Philippa Kaur

1.
Redding, D. W., Moses, L. M., Cunningham, A. A., Wood, J. & Jones, K. E. Environmental-mechanistic modelling of the impact of global change on human zoonotic disease emergence: a case study of Lassa fever. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 646–655 (2016).
Google Scholar 
2.
McCormick, J. B. & Fisher-Hoch, S. P. in Arenaviruses I: The Epidemiology, Molecular and Cell Biology of Arenaviruses — Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology Vol. 262 (ed. Oldstone, M. B. A.) 75–109 (Springer, 2002).

3.
Jonsson, C. B., Figueiredo, L. T. M. & Vapalahti, O. A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23, 412–441 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

4.
Edson, D. et al. Routes of Hendra virus excretion in naturally-infected flying-foxes: implications for viral transmission and spillover risk. PLoS ONE 10, e0140670 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

5.
Luby, S. P., Gurley, E. S. & Jahangir Hossain, M. Transmission of human infection with Nipah virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49, 1743–1748 (2009).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

6.
Georgiou, G. et al. Display of heterologous proteins on the surface of microorganisms: from the screening of combinatorial libraries to live recombinant vaccines. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 29–34 (1997).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7.
Leitner, W. W., Ying, H. & Restifo, N. P. DNA and RNA-based vaccines: principles, progress and prospects. Vaccine 18, 765–777 (1999).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8.
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Porter, F. W. & Weissman, D. mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 261–279 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

9.
Rollier, C. S., Reyes-Sandoval, A., Cottingham, M. G., Ewer, K. & Hill, A. V. S. Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: deployment in sight. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23, 377–382 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.
Ferretti, L. et al. Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing. Science 368, eabb6936 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

11.
Morse, S. S. et al. Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis. Lancet 380, 1956–1965 (2012).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

12.
Rupprecht, C. E., Hanlon, C. A. & Slate, D. in Control of Infectious Animal Diseases by Vaccination — Developments in Biologicals Vol. 119 (eds Schudel, A. & Lombard, M.) 173–184 (Karger, 2004).

13.
Bull, J. J., Smithson, M. W. & Nuismer, S. L. Transmissible viral vaccines. Trends Microbiol. 26, 6–15 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14.
Murphy, A. A., Redwood, A. J. & Jarvis, M. A. Self-disseminating vaccines for emerging infectious diseases. Expert Rev. Vaccines 15, 31–39 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15.
Shellam, G. R. The potential of murine cytomegalovirus as a viral vector for immunocontraception. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 6, 401–409 (1994).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

16.
Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H. Virus-vectored immunocontraception of feral mammals. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 6, 281–287 (1994).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

17.
Barcena, J. et al. Horizontal transmissible protection against myxomatosis and rabbit hemorrhagic disease by using a recombinant myxoma virus. J. Virol. 74, 1114–1123 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

18.
Torres, J. M. et al. First field trial of a transmissible recombinant vaccine against myxomatosis and rabbit hemorrhagic disease. Vaccine 19, 4536–4543 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

19.
Angulo, E. & Barcena, J. Towards a unique and transmissible vaccine against myxomatosis and rabbit haemorrhagic disease for rabbit populations. Wildl. Res. 34, 567–577 (2007).
CAS  Google Scholar 

20.
Nuismer, S. L. et al. Eradicating infectious disease using weakly transmissible vaccines. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20161903 (2016).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

21.
Basinski, A. J., Nuismer, S. L. & Remien, C. H. A little goes a long way: weak vaccine transmission facilitates oral vaccination campaigns against zoonotic pathogens. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13, e0007251 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.
Basinski, A. J. et al. Evaluating the promise of recombinant transmissible vaccines. Vaccine 36, 675–682 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23.
Smithson, M. W., Basinki, A. J., Nuismer, S. L. & Bull, J. J. Transmissible vaccines whose dissemination rates vary through time, with applications to wildlife. Vaccine 37, 1153–1159 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

24.
Lecompte, E. et al. Mastomys natalensis and Lassa fever, West Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12, 1971–1974 (2006).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

25.
Olayemi, A. et al. New hosts of the Lassa virus. Sci. Rep. 6, 25280 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

26.
Douglass, R. J. et al. Longitudinal studies of Sin Nombre virus in deer mouse-dominated ecosystems of Montana. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65, 33–41 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27.
Luis, A. D., Douglass, R. J., Mills, J. N. & Bjornstad, O. N. The effect of seasonality, density and climate on the population dynamics of Montana deer mice, important reservoir hosts for Sin Nombre hantavirus. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 462–470 (2010).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

28.
Viana, M. et al. Assembling evidence for identifying reservoirs of infection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 270–279 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

29.
Fenton, A., Streicker, D. G., Petchey, O. L. & Pedersen, A. B. Are all hosts created equal? Partitioning host species contributions to parasite persistence in multihost communities. Am. Nat. 186, 610–622 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30.
Fichet-Calvet, E. et al. Fluctuation of abundance and Lassa virus prevalence in Mastomys natalensis in Guinea, West Africa. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 7, 119–128 (2007).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

31.
Marien, J. et al. Evaluation of rodent control to fight Lassa fever based on field data and mathematical modelling. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 8, 640–649 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

32.
Towner, J. S. et al. Marburg virus infection detected in a common african bat. PLoS ONE 2, e764 (2007).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

33.
Nziza, J. et al. Coronaviruses detected in bats in close contact with humans in Rwanda. EcoHealth 17, 152–159 (2020).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

34.
Anthony, S. J. et al. Further evidence for bats as the evolutionary source of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Mbio 8, e00373–17 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

35.
Ge, X.-Y. et al. Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor. Nature 503, 535–538 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

36.
Bird, B. H. & Mazet, J. A. K. Detection of emerging zoonotic pathogens: an integrated one health approach. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 6, 121–139 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

37.
Goldstein, T. et al. The discovery of Bombali virus adds further support for bats as hosts of ebolaviruses. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 1084–1089 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

38.
Pernet, O. et al. Evidence for henipavirus spillover into human populations in Africa. Nat. Commun. 5, 5342 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

39.
Grard, G. et al. A novel rhabdovirus associated with acute hemorrhagic fever in Central Africa. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002924 (2012).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

40.
Han, B. A. & Drake, J. M. Future directions in analytics for infectious disease intelligence. EMBO Rep. 17, 785–789 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41.
Han, B. A., Schmidt, J. P., Bowden, S. E. & Drake, J. M. Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7039–7044 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42.
Han, B. A. et al. Undiscovered bat hosts of filoviruses. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10, e0004815 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

43.
Guth, S., Visher, E., Boots, M. & Brook, C. E. Host phylogenetic distance drives trends in virus virulence and transmissibility across the animal-human interface. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20190296 (2019).
Google Scholar 

44.
Olival, K. J. et al. Host and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals. Nature 546, 646–650 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

45.
Pepin, K. M., Lass, S., Pulliam, J. R. C., Read, A. F. & Lloyd-Smith, J. O. Identifying genetic markers of adaptation for surveillance of viral host jumps. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 802–813 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

46.
Babayan, S. A., Orton, R. J. & Streicker, D. G. Predicting reservoir hosts and arthropod vectors from evolutionary signatures in RNA virus genomes. Science 362, 577–580 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

47.
Bakker, K. M. et al. Fluorescent biomarkers demonstrate prospects for spreadable vaccines to control disease transmission in wild bats. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1697–1704 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Garnier, R., Gandon, S., Chaval, Y., Charbonnel, N. & Boulinier, T. Evidence of cross-transfer of maternal antibodies through allosuckling in a mammal: potential importance for behavioral ecology. Mamm. Biol. 78, 361–364 (2013).
Google Scholar 

