Philippa Kaur

1.
Graham, A. L. et al. Fitness consequences of immune responses: Strengthening the empirical framework for ecoimmunology. Funct. Ecol. 25, 5–17 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Maynard, C. L., Elson, C. O., Hatton, R. D. & Weaver, C. T. Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature 489, 231–241 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

3.
Baldo, L., Riera, J. L., Tooming-Klunderud, A., Albà, M. M. & Salzburger, W. Gut microbiota dynamics during dietary shift in eastern African cichlid fishes. PLoS ONE 10, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127462 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Shapira, M. Gut microbiotas and host evolution: Scaling up symbiosis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 539–549 (2016).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Muegge, B. D. et al. Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science 332, 970–974 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

6.
Goodrich, J. K. et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell 159, 789–799 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Org, E. et al. Sex differences and hormonal effects on gut microbiota composition in mice. Gut Microbes 7, 313–322 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Russell, J. B. Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science 292, 1119–1122 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

9.
DuPont, A. W. & DuPont, H. L. The intestinal microbiota and chronic disorders of the gut. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 523–531 (2011).
PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Walters, A. W. et al. The microbiota influences the Drosophila melanogaster life history strategy. Mol. Ecol. 29, 639–653 (2020).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Moreno, S., Villafuerte, R., Cabezas, S. & Lombardi, L. Wild rabbit restocking for predator conservation in Spain. Biol. Cons. 118, 183–193 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Webb, N. J. Growth and mortality in juvenile European wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J. Zool. 230, 665–677 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Villafuerte, R. & Delibes-Mateos, M. The IUCN red list of threatened species: Oryctolagus cuniculus (2019). https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T41291A45189779.en (2019).

14.
Ferrand, N. Inferring the evolutionary history of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from molecular markers. In Lagomorph Biology: Evolution, Ecology and Conservation (eds Alves, P. C. et al.) 47–63 (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
Google Scholar 

15.
Rafati, N. N. et al. A genomic map of clinal variation across the European rabbit hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 27, 1457–1478 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Delibes-Mateos, M., Villafuerte, R., Cooke, B. & Alves, P. C. Oryctolagus cuniculus (Linnaeus, 1758). In Lagomorphs: Pikas, Rabbits and Hares of the World (eds Smith, A. T. et al.) 99–104 (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2018).
Google Scholar 

17.
Geraldes, A. et al. Reduced introgression of the Y chromosome between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in the Iberian Peninsula. Mol. Ecol. 17, 4489–4499 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Sneddon, I. A. Latrine use by the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J. Mammal. 72, 769–775 (1991).
Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Mykytowycz, R. & Dudzinski, M. L. A study on the weight of odoriferous and other glands in relation to the social status and degree of sexual activity in the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.). Wildl. Res. 11, 31–47 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Rouco, C., Villafuerte, R., Castro, F. & Ferreras, P. Effect of artificial warren size on a restocked European wild rabbit population. Anim. Conserv. 14, 117–123 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Villafuerte, R. & Viñuela, J. Size of rabbits consumed by black kites increased after a rabbit epizootic. Mammal Rev. 29, 261–264 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Ferrera, I. et al. High-diversity biofilm for the oxidation of sulfide-containing effluents. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 726–734 (2004).
CAS  Google Scholar 

23.
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4516–4522 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

24.
Edgar, R. C. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 590–596 (2013).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

26.
Paulson, J. N., Stine, O. C., Bravo, H. C. & Pop, M. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat. Methods 10, 1200–1202 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, New York, 2016).
Google Scholar 

28.
Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3-5 (2016).

29.
Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Tax4fun: Predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31, 2882–2884 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

30.
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Bayer, E. A., Shoham, Y. & Lamed, R. Cellulose-Decomposing Bacteria and Their Enzyme Systems 3rd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2006).
Google Scholar 

32.
Foley, W. J. & Cork, S. J. Use of fibrous diets by small herbivores: How far can the rules be ‘bent’?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 159–162 (1992).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Hirakawa, H. Coprophagy in leporids and other mammalian herbivores. Mammal Rev. 31, 61–80 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Zeng, B. et al. The bacterial communities associated with fecal types and body weight of rex rabbits. Sci. Rep. 5, 9342. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09342 (2015).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

35.
Grimont, F. & Grimont, P. A. D. Proteobacteria: Gamma subclass. In The Prokaryotes Vol. 6 (eds Falkow, S. et al.) 219–244 (Springer, New York, 2006).
Google Scholar 

36.
Stecher, B. et al. Gut inflammation can boost horizontal gene transfer between pathogenic and commensal Enterobacteriaceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1269–1274 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

37.
Gagen, E. J., Padmanabha, J., Denman, S. E. & McSweeney, C. S. Hydrogenotrophic culture enrichment reveals rumen Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae acetogens and hydrogen-responsive Bacteroidetes from pasture-fed cattle. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362, 1–8 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

38.
Meehan, C. J. & Beiko, R. G. A phylogenomic view of ecological specialization in the Lachnospiraceae, a family of digestive tract-associated bacteria. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 703–713 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Barcenilla, A. et al. Phylogenetic relationships of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1654–1661 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Flint, H. J. Polysaccharide breakdown by anaerobic microorganisms inhabiting the mammalian gut. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 56, 89–120 (2004).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Stalder, G. L. et al. Gut microbiota of the European hare (Lepus europaeus). Sci. Rep. 9, 2738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39638-9 (2019).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

42.
Gillilland, M. G. et al. Ecological succession of bacterial communities during conventionalization of germ-free mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 2359–2366 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Lupp, C. Host-Mediated inflammation disrupts the intestinal microbiota and promotes the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Host Microbe 2, 119–129 (2007).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

44.
Lawley, T. D. & Walker, A. W. Intestinal colonization resistance. Immunology 138, 1–11 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Punzalan, C. & Qamar, A. Probiotics for the treatment of liver disease. In The Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology: Implications for Human Health, Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Dysbiosis (eds Floch, M. H. et al.) 373–381 (Academic Press, New York, 2017).
Google Scholar 

46.
Lopez-Siles, M. et al. Mucosa-associated Faecalibacterium prausnitzii phylotype richness is reduced in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 7582–7592 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Li, H. et al. Pika population density is associated with the composition and diversity of gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 7, 758 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Amato, K. R. Co-evolution in context: The importance of studying gut microbiomes in wild animals. Microbiome Sci. Med. 1, 10–29 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Thompson, H. V. & King, C. M. The European Rabbit: History and Biology of a Successful Colonizer (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 1984).
Google Scholar 

50.
Martins, H., Milne, J. A. & Rego, F. Seasonal and spatial variation in the diet of the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) in Portugal. J. Zool. 258, 395–404 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Cubas, J. et al. Endemic plant species are more palatable to introduced herbivores than non-endemics. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190136. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0136 (2019).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

52.
Khalifa, A. Y., Alsyeeh, A. M., Almalki, M. A. & Saleh, F. A. Characterization of the plant growth promoting bacterium, Enterobacter cloacae msr1, isolated from roots of non-nodulating Medicago sativa. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 23, 79–86 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Polizeli, M. L. T. M. et al. Xylanases from fungi: properties and industrial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 67, 577–591 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

54.
Fisher, E. H. & Stein, E. A. α-Amylases. In The Enzyme 2nd edn (eds Boyer, P. D. et al.) 313–143 (Academic Press Inc, New York, 1960).
Google Scholar 

55.
Bletz, M. C. et al. Amphibian gut microbiota shifts differentially in community structure but converges on habitat-specific predicted functions. Nat. Commun. 7, 13699. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13699 (2016).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

56.
Martínez-Mota, R. et al. Natural diets promote retention of the native gut microbiota in captive rodents. ISME J. 14, 67–78 (2020).
PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

57.
Van Leeuwen, P. et al. Effects of captivity, diet, and relocation on the gut bacterial communities of white-footed mice. Ecol. Evol. 10, 4677–4690 (2020).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

58.
Grieneisen, L. E., Livermore, J., Alberts, S., Tung, J. & Archie, E. A. Group living and male dispersal to predict core gut microbiome in wild baboons. Integr. Comp. Biol. 57, 770–785 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Cowan, D. P. Aspects of the social organization of the European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Ethology 75, 197–210 (1987).
Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Marsh, M. K., Hutchings, M. R., McLeod, S. R. & White, P. C. Spatial and temporal heterogeneities in the contact behavior of rabbits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 183–195 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Moller, A. H. et al. Social behavior shapes the chimpanzee pan-microbiome. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500997. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500997 (2016).
CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

62.
Carro, F., Ortega, M. & Soriguer, R. C. Is restocking a useful tool for increasing rabbit densities?. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00560 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Rouco, C., Ferreras, P., Castro, F. & Villafuerte, R. A longer confinement period favors European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) survival during soft releases in low-cover habitats. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 215–219 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Garshelis, D. & Steinmetz, R. Ursus thibetanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016. https://dx.doi.org/Downloaded on 17 January 2020 (2016).
2.
Parter, S. H. The Book of Indian Animal (Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford University Press, India, 1980).
Google Scholar 

3.
Sathyakumar, S. & Choudhury, A. Distribution and status of asiatic black bear in India. J. Bomb. Nat. Hist. Soci. 104, 316–323 (2007).
Google Scholar 

4.
Pocock, R. I. The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma, Mammalia Vol. 2 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1941).
Google Scholar 

5.
Sathyakumar, S., Kaul, R., Ashraf, N. V. K., Mookerjee, A. & Menon, V. National Bear Conservation and Welfare Action Plan (Ministry of Environment and Forest, Wildlife Institute of India and Wildlife Trust of India, 2012).
Google Scholar 

6.
Charoo, S.A., Sharma, L.K. & Sathyakumar, S. Asiatic Black Bear—Human Conflicts around Dachigam National Park, Kashmir. Technical Report. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. 29 (2009).

