Sale, P. F. Coexistence of coral reef fishes – a lottery for living space. Environ. Biol. Fishes 3, 85–102 (1978).
Prochazka, K. Spatial and trophic partitioning in cryptic fish communities of shallow subtidal reefs in False Bay, South Africa. Environ. Biol. Fishes 51, 201–220 (1998).
Longenecker, K. Devil in the details: High-resolution dietary analysis contradicts a basic assumption of reef-fish diversity models. Copeia 2007, 543–555 (2007).
Nagelkerken, I., van der Velde, G., Wartenbergh, S. L. J., Nugues, M. M. & Pratchett, M. S. Cryptic dietary components reduce dietary overlap among sympatric butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). J. Fish Biol. 75, 1123–1143 (2009).
Gause, G. F. The struggle for existance. (1934).
Razgour, O. et al. High-throughput sequencing offers insight into mechanisms of resource partitioning in cryptic bat species. Ecol. Evol. 1, 556–570 (2011).
Dahlgren, C. P. & Eggleston, D. B. Ecological Processes underlying ontogenetic habitat shifts in a coral reef fish. Ecology 81, 2227–2240 (2000).
Fry, G. et al. Reproductive dynamics and nursery habitat preferences of two commercially important Indo-Pacific red snappers Lutjanus erythropterus and L. malabaricus. Fish. Sci. 75, 145–158 (2009).
Rooker, J. R. Feeding ecology of the schoolmaster snapper, Lutjanus apodus (Walbaum), from southwestern Puerto Rico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 56, 881–894 (1995).
Wells, R. J. D., Cowan, J. H. Jr & Fry, B. Feeding ecology of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 361, 213–225 (2008).
Usmar, N. R. Ontogenetic diet shifts in snapper (Pagrus auratus: Sparidae) within a New Zealand estuary. New Zeal. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 46, 31–46 (2012).
Cocheret de la Morinière, E., Pollux, B. J. A., Nagelkerken, I., Velde, G. Van Der & Morinie, E. C. De. Diet shifts of Caribbean grunts (Haemulidae) and snappers (Lutjanidae) and the relation with nursery-to-coral reef migrations. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 57, 1079–1089 (2003).
Szedlmayer, S. T. & Lee, J. D. Diet shifts of juvenile red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with changes in habitat and fish size. Fish. Bull. 102, 366–375 (2004).
Allen, G. R. Snappers of the world. FAO Species Catalogue, Vol.6. (FAO, 1985).
Frédérich, B. & Santini, F. Macroevolutionary analysis of the tempo of diversification in snappers and fusiliers (Percomorpha: Lutjanidae). Belgian J. Zool. 147, 17–35 (2017).
Blaber, S. J. M. et al. Shared stocks of snappers (Lutjanidae) in Australia and Indonesia: Integrating biology, population dynamics and socio-economics to examine management scenarios. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 15, 111–127 (2005).
Crowder, L. & Norse, E. Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 32, 772–778 (2008).
Thrush, S. F. & Dayton, P. K. What can ecology contribute to ecosystem-based management? Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2, 419–441 (2010).
Leigh, G. M. & O’Neill, M. F. Gulf of Carpentaria finfish trawl fishery: maximum sustainable yield. (Agri-Science Queensland,Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland, 2016).
Salini, J. P., Blaber, S. J. M. & Brewer, D. T. Diets of trawled tredatory fish of the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, with particular reference to predation on prawns. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 45, 397–411 (1994).
Newman, S. J. & Williams, D. M. B. Variation in reef associated assemblages of the Lutjanidae and Lethrinidae at different distances offshore in the central Great Barrier Reef. Environ. Biol. Fishes 46, 123–138 (1996).
Brewer, D. T., Blaber, S. J. M. & Salini, J. P. Predation on penaeid prawns by fishes in Albatross Bay, Gulf of Carpentaria. Mar. Biol. 109, 231–240 (1991).
Cox, E. F. Resource use by corallivorous butterflyfishes (Family Chaetodontidae) in Hawaii. Bull. Mar. Sci. 54, 535–545 (1994).
Pratchett, M. S. Dietary overlap among coral-feeding butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae) at Lizard Island, northern Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Biol. 148, 373–382 (2005).
Pompanon, F. et al. Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1931–1950 (2012).
Deagle, B. E. et al. Studying seabird diet through genetic analysis of faeces: A case study on Macaroni Penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus). PLoS One 2, e831 (2007).
Siegenthaler, A., Wangensteen, O. S., Benvenuto, C., Campos, J. & Mariani, S. DNA metabarcoding unveils multiscale trophic variation in a widespread coastal opportunist. Mol. Ecol. 28, 232–249 (2019).
Valentini, A., Pompanon, F. & Taberlet, P. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 110–117 (2009).
Sousa, L. L., Silva, S. M. & Xavier, R. DNA metabarcoding in diet studies: Unveiling ecological aspects in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. DNA 1, 199–214 (2019).
Casey, J. M. et al. Reconstructing hyperdiverse food webs: gut content metabarcoding as a tool to disentangle trophic interactions on coral reefs. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1157–1170 (2019).
Leray, M. et al. Dietary partitioning promotes the coexistence of planktivorous species on coral reefs. Mol. Ecol. 28, 2694–2710 (2019).
Wakefield, C. B., Moran, M. J., Tapp, N. E. & Jackson, G. Catchability and selectivity of juvenile snapper (Pagrus auratus, Sparidae) and western butterfish (Pentapodus vitta, Nemipteridae) from prawn trawling in a large marine embayment in Western Australia. Fish. Res. 85, 37–48 (2007).
