More stories

  • in

    Superconductivity gets heated

    NATURE PODCAST
    14 October 2020

    A high pressure experiment reveals the world’s first room-temperature superconductor, and a method to target ecosystem restoration.

    Nick Howe &

    Search for this author in:

    Shamini Bundell

    Search for this author in:

    Hear all the latest from the world of science, brought to you by Nick Howe and Shamini Bundell.
    Your browser does not support the audio element.
    Download MP3

    In this episode:
    00:44 Room-temperature superconductivity
    For decades, scientists have been searching for a material that superconducts at room temperature. This week, researchers show a material that appears to do so, but only under pressures close to those at the centre of the planet. Research Article: Snider et al.; News: First room-temperature superconductor puzzles physicists
    08:26 Coronapod
    The Coronapod team revisit mask-use. Does public use really control the virus? And how much evidence is enough to turn the tide on this ongoing debate? News Feature: Face masks: what the data say
    19:37 Research Highlights
    A new method provides 3D printed materials with some flexibility, and why an honest post to Facebook may do you some good. Research Highlight: A promising 3D-printing method gets flexible; Research Highlight: Why Facebook users might want to show their true colours
    22:11 The best way to restore ecosystems
    Restoring degraded or human-utilised landscapes could help fight climate change and protect biodiversity. However, there are multiple costs and benefits that need to be balanced. Researchers hope a newly developed algorithm will help harmonise these factors and show the best locations to target restoration. Research Article: Strassburg et al.; News and Views: Prioritizing where to restore Earth’s ecosystems
    28:40 Briefing Chat
    We discuss some highlights from the Nature Briefing. This time, a 44 year speed record for solving a maths problem is beaten… just, and an ancient set of tracks show a mysterious journey. Quanta: Computer Scientists Break Traveling Salesperson Record; The Conversation: Fossil footprints: the fascinating story behind the longest known prehistoric journey
    Subscribe to Nature Briefing, an unmissable daily round-up of science news, opinion and analysis free in your inbox every weekday.
    Other links
    Don’t miss our latest YouTube video – Science under Trump: Four key moments
    Never miss an episode: Subscribe to the Nature Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast app. Head here for the Nature Podcast RSS feed.

    Latest on:

    An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

    Related Articles More

  • in

    Lead (Pb) bioaccumulation and antioxidative responses in Tetraena qataranse

    The evaluation of T. qataranse growth parameters suggests that Pb has no adverse effect on the plant at concentrations of less than 100 mg/L Pb. However, at 100 mg/L, the metal disturbed healthy growth and, in particular, interfered with root development. Consistent with our findings, a similar study using Z. fabago reported that Pb negatively affects root development14. The root plays a vital role in plant health and development, influencing other tissues’ response to stress conditions. Despite it being one of the most critical parameters in the assessment of plant health, a significant reduction in total chlorophyll content was observed (Fig. 1c). However, Pb toxicity symptoms (e.g., leaf chlorosis and root darkening) were not apparent across any of the treatments. Typically, Pb accumulation in plants raises the level of chlorophyllase, an enzyme that negatively affects chlorophyll. An increased level of chlorophyllase slows down photosynthesis and, therefore, affects overall growth and development. Consequently, due to slow metabolic activities, cell division is adversely affected and healthy growth is inhibited15.
    Pb accumulates differently in plant tissue parts, especially in the root22. Concerning T. qataranse Pb accumulation, overall data across all treatments indicates that T. qataranse preferentially concentrates Pb in the root (up to 2,784 mg/kg). Our result is consistent with the reports of many similar studies. For instance, known plant species, including Nerium oleander L. and Brassica juncea, accumulate higher Pb concentrations in their roots than other tissue parts16. Also, in a study involving different plants, Finster, et al.17 determined that the roots always accumulate more Pb than other plant parts, including the fruits, where only traces of the metal translocate the shoot. Our result is also in agreement with the work of Langley-Turnbaugh and Belanger18. Kumar, et al.19 and Pourrut, et al.20 conducted several critical reviews of Pb toxicity in plants and determined that several factors contribute to restricted metal translocation in plants. Of such, Casparian strip endodermis restriction is by far the most limiting for Pb. Notheless, the ability of T. qataranse to accumulate more than 1000 mg/kg Pb suggests that it is a Pb hyperaccumulator21.
    Additionally, the root BCF across all treatments was higher than that of the shoot (Fig. 2b). The BCF indicates that, to some degree, T. qataranse sequestrate Pb from growth medium that contains up to 1600 mg/kg Pb. However, it was optimal in the 50 mg/kg treatment. At this concentration, the growth medium had up to 800 mg/kg Pb. The TF under all treatments was less than 1 (Fig. 2c), meaning that T. qataranse can not sufficiently transfer Pb to its aerial parts. In the current study, the restriction of Pb translocation finding is consistent with our previous report on T. qataranse where field samples were analyzed for various metals accumulation, including Pb22. Some of the factors that affect metal bioavailability and uptake include plant and metal types; metal form, concentration, and age in the soil; pH; and organic matter content. However, pH and total organic matter content are the most critical in terms of metal bioavailability and uptake of Pb. The pH significantly affects the behavior of Pb by dictating its chemical form. Metals, including Pb, are more soluble at low or near-neutral pH values. At pH  > 8, metals tend to precipitate in the soil. Similarly, a high TOC limits the bioavailability of Pb11. In this work, the pH and TOC in the growth medium were 7.35 and 1.87%, respectively. Therefore, given the neutral pH and low TOC, their effects on Pb bioavailability and uptake by T. qataranse was insignificant and can be eliminated.
    Various response mechanisms enable plants to withstand metal toxicity, of such, metal avoidance and uptake are the most common. Before compartmentalization, Pb is translocated to a degree that can be described by the TF23. Pb mainly precipitates on the root cell wall and only the free ions are transported to other parts via the xylem and phloem cells24. Previous works confirmed that Pb disrupts cellular homeostasis by replacing essential cations and altering metal-containing enzyme activity. In plants, the primary sources of ROS are chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes. Pb toxicity interferes with electron transport chains in turn increasing ROS accumulation. Nearly every stage of the central dogma of plants (DNA, RNA, protein) is affected by Pb toxicity25.
    The antioxidant system is one mechanism used by plants for protection against metal toxicity. In this study, the result of the SOD, CAT, APX, GPX, and GR assay show increased activity of all five enzymes. SOD activity was the highest, up to ten times higher than the control (0 mg/kg Pb), particularly in the root (Fig. 3a), suggesting the critical role of SOD in T. qataranse antioxidative defense. Having the highest enzymatic activity be in the root changes root organic constituents due to Pb complexation. This indicates that, as suggested in our previous work, as an uptake mechanism, Pb ions bind to T. qataranse root by complexation through cationic exchange with hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups7. This is a well-established complexation mechanism of transition metals, including Pb1. In comparison, GR demonstrated the least activity (Fig. 3e). Such differences can be attributed to the specific roles each enzyme has in ameliorating Pb stress. Many other studies reported a similar increase in the activities of one or all the enzymes analyzed in this work following plants’ exposure to Pb; examples are increases in the activity of CAT, SOD, APX, and GPX in Ceratophyllum demersum L.26 and the cotton plant27; SOD, APX, GPX, and GR in Oryza sativa L.28; and APX, CAT, and GR in Triticum aestivum9. Changes in enzymatic activity account for the elimination of ROS and the improvement of stress conditions in plants. Therefore, the enhanced activities of all enzymes suggest that their role is crucial in ameliorating Pb toxicity in T. qataranse. Other studies support this conclusion, including Ferrer, et al.16 who attribute enhanced CAT and APX activities to the efficient ROS scavenging capability of Z. fabago exposed to Pb. In addition, Nikalje and Suprasanna30 reviewed several other similar studies involving halophytes . However, to the best of our knowledge, our work is the first on T. qataranse. In addition, primarily due to GR activity suggesting the utilization of glutathione, we can conclude that Pb detoxification in T. qataranse may partly involve glutathione metabolism30. Glutathione, which exists in either the reduced (GSH) or oxidized form (GSSG), acts as an antioxidant and chelating bioligand majorly accountable for metals detoxification. Enzymes involved in glutathione metabolism mediates detoxification Glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) are a major phase II GSH-dependent ROS scavenging enzymes. They play significant roles in GSH conjugation with exogenous and endogenous species found during oxidative stress, including H2O2 and lipid peroxides9,10. Consistent with our findings, a more recent review by Kumar and Prasad14 discussed several other studies, some of which include the use of model species, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa, all of which support our findings.
    It is worth mentioning that part of the discussion presented in this work is limited to the perspective of deciphering Pb tolerance and uptake mechanisms from metal translocation and plant antioxidative systems. However, both molecular and biochemical mechanisms play significant roles in toxic metals detoxification, including Pb. For instance, glutathione metabolism is known to regulates the biosynthesis of phytochelatins (PC), which bind Pb and transports it to vacuoles where detoxification can occur. Additionally, genes, such as glutamate cysteine ligae 1 (GSH1), glutamate cysteine ligae 1 (GSH2), phytochelatins synthase 1 (PCS1), and phytochelatins synthase 2 (PCS2), are actively involved in GSH-dependent PCs synthesis. Other primary and secondary metabolites that act as antioxidants, such as Tocols, flavonoids, anthocyanidins, and ascorbic acid, are essential to protecting plants against oxidative damage as well. The functions of these metabolites are well documented8,9,20. Further, we recognize that proteins regulate ROS signaling and the expression of such proteins changes due to Pb exposure11. Due to metal stress in plants, increased protein synthesis is essential in cellular metabolic processes. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways regulate such processes, serving as a signaling system against oxidative stress. Signaling occurs through multiple stages of the reaction, modifying gene expression and, ultimately, protein synthesis4. Therefore, our future work will focus on the differential expression of proteins, particularly those that are related to stress responses, such as the heat shock protein family, due to Pb exposure in T. qataranse. More