7.
Hou, W. R. et al. A complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Asian black bear Sichuan subspecies (Ursus thibetanus mupinensis). Int. J. Biol. Sci. 3, 85–90 (2007).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Yu, L. et al. Analysis of complete mitochondrial genome sequences increases phylogenetic resolution of bears (Ursidae), a mammalian family that experienced rapid speciation. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 198 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Hwang, D. S. et al. A comprehensive analysis of three Asiatic black bear mitochondrial genomes (subspecies ussuricus, formosanus and mupinensis), with emphasis on the complete mtDNA sequence of Ursus thibetanus ussuricus (Ursidae). Mitochondrial. DNA 19, 418–429 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.
Kadariya, R. et al. High genetic diversity and distinct ancient lineage of Asiatic black bears revealed by non-invasive surveys in the Annapurna Conservation Area Nepal. PLoS ONE 13, 0207622 (2018).
Google Scholar 

11.
Shendure, J. & Ji, H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1135–1145 (2008).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Ekblom, R. & Galindo, J. Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity (Edinb) 107, 1–15 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Edwards, S. V., Shultz, A. J. & Campbell-Staton, S. C. Next-generation sequencing and the expanding domain of phylogeography. Folia Zool. 64, 187–206 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Natesh, M. et al. Conservation priorities for endangered Indian tigers through a genomic lens. Sci. Rep. 7, 9614 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Song, N., Cai, W. & Li, H. Deep-level phylogeny of Cicadomorpha inferred from mitochondrial genomes sequenced by NGS. Sci. Rep. 7, 10429 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Delisle, I. & Strobeck, C. Conserved primers for rapid sequencing of the complete mitochondrial genome from carnivores, applied to three species of bears. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 357–361 (2002).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Van Dijk, E., Auger, H., Jaszczyszyn, Y. & Thermes, C. T. years of next-generation sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 30(9), 418–426 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Heather, J. & Chain, B. The sequence of sequencers: the history of sequencing DNA. Genomics 107(1), 1–8 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Wang, S., Wang, B., Wang, F. & Wu, Z. Complete mitochondrial genome of Gallus domesticus (Galliformes: Phasianidae). Mitochondrial. DNA A DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 27(2), 978–979 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Zhou, M., Yu, J., Li, J., Ouyang, B. & Yang, J. The complete mitochondrial genome of Budorcas taxicolor tibetana (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) and comparison with other Caprinae species: Insight into the phylogeny of the genus Budorcas Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 121, 223–232 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Kamalakkannan, R. et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of Indian gaur, Bos gaurus and its phylogenetic implications. Sci. Rep. 10, 11936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68724-6 (2020).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.
Hahn, C., Bachmann, L. & Chevreux, B. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads – a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 129 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Boore, J. L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 1767–1780 (1999).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Feng, H., Feng, C., Wang, L. & Huang, Y. Complete mitochondrial genome of the golden takin (Budorcas taxicolor bedfordi). Mitochondrial. DNA 1, 186–188 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Kumar, A. et al. Sequencing and characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Mishmi takin (Budorcas taxi color taxicolor) and comparison with the other Caprinae species. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 137, 87–94 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Sarvani, R. K. et al. Characterization of the complete mitogenome of Indian Mouse Deer, Moschiola indica (Artiodactyla: Tragulidae) and its evolutionary significance. Sci. Rep. 8, 2697 (2018).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Lan, T. et al. Evolutionary history of enigmatic bears in the Tibetan Plateau-Himalaya region and the identity of the yeti. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20171804 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Jiagi, W. et al. Phylogeographic and demographic analysis of the Asian Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus) based on Mitochondrial DNA. PLoS ONE 10, e0136398 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Timmermans, M. J. et al. Why barcode? High-throughput multiplex sequencing of mitochondrial genomes for molecular systematics. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e197 (2010).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Cabrera-Brandt, M. A. & Gaitan-Espitia, J. D. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitogenome sequence of the raspberry weevil Aegorhinus superciliosus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), supports monophyly of the tribe Aterpini. Gene 571, 205–211 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Grant, J. R. & Stothard, P. The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular 423 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 181–184 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964 (1997).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Perna, N. T. & Kocher, T. D. Patterns of nucleotide composition at fourfold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 353–358 (1995).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Beier, S., Thiel, T., Munch, T., Scholz, U. & Mascher, M. MISA-web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 33, 2583–2585 (2017).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 573–580 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. Mega X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platform. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Mattei, E., Pietrosanto, M., Ferree, F. & Citterich, M. H. Web-Beagle: a web server for the alignment of RNA secondary structures. Nuc Acids Res. 43, 493–497 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Suchard, M. A. et al. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol. 4, 1–5 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Nylander, J.A.A. MrModelTest Version 2. Programme Distributed by the Author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University (2004).

40.
Wayne, R. K., Van, V. B. & O’Brien, S. J. Molecular distance and divergence time in carnivores and primates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8, 297–319 (1991).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

41.
Rambaut, A. FigTree, Version1.4.4. Available at: https://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/. (2018). More

1.
Tharme, R. E. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res. Appl. 19(5–6), 397–441 (2003).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Finn, M. A., Boulton, A. J. & Chessman, B. C. Ecological responses to artificial drought in two Australian rivers with differing water extraction. Fund. Appl. Limnol. 175(3), 231–248 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Dewson, Z. S., James, A. B. & Death, R. G. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 26(3), 401–415 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Poff, N. L. & Zimmerman, J. K. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biol. 55(1), 194–205 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Gillespie, B. R., Desmet, S., Kay, P., Tillotson, M. R. & Brown, L. E. A critical analysis of regulated river ecosystem responses to managed environmental flows from reservoirs. Freshwater Biol. 60(2), 410–425 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

6.
GOSL. CEB statistical digest, Ceylon electricity Board, Colombo, Sri Lanka (2012).

7.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Wigington, R. & Braun, D. P. How much water does a river need?. Freshwater Biol. 37, 231–249 (1997).
Article  Google Scholar 

8.
Dudgeon, D. Effects of water transfer on aquatic insects in a stream in Hong Kong. Regul. River 7, 369–377 (1992).
Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Petts, G. E. & Bickerton, M. A. Influence of water abstraction on the macroinvertebrate community gradient within a glacial stream: La Borgne d’Arolla, Valais Switzerland. Freshwater Biol. 32, 375–386 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Rader, R. B. & Belish, T. A. Influence of mild to severe flow alterations on invertebrates in three mountain streams. Regul. River 15, 353–363 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Dunbar, M. J. et al. River discharge and local-scale physical habitat influence macroinvertebrate LIFE scores. Freshwater Biol. 55(1), 226–242 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Schneider, S. C. & Petrin, Z. Effects of flow regime on benthic algae and macroinvertebrates: a comparison between regulated and unregulated rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 579, 1059–1072 (2017).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Olden, J. D. & Naiman, R. J. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwater Biol. 55(1), 86–107 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Mueller, M., Pander, J. & Geist, J. The effects of weirs on structural stream habitat and biological communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 48(6), 1450–1461 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Holt, C. R., Pfitzer, D., Scalley, C., Caldwell, B. A. & Batzer, D. P. Macroinvertebrate community responses to annual flow variation from river regulation: an 11-year study. River Res. Appl. 31(7), 798–807 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Krajenbrink, H. J. et al. Macroinvertebrate community responses to river impoundment at multiple spatial scales. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 2648–2656 (2019).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Mbaka, J. G. & Wanjiru Mwaniki, M. A global review of the downstream effects of small impoundments on stream habitat conditions and macroinvertebrates. Environ. Rev. 23(3), 257–262 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Anderson, D., Moggridge, H., Warren, P. & Shucksmith, J. The impacts of ‘run-of-river’hydropower on the physical and ecological condition of rivers. Water Environ. J. 29(2), 268–276 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Bilotta, G. S., Burnside, N. G., Turley, M. D., Gray, J. C. & Orr, H. G. The effects of run-of-river hydroelectric power schemes on invertebrate community composition in temperate streams and rivers. Plos One 12(2), e0171634 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

20.
Gabbud, C., Robinson, C. T. & Lane, S. N. Summer is in winter: Disturbance-driven shifts in macroinvertebrate communities following hydroelectric power exploitation. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 2164–2180 (2019).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Quadroni, S., Crosa, G., Gentili, G. & Espa, P. Response of stream benthic macroinvertebrates to current water management in Alpine catchments massively developed for hydropower. Sci. Total Environ. 609, 484–496 (2017).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Rosero-López, D., Knighton, J., Lloret, P. & Encalada, A. C. Invertebrate response to impacts of water diversion and flow regulation in high-altitude tropical streams. River Res. Appl. 36(2), 223–233 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Ogbeibu, A. E. & Oribhabor, B. J. Ecological impact of river impoundment using benthic macro-invertebrates as indicators. Water Res. 36(10), 2427–2436 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Álvarez-Cabria, M., Barquín, J. & Juanes, J. A. Spatial and seasonal variability of macroinvertebrate metrics: Do macroinvertebrate communities track river health?. Ecol. Indic. 10(2), 370–379 (2010).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

25.
Hart, D. D. & Finelli, C. M. Physical-biological coupling in streams: the pervasive effects of flow on benthic organisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 363–395 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Wills, T. C., Baker, E. A., Nuhfer, A. J. & Zorn, T. G. Response of the benthic macroinvertebrate community in a northern Michigan stream to reduced summer stream flows. River Res. Appl. 22(7), 819–836 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
James, A. B. W., Dewson, Z. S. & Death, R. G. The influence of flow reduction on macroinvertebrate drift density and distance in three New Zealand streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 28, 220–232 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Braun, D. P. & Powell, J. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regul. River 14(4), 329–340 (1998).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Shieh, C. L., Guh, Y. R. & Wang, S. Q. The application of range of variability approach to the assessment of a check dam on riverine habitat alteration. Environ. Geol. 52, 427–435 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Yang, P., Yin, X.-A., Yang, Z.-F. & Tang, J. A revised range of variability approach considering the periodicity of hydrological indicators. Hydrol. Process. 28, 6222–6235 (2014).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Yu, C., Yin, X. & Yang, Z. A revised range of variability approach for the comprehensive assessment of the alteration of flow regime. Ecol. Eng. 96, 200–207 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Ge, J., Peng, W., Huang, W., Qu, X. & Singh, S. K. Quantitative assessment of flow regime alteration using a revised range of variability methods. Water 10, 597 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Timpe, K. & Kaplan, D. The changing hydrology of a dammed Amazon. Science Advances 3(11), e1700611 (2017).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Smakhtin, V. U. & Weragala, N. An assessment of hydrology and environmental flows in the Walawe river basin, Sri Lanka. Working Paper 103. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka (2005).