49.
Stading, B. et al. Protection of bats (Eptesicus fuscus) against rabies following topical or oronasal exposure to a recombinant raccoon poxvirus vaccine. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005958 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

50.
Schreiner, C. L., Nuismer, S. L. & Basinski, A. J. When to vaccinate a fluctuating wildlife population: is timing everything? J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 307–319 (2020).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

51.
Varrelman, T. J., Basinski, A. J., Remien, C. H. & Nuismer, S. L. Transmissible vaccines in heterogeneous populations: implications for vaccine design. One Health 7, 100084 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

52.
Alizon, S., Hurford, A., Mideo, N. & Van Baalen, M. Virulence evolution and the trade-off hypothesis: history, current state of affairs and the future. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 245–259 (2009).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

53.
Kew, O. M., Sutter, R. W., de Gourville, E. M., Dowdle, W. R. & Pallansch, M. A. Vaccine-derived polioviruses and the endgame strategy for global polio eradication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59, 587–635 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

54.
Bull, J. J. Evolutionary reversion of live viral vaccines: can genetic engineering subdue it? Virus Evol. 1, vev005 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

55.
Lauring, A. S., Jones, J. O. & Andino, R. Rationalizing the development of live attenuated virus vaccines. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 573–579 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56.
Nuismer, S. L., Basinski, A. & Bull, J. J. Evolution and containment of transmissible recombinant vector vaccines. Evol. Appl. 12, 1595–1609 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

57.
Kew, O. M. et al. Circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses: current state of knowledge. Bull. World Health Organ. 82, 16–23 (2004).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

58.
Hampson, K. et al. Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003709 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

59.
Cost of the Ebola Epidemic (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020); https://go.nature.com/38iF7cg

60.
Forum on Microbial Threats Learning from SARS: Preparing for the Next Disease Outbreak: Workshop Summary (National Academies Press, 2004). More

1.
IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [eds. Pachauri, R.K & L.A. Meyer) (IPCC, 2014).
2.
AMAP (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme). Snow, Water (Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic, AMAP, Tromsø, 2017).
Google Scholar 

3.
Wik, M., Varner, R. K., Walter Anthony, K., MacIntyre, S. & Bastviken, D. Climate-sensitive northern lakes and ponds are critical components of methane release. Nat. Geosci. 9, 99–105 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Holgerson, M. A. & Raymond, P. A. Large contribution to inland water CO2 and CH4 emissions from very small ponds. Nat. Geosci. 9, 222–226 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Bastviken, D., Cole, J., Pace, M. & Tranvik, L. Methane emissions from lakes: Dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate. Global Biogeochem. Cyc. 18, 1–12 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Crill, P. M. & Enrich-Prast, A. Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink. Science 331, 50–51 (2011).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Walter, K. M., Smith, L. C. & Chapin, F. S. Methane bubbling from northern lakes: present and future contributions to the global methane budget. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 1657–1676 (2007).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Walter Anthony, K. M. & Anthony, P. Constraining spatial variability of methane ebullition seeps in thermokarst lakes using point process models. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20087 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Tan, Z. & Zhuang, Q. Arctic lakes are continuous methane sources to the atmosphere under warming conditions. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 1–9 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Tan, Z. & Zhuang, Q. Methane emissions from pan-Arctic lakes during the 21st century: An analysis with process-based models of lake evolution and biogeochemistry. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 2641 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Lehner, B. & Doell, P. Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 296, 1–22 (2004).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Verpoorter, C., Kutser, T., Seekell, D. A. & Tranvik, L. J. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6396–6402 (2014).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Messager, M. L., Lehner, B., Grill, G., Nedeva, I. & Schmitt, O. Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach. Nat. Commun. 7, 13603 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Downing, J. A. & Duarte, C. M. Abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. In Encyclopedia of Inland Water, 1 (ed. Likens, G. E.) 469–478 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2009).
Google Scholar 

15.
McGinnis, D. F., Greinert, J., Artemov, Y., Beaubien, S. E. & Wüest, A. Fate of rising methane bubbles in stratified waters: how much methane reaches the atmosphere?. J. Geophys. Res. 111, C09007 (2006).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Lamarche, C. et al. Compilation and validation of SAR and optical data products for a complete and global map of inland/ocean water tailored to the climate modeling community. Rem. Sens. 9, 36 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540, 418–422 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Sanches, L. F., Guenet, B., Marinho, C. C., Barros, N. & de Assis Esteves, F. Global regulation of methane emission from natural lakes. Sci. Rep. 9, 255 (2019).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Bruhwiler, L. et al. CarbonTracker-CH4: an assimilation system for estimating emissions of atmospheric methane. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 8269–8293 (2014).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Du, J., Kimball, J. S., Duguay, C., Kim, Y. & Watts, J. D. Satellite microwave assessment of Northern Hemisphere lake ice phenology from 2002 to 2015. Cryosphere 11, 47–63 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Kim, Y., Kimball, J. S., McDonald, K. C. & Glassy, J. Developing a global data record of daily landscape freeze/thaw status using satellite microwave remote sensing, Version 4. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 49, 949–960 (2016).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Brown, J., Ferrians, O.J., Heginbottom, J.A. & Melnikov, E.S. Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground-ice conditions, Version 2. Boulder, CO, National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. https://doi.org/10.3133/cp45 (2002).

23.
Obu, J. et al. Northern hemisphere permafrost map based on TTOP modelling for 2000–2016 at 1 km2 scale. Earth Sci. Rev. 193, 299–316 (2019).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) https://daac.ornl.gov/SOILS/guides/HWSD.html.

25.
Allen, G. H. & Pavelsky, T. M. Global extent of rivers and streams. Science 361, 585–588 (2018).
MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Lehner, B. et al. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9(9), 494–502 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Mulligan, M., Saenz-Cruz, L., van Soesbergen, A., Smith, V.T. & Zurita, L. The Global georeferenced Database of Dams (GOOD2), Version 1. Global dams database and geowiki. https://geodata.policysupport.org/dams (2009).

28.
Chau, Y. K., Snodgrass, W. J. & Wong, P. T. S. A sampler for collecting evolved gases from sediment. Water Res. 11, 807–809 (1977).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Howard, D.L., Frea, J.I. & Pfister, R.M. The potential for methane carbon cycling in Lake Erie. In Paper Presented at 14th Conference on Great Lakes Research (Int. Assoc. of Great Lakes Res., Ann Arbor, Mich. 1971).

30.
Townsend-Small, A. et al. Quantifying emissions of methane derived from anaerobic organic matter respiration and natural gas extraction in Lake Erie. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, S356–S366 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Joung, D., Leonte, M. & Kessler, J. D. Methane sources in the waters of Lake Michigan and Lake Superior as revealed by natural radiocarbon measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5436–5444 (2019).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Shimoda, Y. et al. Our current understanding of lake ecosystem response to climate change: what have we really learned from the north temperate deep lakes?. J. Great Lakes Res. 37, 173–193 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Blenckner, T. R. et al. Large-scale climatic signatures in lakes across Europe: a meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1314–1326 (2007).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
van Huissteden, J. et al. Methane emissions from permafrost thaw lakes limited by lake drainage. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 119–123 (2011).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Kalff, J. Limnology, Inland Water Ecosystems (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2002).
Google Scholar 

36.
Kourzeneva, E., Asensio, H., Martin, E. & Faroux, S. Global gridded dataset of lake coverage and lake depth for use in numerical weather prediction and climate modelling. Tellus A 64, 1–14 (2012).
Google Scholar  More