  • in

    The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness

    1.
    IUCN. 50 Years of Working for Protected Areas: A brief history of IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas. (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2010).
    2.
    SCBD. The CBD Programme of Work on Protected Areas. http://www.cbd.int/protected/ (2004).

    3.
    SCBD. In COP 10 Decision X/2: Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010).

    4.
    SCBD. Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/efb0/1f84/a892b98d2982a829962b6371/wg2020-02-03-en.pdf (2020).

    5.
    UNEP-WCMC, IUCN & NGS. Protected Planet Live Report 2020 (August update) https://livereport.protectedplanet.net/ (2020).

    6.
    IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020.2 (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2020).

    7.
    Coad, L. et al. Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 259–264 (2019).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    8.
    Gaston, K. J., Jackson, S. F., Cantú-Salazar, L. & Cruz-Piñón, G. The ecological performance of protected areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evolution Syst. 39, 93–113 (2008).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    9.
    Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    10.
    Andam, K. S., Ferraro, P. J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A. & Robalino, J. A. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16089–16094 (2008).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    11.
    Gray, C. L. et al. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat. Commun. 7, 12306 (2016).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    12.
    Cazalis, V., Belghali, S. & Rodrigues, A. S. L. Using a Large-scale Biodiversity Monitoring Dataset to Test the Effectiveness of Protected Areas at Conserving North-American Breeding Birds. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/433037 (2019).

    13.
    Hiley, J. R., Bradbury, R. B. & Thomas, C. D. Impacts of habitat change and protected areas on alpha and beta diversity of Mexican birds. Diversity Distrib. 22, 1245–1254 (2016).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    14.
    Cazalis, V. et al. Effectiveness of protected areas in conserving tropical forest birds. Nat. Commun. 11, 4461 (2020).
    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    15.
    Mascia, M. B. & Pailler, S. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv. Lett. 4, 9–20 (2011).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    16.
    IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs. Recognising and Reporting Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 2019).

    17.
    Visconti, P. et al. Protected area targets post-2020. Science 364, 239–241 (2019).
    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    18.
    Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Dudley, N. & Phillips, A. Evaluating Effectiveness – A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas (IUCN – The World Conservation Union, 2000).

    19.
    UNEP-WCMC. Global Database on Protected Area Management Effectiveness (August update) https://pame.protectedplanet.net/ (2020).

    20.
    Joppa, L. N. & Pfaff, A. High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE 4, e8273 (2009).
    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

    21.
    Rodrigues, A. S. L. et al. Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioScience 54, 1092–1100 (2004).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    22.
    Ferraro, P. J. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. N. Dir. Eval. 2009, 75–84 (2009).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    23.
    Gill, D. A. et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543, 665–669 (2017).
    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

    24.
    Hillebrand, H. et al. Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: consequences for conservation and monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 169–184 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar 

    25.
    Geldmann, J. et al. A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12434 (2018).
    Article  Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Most abundant metabolites in tissues of freshwater fish pike-perch (Sander lucioperca)

