in

Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia

  • 1.

    Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. & Slobodkin, L. B. Community structure, population control, and competition. Am. Nat. 94, 421–425 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Messier, F. Ungulate population models with predation: A case study with the North American moose. Ecology 75, 478–488 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Solberg, E. J., Saether, B., Strand, O. & Loison, A. Dynamics of a harvested moose population in a variable environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 186–204 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Lavsund, S., Nygrén, T. & Solberg, E. Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia. Alces 39, 109–130 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Chapron, G. et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346, 1517–1519 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Linnell, J. D. C. et al. The challenges and opportunities of coexisting with wild ungulates in the human-dominated landscapes of Europe’s Anthropocene. Biol. Conserv. 244, 108500 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Carter, N. H. & Linnell, J. D. C. Co-adaptation is key to coexisting with large carnivores. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 575–578 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Ikeda, T. et al. Effects of culling intensity on diel and seasonal activity patterns of sika deer (Cervus nippon). Sci. Rep. 9, 1–8 (2019).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Yovovich, V., Allen, M. L., Macaulay, L. T. & Wilmers, C. C. Using spatial characteristics of apex carnivore communication and reproductive behaviors to predict responses to future human development. Biodivers. Conserv. 29, 2589–2603 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    van Eeden, L. M. et al. Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection. PLoS Biol. 16, 1–8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Nilsen, E. B. et al. Moose harvesting strategies in the presence of wolves. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 389–399 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Gervasi, V. et al. Predicting the potential demographic impact of predators on their prey: A comparative analysis of two carnivore-ungulate systems in Scandinavia. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 443–454 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Bassi, E., Gazzola, A., Bongi, P., Scandura, M. & Apollonio, M. Relative impact of human harvest and wolf predation on two ungulate species in Central Italy. Ecol. Res. 35, 662–674 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Yoccoz, N. G. Population dynamics of large herbivores: Variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 58–63 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Caughley, G. Analysis of Vertebrate Populations (Wiley, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Sæther, B.-E., Engen, S. & Solberg, E. J. Optimal harvest of age-structured populations of moose Alces alces in a fluctuating environment. Wildl. Biol. 7, 171–179 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Wikenros, C., Sand, H., Bergström, R., Liberg, O. & Chapron, G. Response of moose hunters to predation following wolf return in Sweden. PLoS One 10, e0119957 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Storaas, T., Gundersen, H., Henriksen, H. & Andreassen, H. The economic value of moose—a review. Alces 37, 9–107 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Boman, M., Mattsson, L., Ericsson, G. & Kriström, B. Moose hunting values in Sweden now and two decades ago: The Swedish hunters revisited. Environ. Resour. Econ. 50, 515–530 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Eurostat & Commission, E. Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Statistics 2013. (Artemis Information Management, 2017).

  • 21.

