MacGregor-Fors, I., Morales-Pérez, L. & Schondube, J. E. Migrating to the city: responses of neotropical migrant bird communities to urbanization. Condor 112, 711–717 (2010).
Reis, E., López-Iborra, G. M. & Pinheiro, R. T. Changes in bird species richness through different levels of urbanization: implications for biodiversity conservation and garden design in Central Brazil. Landsc. Urban Plan. 107, 31–42 (2012).
Parsons, H., Major, R. E. & French, K. Species interactions and habitat associations of birds inhabiting urban areas of Sydney, Australia. Austral Ecol. 31, 217–227 (2006).
Pereira‐Peixoto, M. H., Pufal, G., Staab, M., Feitosa Martins, C. & Klein, A. Diversity and specificity of host‐natural enemy interactions in an urban‐rural interface. Ecol. Entomol. 41, 241–252 (2016).
McKinney, M. L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 11, 161–176 (2008).
Pickett, S. T. A. et al. Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 331–362 (2011).
Shrewsbury, P. M. & Raupp, M. J. Do top-down or bottom-up forces determine Stephanitis pyrioides abundance in urban landscapes? Ecol. Appl. 16, 262–272 (2006).
Raupp, M. J., Shrewsbury, P. M. & Herms, D. A. Ecology of herbivorous arthropods in urban landscapes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 19–38 (2010).
Faeth, S. H., Warren, P. S., Shochat, E. & Marussich, W. A. Trophic dynamics in urban communities. Bioscience 55, 399–407 (2005).
Burkman, C. E. & Gardiner, M. M. Urban greenspace composition and landscape context influence natural enemy community composition and function. Biol. Control 75, 58–67 (2014).
Sorace, A. & Gustin, M. Distribution of generalist and specialist predators along urban gradients. Landsc. Urban Plan. 90, 111–118 (2009).
Turrini, T., Sanders, D. & Knop, E. Effects of urbanization on direct and indirect interactions in a tri-trophic system. Ecol. Appl. 26, 664–675 (2016).
Philpott, S. M. et al. Local and landscape drivers of arthropod abundance, richness, and trophic composition in urban habitats. Urban Ecosyst. 17, 513–532 (2014).
Chamberlain, S. A., Bronstein, J. L. & Rudgers, J. A. How context dependent are species interactions? Ecol. Lett. 17, 881–890 (2014).
Mooney, E. H. et al. Abiotic mediation of a mutualism drives herbivore abundance. Ecol. Lett. 19, 37–44 (2016).
Rocha, E. A. et al. Influence of urbanisation and garden plants on the diversity and abundance of aphids and their ladybird and hoverfly predators. Eur. J. Entomol. 115, 140–149 (2018).
Wimp, G. M. & Whitham, T. G. Biodiversity consequences of predation and host plant hybridization on an aphid-ant mutualism. Ecology 82, 440–452 (2001).
Müller, C. B., Fellowes, M. D. E. & Godfray, H. C. J. Relative importance of fertiliser addition to plants and exclusion of predators for aphid growth in the field. Oecologia 143, 419–427 (2005).
Hazell, S. P. & Fellowes, M. D. E. Intra‐specific variation affects the structure of the natural enemy assemblage attacking pea aphid colonies. Ecol. Entomol. 34, 34–42 (2009).
Rotheray, G. E. Aphid predators. (Richmond Publishing Co. Ltd., 1989).
Losey, J. E., Harmon, J., Ballantyne, F. & Brown, C. A polymorphism maintained by opposite patterns of parasitism and predation. Nature 388, 269–272 (1997).
El‐Ziady, S. & Kennedy, J. S. Beneficial effects of the common garden ant, Lasius niger L., on the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scopoli. Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. London. Ser. A, Gen. Entomol. 31, 61–65 (1956).
Pontin, A. J. The numbers and distribution of subterranean aphids and their exploitation by the ant Lasius flavus (Fabr.) (Hym., Formicidae). Ecol. Entomol. 3, 203–207 (1978).
Rocha, E. A. & Fellowes, M. D. E. Does urbanization explain differences in interactions between an insect herbivore and its natural enemies and mutualists? Urban Ecosyst. 21, 405–417 (2018).
Kitahara, M. & Fujii, K. Biodiversity and community structure of temperate butterfly species within a gradient of human disturbance: an analysis based on the concept of generalist vs. specialist strategies. Res. Popul. Ecol. (Kyoto). 36, 187–199 (1994).
Posa, M. R. C. & Sodhi, N. S. Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biol. Conserv. 129, 256–270 (2006).
Bergerot, B., Fontaine, B., Renard, M., Cadi, A. & Julliard, R. Preferences for exotic flowers do not promote urban life in butterflies. Landsc. Urban Plan. 96, 98–107 (2010).
Lizée, M. H., Mauffrey, J. F., Tatoni, T. & Deschamps-Cottin, M. Monitoring urban environments on the basis of biological traits. Ecol. Indic. 11, 353–361 (2011).