    In the present work, we performed quantitative metabolomic analysis for eleven biological tissues of S. lucioperca. The advantage of the quantitative approach over commonly used semi-quantitative measurements is that the obtained data on the metabolite concentrations expressed in nmoles per gram of a tissue can be directly used by any researcher as a reference to the baseline level of metabolites in that tissue. Quantitative data also allow for the comparing the tissues with very dissimilar metabolomic compositions.
    The metabolomic analysis performed in the present work demonstrates that although the majority of metabolites are common for all tissues, their concentrations in tissues may vary at a large scale. Moreover, there are some tissue-specific compounds with very high abundance in only 1–2 types of tissue. The examples of such metabolites are glycine, histidine, creatine, and betaine in muscle, ovothiol A in lens, NAA in lens and brain, glucose in liver. Apparently, these compounds are important for biological functions specific for these particular tissues.
    Two groups of metabolites, osmolytes and antioxidants, play the key role in the cell protection against osmotic and oxidative stresses. In this work, the following compounds were conventionally assigned to osmolytes: taurine, myo-inositol, NAH, NAA, betaine, threonine-phosphoethanolamine (Thr-PETA), and Ser-PETA. Obviously, this assignment is rather arbitrary: some of these compounds, besides osmotic protection, perform other cellular functions, including cell signaling, providing substrate for biosynthesis, and so on17,18,19. At the same time, the tissues under study contain metabolites with concentrations of the same level or even higher than the concentrations of compounds assigned to osmolytes: lactate, glucose, acetate, creatine. These metabolites are mostly related to the reactions of cellular energy generation, and their concentrations should strongly depend on the fish activity. For that reason, in this work we did not include them into the list of osmolytes. Figure 6 shows the concentrations of osmolytes in different fish tissues (excluding acellular tissues AH and VH), and demonstrates that the composition of osmolytes in tissues strongly depends on the cell type.
    Figure 6

    Concentrations of major osmolytes (in µmol/g) in S. lucioperca tissues.

    Full size image

    We found in the fish tissues the following compounds with antioxidative properties: glutathione (GSH), ascorbate, OSH, and NADH. The detection of minor amounts of one more well-known thiol antioxidant, ergothioneine, in the gills of another freshwater fish, R. rutilus lacustris, has recently been reported15; however, in the present work ergothioneine was not found neither by NMR nor by LC–MS in any of the studied tissues of S. lucioperca. NADH was found only in NMR spectra of liver, muscle, heart, and lens, and its concentration in these tissues does not exceed 15 nmol/g. GSH, OSH, and ascorbate are present in much higher concentrations in the majority of the fish tissues, so these three compounds play the main role in the cellular defense against the oxidative stress. The presence and the relative abundance of GSH and OSH in the fish tissues were confirmed by LC–MS data.
    The metabolomic features of particular fish tissues are discussed below.
    AH and VH
    AH and VH are acellular fluids with minimal metabolic activity. AH is produced in the ciliary epithelium through both the active secretion and the passive diffusion/ultrafiltration of blood plasma20,21,22,23. Consequently, the metabolomic composition of AH is similar to that of plasma10. VH is also connected with blood via the hematoophthalmic barrier24 and with AH, and one can see (Table 1, Fig. 2) that the metabolomic compositions of AH and VH are close to each other. Thus, it is safe to assume that the levels of metabolites in AH and VH reflect their levels in blood plasma, which circulates through the majority of fish tissues. Significant deviations of metabolite levels in tissue as compared to plasma should be attributed to the intracellular metabolic activity specific for this particular tissue.
    Lens
    The eye lens is one of the most anatomically isolated tissues. The lens mostly consists of metabolically inert fiber cells without nuclei and organelles with the exception of metabolically active epithelial monolayer. The data present in Table 1 indicate that the lens contains very high levels of proteinogenic amino acids: for some amino acids (for example, branched-chain amino acids, glutamine, aspartate) their levels in the lens are more than ten-fold higher than that in AH. Moreover, the concentrations of the majority of amino acids in the lens are higher than in any other fish tissue. The elevated levels of amino acids in the lens has been noticed many years ago25, and it was attributed to the active amino acid transport from AH to lens26,27,28,29. These amino acids are presumably needed to synthesize high protein content (up to 40% of the total lens weight), which is in turn needed to provide high refraction coefficient.
    The fish lens contains a unique set of osmolytes and antioxidants. The lens osmolytes are myo-inositol, NAH, NAA, Thr-PETA, and Ser-PETA. We have previously shown15 that the concentrations of osmolytes in the fish lens undergo significant seasonal variations. At the late winter time, when the fish was caught for this study, the most abundant lens osmolyte is myo-inositol. High concentrations of this compound are also found in other fish tissues, including brain, gill, and spleen. Thr-PETA and Ser-PETA are also among the most abundant metabolites in the majority of the fish tissues. In opposite, NAH and NAA are present in high concentrations only in the fish lens and brain. At the same time, the concentration of taurine, which is the most abundant osmolyte in all other fish tissues, in the lens is rather low.
    The major antioxidant of the fish lens is OSH12. It has been shown that the level of OSH in S. lucioperca lens vary from 3 µmol/g at autumn to 1.5 µmol/g at winter15, which is in a good agreement with our present data (Table 1). The concentration of the second most abundant lens antioxidant, GSH, is 3–4 times lower than that of OSH. Taking into account the properties of OSH30,31,32,33, it has been proposed12,34 that OSH is a primary protector against the oxidative stress, while the main function of GSH in the lens is the maintenance of OSH in the reduced state. It should be noticed that although OSH was also found in other fish tissues (Table 1, Fig. 2), its concentration in these tissues is significantly lower than in the lens. Therefore, in respect to fish, OSH can truly be called “lenticular antioxidant”.
    High concentrations of amino acids, osmolytes, antioxidants and some other compounds in the lens indicate that these metabolites are either synthesized in metabolically active epithelial cells, or pumped into the lens from AH against the concentration gradient with the use of specific transporters also located in the epithelial layer. The fiber cells of the lens are metabolically passive, and fresh metabolites can appear in these cells only due to the diffusion from the epithelial layer toward the lens center. Therefore, one can expect that the concentrations of the most important metabolites decrease from the lens cortex toward the lens nucleus. To check this assumption, we measured the metabolomic profiles for cortex and nucleus separately. The measurements were performed for three lenses; then the ratios of the metabolite concentrations in the cortex to that in the nucleus were calculated and averaged. The results of the calculations are shown in Fig. 7 (only for metabolites with the highest and the lowest cortex/nucleus ratios) and Supplementary Table S2 (for all metabolites). Indeed, the levels of the majority of metabolites in the lens nucleus are significantly lower than in the cortex. For five metabolites, namely ATP, NAA, inosinate, ADP, and GSH the difference exceeds the factor of thirty; that means that these compounds are almost completely depleted during their diffusion toward the lens nucleus.
    Figure 7