Experimental design
Following five focus groups with SERNAPESCA’s head of enforcement and other personnel, we designed and implemented an online survey that targeted fisheries enforcement officers who are responsible for monitoring IUU activities in Chile. The survey was structured to capture expert knowledge on various aspects of illegal activities, as well as the relative experience of the officers. The survey defined illegal fishing as a fishing activity carried out in national jurisdiction waters by national or international boats that is in violation of the national fishing law, conducted without a legal permit, or activities that involve unreported or misreported captures to the authorities. The Director of SERNAPESCA delivered the survey via email to all SERNAPESCA enforcement officers. The list of officers was constructed by the Director (n = 86). The survey was anonymous in that the officers were not asked to report their name nor any information that could be used for identification (e.g., email). Answers to questions were not mandatory; that is, respondents could opt-out of answering particular questions and continue with the survey. The survey was available online for ten weeks, over which five reminder emails were sent to officers requesting them to complete the survey.
The survey, in Spanish, consisted of two sections. First, we asked respondents to rank the magnitude of illegal activity for twenty fisheries on a nominal scale (1–5), along with their relative experience with each fishery (nominal scale, 1–5). The twenty fisheries were selected a priori based on our focus groups and known information about illegal activity. All fisheries were single species, with the exception of four that included multiple species: skates (2 species, Zearaja chilensis and Bathyraja macloviana), kelp (4 species: Lessonia spicate, L. berteroana, L. traberculata, Macrocystis pyrifera), red algae (3 species: Sarcothalia crispate, Gigartina skottsbergii, Mazzaella laminarioides), and crabs (10 species excluding southern king crab: Cancer edwardsi, C. porter, C. setosus, C. coronatus, Homalaspis plana, Ovalipes trimaculatus, Taliepus dentatus, T. marginatus, Mursia gaudichaudi, Hemigrapsus crenulatus). In the second part of the survey, we asked respondents additional questions for four focal fisheries: South Pacific hake (Merluccius gayi gayi), southern hake (M. australis), loco or Chilean abalone (Concholepas concholepas), and kelp. For each fishery, we asked respondents to score on a nominal scale (1–5),

The frequency of six specific illegal activities in the industrial sector: size, gear, season, area, transshipment, and port.

The frequency of six specific illegal activities in the small-scale sector: size, gear, season, area, transshipment, and port.

The participation of illegal activity for six different stakeholders along the supply chain: fisher, purchaser, processor, wholesaler, exporter, and restaurateur.

The utilization of seven infrastructure types in illegal activities: fishing boats, refrigeration trucks, processing plants, markets, transshipment boats, export vehicles, and restaurants.

This study was approved by the Advanced Conservation Strategies and Pontificia Universidad Católica ethics institutional review boards and followed guidelines established by their ethics committees, which complies with national and international standards. The surveys included a written informed consent approved by all interviewees, which acknowledged research objectives and established that the survey was anonymous and that interviewees were free to choose to not answer questions. While all species have common names in Chile (which were used in the survey), we use Fishbase and Sealifebase as the taxonomic authority and for the common names reported here to facilitate comparisions34,35.
Statistical analysis
For both sections of the survey, we used a Bayesian cumulative multinomial logit model to predict illegal estimates. First, we fitted a model for illegal estimates for each of the twenty fisheries jointly. Second, we fitted models for illegal estimates for various aspects of the four focal fisheries (i.e., activities, stakeholders, and infrastructure) in a single analysis for each aspect. In both models, we included a random intercept term for respondent, along with a fixed effect for fishery. We evaluated the role of experience, as self-reported by the respondents, by comparing the difference between the illegal score by a respondent for a fishery and the model prediction for that fishery across respondents. If higher levels of expertise increased or decreased the value of a respondent’s scoring, there would be a relationship between the size of the differences and the level of experience reported for a fishery. Experience may also affect the difference in mean responses (i.e., bias), potentially due to more personal experience over a longer period of time, which would lead to a correlation between expertise and mean illegality scores. Depending on the patterns observed in the data, there are several ways to control for a respondent’s experience in illegality estimates. In our case, we used experience scores as a covariate in the model.
For the twenty fisheries, we used the following model,

$$Prleft{{S}_{ij}=kright}=phi left({tau }_{k}-left({varvec{beta}}{{varvec{x}}}_{{varvec{i}}}+{{varvec{z}}}_{{varvec{j}}}{{varvec{V}}}_{{varvec{i}}}right)right)-phi left({tau }_{k-1}-left({varvec{beta}}{{varvec{x}}}_{{varvec{i}}}+{{varvec{z}}}_{{varvec{j}}}{{varvec{V}}}_{{varvec{j}}}right)right)$$
(1)

in which the probability that the score for the level of illegal landings ({S}_{ij}) for the ith species by the jth respondent is equal to category k, can be represented as a latent continuous variable which is divided into K categories, by K − 1 thresholds at ({tau }_{k}). This latent continuous variable is represented by the cumulative normal distribution, (phi). For a given observation, the regression equation is composed of coefficients multiplied times predictor variables ({varvec{beta}}{{varvec{x}}}_{{varvec{i}}}) plus a design matrix for the random effect, multiplied times the error term for the jth respondent, ({{varvec{z}}}_{{varvec{j}}}{{varvec{V}}}_{{varvec{i}}}) . The probability of that observation falling in category k, (Prleft{{S}_{ij}=kright}), is thus the probability of it being in a category equal to or smaller than k, (phi left({tau }_{k}-left({varvec{beta}}{{varvec{x}}}_{{varvec{i}}}+{{varvec{z}}}_{{varvec{j}}}{{varvec{V}}}_{{varvec{i}}}right)right)), less the probability of the observation being in a category smaller than k, (phi left({tau }_{k-1}-left({varvec{beta}}{{varvec{x}}}_{{varvec{i}}}+{{varvec{z}}}_{{varvec{j}}}{{varvec{V}}}_{{varvec{j}}}right)right)). Implemented in the R statistical language, using the brms package36, the call to fit this model looks like the following:

$${text{Score}}; , sim ;{text{Species}} + {text{Experience }} + left( {{1}|{text{Respondent}}} right),;{text{ data}} = {text{SurveyData}},;{text{family}} = {text{cumulative}}),$$

where Score is ({S}_{ij}) in (1) above, the fixed effects, ({varvec{beta}}{{varvec{x}}}_{{varvec{i}}}) are the experience of the respondent and the species that was scored, and (1|Respondent) denotes a random intercept model, where each has a different intercept term, drawn from a shared error distribution. For more information on the application of this model to ordinal response data, see Burkner and Vuorre37.
For the estimates for the various aspects of the four focal fisheries, we used the following model,

$${text{Response}}; sim ;{text{Species}} + {text{Experience}} + left( {{1}|{text{Respondent}}} right),;{text{data}} = {text{SurveyData}},;{text{family}} = {text{cumulative}}),$$

which is structured as per (1) above, but with the responses to the various focal species questions (i.e., activities per sector, stakeholders, and infrastructure) substituted for the species scores as in (1).
We compared both models with simpler models, including a single-term null model using leave-one-out cross-validation. We did so in the R statistical language using the loo packages36,38,39. Prior distributions for all regression terms were improper flat priors over the real numbers, the default in the brms package for population parameters. The priors on the intercept and the random effects were student t3,0,10 distributions, as per the default for uninformative priors in the brms package.
We carried out a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) with the four focal fisheries as categorical variables and the illegal activity, stakeholder, and infrastructure estimates from the Bayesian cumulative multinomial logit model. For each fishery, we used 10,000 estimates from the model, along with a qualitative variable that represented the different factors (e.g., restaurateur). The latter has no influence on the principal components of the analysis but helps to interpret the dimensions of variability. Principal Components Analysis is especially powerful as an approach to visualize patterns, such as clusters, clines, and outliers in a dataset40. In our case, we sought to visualize whether there were common illegal factors with similar set of scores and whether there was any association between high or low scores of illegal factors and the focal fisheries. We used the FactoMineR package in the R statistical language41. More

