in

Long-term impacts of Bt cotton in India

  • 1.

    Charles, D. Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food (Perseus Books Group, 2001).

  • 2.

    Stone, G. D. Both sides now: fallacies in the genetic-modification wars, implications for developing countries, and anthropological perspectives. Curr. Anthropol. 43, 611–630 (2002).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Glover, D. The corporate shaping of GM crops as a technology for the poor. J. Peasant Stud. 37, 67–90 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Lambrecht, B. India gives Monsanto an unstable lab for genetics in farming. St. Louis Post-Dispatch (22 November 1998).

  • 5.

    Gruère, G. P. & Sengupta, D. Bt cotton and farmer suicides: an evidence-based assessment. J. Dev. Stud. 47, 316–337 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 6.

    Gutierrez, A., Ponti, L., Herren, H., Baumgartner, J. & Kenmore, P. Deconstructing Indian cotton: weather, yields, and suicides. Environ. Sci. 27, 12 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 7.

    Two narratives about Bt cotton: technological triumph or abject failure? Economic & Political Weekly Engage https://www.epw.in/node/150121/pdf (2017).

  • 8.

    Hicks, D. J. Epistemological depth in a GM crops controversy. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. A 50, 1–12 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Stone, G. D. Biotechnology, schismogenesis, and the demise of uncertainty. Wash. Univ. J. Law & Policy 47, 29–49 (2015).

    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Stone, G. D. Constructing facts: Bt cotton narratives in India. Econ. Political Wkly 47, 62–70 (2012).

    • Google Scholar
  • 11.

    Prasad, C. S. Suicide deaths and quality of Indian cotton: perspectives from history and technology and Khadi movement. Econ. Political Wkly 34, 12–21 (1999).

    • Google Scholar
  • 12.

    Kranthi, K. R. Fertilizers gave high yields; Bt only provided cover. Cotton Statistics & News 39, 1–6 (2016).

    • Google Scholar
  • 13.

    Karp, J. Deadly crop: difficult times drive India’s cotton farmers to desperate actions. Wall Street Journal (18 February 1998).

  • 14.

    Tabashnik, B. E. & Carrière, Y. Global patterns of resistance to Bt crops highlighting pink bollworm in the United States, China, and India. J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 2513–2523 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 15.

    Suresh, A., Ramasundaram, P., Samuel, J. & Wankhade, S. Impact of technology and policy on growth and instability of agricultural production: the case of cotton in India. Indian J. Agr. Sci. 83, 939–948 (2013).

    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Mayee, C. D. & Choudary, B. Adoption and uptake pathways of Bt cotton in India (Indian Society for Cotton Improvement, 2013).

  • 17.

    Sahai, S. A disaster called Bt cotton. Times of India (1 December 2005).

  • 18.

    Kuruganti, K. Bt cotton and the myth of enhanced yields. Econ. Political Wkly 44, 29–33 (2009).

    • Google Scholar
  • 19.

    Shiva, V. Toxic genes and toxic papers: IFPRI covering up the link between Bt cotton and farmers suicides. Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology http://www.whale.to/b/shiva1.pdf (2008).

  • 20.

    Gammell, C. Prince of Wales resumes GM crops debate. The Telegraph (25 October 2008).

  • 21.

    Herring, R. J. Persistent narratives: why is the “failure of Bt cotton in India” story still with us? AgBioForum 12, 14–22 (2009).

    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Choudhary, B. & Gaur, K. Bt Cotton in India: A Country Profile (ISAAA, 2010).

  • 23.

    Choudhary, B. & Gaur, K. Biotech Cotton in India, 2002 to 2014 (ISAAA, 2015).

  • 24.

    Qaim, M. in Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development (eds Smyth, S. J. et al.) 126–138 (Edward Elgar, 2014).

  • 25.

    Subramanian, A. & Qaim, M. Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: the case of Bt cotton in India. World Dev. 37, 256–267 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 26.

    Smale, M. Rough terrain for research: studying early adopters of biotech crops. AgBioForum 15, 114–124 (2012).

    • Google Scholar
  • 27.

    Morse, S., Bennett, R. & Ismael, Y. Isolating the ‘farmer’ effect as a component of the advantage of growing genetically modified varieties in developing countries: a Bt cotton case study from Jalgaon, India. J. Agr. Sci. 145, 491–500 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 28.

    Crost, B., Shankar, B., Bennett, R. & Morse, S. Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: evidence from Indian data. J. Agr. Econ. 58, 24–36 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    Kathage, J. & Qaim, M. Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11652–11656 (2012).

  • 30.

    Stone, G. D. Field versus farm in Warangal: Bt cotton, higher yields, and larger questions. World Dev. 39, 387–398 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Mal, P., A. V., M., Bauer, S. & Ahmed, M. N. Technical efficiency and environmental impact of Bt cotton and non-Bt cotton in North India. AgBioForum 14, 164–170 (2011).

    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Narayanamoorthy, A. & Kalamkar, S. S. Is Bt cotton cultivation economically viable for Indian farmers? An empirical analysis. Econ. Political Wkly 41, 2716–2724 (2006).

    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Jadad, A. R. & Enkin, M. W. Randomized Controlled Trials 2nd edn (Blackwell, 2007).

  • 34.

    Krishna, V. V. & Qaim, M. Bt cotton and sustainability of pesticide reductions in India. Agr. Syst. 107, 47–55 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Gruere, G. P. & Sun, Y. Measuring the contribution of Bt cotton adoption to India’s cotton yields leap (International Food Policy Research Institute, 2012).

  • 36.

    Herring, R. Reconstructing facts in Bt cotton: why scepticism fails. Econ. Political Wkly 48, 63–66 (2013).

    • Google Scholar
  • 37.

    Jayaraman, K. S. Illicit GM cotton sparks corporate fury. Nature 413, 555 (2001).

  • 38.

    Shah, E. Local and global elites join hands: development and diffusion of Bt cotton technology in Gujarat. Econ. Political Wkly 40, 4629–4639 (2005).

    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Stone, G. D. in Biodiversity and the Law: Intellectual Property, Biotechnology and Traditional Knowledge (Ed. McManis, C.) 207–238 (Earthscan, 2007).

  • 40.

    Lalitha, N., Ramaswami, B. & Viswanathan, P. K. in Biotechnology and Agricultural Development: Transgenic Cotton, Rural Institutions and Resource-poor Farmers (Ed. Tripp, R.) 135–167 (Routledge, 2009).

  • 41.

    Ramaswami, B., Pray, C. E. & Lalitha, N. The spread of illegal transgenic cotton varieties in India: biosafety regulation, monopoly, and enforcement. World Dev. 40, 177–188 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 42.

    Kumar, D. et al. Gujarat’s Agricultural Growth Story: Exploding Some Myths (Institute for Resource Analysis and Policy, 2010).

  • 43.

    Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Naik, G. & Zilberman, D. Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India. Rev. Agr. Econ. 28, 48 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 44.

    Sadashivappa, P. & Qaim, M. Bt cotton in India: development of benefits and the role of government seed price interventions. AgBioForum 12, 172–183 (2009).

    • Google Scholar
  • 45.

    Stone, G. D. & Flachs, A. The ox fall down: path breaking and technology treadmills in Indian cotton agriculture. J Peasant Stud. 45, 1272–1296 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 46.

    Vandeman, A. M. Management in a bottle: pesticides and the deskilling of agriculture. Rev. Radical Pol. Econ. 27, 49–55 (1995).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 47.

    Kouser, S. & Qaim, M. Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: a panel data analysis. Ecol. Econ. 70, 2105–2113 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Kukanur, V. S., Singh, T. V. K., Kranthi, K. R. & Andow, D. A. Cry1Ac resistance allele frequency in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) collected in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India. Crop Prot. 107, 34–40 (2018).

  • 49.

    Dhurua, S. & Gujar, G. T. Field-evolved resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), from India. Pest Manage. Sci. 67, 898–903 (2011).

  • 50.

    Zhang, H. et al. Diverse genetic basis of field-evolved resistance to Bt cotton in cotton bollworm from China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10275–10280 (2012).

  • 51.

    Buradikatti, K. Pink bollworm a nightmare for Bt cotton growers. The Hindu (5 December 2015).

  • 52.

    Gustafson, S. 2018 Farm Bill: protecting the U. S. cotton industry poses risks for developing countries. International Food Policy Research Institute (31 January 2018).

  • 53.

    Klümper, W. & Qaim, M. A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS ONE 9, e111629 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 54.

    James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49 (ISAAA, 2014).

  • 55.

    Kranthi, K. R. Cotton Production Systems — Need for a Change in India (Cotton Association of India, 2014).

  • 56.

    Srivastava, S. K. & Kolady, D. Agricultural biotechnology and crop productivity: macro-level evidences on contribution of Bt cotton in India. Curr. Sci. 110, 311–319 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar

  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Taxon-specific microbial growth and mortality patterns reveal distinct temporal population responses to rewetting in a California grassland soil

    It does not always take two to tango: “Syntrophy” via hydrogen cycling in one bacterial cell