Punishment institutions selected and sustained through voting and learning

Henrich, J. et al. Costly punishment across human societies. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333 (2006).

Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990).

Ostrom, E., Walker, J. & Gardner, R. Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 86, 404–417 (1992).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 980–994 (2000).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, M. A. Winners don’t punish. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06723 (2008).

Rand, D. G., Ohtsuki, H. & Nowak, M. A. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. J. Theor. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.015 (2009).

Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. & Nowak, M. A. Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07601 (2009).

Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E. Understanding reciprocity. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 50, 1–27 (2003).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A Cooperative Species (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).

Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Brandt, H., Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Via freedom to coercion: the emergence of costly punishment. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141588 (2007).

Brandt, H., Hauert, C. & Sigmund, K. Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games. Proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2336 (2003).

Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000758 (2010).

Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083005 (2010).

Perc, M. & Szolnoki, A. Self-organization of punishment in structured populations. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043013 (2012).

Boyd, R., Gintis, H. & Bowles, S. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183665 (2010).

Sigmund, K., De Silva, H., Traulsen, A. & Hauert, C. Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons. Nature 466, 861–863 (2010).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A., Röhl, T. & Milinski, M. Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 752–756 (2014).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Murphy, B. The Punisher’s Brain: The Evolution of Judge and Jury. By Hoffman, Morris B. Pp. xi, 359. Cambridge/NY, Cambridge University Press, 2014, £21.99/$30.00. Heythrop J. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12249_81 (2015).

Gruter, M. & Masters, R. D. Ostracism as a social and biological phenomenon: an introduction. Ethol. Sociobiolo. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(86)90043-9 (1986).

Molleman, L., Kölle, F., Starmer, C. & Gächter, S. People prefer coordinated punishment in cooperative interactions. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0707-2 (2019).

Szolnoki, A., Szabó, G. & Perc, M. Phase diagrams for the spatial public goods game with pool punishment. Phys. Rev. E https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036101 (2011).

Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Platteau, J.-P. Institutions, Social Norms, and Economic Development Vol. 1 (Psychology Press, 2000).

van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. & Munda, G. Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 32, 43–61 (2000).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Traulsen, A., Nowak, M. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. Phys. Rev. E 74, 11909 (2006).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dequech, D. Institutions, social norms, and decision-theoretic norms. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 72, 70–78 (2009).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dunn, S. P. Bounded rationality is not fundamental uncertainty: a post Keynesian perspective. J. Post Keynes. Econ. 23, 567–587 (2001).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Levin, S. The trouble of discounting tomorrow. Solutions 3, 20–24 (2012).

Google Scholar 

Alford, R. P. The proliferation of international courts and tribunals: international adjudication in ascendance. In Proc. Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law Vol. 94, 160–165 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Dunn, L. A. Containing Nuclear Proliferation (International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1991).

Potoski, M. Green clubs in building block climate change regimes. Climatic Change 144, 53–63 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Trzyna, T. C., Margold, E. & Osborn, J. K. World Directory of Environmental Organizations: A Handbook of National and International Organizations and Programs—Governmental and Non-governmental—Concerned with Protecting the Earth’s Resources Vol. 5 (Earthscan, 1996).

Dixit, A. & Levin, S. in The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods: Essays in Memory of Richard C. Cornes (eds Buchholz, W. and Rübbelke, D.) 127–143 (Springer, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_7

Vasconcelos, V. V., Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. A bottom-up institutional approach to cooperative governance of risky commons. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 797–801 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Vasconcelos, V. V., Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. Cooperation dynamics of polycentric climate governance. Math. Model. Methods Appl. Sci. 25, 2503–2517 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Ostrom, E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 641–672 (2010).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Vasconcelos, V. V., Hannam, P. M., Levin, S. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Coalition-structured governance improves cooperation to provide public goods. Sci. Rep. 10, 9194 (2020).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Hannam, P. M., Vasconcelos, V. V., Levin, S. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Incomplete cooperation and co-benefits: deepening climate cooperation with a proliferation of small agreements. Climatic Change 144, 65–79 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Markussen, T., Putterman, L. & Tyran, J.-R. Self-organization for collective action: an experimental study of voting on sanction regimes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81, 301–324 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B. & Rockenbach, B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312, 108–111 (2006).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dannenberg, A. & Gallier, C. The choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems: a survey of experimental research. Exp. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09629-8 (2019).

Bühren, C. & Dannenberg, A. The demand for punishment to promote cooperation among like-minded people. Eur. Econ. Rev. 138, 103862 (2021).

Radzvilavicius, A. L., Kessinger, T. A. & Plotkin, J. B. Adherence to public institutions that foster cooperation. Nat. Commun. 12, 3567 (2021).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar