The impact of tropical cyclones Pam, Harold, Winston and Yasa on tree cover loss in Vanuatu and Fiji

1. Knapp, K. R. et al. The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS) unifying tropical cyclone data. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91 (3), 363–376 (2010).

   Google Scholar 

2. United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). The Disaster Riskscape across the Pacific Small Island Developing States: Key Takeaways for Stakeholders. ST/ESCAP/2880. (2020).

3. Pathak, A. et al. Impacts of climate change on the tourism sector of a small Island developing state: A case study for the Bahamas. Environ. Dev. 37 (2021).

4. Tu’uholoaki, M. et al. Tropical cyclone climatology, variability, and trends in the Tonga region, Southwest Pacific. Weather Clim. Extremes 37 (2022).

5. Pacific catastrophe risk assessment and financing initiative Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group (2011).

6. Johansson, A. et al. Evaluating progress on loss and damage: an assessment of the executive committee of the Warsaw international mechanism under the UNFCCC. Clim. Policy. 22 (9–10), 1199–1212 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

7. Public hearings on the request for an advisory opinion on the Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change. Earth Negotiations Bulletin A Reporting Service for Environment and Development Negotiation (ICJ, 2024). https://www.icj-cij.org/multimedia/204420

8. Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) TC Pam. (2015). https://www.preventionweb.net/media/77809/download?startDownload=20240928

9. Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) TC Harold. (2020). https://www.preventionweb.net/media/81882/download?startDownload=20240928

10. Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) TC Winston. (2016). https://www.preventionweb.net/media/77822/download?startDownload=20240928

11. Hansen, M. et al. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (19), 8650–8655 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

12. Pacific Data Hub. About PICTs (2024).

13. Digital Earth Pacific. Coastlines. Secretariat of the Pacific Community (2024).

14. Liu, C. et al. How many Islands (Isles, Rocks), how large land Areas, and how long of shorelines in the world—vector data based on Google Earth images. J. Glob. Change Data Discov. 3 (2020).

15. Andrew, N. L. et al. Coastal proximity of populations in 22 Pacific Island countries and territories. PLoS One. 14 (9), e0223249 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

16. Walsh, K. J. et al. Tropical cyclones and climate change. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Clim. Change. 7 (1), 65–89 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

17. Diamond, H. et al. A Southwest Pacific tropical cyclone climatology and linkages to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation. J. Clim. 26 (1), 3–25 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

18. Noy, I. The socio-economics of cyclones. Nat. Clim. Change. 6, 343–344 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

19. Peduzzi, P. et al. Global trends in tropical cyclone risk. Nat. Clim. Change. 2, 289–294 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

20. Deo et al. Tropical cyclone contribution to extreme rainfall over Southwest Pacific Island nations. Clim. Dyn. 56, 3967–3993 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

21. Zhou, Q. et al. Influence of Indian ocean dipole on tropical cyclone activity over Western North Pacific in boreal autumn. J. Ocean. Univ. China. 18, 795–802 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

22. Diamond, H. & Renwick, J. The climatological relationship between tropical cyclones in the Southwest Pacific and the Madden–Julian Oscillation. Int. J. Climatol. 35 (5), 676–686 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

23. Chand, S. et al. Projected increase in El Nino-driven tropical cyclone frequency in the Pacific. Nat. Clim. Change. 7, 123–127 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

24. Deo et al. Severe tropical cyclones over Southwest Pacific islands: economic impacts and implications for disaster risk management. Clim. Change 172(8) (2022).

25. Mendelsohn, R. et al. The impact of climate change on global tropical cyclone damage. Nat. Clim. Change. 3 (2), 205–209 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

26. Google, M. T., Google Satellite, Q. G. I. S. & Basemap (2025). https://earth.google.com/intl/earth/

27. QGIS.org. QGIS Geographic Information System version 3.40.11-Bratislava. QGIS Association. (2025). https://www.qgis.org

28. Harris, N. L. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 234–240 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

29. Crippa, M. et al. CO2 Emissions of all World countries. JRC/IEA/PBL 2022 Report (Publications Office of the European Union, 2022).

30. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Supplementary Material for the Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Rulemaking, ‘Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review’, EPA Report on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases: Estimates Incorporating Recent Scientific Advances (2023). https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-12/epa_scghg_2023_report_final.pdf

31. Rennert, K. et al. Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature 610, 687–692 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

32. van den Bergh, J. & Botzen, W. A lower bound to the social cost of CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change. 4, 253–258 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

33. Welker, C. & Faust, E. Tropical cyclone related socio-economic losses in the Western North Pacific region. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13, 115–124 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

34. Shamsuzzoha et al. Damaged area assessment of cultivated agricultural lands affected by cyclone Bulbul in coastal region of Bangladesh using Landsat 8 OLI and TIRS datasets. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 23 (2021).