35.
Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A. & Boes, P. D. C. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics Vol. 3 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005).
Google Scholar 

36.
Zhang, Q., Xu, C. Y., Chen, Y. D. & Yang, T. Spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration across the Pearl River Delta, China, and possible underlying causes. Hydrol. Process. 23(11), 1565–1574 (2009).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Lee, A., Cho, S., Kang, D. K. & Kim, S. Analysis of the effect of climate change on the Nakdong river stream flow using indicators of hydrological alteration. J. Hydro Environ. Res. 8(3), 234–247 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Stefanidis, K., Panagopoulos, Y., Psomas, A. & Mimikou, M. Assessment of the natural flow regime in a Mediterranean river impacted from irrigated agriculture. Sci. Total Environ. 573, 1492–1502 (2016).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Assahira, C. et al. Tree mortality of a flood-adapted species in response of hydrographic changes caused by an Amazonian river dam. Forest Ecol. Manag. 396, 113–123 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Ali, R., Kuriqi, A., Abubaker, S. & Kisi, O. Hydrologic alteration at the upper and middle part of the yangtze river, China: towards sustainable water resource management under increasing water exploitation. Sustainability 11(19), 5176 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Carlisle, D. M., Falcone, J., Wolock, D. M., Meador, M. R. & Norris, R. H. Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams. River Res. Appl. 26(2), 118–136 (2010).
Google Scholar 

42.
Maynard, C. M. & Lane, S. N. Reservoir compensation releases: Impact on the macroinvertebrate community of the Derwent River, Northumberland, UK—a longitudinal study. River Res. Appl. 28(6), 692–702 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Salmaso, F. et al. Benthic macroinvertebrates response to water management in a lowland river: effects of hydro-power vs irrigation off-stream diversions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 190(1), 33 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

44.
Power, M. E., Sun, A., Parker, G., Dietrich, W. E. & Wootton, J. T. Hydraulic food-chain models. BioScience 45(3), 159–167 (1995).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Jayawardana, J. M. C. K., Gunawardana, W. D. T. M., Udayakumara, E. P. N. & Westbrooke, M. Land use impacts on river health of Uma Oya, Sri Lanka: implications of spatial scales. Environ. Monit. Assess. 189(4), 192 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Weliange, W. S., Leichtfried, M., Amarasinghe, U. S. & Füreder, L. Longitudinal variation of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in two contrasting tropical streams in Sri Lanka. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 102(3–4), 70–82 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Benzie, J. A. The colonisation mechanisms of stream benthos in a tropical river (Menik Ganga: Sri Lanka). Hydrobiologia 111(3), 171–179 (1984).
Article  Google Scholar 

48.
Amarathunga, A. D. & Fernando, R. W. Suspended sediment concentration and its impact on aquatic invertebrates in the Gin River, Sri Lanka. Journal of Food and Agriculture 9(1–2), 24–38 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Lancaster, J. & Downes, B. J. Aquatic entomology (OUP, Oxford, 2013).
Google Scholar 

50.
Ramos, V., Formigo, N. & Maia, R. Environmental flows under the WFD implementation. Water Resour. Manag. 32(15), 5115–5149 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Rosero-López, D. et al. Streamlined eco-engineering approach helps define environmental flows for tropical Andean headwaters. Freshwater Biol. 64(7), 1315–1325 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

52.
Warfe, D. M., Hardie, S. A., Uytendaal, A. R., Bobbi, C. J. & Barmuta, L. A. The ecology of rivers with contrasting flow regimes: identifying indicators for setting environmental flows. Freshwater Biol. 59(10), 2064–2080 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Wu, M., Chen, A., Zhang, X. & McClain, M. E. A comment on Chinese policies to avoid negative impacts on river ecosystems by hydropower projects. Water 12(3), 869 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

54.
Chandrapala, L. Long term trends of rainfall and temperature in Sri Lanka. In Climate Variability and Agriculture (eds Abrol, Y. P. et al.) (Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 1996).
Google Scholar 

55.
Halwatura, D. & Najim, M. M. M. Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment. Environ. Modell. Softw. 46, 155–162 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 

56.
USEPA (US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY). Field and laboratory methods for macroinvertebrate and habitat assessment of low gradient, non-tidal streams. Mid-Atlantic Coastal Streams (MACS) Workgroup, Environmental Services Division, Region 3, USEPA, Wheeling, West Virginia, USA (1997).

57.
Turner, A. M. & Trexler, J. C. Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating the options. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16(3), 694–709 (1997).
Article  Google Scholar 

58.
Mendis, A. S. & Fernando, C. H. A guide to the fresh water fauna of Ceylon (Sri Lanka) (Weerawardhena S. R. and Fernando C. H., eds), Gestetner, Sri Lanka, 42-126 pp. (1962).

59.
Starmühlner, F. Result of the Australian: ceylonese hydrological mission, Part xvii: The freshwater Gastropods of Ceylon. Bull. Fish. Res. St. Sri Lanka (Ceylon) 25(1), 97–181 (1974).
Google Scholar 

60.
APHA. Standard Methods for Examinations of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. APHA, AWWA and WEF DC, Washington (2005).

61.
Clarke, K. R. & Warwick, R. M. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation Vol. 2 (PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, 2001).
Google Scholar 

62.
Clarke, K. R. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117–143 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

63.
Anderson, M. J., Gorley, R. N. & Clarke, K. R. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods PRIMER-E (Plymouth, UK, 2008).
Google Scholar  More

1.
Müllerová, P. Vietnamese DIASPORA in the Czech Republic. Arch. Orient. 66, 121–126 (1998).
Google Scholar 
2.
Kleisner, K., Chvátalová, V. & Flegr, J. Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women. PLoS ONE 9, e81237 (2014).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

3.
Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C. & Kleisner, K. Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1664–1672 (2013).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

4.
Linke, L., Saribay, S. A. & Kleisner, K. Perceived trustworthiness is associated with position in a corporate hierarchy. Pers. Individ. Dif. 99, 22–27 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

5.
Little, A. C., Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C. & Kleisner, K. Human perception of fighting ability: Facial cues predict winners and losers in mixed martial arts fights. Behav. Ecol. 1, 089 (2015).
Google Scholar 

6.
Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R. & Mende-Siedlecki, P. Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Psychology 66, 519 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Schmälzle, R. et al. Visual cues that predict intuitive risk perception in the case of HIV. PLoS ONE 14, e0211770 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

8.
Asch, S. E. Forming impressions of personality. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 41, 258–290 (1946).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Bar, M., Neta, M. & Linz, H. Very first impressions. Emotion 6, 269–278 (2006).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

10.
Willis, J. & Todorov, A. First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol. Sci. 17, 592–598 (2006).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

11.
Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C. & Malpass, R. S. Cross-racial identification. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 15, 19–25 (1989).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Meissner, C. A. & Brigham, J. C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Public Policy Law 7, 3 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Sporer, S. L. Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychol. Public Policy Law 7, 36–97 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J. & Sacco, D. F. The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychol. Rev. 117, 1168–1187 (2010).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.
Anzures, G. et al. Developmental origins of the other-race effect. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 173–178 (2013).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Suhrke, J. et al. The other-race effect in 3-year-old German and Cameroonian children. Front. Psychol. 5, 198 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Sangrigoli, S. & de Schonen, S. Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. Dev. Sci. 7, 74–87 (2004).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

18.
Scott, L. S. & Monesson, A. The origin of biases in face perception. Psychol. Sci. 20, 676–680 (2009).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

19.
Ma, F., Xu, F. & Luo, X. Children’s and Adults}’ {Judgments of Facial {Trustworthiness}: The {Relationship} to Facial {Attractiveness}. Percept. Mot. Skills 121, 179–198 (2015).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

20.
Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M. & Bukach, C. M. A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition 93, 1–9 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Webster Michael, A. & MacLeod Donald, I. A. Visual adaptation and face perception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 1702–1725 (2011).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Bukach, C. M., Cottle, J., Ubiwa, J. & Miller, J. Individuation experience predicts other-race effects in holistic processing for both Caucasian and Black participants. Cognition 123, 319–324 (2012).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

23.
Třebický, V. et al. Cross-{cultural} evidence for apparent {racial} outgroup {advantage}: Congruence between perceived {facial} aggressiveness and fighting {success}. Sci. Rep. 8, 9767 (2018).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

24.
Hebl, M. R., Williams, M. J., Sundermann, J. M., Kell, H. J. & Davies, P. G. Selectively friending: Racial stereotypicality and social rejection. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48, 1329–1335 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Cassidy, K. D., Quinn, K. A. & Humphreys, G. W. The influence of ingroup/outgroup categorization on same- and other-race face processing: The moderating role of inter- versus intra-racial context. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47, 811–817 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Johnson, K. J. & Fredrickson, B. L. We all look the same to Mepositive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychol. Sci. 16, 875–881 (2005).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G. & Hugenberg, K. The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychol. Sci. 18, 706–712 (2007).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

28.
Hugenberg, K., Miller, J. & Claypool, H. M. Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 334–340 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C. & DeBruine, L. M. Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 366, 1638–1659 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Langlois, J. H. et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol. Bull. 126, 390–423 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

31.
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A. & Trivers, R. Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 355–370 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Saxton, T. K., Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. & Roberts, S. C. Adolescents’ preferences for sexual dimorphism are influenced by relative exposure to male and female faces. Pers. Individ. Dif. 47, 864–868 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Badaruddoza, A. A paradox of human mate preferences and natural selection. J. Hum. Ecol. 21, 195–197 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Coetzee, V., Greeff, J. M., Stephen, I. D. & Perrett, D. I. Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender. PLoS ONE 9, e99629 (2014).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

35.
Hulse, F. S. Selection for skin color among the Japanese. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 27, 143–155 (1967).
Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Kleisner, K. et al. African and European perception of African female attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38, 744–755 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Kleisner, K., Priplatova, L., Frost, P. & Flegr, J. Trustworthy-looking face meets brown eyes. PLoS ONE 8, e53285 (2013).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M. & Lee, H. K. They don’t all look alike: Individual impressions of other racial groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 85 (1993).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

39.
Laeng, B., Mathisen, R. & Johnsen, J. A. Why do blue-eyed men prefer women with the same eye color?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 371–384 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Gründl, M., Knoll, S., Eisenmann-Klein, M. & Prantl, L. The blue-eyes stereotype: Do eye color, pupil diameter, and scleral color affect attractiveness?. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 36, 234–240 (2012).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41.
Langlois, J. H. & Roggman, L. A. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol. Sci. 1, 115–121 (1990).
Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Rhodes, G. & Tremewan, T. Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychol. Sci. 7, 105–110 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Rhodes, G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 199–226 (2006).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44.
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 452–460 (1999).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

45.
Rhodes, G. et al. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30, 611–625 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A. & Musselman, L. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?. Psychol. Sci. 5, 214–220 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Baudouin, J. Y. & Tiberghien, G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol. 117, 313–332 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

48.
Perrett, D. I., May, K. A. & Yoshikawa, S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368, 239–242 (1994).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

49.
Alley, T. R. & Cunningham, M. R. Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol. Sci. 2, 123–125 (1991).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Pittenger, J. B. On the difficulty of averaging faces: Comments on Langlois and Roggman. Psychol. Sci. 2, 351–353 (1991).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Komori, M., Kawamura, S. & Ishihara, S. Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness?. Acta Psychol. 131, 136–142 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

52.
Rhodes, G., Sumich, A. & Byatt, G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?. Psychol. Sci. 10, 52–58 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Scott, L. S., Tanaka, J. W., Sheinberg, D. L. & Curran, T. The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: A behavioral and neurophysiological study. Brain Res. 1210, 204–215 (2008).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Komori, M., Kawamura, S. & Ishihara, S. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness. Vis. Res. 49, 862–869 (2009).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

55.
Jones, D. & Hill, K. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum. Nat. 4, 271–296 (1993).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56.
Little, A. C., Connely, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C. & Roberts, S. C. Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behav. Ecol. 22, 862–868 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

57.
Van den Berghe, P. L. & Frost, P. Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co-evolution?*. Ethn. Racial Stud. 9, 87–113 (1986).
Article  Google Scholar 

58.
Fink, B., Neave, N. & Seydel, H. Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19, 82–87 (2007).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

59.
Scheib Joanna, E., Gangestad Steven, W. & Randy, T. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 266, 1913–1917 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Perrett, D. I. et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884–887 (1998).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

61.
Penton-Voak, I. S. et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference [7]. Nature 399, 741–742 (1999).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