    Barplot for statistically significant differences in the metabolomic content of lens cortex and nucleus. Bars show the averaged ratio of metabolite concentrations in the cortex to that in the nucleus of the S. lucioperca lens.

    Full size image

    Brain
    The brain tissue similarly to the lens is isolated from the vascular system by means of the hematoencephalic barrier. However, in opposite to the lens, brain is very metabolically active tissue, as in particular indicated by the high level of lactate (14 µmol/g). Similar lactate concentrations were found only in muscle and heart (Table 1). Besides lactate, the most abundant metabolites of the fish brain are osmolytes myo-inositol, Ser-PETA, taurine, Thr-PETA, NAH, and NAA; the concentrations of these compounds in brain are in the range from 2.5 to 13 µmol/g (Table 1). The brain tissue also contains high levels of glutamate and creatine, which are used by brain cells for the cellular energy generation. The level of antioxidant ascorbate in brain (400 nmol/g) is significantly higher than in other fish tissues, which indicates the importance of ascorbate for the brain correct operation. Besides ascorbate, the brain tissue also contains OSH and GSH, but at significantly lower concentrations (100–200 nmol/g).
    Blood-rich organs: liver, spleen, milt, muscle, heart, gill, kidney
    Figure 4 demonstrates that from the metabolomic viewpoint, gill, kidney, milt, and spleen are the most similar tissues. However, the quantitative analysis indicates significant differences. In particular, spleen does not contain measurable by NMR amounts of antioxidants OSH and GSH. The levels of osmolytes are also different: the concentration of taurine in spleen is threefold higher than in gill and milt, while the level of myo-inositol in milt is much lower than in spleen and gill (Fig. 6). Significant differences are also found for some amino acids (alanine, creatine), organic acids (lactate, GABA), and nucleosides (ATP, ADP, AMP, inosine).
    One of the important liver functions is the maintaining the glucose level in blood regulated by producing glucose from stored glycogen. Correspondingly, the level of glucose in liver is extremely high (40 µmol/g), which is higher than in any other tissue by at least an order of magnitude. Liver also contains elevated (as compared to other tissues) concentrations of threonine, glutamate, succinate, fumarate, AMP, and nicotinamide.
    The biological functions of muscle and heart are relatively similar; however, the metabolomic compositions of these tissues differ significantly. The main osmolyte in muscle cells is taurine (30 µmol/g), while in heart the osmotic protection is shared between taurine (15 µmol/g) and Ser-PETA (12 µmol/g). Muscle contains very high levels of glycine and histidine. Glycine is known to protect muscles from wasting under various wasting conditions35,36, while histidine and histidine-related compounds were reported to play the role of intracellular proton buffering constituents in vertebrate muscle37. Very likely that both glycine and histidine also participate in the osmotic protection of the muscle cells. The level of creatine—the energy source—in muscle (23 µmol/g) is five-fold higher than in heart. More

  • in

    Transcriptome sequencing of cochleae from constant-frequency and frequency-modulated echolocating bats