Deguines, N., Julliard, R., Flores, M. & Fontaine, C. Functional homogenization of flower visitor communities with urbanization. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1967–1976 (2016).
Richard, T. T. F. & Alexander, L. E. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 207–231 (1998).
Mader, H. J. Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol. Conserv. 29, 81–96 (1984).
Magura, T., Tóthmérész, B. & Molnár, T. A species-level comparison of occurrence patterns in carabids along an urbanisation gradient. Landsc. Urban Plan. 86, 134–140 (2008).
Bennett, A. B. & Gratton, C. Local and landscape scale variables impact parasitoid assemblages across an urbanization gradient. Landsc. Urban Plan. 104, 26–33 (2012).
Bennett, A. B. & Gratton, C. Measuring natural pest suppression at different spatial scales affects the importance of local variables. Environ. Entomol. 41, 1077–1085 (2014).
Swihart, R. K., Feng, Z., Slade, N. A., Mason, D. M. & Gehring, T. M. Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator–prey metapopulation model. J. Theor. Biol. 210, 287–303 (2001).
Ryall, K. L. & Fahrig, L. Response of predators to loss and fragmentation of prey habitat: a review of theory. Ecology 87, 1086–1093 (2006).
Rand, T. A. & Tscharntke, T. Contrasting effects of natural habitat loss on generalist and specialist aphid natural enemies. Oikos 116, 1353–1362 (2007).
Clavel, J., Julliard, R. & Devictor, V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 222–228 (2011).
Gibb, H. & Hochuli, D. F. Colonisation by a dominant ant facilitated by anthropogenic disturbance: effects on ant assemblage composition, biomass and resource use. Oikos 103, 469–478 (2003).
Menke, S. B. et al. Urban areas may serve as habitat and corridors for dry-adapted, heat tolerant species; an example from ants. Urban Ecosyst. 14, 135–163 (2011).
Lessard, J. P. & Buddle, C. M. The effects of urbanization on ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with the Molson Nature Reserve, Quebec. Can. Entomol. 137, 215–225 (2005).
Philpott, S. M., Perfecto, I., Armbrecht, I. & Parr, C. L. Ant diversity and function in disturbed and changing habitats In Ant Ecology (eds. Lach, lori, Parr, C. L. & Abbott, K.) 137–157 (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Novgorodova, T. A. & Gavrilyuk, A. V. The degree of protection different ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) against aphidophages. Eur. J. Entomol. 109, 187–196 (2012).
Garnas, J., Groden, E. & Drummond, F. A. Mechanisms of competitive displacement of native ant fauna by invading Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) populations. Environ. Entomol. 43, 1496–1506 (2014).
Czechowski, W., Marko, B. & Radchenko, A. Rubbish dumps reveal the diet of ant colonies: Myrmica schencki EM. and Myrmica rubra (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as facultative pollen-eaters. Pol. J. Ecol 56, 737–741 (2008).
Slipinski, P., Zmihorski, M. & Czechowski, W. Species diversity and nestedness of ant assemblages in an urban environment. Eur. J. Entomol. 109, 197–206 (2012).
Eubanks, M. D. Estimates of the direct and indirect effects of red imported fire ants on biological control in field crops. Biol. Control 21, 35–43 (2001).
Offenberg, J. Balancing between mutualism and exploitation: the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, 304–310 (2001).
Nagy, C., Cross, J. V. & Markó, V. Sugar feeding of the common black ant, Lasius niger (L.), as a possible indirect method for reducing aphid populations on apple by disturbing ant-aphid mutualism. Biol. Control 65, 24–36 (2013).
Olden, J. D., LeRoy Poff, N., Douglas, M. R., Douglas, M. E. & Fausch, K. D. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 18–24 (2004).
Vincent, D., Julliard, R., Couvet, D., Alexandre, L. & Jiguet, F. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv. Biol. 21, 741–751 (2007).
Gardiner, M. M., Prajzner, S. P., Burkman, C. E., Albro, S. & Grewal, P. S. Vacant land conversion to community gardens: influences on generalist arthropod predators and biocontrol services in urban greenspaces. Urban Ecosyst. 17, 101–122 (2014).
Lowe, E. C., Wilder, S. M. & Hochuli, D. F. Persistence and survival of the spider Nephila plumipes in cities: do increased prey resources drive the success of an urban exploiter? Urban Ecosyst. 19, 705–720 (2016).
Office for National Statistics. Neighbourhood statistics. 2011 census data. https://www.ons.gov.uk/ (2013).
QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. https://qgis.org/en/site/ (2015).
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/ (2014).
Pinheiro, J. & Sarkar, D. Package nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. Version 3.1-127. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html (2016).
Bates, D. et al. Package lme4: linear mixed-Effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. Version 1.1-10. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html (2015).
Crawley, M. J. The R Book. (John Wiley & Sons, 2007).
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R (Gail, M., Krickeberg, K., Samet, J. M., Tsiatis, A. & Wong, W., eds). (Springer, 2009).
Bjornstad, O. N. Package ‘ncf’: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. Version 1.1-6. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ncf/index.html (2015).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