62.
Rhodes, G., Hickford, C. & Jeffery, L. Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?. Br. J. Psychol. 91, 125–140 (2000).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

63.
Kościński, K. Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropol. Rev. 70, 45–79 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. & Grammer, K. Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 251–267 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Scott, I. M. et al. Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409643111 (2014).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

66.
Brooks, R. et al. National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 810–812 (2011).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

67.
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Crawford, J. R. & Welling, L. L. M. Further evidence for regional variation in women’s masculinity preferences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 278, 813–814 (2011).
Google Scholar 

68.
Dunson, D. B., Colombo, B. & Baird, D. D. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum. Reprod. 17, 1399–1403 (2002).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

69.
Hassan, M. A. M. & Killick, S. R. Effect of male age on fertility: Evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil. Steril. 79, 1520–1527 (2003).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

70.
Buss, D. M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 1–14 (1989).
Article  Google Scholar 

71.
Maestripieri, D., Klimczuk, A. C. E., Traficonte, D. M. & Wilson, M. C. A greater decline in female facial attractiveness during middle age reflects women’s loss of reproductive value. Front. Psychol. 5, 1–6 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

72.
McLellan, B. & McKelvie, S. J. Effects of age and gender on perceived facial attractiveness. Can. J. Behav. Sci. Can. Sci. Comport. 25, 135–142 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

73.
Bovet, J., Barkat-Defradas, M., Durand, V., Faurie, C. & Raymond, M. Women’s attractiveness is linked to expected age at menopause. J. Evol. Biol. 31, 229–238 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

74.
Coetzee, V., Perrett, D. I. & Stephen, I. D. Facial adiposity: A cue to health?. Perception 38, 1700–1711 (2009).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

75.
Coetzee, V., Chen, J., Perrett, D. I. & Stephen, I. D. Deciphering faces: Quantifiable visual cues to weight. Perception 39, 51–61 (2010).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

76.
Schneider, T. M., Hecht, H. & Carbon, C. C. Judging body weight from faces: The height-weight illusion. Perception 41, 121–124 (2012).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

77.
Grillot, R. L., Simmons, Z. L., Lukaszewski, A. W. & Roney, J. R. Hormonal and morphological predictors of women’s body attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 176–183 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

78.
Hume, D. K. & Montgomerie, R. Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of “quality” in women and men. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 93–112 (2001).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

79.
Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A. & Mangalparsad, R. Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 443–456 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

80.
Třebický, V., Fialová, J., Kleisner, K. & Havlíček, J. Focal LENGTH AFFECTS DEPICTED SHAPE AND PERCEPTION OF FACIAL IMAGES. PLoS ONE 11, e0149313 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

81.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

82.
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F. & Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J. 50, 346–363 (2008).
MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

83.
Rosseel, Y. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 37 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

84.
Adams, D. C., Collyer, M. L. & Kaliontzopoulou, A. Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.1.0. (2019).

85.
Mitteroecker, P., Windhager, S., Müller, G. B. & Schaefer, K. The morphometrics of “masculinity” in human faces. PLoS ONE 10, e0118374 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

86.
Valenzano, D. R., Mennucci, A., Tartarelli, G. & Cellerino, A. Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness. Vis. Res. 46, 1282–1291 (2006).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

87.
De Haan, M., Pascalis, O. & Johnson, M. H. Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 199–209 (2002).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

88.
Kelly, D. J. et al. Development of the other-race effect during infancy: Evidence toward universality?. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 104, 105–114 (2009).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

89.
Krasotkina, A., Götz, A., Höhle, B. & Schwarzer, G. Perceptual narrowing in speech and face recognition: Evidence for intra-individual cross-domain relations. Front. Psychol. 9, 1711 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

90.
Kelly, D. J. et al. Cross-race preferences for same-race. Infancy 11, 87–95 (2007).
MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

91.
Kleisner, K. et al. How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world.. Infancy https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7vdmb (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

92.
Hopper, W. J., Finklea, K. M., Winkielman, P. & Huber, D. E. Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40, 1779–1788 (2014).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

93.
Tan, K. W., Tiddeman, B. & Stephen, I. D. Skin texture and colour predict perceived health in Asian faces. Evol. Hum. Behav. 39, 320–335 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar  More

1.
Adeyemi, M. M. H. The potential of secondary metabolites in plant material as deterents against insect pests: a review. Afr. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 4, 243–246 (2010).
CAS  Google Scholar 
2.
Walling, L. L. The myriad plant response to herbivores. J. Plant Growth Regul. 19, 195–216 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3.
Croteau, R., Kutchan, T. M. & Lewis, N. G. Natural products (Secondary metabolites). In Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants (eds Buchanan, B. B. et al.) 1250–1318 (American Society of Plants Biologists, Rockville, 2000).
Google Scholar 

4.
Dewick, P. M. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach 2nd edn. (Wiley, Chichester, England, 2002).
Google Scholar 

5.
Pham, A. & Hwang, S. Chemical-based resistance of Brassica oleracea and Rorippa dubia in response to Spodoptera litura attack. J. Appl. Entomol. 144, 201–2011 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

6.
Niemetz, R. & Gross, G. G. Enzymology of gallotannin and ellagitannin biosynthesis. Phytochemistry 66, 2001–2011 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

7.
Barbosa, P. et al. Plant allelochemicals and insect parasitoids effects of nicotine on Cotesia congregata (Say) (Hymenoptera:Braconidae) and Hyposoter annulipes (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 12, 1319–1328 (1986).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8.
Reitz, S. R. & Trumble, J. T. Effects of linear furanocoumarins on the herbivore Spodoptera exigua and the parasitoid Archytas marmoratus: host quality and parasitoid success. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 84, 9–16 (1997).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

9.
Vinson, S. B. & Barbosa, P. Interrelationships of nutritional ecology of parasitoids. In Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates (eds Slansky, F., Jr. & Rodriguez, J. G.) 673–695 (Wiley, New York, 1987).
Google Scholar 

10.
Vinson, S. B. & Iwantsch, G. F. Host Suitability for Insect Parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25, 397–419 (1980).
Article  Google Scholar 

11.
Duffey, S. S., Bloem, K. A. & Campbell, B. C. Consequences of sequestration of plant natural products in plant insect-parasitoid interactions. In Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predators of Insects (eds Boethel, D. J. & Eikenbary, R. D.) 31–60 (Wiley, New York, 1986).
Google Scholar 

12.
Rowell-Rahier, M., Pasteels, J. M. Phenolglucosides and interactions at three trophic levels: Salicaceae herbivores-predators. In Insect Plant Interactions Volume 2. pp. 75–94. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC. (1990).

13.
Kester, K. M. & Barbosa, P. Behavioral and ecological constraints imposed by plants on insect parasitoids: implications for biological control. Biol. Control 1, 94–106 (1991).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Dhir, B. C., Mohapatra, H. K. & Senapati, B. Assessment of crop loss in groundnut due to tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (F.). Indian J. Plant Prot. 20, 215–217 (1992).
Google Scholar 

15.
Armes, N. J., Wightman, J. A., Jadhav, D. R. & Ranga-Rao, G. V. Status of insecticide resistance in Spodoptera litura in Andhra Pradesh, India. Pesticide Sci. 50, 240–248 (1997).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Kranthi, K. R., Jadhav, D. R., Wanjari, R. R., Ali, S. S. & Russell, D. Carbamate and organophosphate resistance in cotton pests in India, 1995 to 1999. Bull. Entomol. Res. 91, 37–46 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

17.
Brower, J. H., Smith, L., Vail, P. V. & Flinn, P. W. Biological control. In Integrated Management of Insects in Stored Products (eds Subramanyam, B. & Hagstrum, D. W.) 223–286 (Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 1996).
Google Scholar 

18.
Reinert, J. A. & King, E. W. Action of Bracon hehetor Say as a parasite of Plodia interpunctella at controlled densities. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64, 1335–1340 (1971).
Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Press, J. W., Flaherty, B. R. & McDonald, I. C. Survival and reproduction of Bracon hebetor on insecticide-treated Ephestia cautella larvae. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. 16, 231–234 (1981).
CAS  Google Scholar 

20.
Gerling, D. & Rotary, N. Hypersensitivity, resulting from host-unsuitability, as exemplified by two parasite species attacking Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomophaga 18, 391–396 (1973).
Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Selin-Rani, S. et al. Toxicity and physiological effect of quercetin on generalist herbivore, Spodoptera litura Fab. and a non-target earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny. Chemosphere 165, 257–267 (2016).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.
Ghumare, S. S. & Mukherjee, S. N. Performance of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) on different host plants: influence of nitrogen and total phenolics of plants and mid-gut esterase activity of the insect. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 41, 895–899 (2003).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

23
Ananthakrishnan, T. N., Gurusubramanian, G. & Gopichandran, R. Influence of chemical profiles of host plant on the infestation diversity of Retithrips syriacus (Mayet). J. Biosci. 7, 483–489 (1991).
Google Scholar 

24.
Bhattacharya, A. K. & Chenchaiah, K. C. Seed coat phenolic compounds of Cajanus cajan as chemical barrier in formulation of artificial diet of Spodoptera litura (F.). Ann. Plant Prot. Sci. 15, 92–96 (2007).
Google Scholar 

25.
Gautam, S., Samiksha, R., Arora, S. & Sohal, S. K. Chemical profiling of polyphenols in extracts from bark of Acacia nilotica (Linn.) and their efficacy against Spodoptera litura (Fab.). Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 51, 41–53 (2018).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Bernays, E. A., Driver, G. C. & Bilgener, M. Herbivores and plant tannins. Adv. Ecol. Res. 19, 263–302 (1989).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Sharma, R. & Sohal, S. K. Oviposition response of melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) to different phenolic compounds. J. Biopest. 9, 46–51 (2016).
CAS  Google Scholar 

28.
Nathan, S. S. & Kalaivani, K. Combined effects of azadirachtin and nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV) on Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Biol. Control 39, 96–104 (2006).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Deota, P. T. & Upadhyay, P. R. Biological studies of azadirachtin and its derivatives against polyphagous pest, Spodoptera litura. Nat. Prod. Res. 19, 529–539 (2005).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30.
Shu, B. et al. Azadirachtin affects the growth of Spodoptera litura Fabricius by inducing apoptosis in larval midgut. Frontiers Physiol. 9, 137 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

31.
De Moraes, C. M., Lewis, W. J., Pare, P. W., Alborn, H. T. & Tumlinson, J. H. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393, 570–573 (1998).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Camphell, B. C. & Duffey, S. S. Tomatine and parasitic wasps: potential incompatibility of plant antibiosis with biological control. Science 205, 700–702 (1979).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Campbell, B. C. & Duffey, S. S. Alleviation of α-tomatine-induced toxicity to the parasitoid, Hyposoter exiguae, by phytosterols in the diet of the host, Heliothis zea. J. Chem. Ecol. 7, 927–946 (1981).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