    Quality control of the full-length transcriptomes
    The FL transcriptomes for R. a. hainanus, R. a. himalayanus and Myotis ricketti were constructed based on sequencing data of three separated libraries on the PacBio Sequel platform. Specifically, a total of 3,444,947 subreads with 6,448,987,299 nucleotides, 3,255,638 subreads with 6,504,282,447 nucleotides and 3,403,451 subreads with 7,190,237,257 nucleotides were generated for R. a. hainanus, R. a. himalayanus and Myotis ricketti respectively. After quality control, we obtained 137,159 circular consensus sequencing (CCS) reads for R. a. hainanus, 137,160 CCS reads for R. a. himalayanus and 152,251 CCS reads for Myotis ricketti. With the standard IsoSeq. 3 classification and clustering pipeline, we identified 111,806 FLNC for R. a. hainanus, 105,713 FLNC for R. a. himalayanus and 122,222 FLNC for Myotis ricketti. After isoform-level polishing, 10384, 9984 and 10932 high quality isoforms were retained in R. a. hainanus, R. a. himalayanus and Myotis ricketti respectively. After removing redundancy with CD-HIT-EST and filtering isoforms shorter than 200 bp, the final FL transcriptomes for R. a. hainanus, R. a. himalayanus and Myotis ricketti (FL-CF-Rhai, FL-CF-Rhim and FL-FM-Myo, respectively) contain 10103, 9676 and 10504 FL isoforms with an average length of 2251, 2370 and 2530 bp, respectively (Table 2). Finally, the FL transcriptome from both CF and FM bats (FL-CF-FM) contains 26,342 transcripts with an average length of 2,405 bp (Table 2). BUSCO analysis revealed that a total of 2,354 (57.4%) BUSCOs were included in FL-CF-FM. We also found 39.9%, 38.1% and 41.9% BUSCOs in FL-CF-Rhai, FL-CF-Rhim and FL-FM-Myo, respectively (Table 4). Given the highly specialized function of the cochlea, we should not expect a high level of BUSCO value in FL transcriptome of cochlea. A recent single cell RNA-seq study has identified a similar number of genes expressed in the murine cochlea (a total of 12,944)30.
    Table 4 Completeness of each of the four FL transcriptomes assessed by benchmarking universal single-copy ortholog (BUSCO) analysis.
    Full size table

    Quality control of annotation
    Four FL transcriptomes (FL-CF-Rhai, FL-CF-Rhim, FL-FM-Myo, and FL-CF-FM) were functionally annotated by performing DIAMOND and BLASTx searches against the Nr and UniProt databases separately. For FL-CF-FM, 24,793 and 24,198 transcripts were annotated by Nr database and UniProt database, respectively (Table 3). After combining the annotation results from the two databases, a total of 24,833 transcripts were annotated in at least one database. We obtained similar annotation results for FL-CF-Rhai, FL-CF-Rhim and FL-FM-Myo (Table 3). Transcripts without annotations might be novel isoforms of echolocating animals or due to the lack of representative sequences for cochlea in public databases. More

  • in

    GalliForm, a database of Galliformes occurrence records from the Indo-Malay and Palaearctic, 1800–2008