35. Ticehurst, C. et al. Using multitemporal digital elevation model data for detecting canopy gaps in tropical forests due to cyclone damage: an initial assessment. Austral Ecol. 32 (1), 59–69 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

36. Ibanez, T. et al. Globally consistent impact of tropical cyclones on the structure of tropical and subtropical forests. J. Ecol. 107 (1), 279–292 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

37. Xi, W. Synergistic effects of tropical cyclones on forest ecosystems: a global synthesis. J. Res. 26, 1–21 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

38. Cook, G. & Goyens, C. The impact of wind on trees in Australian tropical savannas: lessons from cyclone Monica. Austral Ecol. 33 (4), 462–470 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

39. Lin, T. et al. Tropical cyclone ecology: A scalelink perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35 (7), 594–604 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

40. Metcalfe, D. et al. Cyclone damage to tropical rainforests: Species- and community-level impacts. Austral Ecol. 33 (4), 432–441 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

41. Zeng, H. et al. Impacts of tropical cyclones on U.S. Forest tree mortality and carbon flux from 1851 to 2000. PNAS 106 (19), 7888–7892 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

42. Korznikov, K. et al. Tropical cyclones moving into boreal forests: relationships between disturbance areas and environmental drivers. Sci. Total Environ. 844, 156931 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

43. Tiwari, P. et al. Assessing the influence of land use and land cover data on cyclonic winds and Coastal inundation due to tropical cyclones: a case study for the East Coast of India. Nat. Hazards. 120, 10219–10240 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

44. Feehan, C. J. et al. Ecosystem damage by increasing tropical cyclones. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 674 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

45. Noy, I. et al. Nowcasting from Space: Impact of Tropical Cyclones on Fiji’s Agriculture. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series No. 676 (2023).

46. Delaporte, B. et al. Tropical cyclone impact and forest resilience in the Southwestern Pacific. Remote Sens. 14 (5), 1245 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

47. Foody, G. M. Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground reference data. Remote Sens. Environ. 114(10), 2271–2285. (2010).

48. United Nations. System of Environmental Economic Accounting. ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/124. New York. (2024). https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/documents/EA/seea_ea_f124_web_12dec24.pdf

49. United Nations Statistics Division. New York. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 Central Framework (2014). https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/seea_cf_final_en.pdf

50. Sukhdev, P. et al. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB): challenges and responses. Nat. Balance Econ. Biodivers. 135–152 (2014).

51. Metherall, N. et al. A field and remote sensing assessment of rates and drivers of tree cover loss in Island catchments: variation in global model accuracy. Reg. Environ. Change 25(5) (2025).

52. Simpson, N. et al. A framework for complex climate change risk assessment. One Earth. 4 (4), 489–501 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

53. Varvastian, S. The human right to a clean and healthy environment in climate change litigation. Max Planck Inst. Comp. Public. Law Int. Law (MPIL) Res. Paper. 19, 1–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

54. Badrinarayana, D. To have and to be: an international human right to Clean, Healthy, and sustainable environment. Wm Mary Env’t L Pol’y Rev. 48, 55 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

55. NOAA, International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship. (IBTrACS) v04 column documentation. (2019). https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-07/IBTrACS_v04_column_documentation.pdf

56. Global forest Watch. World Resources Institute & Washington, D. C. (2022). http://www.globalforestwatch.org (accessed March 2002).

57. Hansen, M. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science. 342 (6160), 850–853 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

58. Bureau of Meteorology (BOM). Tropical cyclone categories. (2025). http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/tropical-cycloneknowledgecentre/understanding/categories/

59. Blackard, J. A. et al. Mapping US forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information. Remote Sens. Environ. 112 (4), 1658–1677 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

60. Reams, G. A. et al. The forest inventory and analysis sampling frame. The Enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program—National Sampling Design and Estimation Procedures. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station 11–26 (2005).

61. IPCC. Chapter 4: Forest Land: Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006).

62. C. Hansen, M. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (19), 8650–8655 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

63. Gibbs, D. A. et al. Revised and updated geospatial monitoring of 21st century forest carbon fluxes. Earth Syst Sci. Data. 17 (3), 1217–1243 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

64. Michelle, J. S. et al. Environ. Res. Lett 20(7) (2025).

65. Gibbs, D. A. et al. What’s new with gfw’s forest carbon monitoring. Global Forest Watch. (2025). https://www.globalforestwatch.org/blog/data-and-tools/whats-new-carbon-flux-monitoring/

66. Department of Forestry, Vanuatu. Vanuatu’s National REDD + Forest Reference Level Modified Submission for UNFCCC Technical Assessment in 2023 (Government of Vanuatu, 2022).

67. UNFCCC. FCCC/TAR/2023/VUT: Report on the technical assessment of the proposed forest reference level of Vanuatu submitted in 2023 (2023).

68. Mundhenk, P., Neupane, P. & Michael Köhl. Fiji’s Forest Reference Level: Reference Period 2006–2016 (World Forestry Institute of Wood Science. University of Hamburg, 2019).

69. Alder, D. An Analysis of the Fiji National Forest Inventory 2006 and Permanent Sample Plot Measurements 2010–2018 (Ministry of Forestry, 2020).

70. Ministry of Forestry of Fiji. Carbon Fund Emission Reductions Program Document (ER-PD). Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF). (2019).

71. Hérault, B. et al. Modeling decay rates of dead wood in a neotropical forest. Oecologia 164 (1), 243–251 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

72. European Space Agency Copernicus global digital elevation model. Distrib. OpenTopogr. https://doi.org/10.5069/G9028PQB (2024).

    Google Scholar 

73. Digital Earth Pacific. Digital Earth Pacific Analytics Hub. https://digitalearthpacific.org/. (2025).

74. Buma, B. et al. Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Change. 14 (4), 402–406 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references