34.
Bloem, K. A. & Duffey, S. S. Interactive effect of protein and rutin on larval Heliothis zea and the endoparasitoid Hyposoter exiguae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54, 149–161 (1990).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
El-Heneidy, A. H., Barbosa, P. & Gross, P. Influence of dietary nicotine on fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda and its parasitoid, the ichneumonid wasp Hyposoter annulipes. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46, 227–232 (1988).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Reitz, S. R. & Trumble, J. T. Tritrophic interactions among linear furanocoumarins, the Herbivore Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and the polyembryonic parasitoid Copidosoma floridanum (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Environ. Entomol. 25, 1391–1397 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Mondy, N. et al. Importance of sterols acquired through host feeding in synovigenic parasitoid oogenesis. J. Insect Physiol. 52, 897–904 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

38.
Punia, A., Chauhan, N. S., Kaur, S. & Sohal, S. K. Effect of Ellagic acid on the larvae of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its parasitoid Bracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 23, 660–665 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Barbosa, P. & Saunders, J. A. Plant allelochemicals: Linkages between herbivores and their natural enemies. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 19, 107–137 (1985).
CAS  Google Scholar 

40.
Ode, P., Berenbaum, J. R., Zangerl, M. R. & Hardy, I. C. W. Host plant, host plant chemistry and the polyembryonic parasitoid Copidosoma sosares: indirect effects in a tritrophic interaction. Oikos 104, 388–400 (2004).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Narendra, G., Khokhar, S. & Ram, P. Effect of insecticides on some biological parameters of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammtidae). J. Biol. Control 21, 130–134 (2013).
Google Scholar 

42.
Abedi, Z., Saber, M., Gharekhani, G., Mehrvar, A. & Kamita, S. G. Lethal and sublethal effects of azadirachtin and cypermethrin on Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 107, 638–645 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

43.
Radcliffe, E. B. Population responses of green peach aphid in Minnesota on potatoes treated with various insecticides. Proc. N Cent. Branch Entomol. Soc. Am. 27, 103–105 (1972).
Google Scholar 

44.
Flanders, S. E. Environmental resistance to the establishment of parasitic hymenoptera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 33, 245–253 (1940).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Kaplan, I., Carrillo, J., Garvey, M. & Ode, P. J. Indirect plant-parasitoid interactions mediated by changes in herbivore physiology. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 14, 112–119 (2016).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

46.
Ayyangar, G. S. G. & Rao, P. J. Changes in haemolymph constituents of Spodoptera litura (Fabr.) under the influence of azadirachtin. Indian J. Entomol. 52, 69–83 (1990).
Google Scholar 

47.
Zibaee, A. & Bandani, A. R. Effects of Artemisia annua L. (Asteracea) on the digestive enzymatic profiles and the cellular immune reactions of the Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps (Heteroptera: Scutellaridae), against Beauveria bassiana. Bull. Entomol. Res. 100, 185–196 (2009).
PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Kalyani, S. S. & Holihosur, R. S. N. Toxic effect of crude aqueous leaf extracts of Clerodendron inerme, on the total haemocyte count of sixth instar larva of Helicoverpa armigera (H). Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Technol. 1, 221–224 (2015).
Google Scholar 

49.
Saxena, B. P. & Tikku, K. Effect of plumbagin on haemocytes of Dysdercus koenigii F. Proc. Anim. Sci. 99, 119–124 (1990).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Sakihama, Y. Plant phenolic antioxidant and prooxidant activities: phenolics-induced oxidative damage mediated by metals in plants. Toxicology 177, 67–80 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

51.
Krishnan, N. & Sehnal, F. Compartmentalization of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in the larval gut of Spodoptera littoralis. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 63, 1–10 (2006).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

52.
Lindroth, R. L. Biochemical detoxication: mechanism of differential tiger swallowtail tolerance to phenolic glycosides. Oecologia 81, 219–224 (1989).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

53.
Despres, L., David, J. P. & Gallet, C. The evolutionary ecology of insect resistance to plant chemicals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 298–307 (2007).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Terriere, L. C. Induction of detoxication enzymes in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29, 71–88 (1984).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

55.
Li, X. C., Schuler, M. A. & Berenbaum, M. R. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52, 231–253 (2007).
PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56.
Koul, O. G., Singh, R. & Singh, J. Bioefficacy and mode-of-action of Aglaroxin B and Aglaroxin C from Aglaia elaeagmoidea (syn. A. Irox burghiana) against Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura. Biopesticides Int. 1, 54–64 (2005).
Google Scholar 

57.
Waldbauer, G. P. The Consumption and Utilization of Food by Insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 5, 229–288 (1968).
Article  Google Scholar 

58.
Tauber, O. E. & Yeager, J. F. On total hemolymph (blood) cell counts of insects I. Orthoptera, odonata, hemiptera, and homoptera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 28, 229–240 (1935).
Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Arnold, J. W. & Hinks, C. F. Insect haemocytes under light microscopy: techniques. In Insect Haemocyte Development, Forms, Functions and Techniques (ed. Gupta, A. P.) 531–538 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979).
Google Scholar 

