in

Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods

  • 1.

    Gaynor, K. M. et al. War and wildlife: linking armed conflict to conservation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 533–542 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 2.

    Hanson, T. et al. Warfare in biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Biol. 23, 578–587 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Machlis, G. E. & Hanson, T. Warfare ecology. BioScience 58, 729–736 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Ordway, E. M. Political shifts and changing forests: Effects of armed conflict on forest conservation in Rwanda. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 448–60 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 5.

    Alvarez, M. Forests in the time of violence: conservation implications of the Colombian war. J. Sustain. For. 16, 47–68 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 6.

    Reuveny, R., Mihalache-O’Keef, A. S. & Li, Q. The effect of warfare on the environment. J. Peace Res. 47, 749–761 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 7.

    Jarvie, J., Kanaan, R., Malley, M., Roule, T. & Thomson, J. Conflict Timber: Dimensions of the Problem in Asia and Africa, Volume II, Asian Cases. Final report submitted to the United States Agency for International Development. Burlington, VT: ARD. (2003).

  • 8.

    Baker, M. et al. Conflict timber: Dimensions of the problem in Asia and Africa, Volume III, African cases. Final report submitted to the United States Agency for International Development. Burlington, VT: ARD, https://rmportal.net/library/content/conflict/ARD-ConflictTimber-Vol3-Asia-Africa-PNACT464.pdf/view (2003)

  • 9.

    Adano, W. R., Dietz, T., Witsenburg, K. & Zaal, F. Climate change, violent conflict and local institutions in Kenya’s drylands. J. Peace Res. 49, 65–80 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Beyers, R. L. et al. Resource wars and conflict ivory: the impact of civil conflict on elephants in the Democratic Republic of Congo – the case of the Okapi Reserve. PLoS ONE 6, e27129 (2001).

  • 11.

    Baral, N. & Heinen, J. The Maoist people’s war and conservation in Nepal. Polit. Life Sci. 24, 2–11 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 12.

    Dudley, J. P., Ginsberg, J. R. & Plumptre, A. J. Effects of war and civil strife on wildlife and wildlife habitats. Conserv. Biol. 16, 319–29 (2002).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 13.

    Aveling, R., Anthem, H. & Lanjouw, A. A fighting chance: can conservation create a platform for peace within cycles of human conflict? (Eds. Leader-Williams, N., Adams, W. M. & Smith, R. J.), Trade-Offs in Conservation: Deciding What to Save 253–255 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).

  • 14.

    Witmer, F. D. W. Detecting war-induced abandoned agricultural land in northeast Bosnia using multispectral, multitemporal Landsat TM imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 29, 3805–3831 (2008).

  • 15.

    Hallagan, J. B. Elephants and war in Zimbabwe. Oryx 16, 161–64 (1981).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Kim, K. C. Preserving biodiversity in Korea’s demilitarized zone. Science 278, 242–43 (1997).

  • 17.

    Kaimowitz, D. & Fauné, A. Contras and comandantes. J. Sustain. For. 16, 21–46 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 18.

    Burgess, R., Miguel, E. & Stanton, C. War and deforestation in Sierra Leone. Environ. Res. Lett. 10(2015), 095014 (2015).

  • 19.

    Yin, H. et al. Agricultural abandonment and re-cultivation during and after the Chechen Wars in the northern Caucasus. Global Environ. Chang. 55, 149–159 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 20.

    Baumann, M., Radeloff, V. C., Avedian, V. & Kuemmerle, T. Land-use change in the Caucasus during and afte the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Reg Environ Change 15(8), 1703–1716 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Harding, A. How wars and poverty have saved DR Congo’s forests. BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-16037543 (2011).

  • 22.

    Enaruvbe, G. O., Keculah, K. M., Atedhor, G. O. & Osewole, A. O. Armed conflict and mining induced land-use transition in northern Nimba County, Liberia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00597 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 23.

    Grima, N. & Singh, S. J. How the end of armed conflicts influence forest cover and subsequently ecosystem services provision? An analysis of four case studies in biodiversity hotspots. Land Use Policy 81, 267–75 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 24.

    Gorsevski, V., Geores, M. & Kasischke, E. Human dimensions of land use and land cover change related to civil unrest in the Imatong Mountains of South Sudan. Appl. Geogr. 38, 64–75 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 25.

    Sesnie, S. E., Gessler, P., Finegan, B. & Thessler, S. Integrating Landsat TM and SRTM-DEM derived variables with decision trees for habitat classification and change detection in complex neotropical environments. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 2145–59 (2008).

