in

Global opportunities and challenges for transboundary conservation

  • 1.

    Ceballos, G. et al. Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253 (2015).

  • 2.

    Kark, S. et al. Cross-boundary collaboration: key to the conservation puzzle. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 12, 12–24 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS, 1979); https://go.nature.com/33bnjgr

  • 4.

    Rands, M. R. W. et al. Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329, 1298–1303 (2010).

  • 5.

    Trouwborst, A. Transboundary wildlife conservation in a changing climate: adaptation of the Bonn Convention on migratory species and its daughter instruments to climate change. Diversity 4, 258–300 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 6.

    Ecological Connectivity in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (CMS, 2019); https://go.nature.com/38GB6Nf

  • 7.

    Runge, C. A., Martin, T. G., Possingham, H. P., Willis, S. G. & Fuller, R. A. Conserving mobile species. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 395–402 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 8.

    Hannah, L. A global conservation system for climate-change adaptation: special section. Conserv. Biol. 24, 70–77 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Lambertucci, S. A. et al. Apex scavenger movements call for transboundary conservation policies. Biol. Conserv. 170, 145–150 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Thornton, D. H. et al. Asymmetric cross-border protection of peripheral transboundary species. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12430 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 11.

    Trouwborst, A., Krofel, M. & Linnell, J. D. C. Legal implications of range expansions in a terrestrial carnivore: the case of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 2593–2610 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 12.

    Flesch, A. D. et al. Potential effects of the United States–Mexico border fence on wildlife: contributed paper. Conserv. Biol. 24, 171–181 (2010).

  • 13.

    Linnell, J. D. C. et al. Border security fencing and wildlife: the end of the transboundary paradigm in Eurasia? PLoS Biol. 14, e1002483 (2016).

  • 14.

    Caddell, R. International law and the protection of migratory wildlife: an appraisal of twenty-five years of the Bonn Convention. Colo. J. Int. Environ. Law Policy 16, 113–156 (2005).

    • Google Scholar
  • 15.

    Trouwborst, A. et al. International law and lions (Panthera leo): understanding and improving the contribution of wildlife treaties to the conservation and sustainable use of an iconic carnivore. Nat. Conserv. 21, 83–128 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Barquet, K. ‘Yes to peace’? Environmental peacemaking and transboundary conservation in Central America. Geoforum 63, 14–24 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 17.

    Beyers, R. L. et al. Resource wars and conflict ivory: the impact of civil conflict on elephants in the Democratic Republic of Congo—the case of the okapi reserve. PLoS ONE 6, e27129 (2011).

  • 18.

    Gaynor, K. M. et al. War and wildlife: linking armed conflict to conservation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 533–542 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 19.

    Kark, S., Levin, N., Grantham, H. S. & Possingham, H. P. Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15368–15373 (2009).

  • 20.

    Mazor, T., Possingham, H. P. & Kark, S. Collaboration among countries in marine conservation can achieve substantial efficiencies. Divers. Distrib. 19, 1380–1393 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Mazor, T., Giakoumi, S., Kark, S. & Possingham, H. P. Large-scale conservation planning in a multinational marine environment: cost matters. Ecol. Appl. 24, 1115–1130 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Runting, R. K. et al. Alternative futures for Borneo show the value of integrating economic and conservation targets across borders. Nat. Commun. 6, 6819 (2015).

  • 23.

    Pouzols, F. M. et al. Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516, 383–386 (2014).

  • 24.

    Boschee, E. et al. ICEWS Coded Event Data (Harvard Dataverse, 2015); https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/28075

  • 25.

    Worldwide Governance Indicators (World Bank Group, 2017); https://go.nature.com/33afIPl

  • 26.

    Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).

  • 27.

    Sharm El-Sheikh Declaration Investing in Biodiversity for People and Planet (CBD, 2018). https://go.nature.com/2Q0ZWB6

  • 28.

    SBSTTA Informing the Scientific and Technical Evidence Base for the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework Overview (CBD, 2019); https://go.nature.com/38KpV6p

  • 29.

    King, B. & Wilcox, S. Peace Parks and jaguar trails: transboundary conservation in a globalizing world. GeoJournal 71, 221–231 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 30.

    Daskin, J. H. & Pringle, R. M. Warfare and wildlife declines in Africa’s protected areas. Nature 553, 328–332 (2018).

  • 31.

    Barquet, K., Lujala, P. & Rød, J. K. Transboundary conservation and militarized interstate disputes. Polit. Geogr. 42, 1–11 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Schoon, M. Governance in transboundary conservation: how institutional structure and path dependence matter. Conserv. Soc. 11, 420–428 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Lindsey, P. A. et al. Underperformance of African protected area networks and the case for new conservation models: insights from Zambia. PLoS ONE 9, e94109 (2014).

  • 34.