60.
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar  More

Algicide preparation
Four batches of algicide were used for experiments, labeled Batch 3, Batch 4–5–6, Batch 7, and Batch 8, following methods used by Grasso27. For each batch, a single colony of Shewanella sp. IRI-160 was transferred from a modified LM medium plate to liquid LM medium for overnight growth, then inoculated into f/2 with 0.05% casamino acids and incubated for 10 days at room temperature with bubbling. Bacteria and other compounds greater than 60 kDa in size were filtered out using a HemoFlow HF80S 60 kDa dialysis cartridge (Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, MA), creating a batch of sterile filtered exudate referred to as IRI-160AA. Samples of the algicide were diluted with ultrapure water, then total nitrogen (TN) was measured with a TOC-V total organic carbon analyzer equipped with a Total Nitrogen Measuring Unit (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The algicide has approximately 5.02 mg/L TN. The 24-h EC50 for K. veneficum differed among batches but was always close to 1% (actual EC50s ranged from 0.93% in Batch 4–5–6 to 1.5% in Batch 3), thus a 1% concentration of the algicide was included in all invertebrate assays27. Animals were also exposed to a media control to ensure mortality was due to the algicide.
Statistical analyses
For all statistics, data were analyzed using Shapiro–Wilk normality tests and Brown-Forsythe equal variance tests. If they failed either, data were transformed and reanalyzed. If transformed data passed both tests, then analysis proceeded. If neither log or square-root transformed data passed both normality and equal variance tests, then a non-parametric test was run if possible. Specific details on statistical analyses are provided in each section below.
Copepod mortality
Mortality experiments followed established methods for determining acute toxicity in aquatic animals30,31,33,49. For A. tonsa adults, we collected animals in Fall of 2018 after sunset near the mouth of the Broadkill River (Delaware, USA) using a plankton net. Cod ends were diluted and maintained in field collected seawater with ambient food at room temperature (~ 20 °C) until use in experiments. Adults were filtered out of the bulk collection with a 500-μm mesh, then sorted for adult females. We transferred one adult female (n = 24 for 40%, 48 for 30%, and 72 for all other concentrations) into each well of a 12-well plate containing 5 mL of test solution; test solutions included a seawater control (0%); algicide mixtures prepared from Batch 3 of the IRI-160AA in 20 psu, 0.2 μm-filtered sea water collected from Indian River Inlet, DE, USA (FSW) (1%, 5%, 10%, 13.5%, 18%, 24%, 30%, and 40% v/v); and a 24% media solution as a media control. The plates were incubated at 25 °C in low-light (~ 2.37 × 1013 photons cm-2 s−1) on a 14:10 h day:night cycle for 48 h. Every 6 h for the first 24 h, and again at 48 h, we counted the number alive and dead.
For A. tonsa nauplii, adult females and males were placed in two 1 L beakers at room temperature with a 150-μm mesh placed several centimeters off the bottom (to prevent egg cannibalism), a slow bubbler (~ 2 small bubbles s−1), and ambient seawater diluted with 20 psu FSW until the water was mostly clear. Adults were allowed to mate in the beaker for approximately 24 h, after which we removed the mesh, thus removing the adults and leaving behind any nauplii and eggs. After another 24 h, the contents of the beakers were poured through a 20-μm mesh, and we extracted the nauplii and placed them into experimental treatments (0% seawater control, algicide at 1%, 5%, 10%, 13.5%, 18%, 24%, and 30% v/v concentrations, plus a 24% media control; n = 48 animals for all concentrations) following the procedure outlined above for the adult female copepods. This experiment was conducted three times; the first two mortality experiments used Batch 3 of the IRI-160AA, and the third mortality experiment used Batch 8.
From the data collected, we generated a Probit model50 and obtained a 24-h LC50. Another approach looks at mortality over several time points in order to generate a time series of survival (e.g., Robineau et al.51, Keller et al.52). This also allows the generation of an LC50 at several time points (e.g., 6, 12, 18, and 24 h), which can better inform how a certain animal may survive over time. We used SigmaPlot to generate graphs of survival over time, and R statistical software53 and the R package ecotoxicology54 for generating and graphing the Probit model and running a χ2 test to evaluate the model.
Crab mortality
We conducted mortality experiments for the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) in larval (Z1-stage zoeae) and postlarval (megalopae) stages in a similar manner to mortality experiments with Acartia tonsa. We collected ovigerous female blue crabs during the Summer of 2018 by dip net and drop net at sunset from the Delaware Bay (similar to methods used by Kernehan55) in Cape Henlopen State Park and maintained them in a recirculating water tray containing filtered ambient seawater (~ 30 psu) at room temperature. We staged egg masses every few days55, and females predicted to hatch within ~ 3 days were moved to 7-gallon buckets in a 25 °C incubator containing ~ 30 psu sea water and a bubbler. Zoea larvae (Z1-stage) hatched from these females were kept in large finger bowls with 30 psu sea water at room temperature and were fed lab-reared rotifers (Brachionus rotundiformis, Reed Mariculture). These animals became subjects for mortality and sub-lethal experiments within approximately a day of hatching. Four experiments were conducted; three mortality experiments used Batch 4–5–6 of the IRI-160AA, while the fourth experiment (24 individuals for each concentration) used Batch 7.
Megalopae were collected by plankton net set on rising tides at night during the Summer and Fall of 2018. They were maintained in large finger bowls at room temperature and fed with Artemia nauplii and went into experiments within a few days of collection. Only megalopae in intermolt based on morphology56 were used in experiments. Megalopae experiments used Batch 3 of the IRI-160AA.
Both zoeae and megalopae were exposed to 1%, 5%, 10%, 13.5%, 18%, and 24% algicide concentrations, plus a 0% seawater control and a 24% media control (n = 84 animals for the 0% concentration and 60 for all other concentrations for zoeae, and n = 24 animals for megalopae for all concentrations). Animals were incubated at 25 °C under low-light (~ 2.37 × 1013 photons cm-2 s-1) on a 14:10 light:dark cycle for the duration of experiments. We checked on zoeae and megalopae every 6 h for 24 h; megalopae were checked at an additional 48-h time point.
Oyster mortality
Oyster larvae (eyed pediveligers of Crassostrea virginica) were provided by University of Maryland’s Horn Point Laboratory. Animals were maintained on a damp coffee filter in a sealed plastic container on ice during transport, then released into room-temperature fingerbowls containing 20 psu water and fed a locally-isolated alga (Storeatula major) at room temperature. Experiments occurred in similar fashion to those conducted on Acartia tonsa and Callinectes sapidus. Larvae were assayed in 12-well plates (n = 36 animals for all concentrations). Animals were exposed to 1%, 5%, 10%, 13.5%, 18%, and 24% algicide concentrations, plus a 0% seawater control, and 24% media control. Animals were incubated at 25 °C under a 14:10 light:dark cycle for the duration of experiments. Survival was evaluated every 6 h for 24 h and again at 48 h. Larvae were additionally examined at the start of the experiment and at the 24- and 48-h time points for an activity assay. These experiments used Batch 3 of the IRI-160AA.
Wild-type adult C. virginica were collected from the Delaware Bay near the University of Delaware Lewes Campus, while Haskins-disease-resistant strain individuals were collected from aquaculture cages maintained by the Delaware Center for the Inland Bays. On the first day, individuals were cleaned with a wire brush, and divided into two buckets containing approximately 10 L of 20 psu seawater and were fed Isochrysis galbana (~ 100,000 cells L−1). On the second day the water was changed and they were again fed. On the third day, water was changed and animals were not fed. On the fourth day, individuals were removed from the buckets, dried with a paper towel, labeled with permanent marker, and placed in pairs into forty-one 1 L plastic containers containing 1 L of various algicide solutions: 0%, 1%, 5%, 10%, 13.5%, 18%, and 24% (n = 28 for 0%, 22 for 1% and 18%, and 20 for all other concentrations). Individuals were checked every 6 h for 24 h and assessed if they were alive or dead. Closed individuals were assumed to be alive. If open individuals were observed, we gently tapped on the container to see if the individual shut its shell; animals that responded to this stimulus were marked as alive. Only animals that did not respond to repeated stimuli were scored as dead. Proportion surviving was compared across algicide concentration and strain. These experiments all used Batch 8 of the IRI-160AA.
Copepod sub-lethality
Respiration
We conducted respiration experiments on A. tonsa adult females and young nauplii in a 24-well microplate respirometer (Loligo Systems). First, we sorted animals into fingerbowls containing 100 mL of their respective algicide concentrations. After 24 h of algicide exposure, we removed animals via pipette and put one animal into each well of the respirometer plate (200 μL wells for adult females and 80 μL for nauplii) filled with 0.2 μm filtered FSW, then sealed the plate with Parafilm and a weight. Each experiment also had 4 to 6 wells with only FSW to calculate background oxygen consumption. The experiment occurred in darkness within a 25 °C incubator at night and lasted several hours (n = 26–39 animals for adult females, 11–18 for nauplii). Oxygen concentrations in each well were recorded every minute. At the end of the experiment, respiration rates were calculated in R statistical software using the respR package57 over a period of time when the animals were still in independent respiration, and a one-way ANOVA on ranks in SigmaPlot (Systat Software, San Jose, CA) compared treatments. Experiments with adult females used Batch 3 of IRI-160AA, while nauplii experiments used Batch 8.
Activity
Experiments determining effects on swimming activity utilized Locomotor Activity Monitors (LAMs; TriKinetics). Three beams of infrared light cross a 3 mL test tube containing an animal and register when the animal crosses the beams. We sorted batches of adult female A. tonsa into fingerbowls containing different algicide treatments. Animals were incubated at 25 °C in low-light conditions (~ 2.37 × 1013 photons cm−2 s−1) for 24 h on a 11:13-h light:dark cycle. Animals were pipetted into plastic test tubes (one animal per tube) containing ~ 3 mL of FSW, which then went into the LAMs (n = 21–36 animals). The experiment lasted 24 h with beam breaks summed at one-minute intervals, allowing the data to be analyzed wholly for the 24-h period as well as across different light phases to account for light:dark mediated activity rhythms. Experiments started in the afternoon and ran overnight, creating an initial light phase (L1), a dark phase (D), and a second light phase (L2). Comparing treatments across the entire time period was done using a one-way ANOVA on ranks, while analyzing the data based on the different light phases was performed via a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Additionally, at the end of the LAM activity experiments we collected the individuals and noted mortality. This data was analyzed via a one-way ANOVA on ranks. Copepod activity experiments used Batch 3 of the IRI-160AA. Nauplii were too small to generate a reliable signal in the LAMs and were not used in these experiments.
Crab sub-lethality
Respiration
Respiration experiments followed methods described for A. tonsa above and involved zoeae and megalopae. A one-way ANOVA on ranks was calculated using the data for each life stage. The first four zoeae experiments used Batch 4–5-6 of IRI-160AA, while the last two experiments used Batch 7. Megalopae experiments all used Batch 3.
Activity
Activity level experiments followed methods described for A. tonsa above and involved zoeae and megalopae. The 24-h data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA on square root transformed data for zoeae, and a one-way ANOVA on ranks for megalopae. The data broken down by light phase were analyzed via one-way repeated measures ANOVA on log-transformed data for both zoeae and megalopae. These experiments all used Batch 3 of IRI-160AA.
At the end of experiments we collected the individuals and noted mortality. This data was analyzed via a one-way ANOVA for zoeae and a one-way ANOVA on ranks for the megalopae.
Metamorphosis
We sorted megalopae into finger bowls containing 100 mL of filtered estuary water with different concentrations of the IRI-160AA algicide (0%, 1%, and 17% v/v). After 24-h of exposure, we sorted animals into 12-well plates containing FSW (n = 60 individuals for each treatment). Water was changed daily, and animals were fed freshly hatched Artemia daily. Every 12 h, we counted how many megalopae had molted into first crabs until most had metamorphosed (5.5 days) and used a Kaplan–Meier Survival Analysis with a Gehan-Breslow test to determine if there was a difference in time to metamorphosis (TTM) across treatments. These experiments used Batch 3 of the IRI-160AA.
Abdomen Pumping and Grooming
Crabs with egg masses were collected from the Delaware Bay near Lewes, DE and separated into numbered baskets and maintained in a flow-through sea water table. They were fed thawed squid (Loligo opalescens) every day, and eggs were photographed every two to three days under a dissecting scope until they reached ~ 6 days until hatching (i.e., late-stage sensu Tankersley et al.)36. Homogenized egg water (seawater plus homogenized eggs, designated SW + HE, ~ 20 eggs mL−1) was utilized to induce pumping and grooming behavior and made according to Tankersley et al.36.
Ovigerous females were exposed to several sub-lethal concentrations of algicide combined with the homogenized egg solution and monitored for pumping and grooming behavior. Test solutions were diluted to 1.5 L with filtered 30 psu seawater, and 3.75 mL aliquot of a pre-prepared homogenized egg solution was added to achieve a final concentration of ~ 20 eggs/mL. These experiments used Batch 4–5–6, Batch 7, and Batch 3 of the IRI-160AA.
Between three and six crabs were tested at a time, and all crabs were staged the day of the experiment to verify that their eggs were no more than six days from hatching. All experiments were performed under dim red light to reduce disturbance. Each crab was tested in every treatment. A crab was placed into a translucent container (20.1 × 16.5 × 11.4 cm) with a given treatment condition and acclimated for 2.5 min. Then, for the following 2.5 min, the number of times the crab pumped its abdomen was recorded. Immediately following the end of the first crab’s measurement period, another crab was placed into the same treatment to begin its acclimation period. Each crab was returned to a flowing water table between treatments and remained there for at least twenty minutes before beginning the acclimation period of its next treatment. The treatment series began and ended with 30 psu seawater (SW), and proceeded through an increasing gradient of 0, 7, 11, and 17% IRI-160AA in SW + HE.
Each measurement period of the pumping experiments was filmed. The videos were reviewed later, and the time the crabs spent grooming their egg masses was recorded.
A χ2 test was performed for the 24 crabs tested to assess if the proportion of crabs performing the behaviors differed among treatments. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA (Friedman Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance on Ranks) was used to assess trends in the number of pumps and the time spent grooming. Only crabs that performed the behavior were included in each analysis.
Oyster sub-lethality
Respiration
Respiration on oyster pediveligers following methods described for A. tonsa nauplii above. Two individuals were placed in each 80 µl well, with rates calculated per individual. Data were analyzed via a one-way ANOVA on Ranks. These experiments all used Batch 3 of IRI-160AA.
Activity
Activity experiments on pediveliger larvae were conducted in LAMs and followed similar methods to Acartia tonsa and Callinectes sapidus. The 24-h data was tested via a one-way ANOVA on ranks, while the data broken down by light phase was analyzed via a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. These experiments used Batch 3 of IRI-160AA.
An additional analysis of pediveliger activity occurred during the mortality experiment by ranking how active each animal appeared to be on a scale of 1 (High Activity, HA, animal was actively swimming), 2 (Medium Activity, MA, animal had its velum extended and cilia active, sometimes scooting across the bottom), 3 (Low Activity, LA, animal was enclosed in its shell but viscera moved when the shell was touched), and 4 (Dead/No Activity, D, animal was completely unresponsive even to repeated stimulation). Ranking occurred at the start of the experiment (where all animals scored as HA), at the 24-h mark, and at the 48-h mark. This assessment was analyzed via a χ2 test for both the 24-h and 48-h data sets. At the end of the LAM experiments, animals were analyzed in the same manner.
Activity experiments on the wild-type adult C. virginica occurred during the mortality experiments. At each 6-h time point, animals in the containers (0%, 1%, 5%, 10%, 13.5%, 18%, and 24% v/v IRI-160AA treatments) were scored as either Open (O) or Closed (C), and analyzed via a two-way repeated measures ANOVA on the proportion of animals that opened at each time point in each concentration.
Feeding
Feeding experiments occurred only on adult C. virginica. Animals and containers from the mortality experiments were rinsed to remove algicide residue, then filled with 1 L of 20 psu seawater and Isochrysis galbana at ~ 100,000 cells L−1, and one animal from each container was returned to it. Five milliliters from each container were removed immediately and in vivo chlorophyll a florescence was measured using a fluorometer (Turner Systems). Air stones were added to the containers to keep the algae in suspension, and lids were added to prevent liquid from bubbling out. After 6 h, another fluorescence reading was taken. Animals were given another 6 h to feed, and a final fluorescence reading was taken at the 12-h time point. Clearance rates (CR) were calculated according to Thessen et al.58 from time zero to six hours (initial rate, 0–6), and from six to twelve hours (end rate, 6–12), and compared across time ranges and treatments and strains using a three-way ANOVA. More

1.
Cesar, H. J. S., Burke, L. & Pet-Soede, L. The Economics of Worldwide Coral Reef Degradation. 23 (Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting: The Netherlands). https://www.icran.org/pdf/cesardegradationreport.pdf (2003).
2.
Tambutté, E. et al. Observations of the tissue-skeleton interface in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata. Coral Reefs 26, 517–529 (2007).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Mollica, N. R. et al. Ocean acidification affects coral growth by reducing skeletal density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 1754–1759 (2018).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Mass, T. et al. Cloning and characterization of four novel coral acid-rich proteins that precipitate carbonates in vitro. Curr. Biol. 23, 1126–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.007 (2013).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5.
Guo, W. Seawater temperature and buffering capacity modulate coral calcifying pH. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

