Griggs, D. et al. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495, 305–307 (2013).
FAOSTAT: FAO Statistical Databases (FAO, 2020).
Bai, Z. et al. China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Sci. Adv. 4, r8534 (2018).
Oenema, O. Nitrogen budgets and losses in livestock systems. Int. Congr. Ser. 1293, 262–271 (2006).
Sutton, M. A. et al. Our Nutrient World: The Challenge to Produce More Food and Energy with Less Pollution (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 2013).
van Grinsven, H. J. M. et al. Reducing external costs of nitrogen pollution by relocation of pig production between regions in the European Union. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 2403–2415 (2018).
Sutton, M. A. et al. Too much of a good thing. Nature 472, 159–161 (2011).
Gu, B., Zhang, X., Bai, X., Fu, B. & Chen, D. Four steps to food security for swelling cities. Nature 566, 31–33 (2019).
Zhang, C. et al. Rebuilding the linkage between livestock and cropland to mitigate agricultural pollution in China. Resour. Conserv Recycl. 144, 65–73 (2019).
Gu, B., Ju, X., Chang, S. X., Ge, Y. & Chang, J. Nitrogen use efficiencies in Chinese agricultural systems and implications for food security and environmental protection. Reg. Environ. Change 17, 1217–1227 (2017).
Gu, B., Ju, X., Chang, J., Ge, Y. & Vitousek, P. M. Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8792–8797 (2015).
Ma, L. et al. Exploring future food provision scenarios for China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1385–1393 (2018).
Wu, Y. et al. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7010–7015 (2018).
Ju, X., Gu, B., Wu, Y. & Galloway, J. N. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Glob. Environ. Change 41, 26–32 (2016).
Fan, L. et al. Decreasing farm number benefits the mitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26, 464–472 (2019).
Naylor, R. Losing the links between livestock and land. Science 310, 1621–1622 (2005).
Willems, J. et al. Why Danish pig farms have far more land and pigs than Dutch farms? Implications for feed supply, manure recycling and production costs. Agric. Syst. 144, 122–132 (2016).
Garnier, J. et al. Reconnecting crop and cattle farming to reduce nitrogen losses to river water of an intensive agricultural catchment (Seine basin, France): past, present and future. Environ. Sci. Policy 63, 76–90 (2016).
National Data (National Bureau of China, 2019).
Bai, X., Shi, P. & Liu, Y. Society: realizing China’s urban dream. Nature 509, 158–160 (2014).
Zheng, C., Liu, Y., Bluemling, B., Mol, A. P. J. & Chen, J. Environmental potentials of policy instruments to mitigate nutrient emissions in Chinese livestock production. Sci. Total Environ. 502, 149–156 (2015).
Cui, Z. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).
Bai, Z. et al. China’s pig relocation in balance. Nat. Sustain. 2, 888 (2019).
Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).
van Grinsven, H. J. M. et al. Costs and benefits of nitrogen for Europe and implications for mitigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3571–3579 (2013).
Oenema, O. et al. in The European Nitrogen Assessment: Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives (eds M. A. Sutton et al.) 62–81 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
The Technical Guidelines for Measuring the Bearing Capacity of Soil Contaminated by Livestock and Poultry Manure (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2018).
Gu, B. et al. Toward a generic analytical framework for sustainable nitrogen management: application for China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1109–1118 (2019).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