    These methods are an expanded version of those in our related work, Boakes et al.15.
    The database was compiled over the period 2005–2008. Data collection equates to around 1500 person-days and data were gathered by a team of 21 people. Between them, team members were fluent in English, French, German, Mandarin, Russian, Spanish and Swedish. These languages were extremely helpful in transcribing museum specimen labels and in translating publications. However, the majority of publications were in English and we acknowledge that the database will be biased toward records published in English-language publications.
    Our study focuses on the 130 galliform species that occur within the Palaearctic and Indo-Malay biogeographic realms22 (see Online-only Table 1). We have additionally included records of the Imperial Pheasant (Lophura imperialis) although it is now recognised that this is a hybrid and not a species. The geographic range of two of the species in the database, the Red Grouse (Lagopus lagopus) and the Rock Ptarmigan (Lagopus muta), extends to North America. North American data was often included in the information which museums sent us and in these instances we entered those records into the database since we thought they might be of use to researchers studying these species. However, it should be noted that we did not search exhaustively for records of these species in North America, we have merely included those that we came across.
    We attempted to gather all species distribution data that could be accessed from five different sources; museum collections, literature records, banding (ringing) data, ornithological atlases and birdwatchers’ trip report websites. For each data source, exhaustive and systematic search strategies were adopted.
    Museum collections
    Using web-based searches and Roselaar23, 377 natural history collections were identified. We found contact details for 338 of these collections and requested by email or letter a list of the Galliformes in their holdings along with collection localities and dates. Non-respondents were recontacted. 135 museums were able to share data with us (see Online-only Table 2). Museum records were obtained through publicly available online databases e.g. ORNIS, electronic or paper catalogues sent to us by the museums or by visiting the museums and transcribing data directly from specimens or card catalogues. Almost half of the museums we contacted did not respond despite at least one follow-up enquiry, and there was substantial variation in the amount and format of data contributed by those that did reply. Altogether, over 50% of the records came from just six museums (Natural History Museum, London; Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg; Zoological Museum of Lomonosov Moscow State University; Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago; American Museum of Natural History, New York; National Museum of Natural History, Leiden), a single museum (the Natural History Museum, London) contributing nearly 20% of the museum records that could be georeferenced and dated15. Following databasing and/or georeferencing, records were returned to larger collections and to those who had requested the data.
    Literature
    Data from the literature were added to those previously collected by McGowan24. Entire series of key English-language international and regional ornithological journals such as Ibis, Bird Conservation International, Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, and Kukila were scanned for relevant information, availability allowing. We began at the library of the Zoological Society of London and followed up missing journal issues at the BirdLife International library, Cambridge UK; the British Library, London, UK; the Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, UK. Relevant Chinese literature was also scanned. Additionally, data were obtained from regional reports, personal diaries, letters, newsletters etc stored in the archives of BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK; the World Pheasant Association, Newcastle, UK; the Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, UK. Several of the species/regional experts we consulted also contributed their personal records which were recorded in the database as ‘personal communications’. As far as it were possible, records were classed as primary or secondary data within the ‘dynamicProperties’ field of GalliForm14. It is important to note that some primary records or museum specimens will be duplicated within the database in the secondary data.
    Banding records
    Eighty-three ornithological banding groups were identified using web-based searches and were contacted via email. Thirty of these groups replied and only seven were able to provide us with data (see Table 1). The majority of galliform species tend not to be banded due to their large body sizes and spurs. Additionally, many of the banding groups kept their records on paper and were not able to send them to us. Nevertheless, we were able to access and georeference 15,152 banding records.
    Table 1 The ringing groups that shared data with GalliForm.
    Full size table

    Ornithological atlases
    We digitised location data from 20 ornithological atlases (see Table 2). Data from several other atlases were not used since the range of dates for the records was wider than 20 years.
    Table 2 The atlases that were digitised to be included in GalliForm.
    Full size table

    Trip report website data
    We used the two trip report websites that were popular with birders during the data recording period (2005–2008), www.travellingbirder.com and www.birdtours.co.uk. At that time, eBird (probably the most relevant current online source today) did not cover the majority of the countries within our study region, and our intention with the deposition of this dataset is to focus on pre-eBird data that are more difficult and time consuming to access. We extracted data from all trip reports of birdwatching visits to European, Asian and North African countries. Care was taken to enter reports that featured on both websites once only.
    Criteria for data inclusion
    To be included in the database, records had to meet the following criteria:
    1.
    The record identified the species of the bird concerned.

    2.
    The record contained either a verbal description of the locality at which the bird concerned was observed or the co-ordinates at which the bird was observed.