1.
Bowe, L. M., Coat, G. & DePamphilis, C. W. Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: Extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales’ closest relatives are conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4092–4097 (2000).
ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
2.
Bohlmann, J. & Keeling, C. I. Terpenoid biomaterials. Plant J. 54, 656–669 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

3.
Celedon, J. M. & Bohlmann, J. Oleoresin defenses in conifers: Chemical diversity, terpene synthases, and limitations of oleoresin defense under climate change. New Phytol. 224, 1444–1463 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

4.
Whitehill, J. G. A. et al. Functions of stone cells and oleoresin terpenes in the conifer defense syndrome. New Phytol. 221, 1503–1517 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

5.
Hilker, M., Kobs, C., Varama, M. & Schrank, K. Insect egg deposition induces Pinus sylvestris to attract egg parasitoids. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 455–461 (2002).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

6.
Mumm, R., Schrank, K., Wegener, R., Schulz, S. & Hilker, M. Chemical analysis of volatiles emitted by Pinus sylvestris after induction by insect oviposition. J. Chem. Ecol. 29, 1235–1252 (2003).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

7.
Martin, D. M., Gershenzon, J. & Bohlmann, J. Induction of volatile terpene biosynthesis and diurnal emission by methyl jasmonate in foliage of Norway spruce. Plant Physiol. 132, 1586–1599 (2003).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

8.
Miller, B., Madilao, L. L., Ralph, S. & Bohlmann, J. Insect-induced conifer defense. White pine weevil and methyl jasmonate induce traumatic resinosis, de novo formed volatile emissions, and accumulation of terpenoid synthase and putative octadecanoid pathway transcripts in Sitka spruce. Plant Physiol. 137, 369–382 (2005).

9.
Niinemets, U., Reichstein, M., Staudt, M., Seufert, G. & Tenhunen, J. D. Stomatal constraints may affect emission of oxygenated monoterpenoids from the foliage of Pinus pinea. Plant Physiol. 130, 1371–1385 (2002).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

10.
Harley, P., Eller, A., Guenther, A. & Monson, R. K. Observations and models of emissions of volatile terpenoid compounds from needles of ponderosa pine trees growing in situ: Control by light, temperature and stomatal conductance. Oecologia 176, 35–55 (2014).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Tissier, A. Plant secretory structures: More than just reaction bags. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 49, 73–79 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

12.
Schilmiller, A. L., Last, R. L. & Pichersky, E. Harnessing plant trichome biochemistry for the production of useful compounds. Plant J. 54, 702–711 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

13.
Wagner, G. J., Wang, E. & Shepherd, R. W. New approaches for studying and exploiting an old protuberance, the plant trichome. Ann. Bot. 93, 3–11 (2004).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

14.
Lange, B. M. The evolution of plant secretory structures and the emergence of terpenoid chemical diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 139–159 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

15.
Lange, B. M. et al. Probing essential oil biosynthesis and secretion by functional evaluation of expressed sequence tags from mint glandular trichomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2934–2939 (2000).
ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

16.
Wang, G. et al. Terpene biosynthesis in glandular trichomes of Hop. Plant Physiol. 148, 1254–1266 (2008).
ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

17.
Nagel, J. et al. EST analysis of hop glandular trichomes identifies an o-methyltransferase that catalyzes the biosynthesis of xanthohumol. Plant Cell 20, 186–200 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

18.
Czechowski, T. et al. Artemisia annua mutant impaired in Artemisinin synthesis demonstrates importance of nonenzymatic conversion in terpenoid metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113, 15150–15155 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

19.
Johnson, H. B. Plant pubescence: An ecological perspective. Bot. Rev. 41, 233–258 (1975).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Fernald, M. L. Gray’s Manual of Botany. (American Book Company, 1950).

21.
Hernandez-Castillo, G. R., Stockey, R. A., Rothwell, G. W. & Mapes, G. Reconstructing Emporia lockardii (Voltziales: Emporiaceae) and initial thoughts on paleozoic conifer ecology. Int. J. Plant Sci. 170, 1056–1074 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Rothwell, G. W., Mapes, G. & Hernandez-Castillo, G. R. Hanskerpia gen. nov. and phylogenetic relationships among the most ancient conifers (Voltziales). Taxon 54, 733–750 (2005).

23.
Heinrich, M. Das Harz der Nadelhölzer, seine Entstehung, Vertheilung, Bedeutung und Gewinnung (Springer, Berlin, 1894).
Google Scholar 

24.
Tomlin, E. S., Antonejevic, E., Alfaro, R. I. & Borden, J. H. Changes in volatile terpene and diterpene resin acid composition of resistant and susceptible white spruce leaders exposed to simulated white pine weevil damage. Tree Physiol. 20, 1087–1095 (2000).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

25.
Birol, I. et al. Assembling the 20 Gb white spruce (Picea glauca) genome from whole-genome shotgun sequencing data. Bioinformatics 29, 1492–1497 (2013).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

26.
Warren, R. L. et al. Improved white spruce (Picea glauca) genome assemblies and annotation of large gene families of conifer terpenoid and phenolic defense metabolism. Plant J. 83, 189–212 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

27.
Zulak, K. G., Dullat, H. K., Keeling, C. I., Lippert, D. & Bohlmann, J. Immunofluorescence localization of levopimaradiene/abietadiene synthase in methyl jasmonate treated stems of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) shows activation of diterpenoid biosynthesis in cortical and developing traumatic resin ducts. Phytochemistry 71, 1695–1699 (2010).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

28.
Whitehill, J. G. A., Henderson, H., Strong, W., Jaquish, B. & Bohlmann, J. Function of Sitka spruce stone cells as a physical defense against white pine weevil. Plant. Cell Environ. 39, 2545–2556 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

29.
Franceschi, V. R., Krokene, P., Krekling, T. & Christiansen, E. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distant defense responses to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87, 314–326 (2000).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

30.
Parent, G. J., Giguère, I., Mageroy, M., Bohlmann, J. & MacKay, J. J. Evolution of the biosynthesis of two hydroxyacetophenones in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 620–629 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

31.
Mageroy, M. H. et al. A conifer UDP-sugar dependent glycosyltransferase contributes to acetophenone metabolism and defense against insects. Plant Physiol. 175, 00611.2017 (2017).

32.
Tissier, A. Glandular trichomes: What comes after expressed sequence tags?. Plant J. 70, 51–68 (2012).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

33.
Sacher, J. A. Structure and seasonal activity of the shoot apices of Pinus lambertiana and Pinus ponderosa. Am. J. Bot. 41, 749–759 (1954).
Article  Google Scholar 

34.
De Simón, B. F., Vallejo, M. C. G., Cadahía, E., Miguel, C. A. & Martinez, M. C. Analysis of lipophilic compounds in needles of Pinus pinea L. Ann. For. Sci. 58, 449–454 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Lange, W. & Weissman, G. Untersuchungen der Harzbalsame von Pinus resinosa Ait. und Pinus pinea L. Holz als Roh- und Werkst. 49, 476–480 (1991).