6.
McCulloch, M. et al. Resilience of cold-water scleractinian corals to ocean acidification: boron isotopic systematics of pH and saturation state up-regulation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 87, 21–34 (2012).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Guo, W. et al. Ocean acidification has impacted coral growth on the great barrier reef. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl086761 (2020).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8.
Sevilgen, D. S. et al. Full in vivo characterization of carbonate chemistry at the site of calcification in corals. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7447 (2019).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

9.
Venn, A., Tambutté, E., Holcomb, M., Allemand, D. & Tambutté, S. Live tissue imaging shows reef corals elevate pH under their calcifying tissue relative to seawater. PLoS ONE 6, e20013 (2011).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Cai, W.-J. et al. Microelectrode characterization of coral daytime interior pH and carbonate chemistry. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–8 (2016).
Google Scholar 

11.
Holcomb, M. et al. Coral calcifying fluid pH dictates response to ocean acidification. Sci. Rep. 4, 5207. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05207 (2014).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

12.
DeCarlo, T. M., Holcomb, M. & McCulloch, M. T. Reviews and syntheses: revisiting the boron systematics of aragonite and their application to coral calcification. Biogeosciences 15, 2819–2834. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2819-2018 (2018).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
McCulloch, M. T., D’Olivo, J. P., Falter, J., Holcomb, M. & Trotter, J. A. Coral calcification in a changing world and the interactive dynamics of pH and DIC upregulation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15686. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15686 (2017).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

14.
Horvath, K. M. et al. Next-century ocean acidification and warming both reduce calcification rate, but only acidification alters skeletal morphology of reef-building coral Siderastrea siderea. Sci. Rep. 6, 29613. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29613 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.
Tambutté, E. et al. Morphological plasticity of the coral skeleton under CO2-driven seawater acidification. Nat. Commun. 6, 7368. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8368 (2015).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

16.
Stewart, J. A., Anagnostou, E. & Foster, G. L. An improved boron isotope pH proxy calibration for the deep-sea coral Desmophyllum dianthus through sub-sampling of fibrous aragonite. Chem. Geol. 447, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.10.029 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Allison, N., Finch, A. A. & EIMF. δ11B, Sr, Mg and B in a modern Porites coral: the relationship between calcification site pH and skeletal chemistry. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 1790–1800 (2010).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Rollion-Bard, C. & Blamart, D. SIMS method and examples of applications in coral biomineralization. In Biomineralization Sourcebook: Characterization of Biominerals and Biomimetic Materials (eds DiMasi, E. & Gower, L. B.) 249–261 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014).
Google Scholar 

19.
Trotter, J. et al. Quantifying the pH ‘vital effect’ in the temperate zooxanthellate coral Cladocora caespitosa: validation of the boron seawater pH proxy. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 303, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.01.030 (2011).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Krief, S. et al. Physiological and isotopic responses of scleractinian corals to ocean acidification. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 4988–5001 (2010).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Hönisch, B. et al. Assessing scleractinian corals as recorders for paleo-pH: empirical calibration and vital effects. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 3675–3685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.002 (2004).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Tanaka, K. et al. Response of Acropora digitifera to ocean acidification: constraints from δ11B, Sr, Mg, and Ba compositions of aragonitic skeletons cultured under variable seawater pH. Coral Reefs 34, 1139–1149 (2015).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Reynaud, S., Hemming, N. G., Juillet-Leclerc, A. & Gattuso, J.-P. Effect of pCO2 and temperature on the boron isotopic composition of the zooxanthellate coral Acropora sp. Coral Reefs 23, 539–546 (2004).
Google Scholar 

24.
Anagnostou, E., Huang, K.-F., You, C.-F., Sikes, E. & Sherrell, R. Evaluation of boron isotope ratio as a pH proxy in the deep sea coral Desmophyllum dianthus: evidence of physiological pH adjustment. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 349, 251–260 (2012).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Jurikova, H. et al. Boron isotope composition of the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa along the Norwegian margin: zooming into a potential pH-proxy by combining bulk and high-resolution approaches. Chem. Geol. 513, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.01.005 (2019).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Kasemann, S. A., Schmidt, D. N., Bijma, J. & Foster, G. L. In situ boron isotope analysis in marine carbonates and its application for foraminifera and palaeo-pH. Chem. Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.12.015 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Rollion-Bard, C., Chaussidon, M. & France-Lanord, C. pH control on oxygen isotopic composition of symbiotic corals. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 215, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00391-1 (2003).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Standish, C. D. et al. The effect of matrix interferences on in situ boron isotope analysis by laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 33, 959–968 (2019).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Sadekov, A. et al. Accurate and precise microscale measurements of boron isotope ratios in calcium carbonates using laser ablation multicollector-ICPMS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 34, 550–560 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Fietzke, J. et al. Boron isotope ratio determination in carbonates via LA-MC-ICP-MS using soda-lime glass standards as reference material. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 25, 1953–1957 (2010).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Oppelt, A., López, M. & Rocha, C. Biogeochemical analysis of the calcification patterns of cold-water corals Madrepora oculata and Lophelia pertusa along contact surfaces with calcified tubes of the symbiotic polychaete Eunice norvegica: evaluation of a ‘mucus’ calcification hypothesis. Deep Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 127, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.08.006 (2017).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Fowell, S. et al. Historical trends in pH and carbonate biogeochemistry on the Belize Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3228–3237 (2018).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Runcorn, S. K. Corals as paleontological clocks. Sci. Am. 215, 26–33 (1966).
Article  Google Scholar 

34.
DeCarlo, T. M. & Cohen, A. L. Dissepiments, density bands and signatures of thermal stress in Porites skeletons. Coral Reefs 36, 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-017-1566-9 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

35.
Barnes, D. & Lough, J. On the nature and causes of density banding in massive coral skeletons. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 167, 91–108 (1993).
Article  Google Scholar 

36.
DeCarlo, T. M. et al. Coral Sr-U thermometry. Paleoceanography 31, 626–638 (2016).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Gagnon, A. C., Adkins, J. F., Fernandez, D. P. & Robinson, L. F. Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca vital effects correlated with skeletal architecture in a scleractinian deep-sea coral and the role of Rayleigh fractionation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 261, 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.013 (2007).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Blamart, D. et al. Correlation of boron isotopic composition with ultrastructure in the deep-sea coral Lophelia pertusa: implications for biomineralization and paleo-pH. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001686 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Jokiel, P. L. Coral reef calcification: carbonate, bicarbonate and proton flux under conditions of increasing ocean acidification. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20130031–20130031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0031 (2013).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

40.
Galli, G. & Solidoro, C. ATP supply may contribute to light-enhanced calcification in corals more than abiotic mechanisms. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00068 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Barott, K. L., Venn, A. A., Perez, S. O., Tambutté, S. & Tresguerres, M. Coral host cells acidify symbiotic algal microenvironment to promote photosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413483112 (2015).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42.
Bernardet, C., Tambutté, E., Techer, N., Tambutté, S. & Venn, A. Ion transporter gene expression is linked to the thermal sensitivity of calcification in the reef coral Stylophora pistillata. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Le Goff, C. et al. In vivo pH measurement at the site of calcification in an octocoral. Sci. Rep. 7, 11210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10348-4 (2017).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44.
Zoccola, D. et al. Bicarbonate transporters in corals point towards a key step in the evolution of cnidarian calcification. Sci. Rep. 5, 9983. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09983 (2015).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

45.
Furla, P., Galgani, I., Durand, I. & Allemand, D. Sources and mechanisms of inorganic carbon transport for coral calcification and photosynthesis. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 3445–3457 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

46.
DeLong, K. L., Maupin, C. R., Flannery, J. A., Quinn, T. M. & Shen, C.-C. Refining temperature reconstructions with the Atlantic coral Siderastrea siderea. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 462, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.08.028 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Castillo, K. D., Ries, J. B. & Weiss, J. M. Declining coral skeletal extension for forereef colonies of Siderastrea siderea on the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System Southern Belize. PLoS ONE 6, e14615 (2011).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

48.
Castillo, K. D., Ries, J. B., Weiss, J. M. & Lima, F. P. Decline of forereef corals in response to recent warming linked to history of thermal exposure. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1577 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Foster, G. L. Seawater pH, pCO2 and CO32− variations in the Caribbean Sea over the last 130 kyr: a boron isotope and B/Ca study of planktic forminifera. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.015 (2008).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Foster, G. L. et al. Interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope analyses of boric acid, seawater and marine CaCO3 by MC-ICPMS and NTIMS. Chem. Geol. 358, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.08.027 (2013).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

51.
le Roux P. J. et al. In situ, multiplemultiplier, laser ablation ICP‐MS measurement of boron isotopic composition (δ11B) at the nanogram level. Chem. Geol. 203(1–2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.09.006 (2004).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

52.
Inoue, M., Nohara, M., Okai, T., Suzuki, A. & Kawahata, H. Concentrations of trace elements in carbonate reference materials coral JCp-1 and Giant Clam JCt-1 by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 28, 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2004.tb00759.x (2004).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Thil, F. et al. Development of laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for boron isotopic measurement in marine biocarbonates: new improvements and application to a modern Porites coral. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 30, 359–371 (2016).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

54.
Hathorne, E. C. et al. Interlaboratory study for coral Sr/Ca and other element/Ca ratio measurements. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 3730–3750. https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20230 (2013).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

55.
Hijmans, R. & Van Etten, J. Geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R Package Version 2, 1–25 (2012).
Google Scholar 

56.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2010).

57.
Foster, G. L., von Strandmann, P. & Rae, J. W. B. Boron and magnesium isotopic composition of seawater. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gc003201 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

58.
Klochko, K., Kaufman, A. J., Yao, W. S., Byrne, R. H. & Tossell, J. A. Experimental measurement of boron isotope fractionation in seawater. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.05.034 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

59.
Holcomb, M., DeCarlo, T., Gaetani, G. & McCulloch, M. Factors affecting B/Ca ratios in synthetic aragonite. Chem. Geol. 437, 67–76 (2016).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Dickson, A. G. Thermodynamics of the dissociation of boric acid in synthetic seawater from 273.15 to 318.15 K. Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 37, 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(90)90004-F (1990).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

61.
Lee, K. et al. The universal ratio of boron to chlorinity for the North Pacific and North Atlantic oceans. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 1801–1811 (2010).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

62.
Zeebe, R. E. & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. CO2in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes Vol. 65 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001).
Google Scholar 

63.
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  More

1.
Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
Google Scholar 
2.
Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. J. Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002).
Google Scholar 

3.
Kaspari, M. & Powers, J. S. Biogeochemistry and geographical ecology: Embracing all twenty-five elements required to build organisms. Am. Nat. 188, S62–S73 (2016).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

4.
Kozlowski, J. Why life histories are diverse. Polish J. Ecol. 54, 585–605 (2006).
Google Scholar 

5.
Ejsmond, M. J., Varpe, Ø., Czarnoleski, M. & Kozłowski, J. Seasonality in offspring value and trade-offs with growth explain capital breeding. Am. Nat. 186, E111–E125 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

6.
Filipiak, M. A better understanding of bee nutritional ecology is needed to optimize conservation strategies for wild bees-the application of ecological stoichiometry. Insects 9, 85 (2018).
PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Filipiak, Z. M. & Filipiak, M. The scarcity of specific nutrients in wild bee larval food negatively influences certain life history traits. Biology (Basel). 9, 462 (2020).

