, Virginia and Tennessee 389–402 (Department of Geology Columbia University, 1953).

  39. Arefin, R., Mohir, M. M. I. & Alam, J. Watershed prioritization for soil and water conservation aspect using GIS and remote sensing: PCA-Based approach at Northern elevated tract Bangladesh. Appl. Water Sci. 10 (4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1176-5 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wischmeier, W. H. & Smith, D. D. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses.A Guide to Conservation Planning the USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 537, Maryland (1978).

  41. Prabhakaran, A. & Jawahar, R. N. Drainage morphometric analysis for assessing form and processes of the watersheds of Pachamalai hills and its Adjoinings, central Tamil Nadu, India. Appl. Water Sci. 8 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0646-5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Iqbal, M. & Sajjad, H. Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters of Dudhganga catchment Kashmir Valley India using Spatial technology. J. Geophy Remote Sens. 3 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0049.1000115 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Brahim, B. et al. Identification of critical watershed at risk of soil erosion using morphometric and geographic information system analysis. Appl. Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01532-z (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shekar, P. R. & Mathew, A. Morphometric analysis of watersheds: a comprehensive review of data sources, quality, and geospatial techniques. Watershed Ecol. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2023.12.001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mukaka, M. M. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med. J. 24, 69–71 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Santosh, W. & Vivek, M. A GIS-based morphometric prioritization of watersheds for soil erosion planning: a case study. Environ. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11155-z (2023). 82,443.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bashir, B. & Alsalman, A. Geospatial analysis for tectonic assessment and soil erosion prioritization: a case study of Wadi Al-Lith, red sea Coast, Saudi Arabia. Appl. Sci. 13 (22), 12523. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212523 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Khalifa, A., Bashir, B., Alsalman, A. & Bachir, H. Morphometric-Hydro characterization of the coastal line between El-Qussier and Marsa-Alam, Egypt: preliminary flood risk signatures. Appl. Sci. 12 (12), 6264. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126264 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shekar, P. R. & Mathew, A. Morphometric analysis for prioritizing sub-watersheds of Murredu river basin, Telangana State, India, using a geographical information system. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 69 https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00094-4 (2022). :44.

  50. Gajbhiye, S., Mishra, S. K. & Pandey, A. Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: an RS and GIS perspective. Appl. Water Sci. 4 (1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0129-7 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Arabameri, A., Pradhan, B., Pourghasemi, H. R. & Rezaei, K. Identification of erosion-prone areas using different multicriteria decision-making techniques and GIS. Geomat. Nat. Hazards. 9 (1), 1129–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1513084 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mohammed, J. A., Gashaw, T. & Yimam, Z. A. Identification of erosion-prone watersheds for prioritizing soil and water conservation in a changing climate using morphometric analysis and GIS. Nat. Hazards. 121, 4171–4189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06952-z (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Klingenberg, C. P. & Size Shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Dev. Genes Evol. 226 (3), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-016-0539-2 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sahu, N. et al. Morphometric analysis in basaltic terrain of central India using GIS techniques: a case study. Appl. Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0442-z (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Magesh, N. S., Jitheshlal, K. V., Chandrasekar, N. & Jini, K. Geographical information system-based morphometric analysis of Bharathapuzha river basin Kerala. India Appl. Water Sci. 3, 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0095-0 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Asode, A. N., Sreenivasa, A. & Lakkundi, T. K. Quantitative morphometric analysis in the hard rock Hirehalla sub-basin, Bellary and Davanagere Districts, Karnataka, India, using RS and GIS. Arab. J. Geosci. 9 (6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2414-x (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Fenta, A. A., Hiroshi, Y., Katsuyuki, S., Haregeweyn, N. & Woldearegay, K. Quantitative analysis and implications of drainage morphometry of the Agula watershed in the semi-arid Northern Ethiopia. Appl. Water Sci. 7, 3825–3840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0534-4 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Javarayigowda, N. H., Basavaraju, G. K. S. & Jayaram, S. H. Morphometric analysis of Karadya micro watershed: a case study of Mandya district. Am. J. Remote Sens. 6 (1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajrs.20180601.13 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Harsha, J. & Shivakumar, A. Evaluation of morphometric parameters and hypsometric curve of Arkavathy river basin using RS and GIS techniques. Appl. Water Sci. 10 (3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1164-9 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Bahir Dar University and Dilla University for financial support to conduct this study.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Bahir Dar University and Dilla University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Getu Abey: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, writing (original draft), writing (review & editing) and validation. Derege Tsegaye Meshesha and Enyew Adgo Tsegaye: Supervision, methodology, editing, writing, review, validation and visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Getu Abey Denekewu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denekewu, G.A., Meshesha, D.T. & Tsegaye, E.A. Morphometric analysis and weighted sum priority based prioritization of micro-watershed, kiltie watershed, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia.
Sci Rep (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32595-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32595-6

Keywords

  • Morphometric parameters
  • Weighted sum priority
  • SRTM 30 m
  • Micro watershed prioritization


Source: Ecology - nature.com

Climate-driven transition in microbial deterioration and protection of stone surfaces at cultural heritage sites

Distribution and human health risk of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil and plants in Koko Town, Delta State, Nigeria

Back to Top