36.
Geisler, K., Jensen, N. B., Yuen, M. M. S., Madilao, L. & Bohlmann, J. Modularity of conifer diterpene resin acid biosynthesis: P450 enzymes of different CYP720B clades use alternative substrates and converge on the same products. Plant Physiol. 171, 152–164 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

37.
Hamberger, B., Ohnishi, T., Hamberger, B., Séguin, A. & Bohlmann, J. Evolution of diterpene metabolism: Sitka spruce CYP720B4 catalyzes multiple oxidations in resin acid biosynthesis of conifer defense against insects. Plant Physiol. 157, 1677–1695 (2011).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

38.
Ro, D., Arimura, G., Lau, S. Y. W., Piers, E. & Bohlmann, J. Loblolly pine abietadienol/abietadienal oxidase PtAO (CYP720B1) is a multifunctional, multisubstrate cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8060–8065 (2005).
ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

39.
Hilker, M., Stein, C., Schröder, R., Varama, M. & Mumm, R. Insect egg deposition induces defence responses in Pinus sylvestris: characterisation of the elicitor. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1849–1854 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Schuurink, R. & Tissier, A. Glandular trichomes: Micro-organs with model status?. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16283 (2019).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

41.
Huchelmann, A., Boutry, M. & Hachez, C. Plant glandular trichomes: Natural cell factories of high biotechnological interest. Plant Physiol. 175, 00727.2017 (2017).

42.
Sallaud, C. et al. Characterization of two genes for the biosynthesis of the labdane diterpene Z-abienol in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) glandular trichomes. Plant J. 72, 1–17 (2012).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

43.
Liu, Y. et al. A geranylfarnesyl diphosphate synthase provides the precursor for sesterterpenoid (C25) formation in the glandular trichomes of the mint species Leucosceptrum canum. Plant Cell 28, 804–822 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

44.
Reynolds, E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar  More

1.
Huttenhower, C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 
2.
Nugent, R. P., Krohn, M. A. & Hillier, S. L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 29, 297–301 (1991).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3.
Amsel, R. et al. Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 74, 14–22 (1983).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4.
Boris, S. & Barbes, C. Role played by lactobacilli in controlling the population of vaginal pathogens. Microbes Infect 2, 543–546 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5.
Tyssen, D. et al. Anti-HIV-1 Activity of Lactic Acid in Human Cervicovaginal Fluid. mSphere 3, e00055–00018 (2018).

6.
Petrova, M. I., Reid, G., Vaneechoutte, M. & Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus iners: friend or foe?. Trends Microbiol. 25, 182–191 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7.
Schwebke, J. R. & Desmond, R. Natural history of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in a high-risk group of women. Sex. Transm. Dis. 34, 876–877 (2007).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.
Larsson, P.-G., Platz-Christensen, J.-J., Thejls, H., Forsum, U. & Påhlson, C. Incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease after first-trimester legal abortion in women with bacterial vaginosis after treatment with metronidazole: a double-blind, randomized study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 166, 100–103 (1992).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9.
Hillier, S. L. et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 1737–1742 (1995).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.
Donders, G. et al. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG 116, 1315–1324 (2009).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11.
Borgdorff, H. et al. Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. ISME J. 8, 1781 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

12.
Cherpes, T. L., Hillier, S. L., Meyn, L. A., Busch, J. L. & Krohn, M. A. A delicate balance: risk factors for acquisition of bacterial vaginosis include sexual activity, absence of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli, black race, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex. Transm. Dis. 35, 78–83 (2008).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

13.
Dareng, E. O. et al. Prevalent high-risk HPV infection and vaginal microbiota in Nigerian women. Epidemiol. Infect. 144, 123–137 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14.
Brotman, R. M. et al. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J. Infect. Dis. 210, 1723–1733 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.
Lee, J. E. et al. Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLoS ONE 8, e63514–e63514 (2013).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

16.
Rodriguez-Cerdeira, C., Sanchez-Blanco, E. & Alba, A. Evaluation of association between vaginal infections and high-risk human papillomavirus types in female sex workers in Spain. ISRN Obstet. Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/240190 (2012).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

17.
Di Paola, M. et al. Characterization of cervico-vaginal microbiota in women developing persistent high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection. Sci. Rep. 7, 10200 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

18.
Cauci, S. Vaginal immunity in bacterial vaginosis. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 6, 450–456 (2004).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

19.
Stokholm, J. et al. Antibiotic use during pregnancy alters the commensal vaginal microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, 629–635 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

20.
Welch, J. S. Quantitative and qualitative effects of douche preparations on vaginal microflora. Obstet. Gynecol. 81, 320–321 (1993).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21.
Brotman, R. M. et al. The effect of vaginal douching cessation on bacterial vaginosis: a pilot study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 198(628), e621-628 (2008).
Google Scholar 

22.
Schwebke, J. R., Richey, C. M. & Weiss, H. L. Correlation of behaviors with microbiological changes in vaginal flora. J. Infect. Dis. 180, 1632–1636 (1999).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23.
Beigi, R. H., Wiesenfeld, H. C., Hillier, S. L., Straw, T. & Krohn, M. A. Factors associated with absence of H2O2-producing Lactobacillus among women with bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 191, 924–929 (2005).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

24.
Ahluwalia, N. & Grandjean, H. Nutrition, an under-recognized factor in bacterial vaginosis. J. Nutr. 137, 1997–1998 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

25.
Neggers, Y. H. et al. Dietary intake of selected nutrients affects bacterial vaginosis in women. J. Nutr. 137, 2128–2133 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

26.
Brotman, R. M. et al. Association between cigarette smoking and the vaginal microbiota: a pilot study. BMC Infect. Dis. 14, 471 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

27.
van Houdt, R. et al. Lactobacillus iners-dominated vaginal microbiota is associated with increased susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Dutch women: a case–control study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 94, 117–123 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

28.
Noyes, N., Cho, K.-C., Ravel, J., Forney, L. J. & Abdo, Z. Associations between sexual habits, menstrual hygiene practices, demographics and the vaginal microbiome as revealed by Bayesian network analysis. PLoS ONE 13, e0191625 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

29.
Ravel, J. et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(Suppl 1), 4680–4687 (2011).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

30.
Zhou, X. et al. Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women. ISME J. 1, 121–133 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31.
Zhou, X. et al. The vaginal bacterial communities of Japanese women resemble those of women in other racial groups. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 58, 169–181 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

32.
Borgdorff, H. et al. The association between ethnicity and vaginal microbiota composition in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PLoS ONE 12, e0181135 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

33.
Verstraelen, H. et al. Characterisation of the human uterine microbiome in non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1–2 region of the 16S rRNA gene. PeerJ 4, e1602 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

34.
Rick, A.-M. et al. Open forum infectious diseases. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

35.
Anukam, K. C., Osazuwa, E. O., Ahonkhai, I. & Reid, G. Lactobacillus vaginal microbiota of women attending a reproductive health care service in Benin city, Nigeria. Sex. Transm. Dis. 33, 59–62 (2006).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

36.
Bourgeon, L., Burke, A. & Higham, T. Earliest human presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: new radiocarbon dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada. PLoS ONE 12, e0169486 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

37.
Bortolini, M. C. et al. Y-chromosome evidence for differing ancient demographic histories in the Americas. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 524–539 (2003).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

38.
Hurtado, A. M., Hurtado, I. & Hill, K. Public health and adaptive immunity among natives of South America. Lost Paradises and the Ethics of Research and Publication 164–192 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).