    Gill, R. M. A. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 3. Impact on trees and forests. Forestry 65, 363–388 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Liberg, O., Bergström, R., Kindberg, J. & von Essen, H. Ungulates and their management in Sweden. In European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century (eds Apollonio, M. et al.) 37–70 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Edenius, L., Ericsson, G., Kempe, G., Bergström, R. & Danell, K. The effects of changing land use and browsing on aspen abundance and regeneration: A 50-year perspective from Sweden. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 301–309 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Jonzén, N. et al. Sharing the bounty-Adjusting harvest to predator return in the Scandinavian human-wolf-bear-moose system. Ecol. Modell. 265, 140–148 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Fryxell, J. M., Packer, C., McCann, K., Solberg, E. J. & Saether, B.-E. Resource management cycles and the sustainability of harvested wildlife populations. Science 328, 903–906 (2010).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Sylvén, S. Moose harvest strategy to maximize yield value for multiple goal management—a simulation study. Agric. Syst. 49, 277–298 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Sand, H., Zimmermann, B., Wabakken, P., Andren, H. & Pedersen, H. C. Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf-ungulate ecosystems. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 33, 914–925 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Sand, H. et al. Summer kill rates and predation pattern in a wolf-moose system: Can we rely on winter estimates?. Oecologia 156, 53–64 (2008).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Sand, H. Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): The relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia 106, 212–220 (1996).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Ericsson, G., Wallin, K., Ball, J. P. & Broberg, M. Age-related reproductive effort and senscence in free-ranging moose, Alces alces. Ecology 82, 1613–1620 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Sandström, C., Di Gasper, S. W. & Öhman, K. Conflict resolution through ecosystem-based management: The case of Swedish moose management. Int. J. Commons 7, 549–570 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Dressel, S., Johansson, M., Ericsson, G. & Sandström, C. Perceived adaptive capacity within a multi-level governance setting: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Environ. Sci. Policy 104, 88–97 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Tallian, A. et al. Competition between apex predators? Brown bears decrease wolf kill rate on two continents. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20162368 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Grøtan, V., Sæther, B. E., Lillegård, M., Solberg, E. J. & Engen, S. Geographical variation in the influence of density dependence and climate on the recruitment of Norwegian moose. Oecologia 161, 685–695 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Ueno, M., Solberg, E. J., Iijima, H., Rolandsen, C. M. & Gangsei, L. E. Performance of hunting statistics as spatiotemporal density indices of moose (Alces alces) in Norway. Ecosphere 5, 1–20 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Beschta, R. L. & Ripple, W. J. Large predators and trophic cascades in terrestrial ecosystems of the western United States. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2401–2414 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Ausilio, G. Recolonization of Wolves in Sweden—Does it Affect Moose Browsing Damage on Scots Pine? (Lund University, Lund, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Gicquel, M., Sand, H., Månsson, J., Wallgren, M. & Wikenros, C. Does recolonization of wolves affect moose browsing damage on young Scots pine?. For. Ecol. Manag. 20, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Sand, H., Cederlund, G. & Danell, K. Geographical and latitudinal variation in growth patterns and adult body size of Swedish moose (Alces alces). Oecologia 102, 433–442 (1995).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Melis, C. et al. Predation has a greater impact in less productive environments: Variation in roe deer, Capreolus capreolus, population density across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 724–734 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Zimmermann, B. Predatory behaviour of wolves in Scandinavia. (PdD thesis, Faculty of Applied Ecology and Agricultural Sciences, Høgskolan i Hedmark, 2014).

  • 42.

    Zimmermann, B. et al. Predator-dependent functional response in wolves: From food limitation to surplus killing. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 102–112 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Mattisson, J. et al. Home range size variation in a recovering wolf population: Evaluating the effect of environmental, demographic, and social factors. Oecologia 173, 813–825 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Kuijper, D. P. J. et al. Paws without claws? Ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20161625 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Darimont, C. T., Fox, C. H., Bryan, H. M. & Reimchen, T. E. The unique ecology of human predators. Science 349, 858–860 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Brodie, J. et al. Relative influence of human harvest, carnivores, and weather on adult female elk survival across western North America. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 295–305 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L. & Sjöberg, K. Boreal forest. Ecol. Bull. 46, 16–47 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Zimmermann, B., Nelson, L., Wabakken, P., Sand, H. & Liberg, O. Behavioral responses of wolves to roads: Scale-dependent ambivalence. Behav. Ecol. 25, 1353–1364 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Wabakken, P., Sand, H., Liberg, O. & Bjärvall, A. The recovery, distribution, and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978–1998. Can. J. Zool. 79, 710–725 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Wabakken, P., Svensson, L., Maartmann, E., Åkesson, M. & Flagstad, Ø. Bestandsovervåking av Ulv Vinteren 2017–2018/Inventering av Varg Vintern 2017–2018. (2018).

  • 51.

    Sand, H., Eklund, A., Zimmermann, B., Wikenros, C. & Wabakken, P. Prey selection of Scandinavian wolves: Single large or several small?. PLoS One 11, 1–17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Liberg, O. et al. Monitoring of wolves in Scandinavia. Hystrix 23, 29–34 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. & van Rijn, H. itsadug: Interpreting Time Series and Autocorrelated Data Using GAMMs. R package version 2.4. (2020).

  • 55.

    Lenth, R. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means (2020).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Amanda Hubbard honored with Secretary of Energy’s Appreciation Award

    Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences