in

New priorities for climate science and climate economics in the 2020s

  • 1.

    Nerini, F. F. et al. Connecting climate action with other Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustainability 2, 674–680 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Palmer, T. & Stevens, B. The scientific challenge of understanding and estimating climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24390–24395 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    IPCC. in Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 151 (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014).

  • 4.

    Cook, J. et al. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002 (2016).

  • 5.

    IPCC. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. AI, 1311–1394 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

  • 6.

    Ipcc. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Barros, V. R. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  • 7.

    Knutti, R., Rugenstein, M. A. A. & Hegerl, G. C. Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity. Nat. Geosci. 10, 727 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Palmer, T. N. A. CERN for climate change. Phys. World 24, 14 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Stainforth, D. A., Downing, T. E., Washington, R., Lopez, A. & New, M. Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365, 2163–2177 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Shepherd, T. G. Storyline approach to the construction of regional climate change information. P. Roy Soc A 475, 20190013 (2019).

  • 11.

    McWilliams, J. C. Irreducible imprecision in atmospheric and oceanic simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8709–8713 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Frigg, R., Bradley, S., Du, H. & Smith, L. A. Laplace’s demon and the adventures of his apprentices. Philos. Sci. 81, 31–39 (2014).

  • 13.

    Ricke, K., Drouet, L., Caldeira, K. & Tavoni, M. Country-level social cost of carbon. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 895 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Moore, F. C., Baldos, U., Hertel, T. & Diaz, D. New science of climate change impacts on agriculture implies higher social cost of carbon. Nat. Commun. 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01792-x (2017).

  • 15.

    Tol, R. S. J. A social cost of carbon for (almost) every country. Energy Econ. 83, 555–566 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Weitzman, M. L. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev. Econ. Stat. 91, 1–19 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Calel, R., Stainforth, D. A. & Dietz, S. Tall tales and fat tails: the science and economics of extreme warming. Climatic Change 132, 127–141 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M. & Miguel, E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527, 235 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Lemoine, D. Estimating the consequences of climate change from variation in weather. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 25008, https://doi.org/10.3386/w25008 (2018).

  • 20.

    Hazeleger, W. et al. Tales of future weather. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 107 (2015).

  • 21.

    Shepherd, T. G. et al. Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change. Climatic Change 151, 555–571 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Dessai, S. et al. Building narratives to characterise uncertainty in regional climate change through expert elicitation. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabcdd (2018).

  • 23.

    Pall, P. et al. Diagnosing conditional anthropogenic contributions to heavy Colorado rainfall in September 2013. Weather Clim. Extremes 17, 1–6 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Zappa, G. & Shepherd, T. G. Storylines of atmospheric circulation change for european regional climate impact assessment. J. Clim. 30, 6561–6577 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Bhave, A. G., Conway, D., Dessai, S. & Stainforth, D. A. Water resource planning under future climate and socioeconomic uncertainty in the Cauvery River Basin in Karnataka, India. Water Resour. Res. 54, 708–728 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Daron, J. D. & Stainforth, D. A. On predicting climate under climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034021 (2013).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Assessing the value of battery energy storage in future power grids

    Spatial patterns of microbial communities across surface waters of the Great Barrier Reef