    Records of captive birds were excluded. Records relating to non-native occurrences were included but were flagged in the ‘establishmentMeans’ field as “introduced”.
    Data entry
    GalliForm14 was originally compiled in the programme Microsoft Access 2003. To maximise uniformity in data entry, all data recorders were given thorough and consistent training and each was provided with a set of database guidelines. An Access Database form was created to standardise data entry and to enable multiple members of the team to collect data simultaneously.
    Each entry in GalliForm14 corresponds to a single record of a single species recorded in a specific location. The data fields of GalliForm14 are described in Online-only Table 3. The taxonomy used has been updated to be consistent with the BirdLife International 2019 taxonomy (datazone.birdlife.org). All information was entered exactly as it was described in the data source, with as much information extracted as possible. Multiple records from different sources which recorded the same information were still included in the interest of completeness. The only exception to this is the trip report data in which we did not enter identical records which occurred on both the Travelling Birder and Bird Tours websites.
    The source of the data, i.e. literature, museum, atlas, ringing or website trip report is recorded in the ‘dynamicProperties’ field under the code “dataSource”. For literature data, (where known) the nature of the record, i.e. primary or secondary, is recorded under the code “datatype”.
    Taxonomy has of course changed considerably over time. To allow for this we recorded the taxonomy as it was described in the data source in the ‘originalNameUsage’ field. The current taxonomy was then selected from a look-up table. If at the time of data entry, the data compiler was unsure which species the synonym referred to, the species was tagged as “unknown” and the species was designated at a later date following further research on the synonym.
    Identical localities can also be described in multiple ways. We recorded the locality as it was given in the data source in the ‘verbatimLocality’ field. If the ‘verbatimLocality’ clearly tallied with a locality already within the database, the record was linked to that locality in order to increase georeferencing efficiency.
    It was rare for a source to record absence of evidence, i.e. a survey for a species at a particular locality which failed to find that species. However, in the few cases where we did come across such records, the locality and date of the survey were recorded and “absent” was recorded in the ‘occurrenceStatus’ field.
    Each record refers to an independent observation. For museum and ringing records, this means a single individual. For literature, atlas or trip report records this may refer to a group of birds observed in one particular locality, on one particular day. If given, the number of total individuals is recorded in the ‘individualCount’ field. The number of males and females is recorded in the ‘sex’ field and the number of juveniles and adults in the ‘lifeStage’ field. If the ‘lifeStage’ field is blank, it is reasonable to assume the individual(s) is an adult.
    Occasionally, additional information about the observation might be included in the data source, for example the habitat the bird was observed in or whether the bird was common or rare in that locality. These data are recorded in the ‘habitat’ and ‘organismQuantity’ fields, respectively. Any additional information which did not fit within the structure of the database was recorded in the ‘occurrenceRemarks’ field, along with any notes found on museum labels.
    For the purposes of data deposition, the database was converted to a tab-delimited CSV file with all fields following Darwin Core format. A full summary of these fields is given in Online-only Table 3.
    Georeferencing
    Locality descriptions were converted to geographic co-ordinates using a wide range of atlases and gazetteers, co-ordinates generally only being assigned if accurate to one degree (although in the majority of cases the locations were accurate to within 30 minutes, Table 3). We would initially search for a locality within the gazetteers available to us at the time. If the locality was not listed within those gazetteers we would search for the locality using atlases. Since this fieldwork was conducted, MaNIS standards have become widely used for studies of this kind, but these weren’t fully developed at the time of data collection25. Named places, e.g. towns or counties, were georeferenced using their geographic centre and georeferencing uncertainty measured from the centre to the edge of the named place. Often localities were given simply as the name of a river, mountain or Protected Area. In these instances we used the midpoint of the river between source and mouth (uncertainty measured as distance from midpoint to source/mouth), the summit of the mountain (uncertainty measured as distance from summit to approximate mountain foot) and the rough centre of the Protected Area (uncertainty measured as distance from centre to Protected Area edge). If a particular locality description matched two or more places their midpoint was taken (uncertainty measured as distance from midpoint to place). Offsets from localities (e.g. “50 km N of Kuala Lumpur”; “8 miles along the road from Sheffield to Chesterfield”) were measured using a digital atlas (uncertainty was approximated at the georeferencer’s discretion in these instances, usually between 3 and 10 arc-minutes, depending on the vagueness of the offset.) For georeferencing done ‘in house’, the gazeteer/atlas used was recorded.
    Table 3 Georeference and date completeness of the records.
    Full size table

    When possible, localities we could not georeference ourselves were sent to regional experts.
    92% of our localities are georeferenced to an accuracy of 30 minutes, corresponding to 82% of occurrence records (see Table 3).
    We had less success at georeferencing museum records than literature records15, due in part to difficulties in reading hand-writing on specimen labels. Older records were also harder to georeference, presumably due to changes in place names over time, and to some early ornithologists failing to document the collection locality. As might be expected, localities from countries that do not use the Roman alphabet were also harder to georeference.
    Some records were excluded from the database based on their locality: records which we thought were trading localities, notably Malacca in Malaysia and Leadenhall Market in the UK; records from captive specimens, e.g. zoological gardens.
    Dating
    49% of records are dated to within an accuracy of one year. Where possible, we assigned date ranges to undated records. For example, if the name of the collector was given on a museum specimen and we knew when that collector was active in that region, we assigned a date range covering that period. There remain undated records which could perhaps be dated in this way. Undated literature records were designated as occurring before their publication date. We were able to date 89% of records to within 10 years. More

  • in

    Author Correction: Soil carbon loss by experimental warming in a tropical forest

    Affiliations

    School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
    Andrew T. Nottingham & Patrick Meir

    Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama
    Andrew T. Nottingham, Esther Velasquez & Benjamin L. Turner

    Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
    Patrick Meir

    Authors
    Andrew T. Nottingham

    Patrick Meir

    Esther Velasquez

    Benjamin L. Turner

    Corresponding author
    Correspondence to Andrew T. Nottingham. More

  • in

    Arresting predators

    Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. More