  • 26.

    UNODC- United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime, 2015. World Drug Report 2015. (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.15.XI.6). eISBN: 978-92-1-057300-9

  • 27.

    Armenteras, D., Rodriguez, N. & Retana, J. Landscape dynamics in northwestern Amazonia: an assessment of pastures, fire and illicit crops as drivers of tropical deforestation. PLoS One 8(1), e54310 (2013).

  • 28.

    Clerici, N. et al. Peace in Colombia is a critical moment for Neotropical connectivity and conservation: Save the northern Andes-Amazon biodiversity bridge. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12594 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    McSweeney, K. et al. Drug policy as conservation policy: narco-deforestation. Science 343, 489–90 (2014).

  • 30.

    Negret, P. J. et al. Emerging evidence that armed conflict and coca cultivation influence deforestation patterns. Biol. Conserv. 239, 108176 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Fergusson, L., Romero, D. & Vargas, J. F. The Environmental Impact of Civil Conflict: The Deforestation Effect of Paramilitary Expansion in Colombia. Serie Documentos CEDE No. 2014-36. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2516512 (2014).

  • 32.

    Dourojeanni, M. Environmental impact of coca cultivation and cocaine production in the Amazon region of Peru. Bull. Narc. 44(2), 37–53 (1992).

    • CAS
    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Salisbury, D. & Fagan, C. Coca and conservation: cultivation, eradication and trafficking in the Amazon borderlands. GeoJournal 78, 41–60 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Dávalos, L. M., Sanchez, K. M. & Armenteras, D. Deforestation and coca cultivation rooted in twentieth-century development projects. Bioscience 66, 974–982, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw118 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Rincón-Ruiz, A. & Kallis, G. Caught in the middle, Colombia’s war on drugs and its effects on forest and people. Geoforum 46, 60–78 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 36.

    Nkonya, E., Johnson, T., Kwon, H. Y. & Kato E., Economics of Land Degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa in: Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement – A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development (ed. Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A. & von Braun, J.) 215–259 (Springer, 2016).

  • 37.

    Murillo Sandoval, P. J., Van Dexter, K., Van Den Hoek, J. & Wrathall, D. The end of gunpoint conservation: Forest disturbance after the Colombian peace agreement. Environ Res Lett. in press, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6ae3 (2020).

  • 38.

    Etter, A., Mcalpine, C. & Possingham, H. Historical Patterns and Drivers of Landscape Change in Colombia Since 1500: A Regionalized Spatial Approach. An. Assoc. Amer. Geog. 98, 2–23 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Armenteras, D., Espelta, J. M., Rodríguez, N. & Retana, J. Deforestation dynamics and drivers in different forest types in Latin America: Three decades of studies (1980–2010). Global Environ. Chang. 46, 139–147 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Etter, A., McAlpine, C., Wilson, K., Phinn, S. & Possingham, H. Regional patterns of agricultural land use and deforestation in Colombia. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ 114, 369–386 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 41.

    Armenteras, D., Cabrera, E., Rodríguez, N. & Retana, J. National and regional determinants of tropical deforestation in Colombia. Reg. Environ. Chang. 13, 1181–1193 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 42.

    Dávalos, L. M., Holmes, J. S., Rodríguez, N. & Armenteras, D. Demand for beef is unrelated to pasture expansion in northwestern Amazonia. Biol Conserv. 170, 64–73 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 43.

    Armenteras, D., Rodríguez, N., Retana, J. & Morales, M. Understanding deforestation in montane and lowland forests of the Colombian Andes. Reg. Environ. Chang. 11, 693–705 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 44.

    Dávalos, L. M. et al. Forests and Drugs: Coca-Driven Deforestation in Tropical Biodiversity Hotspots. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 1219–1227 (2011).

  • 45.

    Chadid, M., Dávalos, L., Molina, J. & Armenteras, D. A Bayesian Spatial Model Highlights Distinct Dynamics in Deforestation from Coca and Pastures in an Andean Biodiversity Hotspot. Forests. 6, 3828–3846 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 46.

    Armenteras, D., Rudas, G., Rodríguez, N., Sua, S. & Romero, M. Patterns and causes of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon. Ecol Indic 6(2), 353–368 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 47.