Wakefield, C. B. et al. Performance of bycatch reduction devices varies for chondrichthyan, reptile, and cetacean mitigation in demersal fish trawls: Assimilating subsurface interactions and unaccounted mortality. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 343–358 (2017).
Meeker, D. N., Hutchinson, S. A., Ho, L. & Trede, N. S. Method for isolation of PCR-ready genomic DNA from zebrafish tissues. Biotechniques 43, 610–614 (2007).
Benson, D. A. et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D37–D42 (2017).
Nester, G. et al. Development and evaluation of fish eDNA metabarcoding assays facilitates the detection of cryptic seahorse taxa (family: Syngnathidae). Manuscript submitted for publication (2019).
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
Berry, T. E. et al. Marine environmental DNA biomonitoring reveals seasonal patterns in biodiversity and identifies ecosystem responses to anomalous climatic events. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007943 (2019).
Buschmann, T. DNABarcodes: An R package for the systematic construction of DNA sample tags. Bioinformatics 33, 920–922 (2017).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Wangensteen, O. S. & Turon, X. Metabarcoding techniques for assessing biodiversity of marine animal forests. in Marine Animal Forests: The Ecology of Benthic Biodiversity Hotspots (eds. Rossi, S., Bramanti, L., Gori, A. & Orejas, C.) 455–473 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
Callahan, B. J., Mcmurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 11, 2639–2643 (2017).
Deagle, B. E., Thomas, A. C. & Mcinnes, J. C. Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: how should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? Mol. Ecol. 28, 391–406 (2019).
Leray, M. & Knowlton, N. DNA barcoding and metabarcoding of standardized samples reveal patterns of marine benthic diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 2076–2081 (2015).
Deagle, B. E. & Tollit, D. J. Quantitative analysis of prey DNA in pinniped faeces: potential to estimate diet composition? Conserv. Genet. 8, 743–747 (2007).
Berry, T. E. et al. DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and biodiversity: A case study using the endangered Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea). Ecol. Evol. 7, 5435–5453 (2017).
Piñol, J., Mir, G., Gomez-Polo, P. & Agustí, N. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 819–830 (2015).
Elbrecht, V. & Leese, F. Can DNA-based ecosystem assessments quantify species abundance? Testing primer bias and biomass-sequence relationships with an innovative metabarcoding protocol. PLoS One 10, 1–16 (2015).
Clarke, K. R., Gorley, R. N., Somerfield, P. J. & Warwick, R. M. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 3rd edition. (PRIMER-E: Plymouth, 2014).
Anderson, M. J. & Willis, T. J. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: A useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84, 511–525 (2003).
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. (2016).
Wainwright, P. C. & Richard, B. A. Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 44, 97–113 (1995).
Kwak, S. N., Klumpp, D. W. & Park, J. M. Feeding relationships among juveniles of abundant fish species inhabiting tropical seagrass beds in Cockle Bay, North Queensland, Australia. New Zeal. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49, 205–223 (2015).
Pimentel, C. R. & Joyeux, J. C. Diet and food partitioning between juveniles of mutton Lutjanus analis, dog Lutjanus jocu and lane Lutjanus synagris snappers (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) in a mangrove-fringed estuarine environment. J. Fish Biol. 76, 2299–2317 (2010).
Haak, C. R., Power, M., Cowles, G. W. & Danylchuk, A. J. Hydrodynamic and isotopic niche differentiation between juveniles of two sympatric cryptic bonefishes, Albula vulpes and Albula goreensis. Environ. Biol. Fishes 102, 129–145 (2019).
Salini, J. P., Blaber, S. J. M. & Brewer, D. T. Diets of piscivorous fishes in a tropical Australian estuary, with special reference to predation on penaeid prawns. Mar. Biol. 105, 363–374 (1990).
Deagle, B. E., Chiaradia, A., McInnes, J. & Jarman, S. N. Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: Is what goes in what comes out? Conserv. Genet. 11, 2039–2048 (2010).
Jarman, S. N. et al. Adélie penguin population diet monitoring by analysis of food DNA in scats. PLoS One 8, e82227 (2013).
McInnes, J. C. et al. High occurrence of jellyfish predation by black-browed and Campbell albatross identified by DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 26, 4831–4845 (2017).
Vestheim, H. & Jarman, S. N. Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples – A case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Front. Zool. 5, 1–11 (2008).
Su, M., Liu, H., Liang, X., Gui, L. & Zhang, J. Dietary analysis of marine fish species: Enhancing the detection of prey-specific DNA sequences via high-throughput sequencing using blocking primers. Estuaries and Coasts 41, 560–571 (2017).
Deagle, B. E., Thomas, A. C., Shaffer, A. K., Trites, A. W. & Jarman, S. N. Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA-based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: Which counts count? Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 620–633 (2013).
Leray, M., Boehm, J. T., Mills, S. C. & Meyer, C. P. Moorea BIOCODE barcode library as a tool for understanding predator-prey interactions: Insights into the diet of common predatory coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 31, 383–388 (2012).
Sheppard, S. K. et al. Detection of secondary predation by PCR analyses of the gut contents of invertebrate generalist predators. Mol. Ecol. 14, 4461–4468 (2005).
Pochon, X., Bott, N. J., Smith, K. F. & Wood, S. A. Evaluating detection limits of next-generation sequencing for the surveillance and monitoring of international marine pests. PLoS One 8, e73935 (2013).
Peters, K. J. et al. Fine-scale diet of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) using DNA-based analysis of faeces. Mar. Ecol. 36, 347–367 (2014).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