    Lim, M. Governance criteria for effective transboundary biodiversity conservation. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 16, 797–813 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Lim, M. Strengthening the legal and institutional effectiveness of transboundary biodiversity conservation in the ‘Heart of Borneo’. Asia Pacific J. Environ. Law 17, 65–89 (2014).

    • Google Scholar
  • 36.

    Levin, N., Beger, M., Maina, J., McClanahan, T. & Kark, S. Evaluating the potential for transboundary management of marine biodiversity in the Western Indian Ocean. Australas. J. Environ. Manage. 25, 62–85 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 37.

    Chester, C. C. Yellowstone to Yukon: transborder conservation across a vast international landscape. Environ. Sci. Policy 49, 75–84 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 38.

    Graumlich, L. & Francis, W. L. (eds) Moving Toward Climate Change Adaptation: The promise of the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative for addressing the region’s vulnerabilities (Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, 2010).

  • 39.

    Troupin, D. & Carmel, Y. Can agro-ecosystems efficiently complement protected area networks? Biol. Conserv. 169, 158–166 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Betts, M. G. et al. Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. Nature 547, 441–444 (2017).

  • 41.

    Heart of Borneo Initiative (WWF, 2011).

  • 42.

    Plumptre, A. J., Kujirakwinja, D., Treves, A., Owiunji, I. & Rainer, H. Transboundary conservation in the greater Virunga landscape: its importance for landscape species. Biol. Conserv. 134, 279–287 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 43.

    Martin, A., Rutagarama, E., Casca, A., Gray, M. & Chhotray, V. Understanding the co-existence of conflict and cooperation: transboundary ecosystem management in the Virunga Massif. J. Peace Res. 48, 621–635 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 44.

    Rainer, H. et al. Regional conservation in the Virunga-Bwindi region. J. Sustain. For. 17, 189–204 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 45.

    Sandwith, T., Shine, C., Hamilton, L. & Sheppard, D. Transboundary Protected Areas for Peace and Co-operation (IUCN, 2001).

  • 46.

    Duffy, R. The politics of global environmental governance: the powers and limitations of transfrontier conservation areas in Central America. Rev. Int. Stud. 31, 307–323 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 47.

    Rodríguez, J. P. et al. Globalization of conservation: a view from the South. Science 317, 755–756 (2007).

  • 48.

    Muboko, N. The role of transfrontier conservation areas and their institutional framework in natural resource-based conflict management: a review. J. Sustain. For. 36, 583–603 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 49.

    Amahowé, I. O., Ashanti, L. G. H. S. & Tehou, A. C. Transboundary protected areas management: experiences from W-Arly-Pendjari parks in West Africa. Parks 19, 95–105 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 50.

    Muchapondwa, E. & Stage, J. Whereto with institutions and governance challenges in African wildlife conservation? Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 095013 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 51.

    Bulte, E. H. & Horan, R. D. Habitat conservation, wildlife extraction and agricultural expansion. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 45, 109–127 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Taylor, R. Community based natural resource management in Zimbabwe: the experience of CAMPFIRE. Biodivers. Conserv. 18, 2563–2583 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 53.

    Tchakatumba, P. K., Gandiwa, E., Mwakiwa, E., Clegg, B. & Nyasha, S. Does the CAMPFIRE programme ensure economic benefits from wildlife to households in Zimbabwe? Ecosyst. People 15, 119–135 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 54.

    Duffy, R. The potential and pitfalls of global environmental governance: the politics of transfrontier conservation areas in Southern Africa. Polit. Geogr. 25, 89–112 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (United Nations General Assembly, 1992).

  • 56.

    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2017.5.2 (IUCN, 2017); http://www.iucnredlist.org

  • 57.

    Bird Species Distribution Maps of the World Version 7.0 (BirdLife International and Handbook of the Birds of the World, 2017); http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdis

  • 58.

    Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conserv. Lett. 8, 329–337 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 59.

    Runge, C. A. et al. Protected areas and global conservation of migratory birds. Science 350, 1255–1258 (2015).

  • 60.

    GADM Database of Global Administrative Areas Version 2.8 (GADM, 2015); https://gadm.org

  • 61.

    Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L. & Joppa, L. N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2602–2610 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 62.

    van Rossum, G. & The Python Community The Python Programming Language (The Python Software Foundation, 2012).

  • 63.

    ESRI ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.5 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2017).

  • 64.

    Frank, M. R. et al. Detecting reciprocity at a global scale. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao5348 (2018).

  • 65.

    Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague J. Rule Law 3, 220–246 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 66.

    Amano, T. et al. Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature 553, 199–202 (2018).

  • 67.

    ESRI Data and Maps World Continents (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2018).

  • 68.

    Mason, N., Ward, M., Watson, J. E. M., Venter, O. & Runting, R. K. Data from: Global Opportunities and Challenges for Transboundary Conservation (UQ eSpace digital repository, 2020); https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2020.156


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    The microbiome and resistome of chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans across host lifestyle and geography

    Understanding the impact of climate change on the ocean