    Dávalos, L. The San Lucas mountain range in Colombia: how much conservation is owed to the violence? Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 69–78 (2001).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Forero-Medina, G. & Joppa, L. Representation of Global and National Conservation Priorities by Colombia’s Protected Area Network. PLoS ONE 5(10), e13210, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013210 (2010).

  • 49.

    Joppa, L. N., Loarie, S. R. & Pimm, S. L. On the protection of “protected areas”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6673–6678 (2008).

  • 50.

    Coad, L. et al. Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17(5), 259–264 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 51.

    DeFries, R., Hansen, A., Newton, A. C. & Hansen, M. C. Increasing Isolation of Protected Areas in Tropical Forests over the past Twenty Years. Ecol. Appl. 15, 19–26 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Joppa, L. N. & Pfaff, A. Reassessing the forest impacts of protection: The challenge of nonrandom location and a corrective method. Ann Ny Acad Sci 1185, 135–149 (2010).

  • 53.

    Gray, C. L. et al. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat. Commun. 7, 12306 (2016).

  • 54.

    Armenteras, D., Rodriguez, N. & Retana, J. Are conservation strategies effective in avoiding the deforestation of the Colombian Guyana Shield? Biol. Conserv. 142, 1411–1419 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Rodriguez, N., Armenteras, D. & Retana, J. Land use and land cover change in the Colombian Andes: dynamics and future scenarios. J. Land Use Sci 7, 1–21 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 56.

    Comisionado para la Paz Acuerdo final para la terminación del conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera. available at, http://www.altocomisionadoparalapaz.gov.co/procesos-y-conversaciones/acuerdo-general/Paginas/inicio.aspx (2016).

  • 57.

    Reardon, S. FARC and the forest: peace is destroying Colombia’s jungle – and opening it to science. Nature 558, 169–170 (2018).

  • 58.

    Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

  • 59.

    Prugh, L. R., Hodges, K. E., Sinclair, A. R. E. & Brashares, J. S. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20770–20775 (2008).

  • 60.

    Laurance, W. F. et al. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489, 290–294 (2012).

  • 61.

    Giam, X. Global biodiversity loss from tropical deforestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5775–5777 (2017).

  • 62.

    Solar, R. R. et al. How pervasive is biotic homogenization in human‐modified tropical forest landscapes? Ecol. Lett. 18, 1108–1118 (2015).

  • 63.

    Walker, N. F., Patel, S. A. & Kalif, K. A. B. From Amazon pasture to the High Street: deforestation and the Brazilian cattle product supply chain. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 6, 446–467 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 64.

    SIMCI-UNODC- Sistema Integrado de Monitoreo de Cultivos Ilícitos (SIMCI)-Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (UNODC) Informe de Monitoreo de Territorios Afectados por Cultivos Ilícitos, 2017. Available at, https://www.unodc.org/documents/crop-monitoring/Colombia/Colombia_Monitoreo_territorios_afectados_cultivos_ilicitos_2017_Resumen.pdf (2018).

  • 65.

    Rincón-Ruiz, A., Correa, H. L., León, D. O. & Williams, S. 2016. Coca cultivation and crop eradication in Colombia: The challenges of integrating rural reality into effective anti-drug policy. Int. J. Drug Policy 33, 56–65 (2016).

  • 66.

    Berry, A. Legal, political and economic aspects of the tragedy in rural Colombia in recent decades: hypothesis for analysis. Estud. Socio-Juríd. 16(1), 25–41 (2014).

  • 67.

    GBO-4, Global Biodiversity Outlook. 2014. Pyeongchang, Korea, https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/.

  • 68.

    Lerner, A. M., Zuluaga, A. F., Chará, J., Etter, A. & Searchinger, T. Sustainable Cattle Ranching in Practice: Moving from Theory to Planning in Colombia’s Livestock Sector. Environ. Manage. 60, 176–184 (2017).

  • 69.

    Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo de Colombia. Informes de Turismo, http://www.mincit.gov.co/estudios-economicos/estadisticas-e-informes/informes-de-turismo (2018).

  • 70.

    Yen, P., Ziegler, S., Huettmann, F. & Onyeahialam, A. I. Change detection of forest and habitat resources from 1973 to 2001 in Bach Ma National Park, Vietnam, using remote sensing imagery. Int For Rev 7, 1–8 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 71.

    QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org (2019).

  • 72.

    Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).

  • 73.

    R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, http://www.R-project.org R Foundation for Statistical Computing, (2018).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Emissions of several ozone-depleting chemicals are larger than expected

    New sensor could help prevent food waste