8.
Simpson, S. J. & Raubenheimer, D. The Nature of Nutrition: A Unifying Framework from Animal Adaptation to Human Obesity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2012).
Google Scholar 

9.
Bärlocher, F. & Rennenberg, H. Food chains and nutrient cycles. In Ecological biochemistry (eds Krauss, G. J. & Nies, D. H.) 92–122 (Wiley, New York, 2014).
Google Scholar 

10.
DeAngelis, D. L. Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs (Springer Netherlands, Amsterdam, 1992).
Google Scholar 

11.
Schlesinger, W. H. & Bernhardt, E. S. Biogeochemistry (Academic Press, London, 2020).
Google Scholar 

12.
Jeyasingh, P. D., Cothran, R. D. & Tobler, M. Testing the ecological consequences of evolutionary change using elements. Ecol. Evol. 4, 528–538 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Jeyasingh, P. D., Goos, J. M., Thompson, S. K., Godwin, C. M. & Cotner, J. B. Ecological stoichiometry beyond redfield: An ionomic perspective on elemental homeostasis. Front. Microbiol. 8, 722 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

14.
González, A. L. et al. Ecological mechanisms and phylogeny shape invertebrate stoichiometry: A test using detritus-based communities across Central and South America. Funct. Ecol. 32, 2448–2463 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Peñuelas, J. et al. The bioelements, the elementome, and the biogeochemical niche. Ecology 100, e02652 (2019).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

16.
Fagan, W. F. & Denno, R. F. Stoichiometry of actual vs. potential predator-prey interactions: Insights into nitrogen limitation for arthropod predators. Ecol. Lett. 7, 876–883 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Kay, A. D. et al. Toward a stoichiometric framework for evolutionary biology. Oikos 109, 6–17 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Cherif, M. et al. An operational framework for the advancement of a molecule-to-biosphere stoichiometry theory. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 1–16 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Welti, N. et al. Bridging food webs, ecosystem metabolism, and biogeochemistry using ecological stoichiometry theory. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1298 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

20.
Hessen, D. O., Elser, J. J., Sterner, R. W. & Urabe, J. Ecological stoichiometry: An elementary approach using basic principles. Limnol. Oceanogr. 58, 2219–2236 (2013).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Lemoine, N. P., Giery, S. T. & Burkepile, D. E. Differing nutritional constraints of consumers across ecosystems. Oecologia 174, 1367–1376 (2014).
ADS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22.
Morehouse, N. I., Nakazawa, T., Booher, C. M., Jeyasingh, P. D. & Hall, M. D. Sex in a material world: Why the study of sexual reproduction and sex-specific traits should become more nutritionally-explicit. Oikos 119, 766–778 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Filipiak, M. Key pollen host plants provide balanced diets for wild bee larvae: A lesson for planting flower strips and hedgerows. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1410–1418 (2019).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Goos, J. M., Cothran, R. D. & Jeyasingh, P. D. Within-population variation in the chemistry of life: The stoichiometry of sexual dimorphism in multiple dimensions. Evol. Ecol. 31, 635–651 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Halvorson, H. M., Scott, J. T., Sanders, A. J. & Evans-White, M. A. A stream insect detritivore violates common assumptions of threshold elemental ratio bioenergetics models. Freshw. Sci. 34, 508–518 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

26.
Meunier, C. L. et al. From elements to function: Toward unifying ecological stoichiometry and trait-based ecology. Front. Environ. Sci. 5, 1–10 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Sperfeld, E., Wagner, N. D., Halvorson, H. M., Malishev, M. & Raubenheimer, D. Bridging ecological stoichiometry and nutritional geometry with homeostasis concepts and integrative models of organism nutrition. Funct. Ecol. 31, 286–296 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Filipiak, M. & Weiner, J. Plant–insect interactions: The role of ecological stoichiometry. Acta Agrobot. 70, 1–16 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Elser, J. J., Dobberfuhl, D. R., MacKay, N. A. & Schampel, J. H. Organism size, life history, and N: P stoichiometry: Toward a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. Bioscience 46, 674–684 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

30.
Polidori, C. et al. Strong phylogenetic constraint on transition metal incorporation in the mandibles of the hyper-diverse Hymenoptera (Insecta). Org. Divers. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-020-00448-x (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Bosch, J., Sgolastra, F. & Kemp, W. P. Life cycle ecophysiology of Osmia mason bees used as crop pollinators. In Bee Pollination in Agricultural Eco-systems (eds James, R. & Pitts-Singer, T. L.) 83–105 (Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford, 2008).
Google Scholar 

32.
Giejdasz, K. & Wilkaniec, Z. Individual development of the red mason bee (Osmia rufa L., Megachilidae) under natural and laboratory conditions. J. Apic. Sci. 46, 51–57 (2002).
Google Scholar 

33.
Gruber, B., Eckel, K., Everaars, J. & Dormann, C. F. On managing the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis) in apple orchards. Apidologie 42, 564–576 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Kaspari, M. The seventh macronutrient: How sodium shortfall ramifies through populations, food webs and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1153–1168 (2020).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

35.
Rizzuto, M. et al. Patterns and potential drivers of intraspecific variability in the body C, N, and P composition of a terrestrial consumer, the snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus). Ecol. Evol. 9, 14453–14464 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Sitters, J. & Olde Venterink, H. The need for a novel integrative theory on feedbacks between herbivores, plants and soil nutrient cycling. Plant Soil 396, 421–426 (2015).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Sitters, J. et al. Nutrient availability controls the impact of mammalian herbivores on soil carbon and nitrogen pools in grasslands. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2060–2071 (2020).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

38.
Sitters, J. et al. The stoichiometry of nutrient release by terrestrial herbivores and its ecosystem consequences. Front. Earth Sci. 5, 1–8 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
González, A. L., Fariña, J. M., Kay, A. D., Pinto, R. & Marquet, P. A. Exploring patterns and mechanisms of interspecific and intraspecific variation in body elemental composition of desert consumers. Oikos 120, 1247–1255 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Seidelmann, K. Optimal progeny body size in a solitary bee, Osmia bicornis (Apoidea: Megachilidae). Ecol. Entomol. 39, 656–663 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Kim, J. Y. Female size and fitness in the leaf-cutter bee Megachile apicalis. Ecol. Entomol. 22, 275–282 (1997).
Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Markow, T. et al. Elemental stoichiometry of Drosophila and their hosts. Funct. Ecol. 13, 78–84 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Bergwitz, C. & Jüppner, H. Phosphate sensing. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 18, 132–144 (2011).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

44.
Werner, A. & Kinne, R. K. H. Evolution of the Na-Pi cotransport systems. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 280, R301–R312 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

45.
Morgan, A. J., Kille, P. & Stürzenbaum, S. R. Microevolution and ecotoxicology of metals in invertebrates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 1085–1096 (2007).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

46.
Bednarska, A. J., Świątek, Z. M. & Labecka, A. M. Effects of cadmium bioavailability in food on its distribution in different tissues in the ground beetle Pterostichus oblongopunctatus. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 103, 421–427 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Świątek, Z. M. & Bednarska, A. J. Energy reserves and respiration rate in the earthworm Eisenia andrei after exposure to zinc in nanoparticle or ionic form. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26, 24933–24945 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

48.
Cohen, A. C. Insect Diets: Science and Technology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005).
Google Scholar 

49.
Seidelmann, K. Optimal resource allocation, maternal investment, and body size in a solitary bee, Osmia bicornis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 166, 790–799 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Bosch, J. & Vicens, N. Relationship between body size, provisioning rate, longevity and reproductive success in females of the solitary bee Osmia cornuta. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60, 26–33 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Seidelmann, K., Ulbrich, K. & Mielenz, N. Conditional sex allocation in the Red Mason bee, Osmia rufa. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 337–347 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

52.
González, A. L., Dézerald, O., Marquet, P. A., Romero, G. Q. & Srivastava, D. S. The multidimensional stoichiometric niche. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 110 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

53.
Lemmen, K. D., Butler, O. M., Koffel, T., Rudman, S. M. & Symons, C. C. Stoichiometric traits vary widely within species: A meta-analysis of common garden experiments. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1–15 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

54.
Prater, C., Wagner, N. D. & Frost, P. C. Interactive effects of genotype and food quality on consumer growth rate and elemental content. Ecology 98, 1399–1408 (2017).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

55.
Sherman, R. E., Chowdhury, P. R., Baker, K. D., Weider, L. J. & Jeyasingh, P. D. Genotype-specific relationships among phosphorus use, growth and abundance in Daphnia pulicaria. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170770 (2017).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

56.
Zajitschek, F. & Connallon, T. Partitioning of resources: The evolutionary genetics of sexual conflict over resource acquisition and allocation. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 826–838 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

57.
Moe, S. J. et al. Recent advances in ecological stoichiometry: Insights for population and community ecology. Oikos 109, 29–39 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

58.
Peñuelas, J., Sardans, J., Ogaya, R. & Estiarte, M. Nutrient stoichiometric relations and biogeochemical niche in coexisting plant species: Effect of simulated climate change. Polish J. Ecol. 56, 613–622 (2008).
Google Scholar 

59.
Urbina, I. et al. Plant community composition affects the species biogeochemical niche. Ecosphere 8, e01801 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 

60.
Jeyasingh, P. D., Goos, J. M., Lind, P. R., Roy Chowdhury, P. & Sherman, R. E. Phosphorus supply shifts the quotas of multiple elements in algae and Daphnia: Ionomic basis of stoichiometric constraints. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1064–1072 (2020).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

61.
Ruedenauer, F. A. et al. Best be (e) on low fat: Linking nutrient perception, regulation and fitness. Ecol. Lett. 23, 545–554 (2020).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

62.
Trinkl, M. et al. Floral species richness correlates with changes in the nutritional quality of larval diets in a stingless bee. Insects 11, E125 (2020).
PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

63.
Roswell, M., Dushoff, J. & Winfree, R. Male and female bees show large differences in floral preference. PLoS ONE 14, e0214909 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

64.
Vaudo, A. D. et al. Pollen protein: Lipid macronutrient ratios may guide broad patterns of bee species floral preferences. Insects 11, 132 (2020).
PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

65.
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 9 (2001).
Google Scholar 

66.
Smilauer, P. & Lepš, J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO 5 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
Google Scholar  More