39.
Lindenau, J. et al. Distribution patterns of variability for 18 immune system genes in Amerindians–relationship with history and epidemiology. HLA 82, 177–185 (2013).
CAS  Google Scholar 

40.
Bhatia, K. K., Black, F. L., Smith, T. A., Prasad, M. L. & Koki, G. N. Class I HLA antigens in two long-separated populations: Melanesians and South Amerinds. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 97, 291–305 (1995).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

41.
Watkins, D. I. et al. New recombinant HLA-B alleles in a tribe of South American Amerindians indicate rapid evolution of MHC class I loci. Nature 357, 329–333 (1992).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42.
Ewerton, P. D., de Meira Leite, M., Magalhães, M., Sena, L. & dos Santos, E. J. M. Amazonian Amerindians exhibit high variability of KIR profiles. Immunogenetics 59, 625–630 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

43.
Freire, G. & Tillett, A. Salud indígena en Venezuela. First volume. (Dirección de Salud Indígena, 2007).

44.
Contreras, M. et al. The bacterial microbiota in the oral mucosa of rural Amerindians. Microbiology 156, 3282–3287 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

45.
Clemente, J. C. et al. The microbiome of uncontacted Amerindians. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500183 (2015).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

46.
Blaser, M. J. et al. Distinct cutaneous bacterial assemblages in a sampling of South American Amerindians and US residents. ISME J. 7, 86–95 (2012).
Google Scholar 

47.
Yatsunenko, T. et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222–222 (2012).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Godinho, N. M. D. O. O Impacto das Migrações na Constituição Genética de Populações Latino-Americanas. (2008).

49.
Jespers, V. et al. The significance of Lactobacillus crispatus and L. vaginalis for vaginal health and the negative effect of recent sex: a cross-sectional descriptive study across groups of African women. BMC Infect. Dis. 15, 115 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

50.
Gosmann, C. et al. Lactobacillus-deficient cervicovaginal bacterial communities are associated with increased HIV acquisition in Young South African Women. Immunity 46, 29–37 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

51.
Godoy-Vitorino, F. et al. Cervicovaginal fungi and bacteria associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and high-risk Human Papillomavirus infections in a Hispanic population. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2533 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

52.
Tarnberg, M., Jakobsson, T., Jonasson, J. & Forsum, U. Identification of randomly selected colonies of lactobacilli from normal vaginal fluid by pyrosequencing of the 16S rDNA variable V1 and V3 regions. APMIS 110, 802–810 (2002).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

53.
Huse, S. M., Ye, Y., Zhou, Y. & Fodor, A. A. A core human microbiome as viewed through 16S rRNA sequence clusters. PLoS ONE 7, e34242 (2012).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Shen, J. et al. Effects of low dose estrogen therapy on the vaginal microbiomes of women with atrophic vaginitis. Sci. Rep. 6, 24380 (2016).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

55.
Witkin, S. S. et al. Vaginal biomarkers that predict cervical length and dominant bacteria in the vaginal microbiomes of pregnant women. mBio 10, e02242-129 (2019).
Google Scholar 

56.
Ravel, J. et al. Daily temporal dynamics of vaginal microbiota before, during and after episodes of bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome 1, 29 (2013).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

57.
Smith, B. C. et al. The cervical microbiome over 7 years and a comparison of methodologies for its characterization. PLoS ONE 7, e40425 (2012).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

58.
Gajer, P. et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 132ra152 (2012).
Google Scholar 

59.
Kim, T. K. et al. Heterogeneity of vaginal microbial communities within individuals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 1181–1189 (2009).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

60.
Liu, M.-B. et al. Diverse vaginal microbiomes in reproductive-age women with vulvovaginal candidiasis. PLoS ONE 8, e79812 (2013).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

61.
Verstraelen, H. et al. Longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microflora in pregnancy suggests that L. crispatus promotes the stability of the normal vaginal microflora and that L. gasseri and/or L. iners are more conducive to the occurrence of abnormal vaginal microflora. BMC Microbiol. 9, 116 (2009).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

62.
Byrne, E. H. et al. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity 42, 965–976 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

63.
Mach, N. & Fuster-Botella, D. Endurance exercise and gut microbiota: a review. J. Sport Health Sci. 6, 179–197 (2017).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

64.
Tasnim, N., Abulizi, N., Pither, J., Hart, M. M. & Gibson, D. L. Linking the gut microbial ecosystem with the environment: does gut health depend on where we live?. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1935 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

65.
Collins, M. D. The Prokaryotes 1013–1019 (Springer, Berlin, 2006).
Google Scholar 

66.
Freitas, A. C. et al. Increased richness and diversity of the vaginal microbiota and spontaneous preterm birth. Microbiome 6, 117 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

67.
Marrazzo, J. M., Thomas, K. K., Fiedler, T. L., Ringwood, K. & Fredricks, D. N. Relationship of specific vaginal bacteria and bacterial vaginosis treatment failure in women who have sex with women. Ann. Intern. Med. 149, 20–28 (2008).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

68.
Si, J., You, H. J., Yu, J., Sung, J. & Ko, G. Prevotella as a hub for vaginal microbiota under the influence of host genetics and their association with obesity. Cell Host Microbe 21, 97–105 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

69.
Srinivasan, S. et al. Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria. PLoS ONE 7, e37818 (2012).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

70.
Yeoman, C. J. et al. A multi-omic systems-based approach reveals metabolic markers of bacterial vaginosis and insight into the disease. PLoS ONE 8, e56111 (2013).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

71.
Oakley, B. B., Fiedler, T. L., Marrazzo, J. M. & Fredricks, D. N. Diversity of human vaginal bacterial communities and associations with clinically defined bacterial vaginosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 4898–4909 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

72.
Machado, A. & Cerca, N. Influence of biofilm formation by gardnerella vaginalis and other anaerobes on bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 212, 1856–1861 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

73.
Vargas-Robles, D. et al. High rate of infection by only oncogenic human papillomavirus in Amerindians. mSphere 3, e00176-e118 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

74.
Song, D., Li, H., Li, H. & Dai, J. Effect of human papillomavirus infection on the immune system and its role in the course of cervical cancer. Oncol. Lett. 10, 600–606 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

75.
Briselden, A. M., Moncla, B. J., Stevens, C. E. & Hillier, S. L. Sialidases (Neuraminidases) in bacterial vaginosis and bacterial vaginosis-associated microflora. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30, 663–666 (1992).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

76.
Gillet, E. et al. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 11, 10 (2011).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

77.
Discacciati, M. G. et al. Presence of 20% or more clue cells: an accurate criterion for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in Papanicolaou cervical smears. Diagn. Cytopathol. 34, 272–276 (2006).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

78.
World Health Organization. Haemoglobin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Anaemia and Assessment of Severity (World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011).
Google Scholar 

79.
Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

80.
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

81.
Allard, G., Ryan, F. J., Jeffery, I. B. & Claesson, M. J. SPINGO: a rapid species-classifier for microbial amplicon sequences. BMC Bioinform. 16, 324 (2015).
Google Scholar 

82.
Cole, J. R. et al. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D633–D642 (2013).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

83.
Morgulis, A. et al. Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches. Bioinformatics 24, 1757–1764 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

84.
Muzny, C. A. et al. Characterization of the vaginal microbiota among sexual risk behavior groups of women with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS ONE 8, e80254 (2013).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

85.
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

86.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016).

87.
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-4. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2010).

88.
Anderson, M. J. Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 626–639 (2001).
Google Scholar 

89.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. (2015).

90.
textmineR: Functions for Text Mining and Topic Modeling v. 2.0.6 (2017).

91.
Rousseeuw, P. J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987).
MATH  Google Scholar 

92.
Walther, R. T. A. G. Cluster validation by prediction strength. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 14, 511–528 (2005).
MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

93.
Philentropy: Information Theory and Distance Quantification with R (2018).

94.
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol 7, 1451–1456 (2016).
Google Scholar 

95.
Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46 (1960).
Google Scholar 

96.
Viera, A. J. & Garrett, J. M. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam. Med. 37, 360–363 (2005).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

97.
Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60 (2011).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

98.
Nakazawa, M. fmsb: Functions for medical statistics book with some demographic data. R package version 0.4 (2014).

99.
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289–300 (1995).
MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

100.
Wickham, H. Reshaping Data with the reshape Package. J. Stat. Softw. 21, 1–20 (2007).
Google Scholar 

101.
gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data (R, 2016).

102.
Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Pirrung, M., Gonzalez, A. & Knight, R. EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data. Gigascience 2, 16 (2013).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  More

1.
Sichert, A. et al. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0720-2 (2020).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
2.
Krause-Jensen, D. & Duarte, C. Nat. Geosci. 9, 737–742 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Wang, M. et al. Science 365, 83–87 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Sakai, T., Ishizuka, K. & Kato, I. Mar. Biotechnol. 5, 409–416 (2003).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Ndeh, D. et al. Nature 544, 65–70 (2017).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Rogowski, A. et al. Nat. Commun. 6, 7481 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Petit, E. et al. PLoS ONE 8, e54337 (2013).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Desai, M. S. et al. Cell 167, 1339–1353 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D490–D495 (2014).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Toruño, T. Y., Stergiopoulos, I. & Coaker, G. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 419–441 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Elphinstone, J. in Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Complex (eds Allen, C. et al.) 9–28 (APS Press, 2005).

3.
Gu, S. et al. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0719-8 (2020).

4.
Bossier, P., Hofte, M. & Verstraete, W. in Advances in Microbial Ecology (ed. Marshall, K. C.) 385–414 (Springer, 1988).

5.
Miethke, M. & Marahiel, M. A. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 413–451 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Winkelmann, G. in Iron Transport in Bacteria (eds Crosa, J. H. et al.) 435–450 (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).

7.
Lee, W., van Baalen, M. & Jansen, V. A. A. Ecol. Lett. 15, 119–125 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Brune A. Methanogenesis in the digestive tracts of insects. In: Timmis KN (ed). Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2010. pp. 707–728.
2.
Zimmerman PR, Greenberg JP, Wandiga SO, Crutzen PJ. Termites: a potentially large source of atmospheric methane, carbon dioxide, and molecular hydrogen. Science. 1982;218:563–5.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

3.
Rasmussen RA, Khalil MAK. Global production of methane by termites. Nature. 1983;301:700.
CAS  Google Scholar 

4.
Sugimoto A, Inoue T, Tayasu I, Miller L, Takeichi S, Abe T. Methane and hydrogen production in a termite-symbiont system. Ecol Res. 1998;13:241–57.
CAS  Google Scholar 

5.
Brauman A, Kane MD, Labat M, Breznak JA. Genesis of acetate and methane by gut bacteria of nutritionally diverse termites. Science. 1992;257:1384–7.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6.
Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Saunois M, Canadell JG, Dlugokencky EJ, et al. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat Geosci. 2013;6:813–23.
CAS  Google Scholar 

7.
Nauer PA, Hutley LB, Arndt SK. Termite mounds mitigate half of termite methane emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:13306–11.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.
Hanson RS, Hanson TE. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:439–71.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

9.
Reuß J, Rachel R, Kämpfer P, Rabenstein A, Küver J, Dröge S, et al. Isolation of methanotrophic bacteria from termite gut. Microbiol Res. 2015;179:29–37.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.
Pester M, Tholen A, Friedrich MW, Brune A. Methane oxidation in termite hindguts: absence of evidence and evidence of absence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:2024–8.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

11.
Dunfield PF. The soil methane sink. In: Reay D, Hewitt K, Smith K, Grace J, editors. Greenhouse gas sinks. Wallingford: CABI; 2007. pp. 152–70.

12.
Bignell DE, Eggleton P, Nunes L, Thomas KL. Termites as mediators of forest carbon fluxes in tropical forests: budgets for carbon dioxide and methane emissions. In: Watt AD, Stork NE, Hunter MD (eds). Forests and insects. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997. pp. 109–134.

13.
Jamali H, Livesley SJ, Grover SP, Dawes TZ, Hutley LB, Cook GD, et al. The importance of termites to the CH4 balance of a tropical savanna woodland of northern Australia. Ecosystems. 2011;14:698–709.
CAS  Google Scholar 

14.
Ho A, Erens H, Mujinya BB, Boeckx P, Baert G, Schneider B, et al. Termites facilitate methane oxidation and shape the methanotrophic community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:7234–40.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.
Noirot C, Darlington JPEC. Termite nests: architecture, regulation and defence. In: Abe T, Bignell DE, Higashi M (eds). Termites: Evolution, Sociality Symbioses, Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer; 2000. pp. 121–139.

16.
Korb J. Termite mound architecture, from function to construction. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds). Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. pp. 349–373.

17.
Jones DT, Eggleton P. Global biogeography of termites: a compilation of sources. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N, editors. Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. pp. 1–576.

18.
Knief C. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1346.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

19.
Nauer PA, Chiri E, Souza D, de, Hutley LB, Arndt SK. Rapid image-based field methods improve the quantification of termite mound structures and greenhouse-gas fluxes. Biogeosciences. 2018;15:3731–42.
Google Scholar 

20.
Holmes AJ, Costello A, Lidstrom ME, Murrell JC. Evidence that participate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;132:203–8.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

21.
Costello AM, Lidstrom ME. Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:5066–74.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.
Henneberger R, Chiri E, Bodelier PEL, Frenzel P, Lüke C, Schroth MH. Field‐scale tracking of active methane‐oxidizing communities in a landfill cover soil reveals spatial and seasonal variability. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:1721–37.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23.
Ji R, Brune A. Nitrogen mineralization, ammonia accumulation, and emission of gaseous NH3 by soil-feeding termites. Biogeochemistry. 2006;78:267–83.
Google Scholar 

24.
Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4516–22.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

25.
Parada AE, Needham DM, Fuhrman JA. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:1403–14.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

26.
Apprill A, McNally S, Parsons R, Weber L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2015;75:129–37.
Google Scholar 

27.
Heil JR, Lynch MDJ, Cheng J, Matysiakiewicz O, D’Alessio M, Charles TC. The completed PacBio single-molecule real-time sequence of Methylosinus trichosporium strain OB3b reveals the presence of a third large plasmid. Genome Announc. 2017;5:e01349–17.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

28.
Kolb S, Knief C, Stubner S, Conrad R. Quantitative detection of methanotrophs in soil by novel pmoA-targeted real-time PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:2423–9.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

29.
Kolb S, Knief C, Dunfield PF, Conrad R. Abundance and activity of uncultured methanotrophic bacteria involved in the consumption of atmospheric methane in two forest soils. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1150–61.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

30.
Větrovský T, Baldrian P. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57923.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

31.
Chiri E, Nauer PA, Rainer E-M, Zeyer J, Schroth MH. High temporal and spatial variability of atmospheric-methane oxidation in Alpine glacier-forefield soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e01139–17.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

32.
Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33.
Wen X, Yang S, Liebner S. Evaluation and update of cutoff values for methanotrophic pmoA gene sequences. Arch Microbiol. 2016;198:629–36.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

34.
Dumont MG, Lüke C, Deng Y, Frenzel P. Classification of pmoA amplicon pyrosequences using BLAST and the lowest common ancestor method in MEGAN. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:34.
PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

35.
Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:221–4.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36.
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

37.
McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

38.
Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4:2584.
Google Scholar 

39.
Lozupone C, Lladser ME, Knights D, Stombaugh J, Knight R. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 2011;5:169.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

40.
Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics, Cambridge, UK: The Babraham Institute; 2010.

41.
Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–8.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

42.
Bushnell B. BBMap: A fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Berkeley, CA, US: Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (LBNL); 2015.

43.
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2014;12:59.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

44.
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

45.
Kang D, Li F, Kirton ES, Thomas A, Egan RS, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

46.
Wu Y-W, Tang Y-H, Tringe SG, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Microbiome. 2014;2:26.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

47.
Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, De Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1144.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

48.
Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:836–43.

49.
Laczny CC, Sternal T, Plugaru V, Gawron P, Atashpendar A, Margossian HH, et al. VizBin—an application for reference-independent visualization and human-augmented binning of metagenomic data. Microbiome. 2015;3:1–7.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

50.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

51.
Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

52.
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004.
CAS  Google Scholar 

53.
Rusley C, Onstott TC, Vishnivetskaya TA, Layton A, Chauhan A, Pfiffner SM, et al. Metagenome-assembled genome of USCα AHI, a potential high-affinity methanotroph from Axel Heiberg Island, Canadian High Arctic. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:1–4.
Google Scholar 

54.
Ricke P, Kube M, Nakagawa S, Erkel C, Reinhardt R, Liesack W. First genome data from uncultured upland soil cluster alpha methanotrophs provide further evidence for a close phylogenetic relationship to Methylocapsa acidiphila. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:7472–82.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

55.
Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;32:268–74.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56.
Le SQ, Gascuel O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1307–20.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

57.
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W256–9.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

58.
Dong X, Strous M. An integrated pipeline for annotation and visualization of metagenomic contigs. Front Genet. 2019;10:1–10.
Google Scholar 

59.
Zhou Z, Tran P, Liu Y, Kieft K, Anantharaman K. METABOLIC: a scalable high-throughput metabolic and biogeochemical functional trait profiler based on microbial genomes. bioRxiv. 2019:761643.

60.
Urmann K, Gonzalez-Gil G, Schroth MH, Hofer M, Zeyer J. New field method: gas push–pull test for the in-situ quantification of microbial activities in the vadose zone. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:304–10.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

61.
Reim A, Lüke C, Krause S, Pratscher J, Frenzel P. One millimetre makes the difference: high-resolution analysis of methane-oxidizing bacteria and their specific activity at the oxic–anoxic interface in a flooded paddy soil. ISME J. 2012;6:2128.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

62.
Raj SS, Sumangala RK, Lal KB, Panicker PK. Gas chromatographic analysis of oxygen and argon at room temperature. J Chromatogr Sci. 1996;34:465–7.
Google Scholar 

63.
Schroth MH, Istok JD. Models to determine first‐order rate coefficients from single‐well push‐pull tests. Groundwater. 2006;44:275–83.
CAS  Google Scholar 

64.
Urmann K, Schroth MH, Noll M, Gonzalez‐Gil G, Zeyer J. Assessment of microbial methane oxidation above a petroleum‐contaminated aquifer using a combination of in situ techniques. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences. 2008;113:G02006.

65.
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.
Google Scholar 

66.
Holt JA. Microbial activity in the mounds of some Australian termites. Appl Soil Ecol. 1998;9:183–7.
Google Scholar 

67.
Knief C, Lipski A, Dunfield PF. Diversity and activity of methanotrophic bacteria in different upland soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:6703–14.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

68.
King H, Ocko S, Mahadevan L. Termite mounds harness diurnal temperature oscillations for ventilation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:11589–93.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

69.
Bristow KL, Holt JA. Can termites create local energy sinks to regulate mound temperature? J Therm Biol. 1987;12:19–21.
Google Scholar 

70.
Tveit AT, Hestnes AG, Robinson SL, Schintlmeister A, Dedysh SN, Jehmlich N, et al. Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:8515–24.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

71.
Pratscher J, Vollmers J, Wiegand S, Dumont MG, Kaster A-K. Unravelling the identity, metabolic potential and global biogeography of the atmospheric methane-oxidizing upland soil cluster α. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:1016–29.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

72.
Bender M, Conrad R. Kinetics of CH4 oxidation in oxic soils exposed to ambient air or high CH4 mixing ratios. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;101:261–70.
CAS  Google Scholar 

73.
Nauer PA, Schroth MH. In situ quantification of atmospheric methane oxidation in near-surface soils. Vadose Zo J. 2010;9:1052–62.
CAS  Google Scholar 

74.
Judd CR, Koyama A, Simmons MP, Brewer P, von Fischer JC. Co-variation in methanotroph community composition and activity in three temperate grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2016;95:78–86.
CAS  Google Scholar 

75.
Schroth MH, Eugster W, Gómez KE, Gonzalez-Gil G, Niklaus PA, Oester P. Above-and below-ground methane fluxes and methanotrophic activity in a landfill-cover soil. Waste Manag. 2012;32:879–89.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

76.
Baani M, Liesack W. Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:10203–8.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

77.
Gebert J, Stralis‐Pavese N, Alawi M, Bodrossy L. Analysis of methanotrophic communities in landfill biofilters using diagnostic microarray. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:1175–88.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

78.
Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:725–31.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

79.
Ji M, Greening C, Vanwonterghem I, Carere CR, Bay SK, Steen JA, et al. Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil. Nature. 2017;552:400–3.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

80.
Pratscher J, Dumont MG, Conrad R. Assimilation of acetate by the putative atmospheric methane oxidizers belonging to the USCα clade. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:2692–701.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

81.
Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR, Jackson CJ, Taylor MC, Stott MB, et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J. 2016;10:761–77.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

82.
Cordero PRF, Bayly K, Leung PM, Huang C, Islam ZF, Schittenhelm RB, et al. Atmospheric carbon monoxide oxidation is a widespread mechanism supporting microbial survival. ISME J. 2019;13:2868–81.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

83.
Carere CR, Hards K, Houghton KM, Power JF, McDonald B, Collet C, et al. Mixotrophy drives niche expansion of verrucomicrobial methanotrophs. ISME J. 2017;11:2599–610.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

84.
Schmitz RA, Pol A, Mohammadi SS, Hogendoorn C, van Gelder AH, Jetten MSM, et al. The thermoacidophilic methanotroph Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolV oxidizes subatmospheric H2 with a high-affinity, membrane-associated [NiFe] hydrogenase. ISME J. 2020;14:1223.

85.
Mohammadi SS, Pol A, van Alen T, Jetten MSM, Op, den Camp HJM. Ammonia oxidation and nitrite reduction in the verrucomicrobial methanotroph Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolV. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1901.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

86.
Jamali H, Livesley SJ, Hutley LB, Fest B, Arndt SK. The relationships between termite mound CH4/CO2 emissions and internal concentration ratios are species specific. Biogeosciences. 2013;10:2229–40.
CAS  Google Scholar 

87.
Schnell S, King GM. Mechanistic analysis of ammonium inhibition of atmospheric methane consumption in forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:3514–21.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

88.
Carlsen HN, Joergensen L, Degn H. Inhibition by ammonia of methane utilization in Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1991;35:124–7.
CAS  Google Scholar 

89.
Bodelier PLE, Laanbroek HJ. Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. Fems Microbiol Ecol. 2004;47:265–77.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

90.
Veraart AJ, Steenbergh AK, Ho A, Kim SY, Bodelier PLE. Beyond nitrogen: the importance of phosphorus for CH4 oxidation in soils and sediments. Geoderma. 2015:259–60.

91.
Chiri E, Nauer PA, Henneberger R, Zeyer J, Schroth MH. Soil–methane sink increases with soil age in forefields of Alpine glaciers. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;84:83–95.
CAS  Google Scholar 

92.
Angel R, Conrad R. In situ measurement of methane fluxes and analysis of transcribed particulate methane monooxygenase in desert soils. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:2598–610.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

93.
de Caritat P, Cooper M, Wilford J. The pH of Australian soils: field results from a national survey. Soil Res. 2011;49:173–82.
Google Scholar  More